On 24 Oct 2002, at 14:49, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Must send my SMSQ source CD back to Wolfgang so I can get the updated one.
I'm ready...
Wondering whether Jochen is about. I emailed him about the Qmake disk I bought at
the Byfleet show but have not had a reply.
I'm pretty sure that
On 5 Nov 2002, at 8:46, Phoebus Dokos wrote:
Wolfgang,
I was under the impression that Peter had acquired (ie paid) the rights to
resell/modify SMSQ/E...
Not that I know of
Even it isn't so, I do not believe that DD would want to hijack the
software only that there's an honest
On 5 Nov 2002, at 10:05, Öïßâïò Ñ. Íôüêïò wrote:
Now that's an interesting thought :-). However Bill, that's
(legally) up to the software license. If it doesn't EXPLICITLY
state that for every platform you NEED to have a separate
copy of the software (I haven't read the finalized license in
On 5 Nov 2002, at 9:36, Bill Cable wrote:
Wolfgang,
What if you already own a current legal copy of SMSQ/E in QPC2 or some other
way when you buy a Q40/60 as many already do. Surely you do not have to buy it
twice.
-- Bill
Under the licence you do, because you get an entirely new copy
Tony Tebby wrote:
(rest of message clipped).
I just hope that this put some doubts to rest. And again I appeal to
DD - let's get on with it, correct the situation, it isn't too late yet.
Wolfgang
-
www.wlenerz.com
On 7 Nov 2002, at 17:07, Dave P wrote:
(different possibilities on different machines)
I don't know what I'm doing wrong, but, obviously it is something.
I distinctly seem to remember that, as long as something is useful
only for one machine, I see no problem in putting it in the code for
On 7 Nov 2002, at 23:21, Mike MacNamara wrote:
(...). Which license would it be under, old or new??
This would be the new licence. But, anyway, for the end user
nothing much has changed, apart from the fact that, if they are
technically literate, they can get the sources and tinker with
On 7 Nov 2002, at 21:11, Michael Berger wrote:
Hello Everybody!
I am SO tired of that endless piracy discussion.
Do you really believe anybody likes it?
On the othe rhand, if there is really a problem like that, shouldn't
you be told?
(..)
This is my advice to the involved parties:
On 7 Nov 2002, at 21:46, dndsystems1 wrote:
But he has asked you, correct.
Not after the licence came into force correct...
You have not told him, correct. So I do
not know, correct.
You are selling them. correct. You must ask correct. You didn't
still correct. etc...
This is a
Hey Norman,
Is that you mentioning QPC UQLX in PC Plus?
When are you getting a regular column?
:-)
Wolfgang
-
www.wlenerz.com
On 8 Nov 2002, at 15:34, François Van Emelen wrote:
Hi,
Is there a way to hide the 'QXL.WIN' files to avoid accidental deletion
from within 'QPC' ?
You can set (under windows) the attribute of the file to read only.
That way you can'r write (delete) anything to/from the disk.
If you want
On 8 Nov 2002, at 12:18, Mike MacNamara wrote:
Hi Wolfgang
That's what I feared, if I need any further support on any of my
existing copies, or indeed updates or fixes. I will have to buy a
new license and lose the old ones.
Umm, sorry where did that come from? All we were talking about
On 8 Nov 2002, at 11:47, Tony Firshman wrote:
(...) The best course is to stop thinking,
How do you do that?
Does it happen often to you?...
grin
Wolfgang
-
www.wlenerz.com
On 8 Nov 2002, at 17:15, Dave P wrote:
(...)
Now that we've had two or three different problems with the license, and
Wolfgang has given various reassurances (which has been a positive
experience, Wolfgang!),
Thanks, but this begs the question - have I been acting in
accordance with
On 8 Nov 2002, at 16:00, Dave P wrote:
Well, that's illegal in every European country. Once someone owns a
license to software, they're free to sell it to whomsoever they wish under
the first sale doctrine. You cannot restrict someone's right to sell
something they own, even by license,
On 9 Nov 2002, at 9:16, Jonathan Dent wrote:
How about: Everybody takes their QL stands in front of a local famous
landmark
and gets someone to photograph them.
What, you means with us in the picture, too?
Hey, It'll be the the QL Horror picture show, then...
Wolfgang
-
On 8 Nov 2002, at 21:10, Tony Firshman wrote:
Not often enough (8-)#
Hmm I wuld have thought
Never mind.
