Both racket-users and racket-dev have just now been changed to "Anyone
can ask."
On 1/12/22 1:17 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 1:14 PM Sage Gerard wrote:
>> Yes. I assumed was that (b) was not true, since I thought volunteers
>> were hard to c
, it's
> easy to have someone else step up. The alternative where we specify a
> specific email requires potentially changing that email address when
> the responsibility changes.
>
> Does that seem like a reasonable approach?
>
> Sam
>
> On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 2:30 PM Sage Gerar
No no, that was helpful, thank you. We do need to figure this part out.
On 1/11/22 2:22 PM, Robby Findler wrote:
> Sorry, I probably shouldn't have jumped in here. I'm happy with whatever you
> folks decide is best!
>
> Robby
>
> On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 1:09 PM Sage Gerard
Anyone on the web can ask" to join.
>> It's not immediately clear who gets the emails when people ask, but
>> this seems like it might be a good intermediate position.
>>
>> Sam
>>
>> On Sun, Dec 19, 2021 at 12:32 PM Sage Gerard wrote:
>>>
>
eft bar read "Conversations", "Members", "About", "My membership settings".
>> But in the Racket Users, there isn't a link to the "Members" list.
>>
>> On Sun, Dec 19, 2021 at 5:24 PM Sage Gerard wrote:
>>
>>> Looks lik
o that might not have been the most useful test.
>>
>> Robby
>>
>> On Sun, Dec 19, 2021 at 11:32 AM Sage Gerard wrote:
>>
>>> Alright, thanks to all of you for the quick replies. As of this writing,
>>> the list has been reconfigured to cre
:
>>
>> +1! Thank you.
>>
>> Robby
>>
>> On Sat, Dec 18, 2021 at 1:43 PM Matthew Flatt wrote:
>>
>>> The "members" option sounds right to me. Thanks for tracking down a way
>>> to improve the situation!
>>>
>>> At Sat, 18
If I understand this correctly, there's a difference between deleting a
reference to 50 GB (like an inode), and actually writing 50 GB.
When you write to an output port, you are writing to a buffer in memory. This
prevents the slow downs you've witnessed, because storage mediums are
comparably
Core team,
Sam asked me to issue bans for a troublesome spammer. I've done so, even
just today. I understand I need quorum for larger decisions. This is why
I have not yet reconfigured the list to permanently stop the spammer.
After researching the problem further, I need your urgent attention.
mess with the list.
On 12/14/21 3:53 PM, David Bremner wrote:
> Sage Gerard
> [](mailto:s...@sagegerard.com)
> writes:
>
>> All,
>>
>> I've gained administrative privileges over this list to address the spammer.
>> I want to hear from others before I touch anyth
Correction: "Invited users only" does have a moderation requirement, but I
expect it is not the kind that requires daily interruption.
On 12/14/21 1:28 PM, Sage Gerard wrote:
> All,
>
> I've gained administrative privileges over this list to address the spammer.
> I wa
All,
I've gained administrative privileges over this list to address the spammer. I
want to hear from others before I touch anything.
The spams continues because moderation is outright disabled for the list. Our
other choices are to apply moderation to non-group members only, or everybody.
I
Can assist, but am biased to my own tools and designs. Is there a way to
volunteer from that angle?
Sent from ProtonMail mobile
Original Message
On Dec 7, 2021, 4:43 PM, Jacob Jozef wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have no experience with system admin, web servers, the Racket web server,
>
The spammer's messages unfailingly contain a swastika character for
those looking for a simple filter. Beyond that, I volunteer to help ban
this account at the list level if someone is willing to trust me with
the related access.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
eds to read the docs and check what’s
> required in order to set it up.
>
> John
>
>> On Nov 22, 2021, at 11:56, Sage Gerard wrote:
>>
>> Y'all are configuring Discourse to allow replies by emails too, right?
>>
>> On 11/22/21 11:00 AM, J. Ryan Stinnett wrote:
Y'all are configuring Discourse to allow replies by emails too, right?
