There is a key difference between penumbral rights and structures the Constitution protects without direct mention, and an official recognition of God. The Constitution has provisions that directly protect rights of privacy, for example, even though the right itself is not named. There is little
s who plan to be doing business overseas.
Thank you for anything you can offer,
Ed Darrell
Dallas, TexasPaul Diamond [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My name is Paul Diamond; I am a British barrister who works in the field of religious rights in the UK/Europe. I am affliliated with a Cambridge College.
as for the educational achievement of the kids affected.
Ed Darrell
DallasMarty Lederman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dahlia Lithwick in Slate on current released-time programs in Virginia and elsewhere: http://slate.msn.com/id/2113611/.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit recently upheld a New
case. Those choices deserve no less respect than the small minority of dissidents who want out.
Ed Darrell
DallasEd Brayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Isn't there something to be said for accommodation? Here comes big old bully State, grabs parents by the lapels
What federal building in Washington has something that would need to be sandblasted off? I spent a decade looking, and didn't find anything.
Ed Darrell
Dallas (now)[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 3/1/2005 6:26:28 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I hesitate
And isn't that exactly what deTocqueville said he found?
Ed Darrell
Dallas"A.E. Brownstein" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marci, of course, is more than capable of speaking for herself. But I would think that the reference to religious "intensity of belief" that thrives in an envi
solemnizers allows marriage performers to use many different reasons to refuse to perform any particular marriage, even unsavory and against-public-policy reasons.
Ed Darrell
Dallas
Jean Dudley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm of the mind that the recent decision from Judge Robert Kramer in California
Americans not already separated marriage from the church, in large measure? One bridal website I found said there are about 2.4 million marriages in the U.S. annually. I haven't found a comparison, but I'd bet about 60% are outside any church. Does anyone have a bead on more solid statistics?
Ed
with condemning the action on private grounds. Perry's actions violate the Four-Square policy of the Rotary Clubs International, for example. I find they violate the Scout Law (Perry is an Eagle Scout).
And what appeared to me to be an intentional affront to Jews was extremely poor taste.
Ed
s at Judge McConnell in order to improve his chances?
Ed Darrell
Dallas"Conkle, Daniel O." [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/07/01/politics/01cnd-oconnor.html ___To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.eduTo subscribe,
or givers of laws.
It's been my observation that the displays that get into trouble are those that don't feature the pagans, animists, Jews, Moslems, atheists and French whose contributions help our laws today. One might make a case that they are bad because they do not accurately show the history.
Democrat Party" in error. It shows pique and little regard for history and fair discussion. Arthur V. Watkins and others of honor will, in this author's view, remain a Republican.
It's not the "Republic Pary," either.
Smiling all the time,
Ed Darrell
Dallas, by way of Columbia Falls,
and Ronald Reagan, for example), and the non-political requirements of a 501(c)(3) where it is an officer of the organization either urging or ordering members to act politically.
Ed Darrell
Dallas[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps you'd be interested in this news story: "The Internal Revenue Se
, instead.
Does anyone have a reference to a serious attempt to re-establish a church after 1778, in any of the colonies?
Ed Darrell
DallasGene Garman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unfortunately, Steve's suggested "problem" is erroneous and a distortion. I never said the First Amendment when writt
efferson's view. Not toleration.
Ed Darrell
Dallas[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 7/28/2005 7:43:08 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm not sure why it is implied that one's oath to God is false or rather to a false God unless one's hand is on the Bible. How can a plurali
of Rights, Madison's views on what the law should be never varied.
Ed Darrell[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 7/29/2005 4:31:28 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Everybody's included, in Jefferson's view. Not toleration
Okay. Now that evidences the possibility
informed by history, I think it's quite clear.
Ed Darrell
Dallas
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 7/29/2005 6:33:44 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Any alternativeargument must have Madison flip-flopping on religious freedom, and I don't think there is any
any branch of government or a quasi-governmental body to act in religion.
Beyond the First Amendment, generally the government is silent about religious _expression_, and has been mostly silent since 1789.
Ed Darrell
DallasFrancis Beckwith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gene:Isnt there something
to teach creationism; that was the basis for the judgment against the Louisiana statute in Edwards v. Aguillard, which the Supreme Court agreed with in 1987.
In the current controversies, the proposal is to put intelligent design into biology classes.
Ed Darrell
Dallas[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
tradition, and by several different laws. Curriculum is a local issue.
Ed Darrell
Dallas[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There was a story in yesterday's NYT about a group placing "Bible" classes in various public schools. Apparently, the content includes assertions about intelligent design
em stick.
Biology books teach evolution agnostically, with no reference to origins other than a history of the planet geologically and a factual listing of the research on the conditions scientists find necessary for early life. It is that agnostic teaching exactly that the critics find offensiv
But isn't that exactly what the First Amendment means when it says "Congress shall make no law?" It's not odd at all, to me. It is historically, patriotically, and liberty-confirminglycomforting.