:-)))
Wolfgang
-
www.wlenerz.com
On 8 Nov 2002, at 22:21, Malcolm Cadman wrote:
There seems to be some confusion around SMSQ/E's 'core' and its
'flavours'.
It seems to me that Wolfgang has taken on the onerous task of
maintaining the integrity of SMSQ/E so that it remains consistent and
coherent, and that all users -
On 8 Nov 2002, at 17:13, Norman Dunbar wrote:
PS. Note that they are asking for emails/letters from people who use
emulators - why not all write in, they might even do an article on us
'retro-dudes' !
Well, I will, but not living ointhe UK I will have little impact.
Wolfgang
On 9 Nov 2002, at 14:45, dndsystems1 wrote:
I have called Wolfgang a fool on this list for using the wrong address
while I was waiting for his incomming. :-)))
Oh dear, oh dear, oh dear. How wrong can things go?
Wolfgang, the above mess is DDs fault. Please accept my apology on
behalf
On 9 Nov 2002, at 23:42, Marcel Kilgus wrote:
Tony Firshman wrote:
ftp://ftp.franken.de/pub/people/m/pix/comp/QLs_and_Zwiebeltuete-3-s.jpg
he he - who is that?
What a crank.
Wolfgang
-
www.wlenerz.com
On 10 Nov 2002, at 11:23, Dilwyn Jones wrote:
Aha...a possible future editor of QL Today perhaps ;-))
Oops, youre thinking of resigning?
Wolfgang
-
www.wlenerz.com
On 10 Nov 2002, at 0:28, Roy Wood wrote:
(...)
Wolfgang is the person who could
incorporate the 'patch' into the distribution not DD.
Yes, then it wouldn't be a patch anymore, of course.
Wolfgang
-
www.wlenerz.com
On 9 Nov 2002, at 19:31, Roy Wood wrote:
You could be saying there
has to be a version of SMSQ/E specially for the Q60. If so you must
discuss this with Wolfgang.
If there was a differnce between the Q60 platform and other
platforms (e.g. the Q40), that could warrant another version. It
On 9 Nov 2002, at 18:42, ZN wrote:
The key to it is not to have a wife ;-) A friend of mine used to say that
you have a counter argument if she has her own set of toys. Then he got
married and had all the proof it wasn't so :-)
yes, strangen, that, isn't it? Wives never have toys, only
On 9 Nov 2002, at 19:44, Roy Wood wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Derek
Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
I am comming to the London Show with a Q60, I hiope things can be sensible.
For my part, as I told Derek privately, my emails may seem a trifle
'spirited' but there is no
On 10 Nov 2002, at 13:05, Dilwyn Jones wrote:
François Van Emelen's toolkit keywords list is now available from the
QL Documentation page on my website, as a plain text file.
Great Work François!
(warning: about 102KB download!)
(why not zip it?)
The QL Net links page now includes a
On 11 Nov 2002, at 9:42, Norman Dunbar wrote:
Morning all,
I'll try to combine all replies into one email - I don't want to hog the
list :o)
MARCEL :
(...)
I don't have the magazine any more (I'm not that vain !) but maybe someone
else still has it and will scan it for you.
Yes, I
On 11 Nov 2002, at 13:33, Dave P wrote:
> Finally, how important would it be to use a pointer environment, or would
> you be happy to use industry standard CTRL-key combinations?
For, it would be PE, Prowess or nothing...
If you want, I could probably rapidly build you a prototype PE
On 12 Nov 2002, at 14:01, TonyTebby wrote:
The specific solution is to re-write the QL colour mode driver to
eliminate all MOVEP instructions. I had started this work before
passing the partially modified MC68060 routines over to Peter Graf.
The modified code works on earlier processors,
On 12 Nov 2002, at 17:58, Andreas Berger wrote:
Hi,
i have heard that SMSQ/E is free for users of Gold Card/Super Gold
Card. Can anyone enlighten me?
regards, Andreas
No, SMSQ/E isn't free for GC or SGC users.
As with all other SMSQ/Es, there is the 10 EUR payment to TT,
and then
On 12 Nov 2002, at 10:57, Dave P wrote:
On Tue, 12 Nov 2002, Wolfgang Lenerz wrote:
The relatively small take up is also the reason I haven't yet seen
fit to call upon Dexter's help for setting up a website for the
sources.
For those who missed out on that conversation, I
On 12 Nov 2002, at 18:29, TonyTebby wrote:
(and, hopefully, functionally identical !!!)
Yes!
OK, so if the open source system is working fine, why are some people
making such of fuss
Beats me.