On 11/22/21 11:00 AM, J. Ryan Stinnett wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Nov 2021 at 15:25, Martin Weigele wrote:
>
>> A discourse type forum - we had this discussions in other contexts again and
>> again - may be a better choice for
1 11:40 AM, Sage Gerard wrote:
> Since I missed the hallway I'll settle with a belated comment.
>
> Over my lifetime I have accumulated hundreds of accounts. Breaches led to
> incessant spamming. Thankfully I've kept my passwords varied and strong, so
> the damage hasn't terrible to c
Since I missed the hallway I'll settle with a belated comment.
Over my lifetime I have accumulated hundreds of accounts. Breaches led to
incessant spamming. Thankfully I've kept my passwords varied and strong, so the
damage hasn't terrible to contain. I tried to delete accounts to manage my
Thanks!
On 11/22/21 9:58 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 9:52 AM Sage Gerard wrote:
>> Thanks for checking on this. I'd expect something like a CoC more than a ToS
>> in this case, but terms are terms :)
> The discourse site is hosted by the p
group at RacketCon, and there was some
> “hallway” discussion about it.
> 2) No, no sponsor was involved. Yikes! Indeed, I’m not aware that Racket
> *has* any sponsors currently, aside from the research and infrastructure
> grants that are being funded by the NSF et cetera.
>
> John
>
>>
On Nov 22, 2021, at 04:54, Norman Gray
>> [](mailto:norman.g...@glasgow.ac.uk)
>> wrote:
>>
>> Greetings.
>>
>> On 22 Nov 2021, at 4:24, Sage Gerard wrote:
>>
>>> But I have to ask, who wrote the ToS? Who is "the company" in its
&
If anyone here still has demand for a vanilla email list, please reach out to
me.
On 11/22/21 9:40 AM, David Storrs wrote:
> That's sudden.
>
> On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 8:06 AM Etan Wexler wrote:
>
>> The stewards of [Racket](https://racket-lang.org/) have decided that it’s
>> time to give up
Also: Apologies. That came off as rude. No offense intended.
But I have to ask, who wrote the ToS? Who is "the company" in its
context? Discord? One of the Racket team's universities? A sponsor?
On 11/21/21 11:20 PM, Sage Gerard wrote:
> Thanks for letting us know. When should
Thanks for letting us know. When should people expect to unsubscribe?
I read the ToS, privacy policy, and thoughts. Hard pass.
On 11/21/21 1:09 PM, 'John Clements' via Racket Users wrote:
> TL;DR: Go to
>
> https://racket.discourse.group/invites/okLTSrQw1T
>
> and sign up for Racket
I get these timings on x86_64 GNU/Linux using the following profile program.
; A: cpu time: 7444 real time: 7445 gc time: 716
; B: cpu time: 9227 real time: 9228 gc time: 884
(module profile racket/base
(define target-length #e5e4)
(define (A current-list new-element)
(append current-list (list
ober 26, 2021 at 11:01:38 AM UTC-5 Sage Gerard wrote:
>
>> - Assuming I have the right repository link, gregor's tz/c contract is only
>> (or/c string? (integer-in -64800 64800)) [1]. I can set the feed-timezone
>> parameter in Splitflap to an arbitrary string and the guard
nightmare.
>
>> On Monday, October 25, 2021 at 6:36:30 PM UTC-5 Sage Gerard wrote:
>>
>>> Thank you for this!!
>>>
>>> Feedback
>>>
>>> - I like your podcast-specific entries
>>> - The validation logic is refreshing to see
>>
Thank you for this!!
Feedback
- I like your podcast-specific entries
- The validation logic is refreshing to see
- Re: boolean arguments, I'd stick to keyword arguments and ask for any/c, not
boolean?, in contracts. That way forms like (and ... (member ...)) won't bug
users about a
I got all tests to pass by updating the first clause of pre-escape to use equal?
> (and (txexpr? x) (equal? "text" (attr-ref x 'type #f)))
My hypothesis is that when you didn't have bytecode, the reference to the
literal string "text" just happened to be eq?. I couldn't say why.
