Monday, I am switching the MX records to the Windows 2000 server. I will
continue to try and get postfix or something to work but until then, I go
with the tried and true. I don't necessarily need a mailserver on the Nix
unit, just the httpd server. The Windows can handle the rest of the load.
On Sat, Jul 12, 2003 at 02:38:02AM -0600, Daryl Hunt wrote:
Linux is still not quite ready for the Prime Time IMO.
Because YOU can't figure out Postfix??? Wow. I'd say you are not ready
for a real operating system.
--
Hal Burgiss
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL
On Sat, Jul 12, 2003 at 02:38:02AM -0600, Daryl Hunt wrote:
Monday, I am switching the MX records to the Windows 2000 server. I will
continue to try and get postfix or something to work but until then, I go
with the tried and true. I don't necessarily need a mailserver on the Nix
unit, just
effort in learning HOW to
achieve your goals.
Ben
- Original Message -
From: Daryl Hunt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 12, 2003 3:38 AM
Subject: Re: Postfix (Was: qmail or sendmail(postfix))
Monday, I am switching the MX records to the Windows 2000 server. I
- Original Message -
From: Hal Burgiss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 12, 2003 5:03 AM
Subject: Re: Postfix (Was: qmail or sendmail(postfix))
On Sat, Jul 12, 2003 at 02:38:02AM -0600, Daryl Hunt wrote:
Linux is still not quite ready for the Prime
- Original Message -
From: Ed Wilts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 12, 2003 7:18 AM
Subject: Re: Postfix (Was: qmail or sendmail(postfix))
On Sat, Jul 12, 2003 at 02:38:02AM -0600, Daryl Hunt wrote:
Monday, I am switching the MX records to the Windows
- Original Message -
From: Benjamin J. Weiss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 12, 2003 10:10 AM
Subject: Re: Postfix (Was: qmail or sendmail(postfix))
Daryl,
Millions of us are using linux mail without any problems. I think that
what you are running
Daryl Hunt wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Benjamin J. Weiss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 12, 2003 10:10 AM
Subject: Re: Postfix (Was: qmail or sendmail(postfix))
Daryl,
Millions of us are using linux mail without any problems. I think that
what you
- Original Message -
From: John Nichel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 12, 2003 8:50 PM
Subject: Re: Postfix (Was: qmail or sendmail(postfix))
Daryl Hunt wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Benjamin J. Weiss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
On Jue 10 Jul 2003 21:37, Daryl Hunt wrote:
Logs?
I thought mine was not doing it only from an outside source. I am at
the terminal now going through a Windows Server to send this message.
Postfix is dead as a doornail (or blocking port 25) even on the RH
Server.
In otherwords, Postfix
On Jue 10 Jul 2003 18:14, Daryl Hunt wrote:
FWIW I think that Postfix will be your best solution.
I have postfix installed. It seems not to want want to do smtp from an
outside source.
What do you mean? doesn't recieve smtp conections, or doesn't send mail to
the outside?
Logs?
--
Porqué
- Original Message -
From: Martin Marques [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 3:37 PM
Subject: Postfix (Was: qmail or sendmail(postfix))
On Jue 10 Jul 2003 18:14, Daryl Hunt wrote:
FWIW I think that Postfix will be your best solution.
I have
from Qmail to Postfix is the issue of alias management
with Qmail
if you have a user foo
and an alias foo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mail sent to foo will end up in foos Maildir
because the alias file is checked last
this meens stuffing around with .forawrd/.qmail files
while
The reason we changed from Qmail to Postfix is the issue of alias management
with Qmail
if you have a user foo
and an alias foo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mail sent to foo will end up in foos Maildir
because the alias file is checked last
this meens stuffing around with .forawrd/.qmail files
while
:
The reason we changed from Qmail to Postfix is the issue of alias management
with Qmail
if you have a user foo
and an alias foo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mail sent to foo will end up in foos Maildir
because the alias file is checked last
this meens stuffing around with .forawrd/.qmail files
Hello Michael,
Tuesday, December 05, 2000, 02:36:33, you wrote:
MB Measured by sheer numbers of installations.
sorry, my wrong, sendmail is the best, it's the second to MS Windows only
by sheer numbers of installations. How about switching to Chinese?