In this case, Fabrizio is playing entirely by the rules and hasn't
asked for any money
On 12 Nov 2002, at 12:27, Dave P wrote:
(...)
If someone where to, say, make a TVToy, they should be
able to drop all of the redundant modules of SMSQ and alter others as
appropriate, and submit to Wolfgang and have an official branch for
that specific application.
Just to go on record
On 12 Nov 2002, at 19:37, Phoebus Dokos wrote:
I have a problem with the mouse. I am using a MS
compatible 3 button serial/PS/2 mouse (worked great with superHermes
and the regular QL using Sermouse) but isn't recognized by SMSQ/E...
is there anythin I need to run? (I tried sermouse but it
On 12 Nov 2002, at 21:45, Dilwyn Jones wrote:
available from (um Dilwyn's web site ?)
Ummm, no, but I think I have the sources of some of Chas's programs,
which he sent me when re released his ex-DP programs. Not sure if that
includes compare...must have a browse. -- Dilwyn Jones
I
On 12 Nov 2002, at 12:53, Dave P wrote:
Dave, do you think it would be worth it for such a small base?
There is a conflict with the license, because electronic distribution
is not allowed.
Wrong. This was one of the concerns you had already expressed
earlier during the discussion about
On 13 Nov 2002, at 9:54, Malcolm Lear wrote:
>
> I was wondering if anyone can explain why programs such as
> POV Ray only work on Qx0 machines.
Mainly because they check whether they ARE running on such a machine, and, when not, just give up.
The reason:
The Qx0 on the one side, and
On 14 Nov 2002, at 1:35, Marcel Kilgus wrote:
WMAN should really be updated to GD2 - any volunteers?
That'd be me again, then... In fact I'm almost done. Since
yesterday all routines accept the new colour word definition, only
a few more lines for the system palette are needed. And some
On 14 Nov 2002, at 1:39, P Witte wrote:
(...)
Quite some work has already been done by various people,
such as tidying up the code to make it suitable for general
distribution, adding various tools and help utilities, and
Marcel has added some significant improvements to the code
base which
On 14 Nov 2002, at 2:50, Phoebus Dokos wrote:
There is a distinctive problem there provided you've used just what I call bit
cropping... ie removing by brute-force the highest order bits from each colour...
err no, the lowest oder bits of course...
Anyway, the problem you describe is,
On 14 Nov 2002, at 13:54, Marcel Kilgus wrote:
2 - I often give my application subwindows different colours to my
info subwindows.
Ok. How would you call the entries?
Info window colours...
Appsub window colours...
Wolfgang
-
www.wlenerz.com
On 14 Nov 2002, at 11:42, Tony Firshman wrote:
When one does a reboot with SMSQ/E image file (using LRESPR), I wonder
whether the following might work:
No, that won't work.
SMSQ/E checks the available memory.
However, it might be possible to poke a value somewhere before
doing the cCALL -
On 20 Nov 2002, at 13:51, Marcel Kilgus wrote:
Hi.
All things I wanted to integrate into WMAN are now there,
Great news!
though some
still need to be tested.
I'm volunteering!
(...)
The development
state is too early to be integrated into the other versions. That will
probably
On 19 Nov 2002, at 20:49, Dilwyn Jones wrote:
Anyone have any experience of saving and restoring screen areas with
Easyptr under GD2? Can it be made to work reliably or not?
I had a quick go and could get it to load (L_WSA) a mode 32 PIC file
and display it (using WSARS) as long as the
On 21 Nov 2002, at 13:35, Norman Dunbar wrote:
Hi Wolfgang,
I always thought you were German - oops ! (Must be the name !)
What, Wolfgang is a germanic sounding name? Whatever gave
you that idea?
I'm living near Paris, though, hence the Azerty...
Ok, if you are so clever then, get over
(...)
Anybody volunteering for adaption work?
Actually there's no adaption work required, as usual it will run out
of the box. I just need to go through everything again, collect all
involved files, etc.
I want more of stuff like that!
Wolfgang
On 22 Nov 2002, at 7:16, Phoebus Dokos wrote:
V. 2y99 (If you are talking about this one Fabrizio) is available now
for sale (It has been for about a week now). As a matter of fact it's
the one I am using now. I have noticed however too that scrolling in
general is slower compared to v2.98
On 23 Nov 2002, at 17:49, Phoebus Dokos wrote:
.. I will wait for the sources and get the
fix :-)
Haven't they arrived yet?