Ed Darrell'
DallasFrancis Beckwith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ed:Cause and effect co
Bible course. Dr. Paterson's criticisms strike me as quite valid.
Has this course ever been seriously challenged in court? What is the record of its surviving challenge on constitutional issues? If there has been no court test, it may be that Mr. Bradley's letter has simply scared off not-well-pr
s. Of course that's impossible if some people take a religious stand contrary to history, or science, or literature that is taught in the public schools. I can hope.
We need to concentrate on liberty, and be careful that we don't start defending license.
Ed Darrell
DallasRick Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED] w
frustrates their religion, them's the breaks.
We have methods for determining good science from bad, or current science from disproven science. Those methods work fine with ID.
Ed Darrell
DallasRick Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any scientific theory that needs bad constitutional law to protect it
, and fishes.
Ed Darrell
Dallas[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 8/19/2005 5:50:57 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We have methods for determining good science from bad, or current science from disproven science.
Here we agree and disagree. Utter silence from
nce issues, I think. In a fair fight, the evidence is solidly in back of Darwinian ideas.
Ed Darrell
Dallas[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 8/19/2005 6:02:46 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What I have seenis a concerted effort to debunk ID's claim to be science.
blic health are rife with stories of goofs that led to evolution of newer and hardier breeds of germs and the insects and vermin who carry them. Keeping to the old Hippocratic Oath standard of, "First, do no harm," becomes more difficult the more we know and the tougher diseases become.
Ed
such commentaries assume that science has been demonstrated, but that assumption has not been borne out in any court, and I don't think it can be.
Ed Darrell
Dallas
Rick Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Edwards did not hold that "creation science" could not be taught in the govt school
able to ID advocates, I think. A fair curriculum would of necessity expose the manifold errors of ID, and ID advocates would protest. That's why high school biology texts take it so easy on creationism now.
Creationists need courses in evidence in civil procedure, not Constitutional law.
Ed Darrell
. There remain some areas where information and education are still our best tools against disease.
Ed Darrell
DallasRick Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does Sandy now agree with me that male on male anal sodomy is "victim-causing" behavior? If so, then the law could rationally go after th
rd members in Pennsylvania, too. As an active and practicing Christian, I have difficulty figuring out what these peole say is offensive in evolution. That is evidence again that it's a sectarian issue, and not one of science.
Ed Darrell
DallasFrancis Beckwith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ed:Its not clear
evidence.
Ed Darrell
DallasNewsom Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark, with due respect, I don't think that there is an equivalence here.The news reports about students being driven away from science rest onempirical data. There is no empirical data that the questioner at thebeginning of the NYT
.org/docs2/news/fedsdropcase01042303.htmFrankOn 8/23/05 6:35 PM, "Ed Darrell"
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In 2003 the Justice Department investigated a report of religious discrimination at Texas Tech University, where a popular and tough biology professor required students to pass his class
t Calculus is not considered automatically as having understood the subject well enough to avoid taking it as the university teaches it. A bad calculus book can sink a kid's hopes for advanced placement in calculus. Why wouldn't a good university apply similar standards to other courses?
Ed Darrell
Dallas[EMAIL
Jim, do you mean like Mormons and Moslems who do not accept communism on religious reasons? No, they don't get a pass on the parts of the history or economics exams that deal with communism.
Are there other examples?
Ed Darrell
DallasJames Maule [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Question 6 (followup
presentation may be made by the Chaplain in charge, if necessary."
Here's their website: http://www.gideons.org/faq.html
Ed Darrell
DallasGordon James Klingenschmitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The mass distribution of Bibles to new recruits is generally done by Chaplains, in the chapel
the street, away from the government hall, forprayer and a sermon. I think Judge Dement would have approved of that, too.
Surely there should be no less separation after incorporation.
We can learn a lot from history.
Ed Darrell
Dallas[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 9/1/2005 4:11:37
of the problems Judge Dement noted in the earlier case.
Let's not get distracted by unlikely hypotheticals. North Carolina, Florida, Texas, and other coastal areas can still be saved, with action.
Ed Darrell
Dallas[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The wall is the central metaphor defining the meaning and work
But don't forget Roberts' time as clerk, and his Washington experience. Plus, soon there will be another new justice, with less time on the Court than Roberts has. There will be a shuffling of relationships, and a lot of new ties formed (and rather quickly, everyone hopes).
The big question
How are we counting Cardozo?
Ed DarrellRick Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now that the President has nominated Roberts for CJ, any predictions on who will be nominated to fill O'C's seat?
Here is mine--Judge Emilio Garza of the 5th Circuit (New Orleans).
This is a political 3-base hit--Garza
ADF is larger than ACLU now? Amazing.
Ed Darrell
DallasRick Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here is an ADF press release concerning a victory in a public school censorship case:
On with the show: ADF secures student's right to dance to religious music Once-censored song back in play for high
.