On 10/24/21
Yes. The keyword here is "launcher." See the gracket-launcher* and
racket-launcher-* options for info.rkt files in
https://docs.racket-lang.org/raco/setup-info.html
These options affect `raco setup` in particular. Here's one of my
info.rkt files as an example
Also check koyo and Axio
On 9/4/21 12:14 PM, 'John Clements' via Racket Users wrote:
> I use Greg Hendershott’s excellent and trouble-free ‘frog’ library. How would
> your code relate to this?
>
> John
>
>> On Aug 30, 2021, at 10:57, Dexter Lagan wrote:
>>
>> Hi again,
>>
>>I've been
t;
> I also coincidentally came across the package
> [natural-cli](https://docs.racket-lang.org/natural-cli/index.html) by Sage
> Gerard. Looks like it provides some interesting features and in particular
> subcommands, which are absent in #lang cli. It very well may be that this
> packa
Thank you for letting us know.
~slg
Original Message
On Jul 19, 2021, 2:35 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
> The Racket team recently became aware of a security vulnerability in
> the `racket/sandbox` library. Code evaluated using a sandbox could
> cause system modules to
rcises? What do you find clear/confusing? Did the examples work on your
machine? etc.
On 7/2/21 6:02 PM, Sage Gerard wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> I did a pretty sweeping edit pass on Xiden's documentation. I'm really proud
> of it, and I'd like to show it off.
> https://docs.racket
Hey folks,
I did a pretty sweeping edit pass on Xiden's documentation. I'm really proud of
it, and I'd like to show it off.
https://docs.racket-lang.org/xiden-index/index.html?q=xiden%20documentation
This revision of the docs uses a Guide [-> Exercises] -> Reference reading
flow. It allowed
Short answer: Yes...ish. I wrote a few code generation programs.
It can happen, but the Racket program would be dependent on the target
language's toolchain and standard library. Before we get to that, note that not
all languages cleanly translate into one another (Some scripting languages
John Carmack did so for his 10 year old. His notes may be of interest.
https://groups.google.com/g/racket-users/c/yjRuIxypUQc
On 6/15/21 1:42 PM, Nathaniel W Griswold wrote:
> Has anyone taught racket to kids, like middle school and above?
>
> I see some really basic articles when googling
What is the value of
([][use-user-specific-search-paths](https://docs.racket-lang.org/reference/collects.html?q=PLTCOLLECTS#%28def._%28%28quote._~23~25kernel%29._use-user-specific-search-paths%29%29))
in each case?
On 6/5/21 6:39 PM, Don Green wrote:
> When I run drracket v 8.1 the additional
My understanding is that you can shadow `foo`, but you cannot use `foo` in any
expression at the same scope where the struct's bindings appear. In this
context, some of `foo`'s lexical information is reserved so that `struct-out`
works correctly.
On 6/3/21 5:01 PM, flirora wrote:
> Am I
Credit to @samth on the Discord for noticing that I did not use
`_bytes/nul-terminated` on Racket CS byte strings. Doing so fixed the issue.
Thanks, Sam!
On 6/2/21 10:21 AM, Sage Gerard wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Consider this small FFI that currently works only on GNU/Linux.
>
> htt
Hi all,
Consider this small FFI that currently works only on GNU/Linux.
https://github.com/zyrolasting/xiden/blob/libcrypto/crypto.rkt
https://github.com/zyrolasting/xiden/blob/libcrypto/crypto/crypto.c
`raco test` intermittently fails this module with "invalid memory reference.
Some debugging
hew Flatt wrote:
>
>> At Sun, 23 May 2021 14:57:42 +, Sage Gerard wrote:
>>> Is there a cross-VM way to pass an arbitrary input port to the C
>>> runtime (e.g. via open-input-bytes), such that the C runtime can read
>>> bytes on its own?
