[ql-users] Hardware

2005-01-09 Thread ian . pizer
My wife has been cleaning up and found a box with a lot of QL stuff. An original QL! A keyboard mat in original package. Some keyboards and electronic boards. The total is not very heavy. I would be willing to pack it all and send it to someone or place where it could be of use. Any suggestions?

Re: [ql-users] Lynx 282

2005-01-09 Thread Rich Mellor
On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 14:18:40 -, Dilwyn Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I honestly don't believe this is useable on QPC2. It starts off overwriting its own files as you unzip them because the path names are stored too long. Classic example of an author supplying a problem for you to use.

Re: [ql-users] Lynx 282

2005-01-09 Thread Malcolm Cadman
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Dilwyn Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes I honestly don't believe this is useable on QPC2. Clip Just what is happening? What's being done wrong here? Using Lynx 282, latest on JRH's website. The lynx_cfg and lynxrc files are meaningless garbage to me, so I haven't

Re: [ql-users] Hardware

2005-01-09 Thread Malcolm Cadman
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes My wife has been cleaning up and found a box with a lot of QL stuff. An original QL! A keyboard mat in original package. Some keyboards and electronic boards. The total is not very heavy. I would be willing to pack it all and send it to

Re: [ql-users] Lynx 282

2005-01-09 Thread Malcolm Cadman
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Dilwyn Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes I honestly don't believe this is useable on QPC2. clip Just what is happening? What's being done wrong here? Using Lynx 282, latest on JRH's website. The lynx_cfg and lynxrc files are meaningless garbage to me, so I haven't

Re: [ql-users] Lynx 282

2005-01-09 Thread Dilwyn Jones
I honestly don't believe this is useable on QPC2. Well, works here. ...without help to get over needless problems which should never have occurred int he first place. Thank you Marcel. Yet again. It now works. 130 SETENV TERMINFO=win1_LYNX282_terminfo_qdos That should be SETENV

Re: [ql-users] Hardware

2005-01-09 Thread Roy wood
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Malcolm Cadman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes My wife has been cleaning up and found a box with a lot of QL stuff. An original QL! A keyboard mat in original package. Some keyboards and electronic boards. The total

Re: [ql-users] Lynx 282

2005-01-09 Thread Roy wood
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Dilwyn Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes SNIP And while I'm in a foul mood over another non-QL issue, will anyone having successfully installed a Tevion MD Slimline MD 42361 USB digital camera please contact me off list - it was bought by my father for my son from Aldi

Re: [ql-users] Lynx 282

2005-01-09 Thread Roy wood
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Rich Mellor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes SNIP Hmm seeing as Dilwyn has mentioned running Lynx from within QPC2 - does Marcel want to actually let us poor mortals who do not have the beta version what v3.30 is going to contain - I guess the ability to access the

Re: [ql-users] camera (was Lynx 282)

2005-01-09 Thread Wolfgang Lenerz
On 9 Jan 2005 at 16:38, Dilwyn Jones wrote: And while I'm in a foul mood over another non-QL issue, will anyone having successfully installed a Tevion MD Slimline MD 42361 USB digital camera please contact me off list - () What a sad story! One, probably stupid, question: Do you need

Re: [ql-users] Lynx 282

2005-01-09 Thread Dilwyn Jones
This is the problem with all the programs ported from Unix - no-one bothers to look at the documentation and see if it would make any sense to QL users. Guess that's why Linux is free but you pay so much to purchase a copy and get support... Linux ports to QL systems will be a waste of time

Re: [ql-users] Lynx 282

2005-01-09 Thread Wolfgang Lenerz
On 9 Jan 2005 at 18:02, Roy wood wrote: It is coming. Be glad he does extensive beta testing so it is us and not the users who find most of the bugs. I think the one I have here is probable release candidate - but then I have not made any of the other three betas fall over. Neither have I.