Wolfgang
-
www.wlenerz.com
On 24 Nov 2002, at 14:22, P Witte wrote:
. However, keystrokes intended for the main window dont
get passed on if the pointer happens to be in an AW.
?
Are you sure? This is not the behaviour I experience - provided, of
course, that the AW doesn't have an item with the same keystroke.
On 26 Nov 2002, at 17:25, P Witte wrote:
iop.rptr does if you set the appropriate bits in the return vector.
But Wman calls (wm.rptr) only respond to events (see the Qptr
manual, pages 89 ff Window Manager Access Routines)
Ah yes, you WERE talking about wm.rptr...
AW events are entirely
On 27 Nov 2002, at 17:53, P Witte wrote:
Yes please.
OK, enclosed- load outptr_bin first. (lrespr)
Wolfgang
The following section of this message contains a file attachment
prepared for transmission using the Internet MIME message format.
If you are using Pegasus Mail, or any another
Well on the Q40 (at least mine) I tried to load it and it's impossible
to get it to work.
There has been a long history with incompatibilities between the
Q40 and Prowess. I have managed to get it working, though and
working correctly on the latest SMSQ/E (2y99 - else I wouldn't
have
On 28 Nov 2002, at 12:15, TonyTebby wrote:
(...)
There are other simpler methods. How about
alert('Hello World') (Javascript)
Wouldn't you need something like
html
head
script language=javascript
(...)
/script
/head
/html
around it?
(makes everything longer)
How about:
On 29 Nov 2002, at 4:18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
WM.RPTR does a lot of work for the programmer, but has a fairly
complicated way of monitoring the position of the pointer and any
mouse clicks/keystrokes.
I wanted to do two things.
(...)
b.
Produce the little explanatory windows after
On 30 Nov 2002, at 0:18, P Witte wrote:
This is not documented anywhere in my Qptr manual!! (3rd revision)
so its the first I hear of it. It looks like its been in the code all along.
Ive needed such a call many a time!
Apart from the timeout, are there any other parameters?
Enclosed a
On 29 Nov 2002, at 22:42, Phoebus Dokos wrote:
Other tricks include: fiddle with the TIMEOUT values, change the scroll value to
greater than 200, reduce the shadow to 1 pixel or none -never tried the latter
really but I will now that I thought about it-). Use only two colours for everything
On 1 Dec 2002, at 20:15, Dilwyn Jones wrote:
Now up and running, the revised Dilwyn Jones QL website!
Pretty neat!
Wolfgang
Doesn't that mean the the item stays marked as current?
No. WM.DRBDR draws/undraws the border first. Then it checks whether
the pointer is in or out of the program's window area.
Actually, it's the other way around, wm.rptr(t) checks whether the
pointer is out of the window and
On 4 Dec 2002, at 18:05, Phoebus Dokos wrote:
(...): QXL_EXT...(...)... anybody have any idea of what they do (well the second one
is
obvious) and their syntax if any?
Thanks,
1 - Look at dev8_smsq_qxl_basic_asm
QXL_EXT just loads (modified) CALL and LRESPR procedures.
2 - look at
On 6 Dec 2002, at 14:10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have successfully produced my own explanation windows now by WM.RPTRT on
your advice. However, I look to see where the pointer is on a timeout
(comparing the pointer position with each of the hit areas of the loose
items).
... thus
Just t=o tell everyone that I'll be absent til the beginning of the new
year.
Merry Chrstimas and a Happy New Year to all of you!
Wolfgang
On 3 Jan 2003, at 9:09, Jerome Grimbert wrote:
} 1) What is the best way of detecting whether GD2 drivers are present
} and in use??
For the time being, there seem only to be the WMAN version
numbers.
If you can wait a little, I should write a new trap soon
(rest cut)
OK, so that takes
On 7 Jan 2003, at 18:48, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think that this bug does need fixing to allow different colours to
be used for the scroll bars, but agree that in the case of both
parameters being set to zero, the scroll bars should not be drawn (as
at present)
I'm not so sure - it all
On 13 Jan 2003, at 7:41, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, I have tried to create a null pointer. However, can anyone please
explain why the following code shows 2 pointers on screen:
As I don'thave easyptr, I can't really comment.
However, the sprite defintion seems wrong to me
1 - the form
On 14 Jan 2003, at 18:34, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone have any indication of the current QL market??
market ?
Wolfgang
On 17 Jan 2003, at 10:20, TonyTebby wrote:
I used to solve a lot of problems this way but, since I moved to
France I have started talking to myself in French. The trouble is, my
French is so bad I cannot understand myself.