>>
>> No, no
Hi all,
I have a C shared library exposing a simplified interface for computing message
digests. Here's a `while` that reads bytes using a callback.
https://github.com/zyrolasting/xiden/blob/libcrypto/crypto/crypto.c#L46
A compatible callback provided by Racket might look like this.
(λ (buf
Thank you for organizing the news and for bringing attention to so many cool
projects out there. Definitely cause to celebrate! :)
On 5/19/21 10:00 AM, Paulo Matos wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> We have hit 50 issues! :)
> https://racket-news.com/2021/05/racket-news-issue-50.html
>
> Enjoy!
>
> --
>
Ah, you're right. I'm still acclimated to BC here. Disregard!
On 5/14/21 7:30 AM, Paulo Matos wrote:
>
> Sage Gerard writes:
>
>> I ran into this issue with rsound. I'm not sure how standard output can
>> be directly captured from a lower-level language in a Racket context
I have a program that takes a (trusted) module form as a list and then
pulls out a provided value using this method. I used syntax/modread and
generate a pseudorandom id for each value of `trusted` here.
(define-namespace-anchor anchor)
(define module-namespace (namespace-anchor->namespace
I ran into this issue with rsound. I'm not sure how standard output can
be directly captured from a lower-level language in a Racket context
when that language can freely ignore the Racket printer and write
directly to STDOUT within the same operating system process.
I'd hate to just add a "me
RacketCon): Leif Andersen -- Movies as Programs: The Story of a
> Racket -
> YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OZXslNVaCOQ=PLXr4KViVC0qIgkwFFzM-0we_aoOfAl16Y=3)
>
> 11 May 2021 15:30 Sage Gerard
> [](mailto:s...@sagegerard.com) wrote:
>
>> I don't know of one off h
I don't know of one off hand, but I believe RacketCon 2018 (?) included a
presenter that showed a PostScript-like DSL for designers and artists. If pict
not cover your needs, maybe dig into the presentations?
Failing that, can you show what you'd hope the syntax would look like? That
would
AM, Hendrik Boom wrote:
> On Sun, May 09, 2021 at 10:23:34PM +0000, Sage Gerard wrote:
>
>> I have a project with 57 prefab structure types. I need to construct
>> instances using a local contract (module level contracts do not fit my needs
>> here). Since I cannot def
, all
invariant violations come down to what went a constructor, because all program
output is encoded as prefab structures. That's why I want to raise any errors
on instantiation.
On 5/9/21 8:55 PM, Sage Gerard wrote:
> Of course, if you're okay with a longer email. Before that, thank you b
nt to
>> extend the struct type, though, you still need to use the real one.)
>>
>> Another option would be to "forge" a new compile-time struct-info based on
>> the original struct-info but replacing the constructor.
>>
>> Minimally tested sample implementati
I have a project with 57 prefab structure types. I need to construct instances
using a local contract (module level contracts do not fit my needs here). Since
I cannot define guards, the solution is easy enough.
(struct foo (num) #:prefab)
(define/contract make-foo (-> real? foo?) foo)
os with new code, and that pass has its own set of bindings that only
that pass can see."
~slg
Original Message ----
On May 9, 2021, 3:14 PM, Sage Gerard wrote:
> I'm stretching details a bit, but maybe it would help to think of phases as
> "passes." That i
I'm stretching details a bit, but maybe it would help to think of phases as
"passes." That is, there's a compile-time "pass" where Racket is focuses on the
code you write and what they can see. These passes continue until the Racket
program is fully expanded.
Where things get tricky is
For the time being I've decided to use this macro and attach contracts to the
fallbacks a different way. Please let me know if there's a better solution.
(define-syntax-rule (I/weak/c [method-id method-contract] ...)
(I/c [method-id (or/c #f method-contract)] ...)
On 4/17/21 10:48 PM, Sage
Playing with this program. Its output is in the comments.
; /tmp/gen.rkt:9:10: assertion violation
; expected: a procedure
; given: #f
; in: method m
; (I/c (m (-> I? 1)))
; [...removed the rest of the error...]