Re: [ql-users] Lynx 282

2005-01-09 Thread Wolfgang Lenerz
On 9 Jan 2005 at 17:34, Dilwyn Jones wrote: (...) I forgot it wasn't public knowledge yet. QPC2 v3.30 will have access to Windows TCP/IP much like how uQLx allows access to TCP/IP of the underlying Linux. It's not a general TCP/IP system like soql because it uses Windows. So don't expect

Re: [ql-users] Lynx 282

2005-01-09 Thread Rich Mellor
On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 17:34:13 -, Dilwyn Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is the problem with all the programs ported from Unix - no-one bothers to look at the documentation and see if it would make any sense to QL users. Guess that's why Linux is free but you pay so much to purchase a

Re: [ql-users] Lynx 282

2005-01-09 Thread Marcel Kilgus
Dilwyn Jones wrote: Ah! So you don't use the real full filename of the file, you refer to terminfo_qdos as terminfo? So the filename must be made up of the joined together TERMINFO and TERM strings. Yes, that's the idea. You tell it where all the TERMINFOs are stored and which one of those you

Re: [ql-users] Lynx 282

2005-01-09 Thread Tony Firshman
On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 at 16:38:37, Dilwyn Jones wrote: (ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED]) snip It works now and just goes to show how lucky we are on this list to have our collective selves to help each other, especially people like That said, my wife bought a 3 year old BMW-Rover 25 before christmas. She's

Re: [ql-users] camera (was Lynx 282)

2005-01-09 Thread Tony Firshman
On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 at 19:14:16, Wolfgang Lenerz wrote: (ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED]) On 9 Jan 2005 at 16:38, Dilwyn Jones wrote: snip Hmm sorry to add to your woes, but I have a totally different story... I took my digicam digi camcorder to my recent vacations. I took picures films of my children

Re: [ql-users] camera (was Lynx 282)

2005-01-09 Thread James Hunkins
This is absolutely hit and miss, depending on the software, updates, manufacturer of system and camera, other software, etc. (IE: ouch). Simple solution - buy a Mac or better yet, do we have someone volunteering to write all the drivers and design the hardware for our system? (in case

RE: [ql-users] Lynx 282

2005-01-09 Thread Duncan Neithercut
Hi, Dilwyn wrote: Linux ports to QL systems will be a waste of time until either we all learn Linux or authors learn to make documentation make sense. Marcel has already explained about the terminfo, I didn't as its some time (years) since I set Lynx up and had forgotten I havent looked at email

Re: [ql-users] Lynx 282

2005-01-09 Thread Jeremy Taffel
Under uQLx the apps have comlete unfettered access to the native unix file system. Therefore AFAIK none of the file name/path issues affecting Dilwyn would have hit users of Lynx under uQLx. ( I haven't tried it myself). So, the port of any unix programme onto uQLx can, and often does, make

Re: [ql-users] Lynx 282

2005-01-09 Thread Dilwyn Jones
Medion is another of those makes so beloved of PC World (spit!) and they are hand in hand with Packard Bell for a. making crap b. not caring when a customer notices its crap c. not listening to anything you say or write because anyone who buys anything at PC World (spit) can't know anything

Re: [ql-users] Lynx 282

2005-01-09 Thread Dilwyn Jones
Hmm seeing as Dilwyn has mentioned running Lynx from within QPC2 - does Marcel want to actually let us poor mortals who do not have the beta version what v3.30 is going to contain - I guess the ability to access the internet :-) It is coming. Be glad he does extensive beta testing so it is us

Re: [ql-users] Lynx 282

2005-01-09 Thread Dilwyn Jones
Rich Mellor wrote: Do you want to put together a new zip which we can extract on the QL please Dilwyn... And maybe your sample boot file Well, I've made some progress. Lynx starts. Lynx browses websites. I can now display 'help' after fixing path and file names (the only way to get it to work

Re: [ql-users] camera (was Lynx 282)

2005-01-09 Thread Jeremy Taffel
What a sad story! One, probably stupid, question: Do you need drivers at all? Isn't the camera recognized (as a removable drive) as is? AFAIK it depends upon the OS. Win 98 will need drivers. XP might need them, Win 2000 won't. That's my experience with usb cameras and memory sticks. XP

Re: [ql-users] Lynx 282

2005-01-09 Thread Malcolm Cadman
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Dilwyn Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes clip Well, that's the correct way to set up the home page according to Lynx!!! Local files (i.e. files on your computer) are worse, to set the above for a local file such as WIN1_TEST_FILE_HTML you'd need to unix-ify it a bit:

[ql-users] Subject ? ? ? ?

2005-01-09 Thread David Tubbs
can anyone tell me what the point is ? ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm

Re: [ql-users] Subject ? ? ? ?

2005-01-09 Thread James Hunkins
I believe in this case, it would be the thing at the bottom of the ? jim On Jan 9, 2005, at 1:53 PM, David Tubbs wrote: can anyone tell me what the point is ? ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm

Re: [ql-users] Subject ? ? ? ?