Nor can anyone else...
grin
Wolfgang
On 17 Jan 2003, at 11:04, Jerome Grimbert wrote:
harpo equ $160
chico equ $140
elem_size equ $0c
clr.l a1 ; (just to fixe a1 to 0 for the question,
; irrelevant how to if illegal)
; but once a1 has been modified, we cannot have
On 17 Jan 2003, at 12:30, Joachim Van der Auwera wrote:
Wow, very strong. This is the kind of features that make writing (and
debugging) assembler interesting.
Yeah, right, next you're gonna suggest we switch to 'C'.
:-)))
Wolfgang
On 17 Jan 2003, at 16:53, Jerome Grimbert wrote:
Oh, while you speak of the PE, I will jump in the wagon...
I have just found out that blob and mask when used in an information windows
(How silly, it would be simpler to use a sprite instead!), seems to
have their origin at the screen
On 25 Jan 2003, at 16:04, Marcel Kilgus wrote:
No, fortunately not. Otherwise I would be as depressed as Marvin (as
anybody hitchhiking through the galaxy should now) ;-)
Does that mean that you're an android?
Now THAT explains a lot...
Don't panic...
Wolfgang
-
On 26 Jan 2003, at 15:51, Phoebus Dokos wrote:
He has to be an android as he has been working around the clock
apparently... at a certain point he sent me more than 3 versions in
less than 20 mins ;-))) (Okay just happened once but you get the idea)
Oh well, that only shows that we worked
On 27 Jan 2003, at 7:03, Wolfgang Lenerz wrote:
Oh well, that only shows that we worked for 20 minutes
Oops, I meant of couse He worked (I didn't have anything to do with
it).
Just a typo
Wolfgang
On 3 Feb 2003 at 12:12, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess what he means, is that it WMAN is not a true sprite handler -
ie. although you can animate a sprite by switching between several
images in a loop, there is no way of giving a sprite direction and
speed, plus collision detection - this
On 4 Feb 2003 at 0:05, Marcel Kilgus wrote:
Nice one regarding programming style: I have just spent several hours
tracing through the SBasic compiler to find a bug that caused SBasic
to crash. The program causing the crash used PROCedures with up to 358
(sic! three hundred fifty eight!)
On 7 Feb 2003, at 13:26, Jerome Grimbert wrote:
Thanks. At least it clarify a little the structure of the first sector of the file
system.
(but qwa.pflg for instance lie on the partition list (which I luckily already
found and understood) on the first physical sector. It should never
On 12 Feb 2003, at 15:58, Jerome Grimbert wrote:
I do not know, but I wonder also if there is somewhere
the equivalent of the QL Advanced User Guide, updated for SMSQ/E (with a comparaison
of the original QL) ?
(Especially the documentation of all the trap calls and vectored utilities)
He is currently trapped in the UL (8-)#
United Lapland?
Ubiquitous Laughter?
Unashamed User?
grin
Wolfgang
-
www.wlenerz.com
On 21 Jun 2003, at 2:41, P Witte wrote:
(...)
Yes, that is understood. It is in situations where the whole file cannot be
read at once, Im thinking about. (Besides, on a multitasking machine it is
probably not very polite to grab huge buffers ;)
(...)
Oh well, if you start worrying about
Hi all,
version 3.01 of smsqe is now arriving at your friendly dealer.
go get it!
Wolfgang
-
www.wlenerz.com
On 13 Jul 2003, at 21:01, P Witte wrote:
..plus array slicing, of course
? doesn't that work in Turbo?
Wolfgang
-
www.wlenerz.com
On 13 Jul 2003, at 18:03, Dilwyn Jones wrote:
On
Expect a wayward American missile to fly low over you soon...
(just
pray it has a QL controlling it not a PC!)
No, no, let it have a PC by all means -it'll probably go down
somewhere in the ocean (a blue screen of death...)
On 15 Jul 2003, at 12:05, Dilwyn Jones wrote:
Anyway, you'll never get hit by anything British, not because British
bombs and bullets are accurate but our poor soldiers end up having to
borrow and scrouunge American kit and bullets while overseas...
Is that the newspeak for friendly fire?
On 9 Aug 2003, at 20:39, P Witte wrote:
Ive recently discovered the following bugs in Smsq/e
recently was a long time ago. - I'm slowly working up my backlog.