; 1
(module gen-contracts racket/base
(require racket/contract racket/exn
ty namespace,
> or something else.)
>
> At Fri, 16 Apr 2021 18:02:47 +, Sage Gerard wrote:
>> Yes. The error changed to "hello: unbound identifier, also no #%app ..."
>> for me, so I also had to add `(namespace-require (quote-module-path
>> restricted) ns)` t
tach-module (namespace-anchor->namespace a)
> (quote-module-path restricted)
> ns)
>
> is probably what you want.
>
>
> At Fri, 16 Apr 2021 17:29:28 +, Sage Gerard wrote:
>> Why does this raise "namespace-attach-
Why does this raise "namespace-attach-module: module not declared (in
the source namespace)"?
I expected that the `restricted` submodule would be both declared and
instantiated by the time control reached `namespace-attach-module`.
(module anon racket/base
(module restricted racket/base
I'd like to use `eval` in terms of a restricted namespace including
`#%datum` and `#%app`. For minimalism and security, I want to build that
namespace starting from an empty one, without using racket/sandbox,
security guards, or attaching racket/base.
Under these restrictions, I would normally
the certificate to XIDEN_TRUST_CERTIFICATES. Original exception follows: ...
On 4/12/21 10:43 AM, Ryan Culpepper wrote:
> Yes, that's right.
>
> Ryan
>
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 4:23 PM Sage Gerard wrote:
>
>> Understood, thank you. By "trusted location," do you me
a file containing
> additional root certificates.
>
> Ryan
>
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 3:20 PM Sage Gerard wrote:
>
>> When ssl-connect fails due to an untrusted certificate, this error is
>> raised:
>>
>> ssl-connect: connect failed (error:1416F086:SSL
&
When ssl-connect fails due to an untrusted certificate, this error is
raised:
ssl-connect: connect failed (error:1416F086:SSL
routines:tls_process_server_certificate:certificate verify failed)
I'd like to give the user a more helpful error, like this:
Could not connect due to an untrusted
ndency confusion
> attacks? In any case, it would be good to know where Racket stands with that.
>
> On Apr 1, 2021, at 12:39 PM, Sage Gerard wrote:
>
>> Are there any plans to publish GPG signatures for Racket installers, or
>> at least upgrade the cryptographic hash f
o-build/blob/21ccc39fc14408eea79aff035e508856a66adf89/distro-build-server/pack-built.rkt#L76
>
> Sam
>
> On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 12:39 PM Sage Gerard wrote:
>> Are there any plans to publish GPG signatures for Racket installers, or
>> at least upgrade the cryptographic hash function used for the checksum
Are there any plans to publish GPG signatures for Racket installers, or
at least upgrade the cryptographic hash function used for the checksums?
If not, who would be a good person to talk to about contributing that?
--
~slg
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
/dstorrs/thread-with-id/blob/master/info.rkt
If that's not it, I'd have to take time after work to look more closely.
On 4/1/21 12:31 PM, David Storrs wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 12:18 PM Sage Gerard wrote:
>> Neat! Thanks for this. Did you make sure to list your scribble file in
>&g
Neat! Thanks for this. Did you make sure to list your scribble file in
`scribblings` under info.rkt?
On 4/1/21 12:12 PM, David Storrs wrote:
> Wraps an arbitrary value into a synchronizable event. The
> synchronization result of the event is the original value, with two
> exceptions: procedures
d already know the answer to this)
>
> On Friday, March 19, 2021 at 3:56:18 PM UTC-5 Sage Gerard wrote:
>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> About a year, 1384 commits, 489 tests, ~10k LOC, and 2" on my waistline
>> later, Xiden is in beta. An update is pending on the default
Hi folks,
About a year, 1384 commits, 489 tests, ~10k LOC, and 2" on my waistline later,
Xiden is in beta. An update is pending on the default catalog.
https://github.com/zyrolasting/xiden
Xiden is a dependency manager I wrote to support use cases that I could not get
working with `raco pkg`.