2005-01-09 Thread Rich Mellor
On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 14:08:00 -0800, James Hunkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I believe in this case, it would be the thing at the bottom of the ? lol Jim I think he means wot's the point ohf having a subject line - the body of the emails soon goes away from it... -- Rich Mellor RWAP Services 26

Re: [ql-users] Subject ? ? ? ?

2005-01-09 Thread James Hunkins
Sorry about that, been working on the QDT install database for 3 days now and my mind is having problems being serious about much of anything :) Actually, subject lines are very important and a continuing frustration to me - and definitely not only on this mail list. I treat subject lines

Re: [ql-users] Lynx 282

2005-01-09 Thread Dilwyn Jones
Under uQLx the apps have comlete unfettered access to the native unix file system. Therefore AFAIK none of the file name/path issues affecting Dilwyn would have hit users of Lynx under uQLx. ( I haven't tried it myself). So, the port of any unix programme onto uQLx can, and often does, make

[ql-users] Lynx and QPC2

2005-01-09 Thread Dilwyn Jones
OK, time to eat my words. After a little while browsing with Lynx, I even downloaded a QPC2 update from Marcel's website using Lynx from within QPC2 itself. I hope I have now created a useable minimal Lynx distro on my website for download. Even this 'minimal' distribution is about 480KB in

Fw: [ql-users] camera (was Lynx 282)

2005-01-09 Thread Dilwyn Jones
- Original Message - From: Dilwyn Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2005 9:20 PM Subject: Re: [ql-users] camera (was Lynx 282) This is absolutely hit and miss, depending on the software, updates, manufacturer of system and camera, other software,

Fw: [ql-users] E-mail client

2005-01-09 Thread Dilwyn Jones
- Original Message - From: Dilwyn Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2005 9:24 PM Subject: Re: [ql-users] E-mail client Now that tcp access using Qpc is possible, writing an e-mail client should be not so difficult to write even using sbasic. I am

Fw: [ql-users] camera (was Lynx 282)

2005-01-09 Thread Dilwyn Jones
- Original Message - From: Dilwyn Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2005 9:11 PM Subject: Re: [ql-users] camera (was Lynx 282) Incidentally, Dilwyn, you should be able to plug in the camera's storage card into, say, a 6x1 reader and copy the photos

Fw: [ql-users] Lynx 282

2005-01-09 Thread Dilwyn Jones
- Original Message - From: Dilwyn Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2005 9:06 PM Subject: Re: [ql-users] Lynx 282 I forgot it wasn't public knowledge yet. QPC2 v3.30 will have access to Windows TCP/IP much like how uQLx allows access to TCP/IP of

[ql-users] bounced messages

2005-01-09 Thread Dilwyn Jones
I apologise in advance if I foul up the list. 4 emails I sent tonight have been interfered with by AVG and may arrive garbled. If reasdable at all, you'll find the AVG signature at the bottom. Sometimes email to the list seem to upset it, some even bounce back to me with a Relay error. Not

Fw: [ql-users] camera (was Lynx 282)

2005-01-09 Thread Dilwyn Jones
What a sad story! One, probably stupid, question: Do you need drivers at all? Isn't the camera recognized (as a removable drive) as is? AFAIK it depends upon the OS. Win 98 will need drivers. XP might need them, Win 2000 won't. That's my experience with usb cameras and memory sticks. XP

Re: [ql-users] Lynx 282

2005-01-09 Thread P Witte
Dilwyn Jones writes: I honestly don't believe this is useable on QPC2. Poor old Dilwyn. My commiserations (in advance) for 2005. I agree with you that for us poor QLers Lynx is a malevolent and misogynistic piece of software. I also agree with Marcel (as he says further down the line) that it

Re: [ql-users] Lynx 282

2005-01-09 Thread Marcel Kilgus
P Witte wrote: Marcel: Presumably, there is no 36 character limit on www paths under the TCP etc devices? Right, this is a character device. So couldnt the DOS device (easily) be made to work the same under TCP? Eg: No, DOS is a directory device. Marcel

Re: [ql-users] Lynx 282

2005-01-09 Thread Marcel Kilgus
Dilwyn Jones wrote: I honestly don't believe this is useable on QPC2. Well, works here. I connected to my ISP from Windows, then ran the boot program for Lynx and all that happens is a brief flash of a Lynx screen and nothing, disappears without error or anything. Try ex