PRINT PRT_USE$ crashes Smsq/e since at least version 2.98 on QPC2 (and QPC2
itself).
Yes, confirmed, I'll have a bugfix soon.
On 15 Oct 2003, at 10:56, Phoebus R. Dokos (Φοίβος Ρ. Ντό wrote:
(...)
Well that's restriction 1... As seen below you have to be able to
distribute legitimate copies both in binary and in source form so... it's
not OK
That's the restriction, alright.
(...)
To your (*) that alone breaks
On 17 Oct 2003, at 15:56, Tarquin Mills wrote:
(...)
There is no technical reason why 68020+ instructions cannot be assembled
in an easy way on all 68K based environments.
That's not the problerm - the problem is that GWASS doesn't run
on sub 68020 machines.
From the point view of
On 22 Oct 2003, at 19:37, Roy wood wrote:
(...)
You have just broken your own licence !
Well I AM allowed to send it out for testing purposes, and it
obviously was intended only for you, not the entire list.
So the intention was OK, at least.
Wolfgang
-
On 22 Oct 2003, at 17:30, Wolfgang Lenerz wrote:
Hi Roy,
This is what should be the final version of SMSQ/E 3.03 for the
GoldCard.
Would you lminbd having a look at it, to see whther is now (!)
works OK bvefore I release it?
It works here, but I remember you having had problems
On 22 Oct 2003, at 23:25, Marcel Kilgus wrote:
I dont suppose it was intentional
Definitely not.
Bloody right.
(...)
Yes, fortunately the version didn't include my GD2 aurora driver.
It never does.
Wolfgang
-
www.scp-paulet-lenerz.com
On 22 Oct 2003, at 21:52, Duncan Neithercut wrote:
I dont suppose it was intentional and its not Wolfgang's licence but its TTs
SMSQ/E licence, but if you are interested I was sufficiently interested to
test it on my Aurora setup. Aurora, Supergoldcard 2.49 Qubide 2.01. After
approx
On 22 Oct 2003, at 23:23, Tony Firshman wrote:
This could save future embarrassment - I can feel the heat from
Wolfgang's ears from here (8-)#
Yup.
I'm just baking bread in them.
He isn't the first to post to the wrong place, and I am sure won't be
the last.
Thanks.
I do hope it'll be MY
On 5 Dec 2003 at 8:57, Phoebus R. Dokos (è á. ç) wrote:
Pah! Blame it on the woman now won't we? :-D
Poor thing she couldn't help it! It's like saying that it's Dilwyn's fault
that he's so popular with the ladies ;-)
Hmm, Dilwyn of Wales somehow hasn't got the right ring to it.
Hi all,
version 1.01 of BMP2sprt can be found at
www.scp-paulet-lenerz.com/14mljkl24/wolf/download
Wolfgang
Hi all,
Plaese note that the SMSQ/E sources may, as off now, be obtained at the
following website:
www.scp-paulet-lenerz.com/smsqe
The site is still under construction, so please be patient.
It is forseen to include the following for download:
individual directories within the sources
On 8 Dec 2003 at 12:44, Phoebus Dokos wrote:
I think it cannot be killed but CAN BE replaced (ie from another shell
or whatever... at least I think that's what TT said at one point) (or
something)
?
It's a moot point here since that is not what is happening.
(...)
IIRC he is ie the
On 8 Dec 2003 at 16:36, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Umpf, and how do you test for that? What happens if the user unsuspends the
job
whilst the screen is still too small?
The unsuspend routine could surely check the screen dimensions and refuse to
unsuspend the job if the screen is too small...
Hi all,
version 1.03 of bmp2sprt i ready and waiting.
You can get it at:
www.scp-paulet-lenerz.com/14mljkl24/wolf/download
New in this version:
Support for mode 16 sprites (thanks Marcel!)
Support for extended sprites.
Wolfgang
On 2 Jan 2004 at 11:51, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(...)
Since the original IOP.RPTR asks for D2.B to be set, does this not mean that old
programs
calling the routine might find peculiar things happening? For example, the contents
of D2.L could
have $FF as the top byte. D2 might have
Hi all,
there is a new version of bmp2sprt at
http://www.scp-paulet-lenerz.com/14mljkl24/wolf/download/
Thanks to Per Witte for finding the bugs!
Wolfgang
BMP2SPRT v. 1.10 can be found on my website
www.SCP-Paulet-Lenerz.com/14mljkl24/Wolf/Download
Have fun.
Wolfgang
1 - 100 of 138 matches
Mail list logo