I admit, I am skipping logic when
o
procmail) and am happy, but what the hell, maybe I'll give qmail another
try.
So my recommendation to the original questioner is this ... try both qmail
and postfix.
Yeah.
See which one suits your fancy. Use it. Just please don't use
sendmail grin.
Right on, dude!
Frankly I don't understand
in enterprise
environments. Which scales better, qmail or postfix? Which performs
better under heavy load? Any experiences on other platforms (Solaris
in particular)?
- -d
- --
David Talkington
Community Networking Initiative
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
217-244-1962
PGP key: http://www.prairienet.org/~dtalk
of configuration. I'd like to
hear a bit about how these packages perform in enterprise
environments. Which scales better, qmail or postfix? Which performs
better under heavy load? Any experiences on other platforms (Solaris
in particular
and qmail
required maildir.
This is not the case now (not sure if it was previously). qmail can use
several different mail storage formats. These include Mailbox and Maildir
and others.
So my recommendation to the original questioner is this ... try both qmail
and postfix. See which one suits
On Fri, 1 Dec 2000, Thornton Prime wrote:
I tried qmail before I tried postfix and didn't like it. It was a
while ago, but if I remember I decided that I wasn't ready for maildir
and qmail required maildir. I also was addicted to procmail, and I
didn't think qmail supported procmail. I don't
On Sat, 2 Dec 2000, David Talkington wrote:
Far as I can tell (sorry if I missed some of the thread), this
discussion has revolved around ease of configuration. I'd like to
hear a bit about how these packages perform in enterprise
environments. Which scales better, qmail or postfix
Hello Todd,
Saturday, December 02, 2000, 23:50:22, you wrote:
TAJ Because RH doesn't support anything other than the installation--not the
TAJ configuration, other than the real basics. And sendmail *is* the de-facto
TAJ standard; everything else is measured relative to that.
Measured by
Measured by sheer numbers of installations.
On Tue, 5 Dec 2000 02:21:07 +, Y u r i wrote:
TAJ Because RH doesn't support anything other than the installation--not the
TAJ configuration, other than the real basics. And sendmail *is* the de-facto
TAJ standard; everything else is measured
I'm a qmail junkie so take my reply with a grain of salt.
Jonathan I finally decided that
Jonathan 1. it seems more people use postfix
Not true as of this spring, when a huge survey found qmail's share of
mail service domains to be about 100 times larger than postfix's.
Jonathan 2. I heard
then), but now I've transitioned to using maildir with postfix (no
procmail) and am happy, but what the hell, maybe I'll give qmail another
try.
So my recommendation to the original questioner is this ... try both qmail
and postfix. See which one suits your fancy. Use it. Just please don't use
sendmail grin
I was just wondering, which of the two email servers do people enjoy? I've
read a bit on qmail and it looks pretty good, but I'm not sure how people
respond to postfix? This is to run about 3,000 or so email accounts. BTW,
this is my first email server I'm running, so I'm hoping either of the two
I've seen qmail in action, and am running Postfix...I've been pretty
happy with Postfix, to this point.
On Thu, 30 Nov 2000 14:52:20 -0800 (PST), Chris Cho wrote:
I was just wondering, which of the two email servers do people enjoy? I've
read a bit on qmail and it looks pretty good, but I'm not
Chris Cho wrote:
I was just wondering, which of the two email servers do people enjoy? I've
read a bit on qmail and it looks pretty good, but I'm not sure how people
respond to postfix? This is to run about 3,000 or so email accounts. BTW,
this is my first email server I'm running, so I'm hoping
that use sendmail (and we do have a few of those :-).
Our php programmer found a wrapper of some sort for Qmail/Php, but we decided the
benifits of postfix outweighed qmail.
For what it's worth
JW
At 09:13 PM 11/30/2000 -0600, you wrote:
Chris Cho wrote:
I was just wondering, which
14:52:20 -0800 (PST)
From: Chris Cho [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: postfix or qmail
I was just wondering, which of the two email servers do people enjoy? I've
___
Redhat-list mailing list
[EMAIL
31 matches
Mail list logo