The last sentence of the first paragraph you quoted starts with "A version is
intended," but I don't know for sure if it is a complete answer. You'll also
notice on the catalog that there are version exceptions, but you may have
already read that by now.
There's an issue where if a package build fails, the pretty links to the docs
do not resolve.
For future reference, you can get around this by going to the package page...
https://pkgs.racket-lang.org/package/pollen
...and then clicking "Documentation". That particular URL seems to still work.
Typo: "but the library itself leverages the reader" should read "but if the
library itself leverages the reader"
On 2/28/21 4:20 PM, Sage Gerard wrote:
> Does call-with-default-reading-parameterization help?
>
> https://docs.racket-lang.org/reference/Reading.html?
Does call-with-default-reading-parameterization help?
https://docs.racket-lang.org/reference/Reading.html?q=accept-compiled#%28def._%28%28lib._racket%2Fprivate%2Fmisc..rkt%29._call-with-default-reading-parameterization%29%29
The parameters you are seeing re: accepting -lang, -reader are for when
I can't speak to DrRacket since I never use it, so I'll focus more on the first
question.
Functional programming typically deals with these considerations (among others):
- Write functions that return values purely in terms of arguments.
- Defer side-effects until you can't.
A goal to make the
So exciting! A massive thank you to everyone making Racket even better. :)
~slg
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Saturday, February 13, 2021 9:17 PM, 'John Clements' via Racket Users
wrote:
> *** Racket 8.0 is here! ***
>
> Racket version 8.0 is now available from
>
>
gt; (require/expose openssl/mzssl (X509_get_default_cert_file))
> > ...
> > [sandbox-path-permissions (append `((exists
> > ,(X509_get_default_cert_file)))
> > (sandbox-path-permissions))]
> > ...
>
> --
>
> William J. Bowman
>
> On Tue, Jan 05, 2021
sl-default-verify-sources#%28def._%28%28lib._openssl%2Fmain..rkt%29._ssl-default-verify-sources%29%29
~slg
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Monday, January 4, 2021 6:53 PM, Sage Gerard wrote:
> If you just want to silence the error with a blunt instrument, then you could
> try a parame
If you just want to silence the error with a blunt instrument, then you could
try a parameterization where sandbox-path-permissions is set to:
(append (map (λ (p) `(exists ,p)) (filesystem-root-list)
(sandbox-path-permissions)))
This suffices since it is an existential check, not a file
ok?" must be reflected in the fully-expanded
> syntax of the module.
>
> Ryan
>
> On Sun, Jan 3, 2021 at 8:40 AM Michael MacLeod
> wrote:
>
>> Oops, sorry about interpreting your question wrong. Unfortunately I don't
>> know the answer to your actual question.
&
Thanks for sharing.
I honed in on the review video because I like the philosophical discussions
that come from them. I'm not sure about the comments re: toxicity in the
community and how that helps one succeed in academia, but I did see some value
in discussing the merits of LOP.
I spent
by macro-expansion behavior near
> #%module-begin" for more context).
>
> Best,
> Michael
>
> On Sat, Jan 2, 2021 at 8:26 PM Sage Gerard wrote:
>
>> Why does Racket handle modules with exactly one form differently?
>>
>> I ran into a bug where modules in my mo
Why does Racket handle modules with exactly one form differently?
I ran into a bug where modules in my module language won't expand if the
modules have exactly one form, so I'm just curious.
(Wild guess: It's Racket's way of checking for a shortcut to end expansion
earlier)
~slg
--
You
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Friday, January 1, 2021 12:51 PM, Sage Gerard wrote:
> Alright, thank you for sticking with this. I'm refactoring now.
>
> ~slg
>
> ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
> On Friday, January 1, 2021 11:56 AM, Jay McCarthy
> wrote:
>
>&
Dominik*, apologies.
~slg
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Friday, January 1, 2021 5:56 PM, Sage Gerard wrote:
> > "Proper mail systems" "Now you know the reason" grrr g!
>
> Relax, I come in peace.
>
> Clients aren't created equal. I don't h
ld think that in most cases, the typical
behavior is to reply to the list and the exceptional behavior is to go off list.
If that's true, is there something wrong with making the default behavior
more accessible to more clients?
~slg
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Friday, January 1, 2021 2:16 P
n Fri, Jan 1, 2021 at 11:44 AM Sage Gerard wrote:
>
>> Ah, I see. Thank you for that!
>>
>> As for rephrasing my original question: If program were provided as
>> #%module-begin, I expect that syntax-protect would prevent a programmer from
>> using out the phase-
ah)
> (the-c-is "Caaah")
> (the-d-looks-like 42))
> ```
>
> --
> Jay McCarthy
> Associate Professor @ CS @ UMass Lowell
> http://jeapostrophe.github.io
> Vincit qui se vincit.
>
> On Thu, Dec 31, 2020 at 12:07 PM Sage Gerard wrote:
>
>> I didn't see a
The Reply-To experience for this list seems wrong.
Clicking normal "Reply" sets the reply to the person who last sent an email to
the thread, but not the list address.
Clicking "Reply All" sends a copy of the email to an increasingly larger list
of people, with the mail list CC'd. The extra
y McCarthy
> Associate Professor @ CS @ UMass Lowell
> http://jeapostrophe.github.io
> Vincit qui se vincit.
>
> On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 10:20 PM Sage Gerard wrote:
>
>> I'm trying to learn how to restrict where expressions appear. Those
>> expressions might be procedure
I'm trying to learn how to restrict where expressions appear. Those expressions
might be procedure applications, or macros before expansion.
[1] shows a library I use to help me implement a collection pass for a module
language. To save you some reading, it uses syntax-parse with a lengthy
ou couldn't tell whether `(f "1.2.3")` was a single version (whose
> value is produced by a function call) or by a range (whose lower bound is the
> variable f). But you could change the grammar to avoid that problem. Then you
> could use `expr/c` to wrap the expressio
Typos:
- "*" remove a bound ==> "*" removes a bound
- All examples should read (versions ...), not (version ...)
~slg
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Wednesday, December 16, 2020 6:27 PM, Sage Gerard
wrote:
> I'm trying to learn how to write syntax classes. M
I'm trying to learn how to write syntax classes. My intended macro expresses a
set of Racket versions, either as inclusive intervals or as exact versions. In
an interval, "*" remove a bound.
- (version "6.5") means exactly version "6.5", as does (version ("6.5" "6.5"))
- (versions ("7.0"
Missed Ryan's email earlier. Thanks Ryan!
~slg
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Tuesday, December 15, 2020 3:27 PM, Sage Gerard wrote:
> Answering my own question for those searching.
>
> Yes, make-ssl-connect@ tracks protocol recommendations. [1] shows that
> make-ssl-connec
web-server/web-server.rkt#L74
~slg
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Thursday, December 10, 2020 7:47 PM, Sage Gerard wrote:
> I've seen articles say "SSL" when they mean "TLS". When I read the docs for
> make-ssl-connect@, it does not clarify what algorithm back
I've seen articles say "SSL" when they mean "TLS". When I read the docs for
make-ssl-connect@, it does not clarify what algorithm backs use of HTTPS. Only
that OpenSSL is used.
Does make-ssl-connect@ track current recommendations like TLS 1.2 or 1.3, or is
it fixed to some version of SSL?
I opted for the read-syntax based solution. For those reading, it's convenient
to use `replace-context` from `syntax/strip-context` to donate lexical info.
The form of the transformer I used is:
@(define-syntax (reformat stx)
(replace-context stx
(read-syntax #f (open-input-string
I attached an image showing the rendered output of
https://github.com/zyrolasting/xiden/blob/master/docs/reference/settings.scrbl#L48
I create an application to `(defthing)` as a datum due to circumstances in the
surrounding code. The hacky part being `get-contract-datum`, which tries to
1 - 100 of 204 matches
Mail list logo