Ed Darrell
Dallas[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jim, of course, has taken my points out of context. When a recruit seeks out a chaplain for information about the chaplain's religion, that is entirely different from a chaplain engaging in proselytization on his or her own initiative. As Doug so rightly
without objection.
Duncanville's school lawyers may be more up on the law than other school lawyers.
Ed Darrell
Dallas (Duncanville ISD, by the way)"Volokh, Eugene" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
An amusing little incident; thanks to Becky Dale for thepointer:http://www.potomacnews.com/servlet
religious freedoms.
Without additional action to infer religious intent on the part of the band director, I think it would be difficult to maintain a case that a marching band's instrumental music violates the reasonable separation of church and state.
Ed Darrell
Dallas[EMAIL PROTEC
You graduated from Cornell, and moved to Kentucky?
Cornell's student paper has had several ID pieces in the last year. Is it a bit of a campus controversy? Rawlings seems eminently rational on the issue. Watch for attacks from the ID camp.
And thanks for the URL.
Ed[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My apologies to the list. Wrong Art. Wrong list. I need more coffee.
Ed DarrellEd Darrell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You graduated from Cornell, and moved to Kentucky?
___
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe,
ed in the Nebraskans singing Texas aspect,
Ed Darrell
DallasRick Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess I don't understand the difference between "speech on a religious topic" and a "religious service." The "services" I attend most Sundays involve announcemen
, that this case is still in the system.
Ed Darrell
Dallas[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Isn't the key question whether the public schools rent to groups 52 weeks/year for long periods of time? Many of the church-planting initiatives involve using the school the entire weekend, or at least almost all
ience is taught, why not simply disclaim that religious view and leave the science alone? Surely it would be within the law for a governmental agency to note that it makes no religious endorsement in a given case, in support of Constitutional principles.
Ed Darrell
Dallas
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
bama's law. If evolution critics want to make a label to avoid religious offense while withstanding judicial scrutiny, they need to compose a warning that avoids religious defense, too.!
sp;
There's the rub.
Ed Darrell
Dallas"Volokh, Eugene" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I think that man
to subvert the legal machinery rather than go into the lab. Shakespeare was right about tangled webs. In nature, of course, we don't find tangled webs. Judge Jones saw that, and noted it accurately. IMHO, of course.Ed Darrell Dallas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Although I do not disagree
separately by two newspapers and captured on videotape. Judge Jones was probably wise to include this statement about the defendants' testimony, as a help for appellate courts.Ed Darrell DallasBrad M Pardee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The judge wrote, "Those who disagree with our ho
l. I think Judge Jones' standing up for high standards on this issue is a good thing.Ed Darrell Dallas[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Unfortunately, Ed Darrell distorts my post. I never said or implied that Kuhn's theory of sciencefavors intelligent!
design
in any way at all." What
, and spades as spades!
.
Judge Jones' carefully labeling a lie as a lie should leave no question, at least.Ed Darrell DallasBrad Pardee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Perhaps. If he had stopped at saying he believed they lied, that would be one thing. When the judge throws in the accusation
d outcomes.Ed Darrell Dallas[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:In a message dated 12/21/2005 8:42:58 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Interesting that you think that a judge's job does not include being aware of the political impact of his or her decision! Am
nce of any possible answer to that question points to the lack of science behind ID. That is the whole issue.Ed Darrell DallasPerry Dane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Robert Lipkin wrote:I would argue that Steve's inference from the facts of "disease, war,violence, inequity, inequality, stupidity
by school boards that micromanage, either. Ed Darrell DallasSteven Jamar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: so!
mething
can be true without being the full truth.2+2 = 4. That is true.But it does a poor job of fully describing nature. Or math.Setve On Dec 21, 2005, at 2:06 PM, Perry Dane
In the Mermelstein case in California, the judge took judicial note of the accuracy of the history of the Holacaust. Was there a number mentioned in that decision?Ed Darrell DallasPaul Finkelman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: fair enough; I am just trying to get Larry Darby to explain his position
Compare the Alabama "moment of silence" case with Brown v. Georgia. Does that qualify?Ed Darrell Dallas"Conkle, Daniel O." [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've been asked the following question and don't have a good answer: Do you know of a case from any court where a
valid reason to want to contradict so much science -- valid secular or religious reason?I haven't had my coffee yet. I may be missing problems with the language, but that's my first reaction.Ed Darrell Dallas "Gibbens, Daniel G."
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Belowisdraft language fora
, and in the prac!
tice of
law. Will the legislature be in session when the science changes? I don't think a case is yet made that current systems are inadequate to determine what is known by science and what gets put in the textbooks.Ed Darrell Dallas"Gibbens, Daniel G." [EMAIL
sk, Eugene? Is this a wholly hypothetical situation (I hope)?Ed Darrell DallasAlan Brownstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think the answer to this question depends on what the Scouts believeand why they require a belief in G-d and reverence to G-d as a conditionfor membership. If the conditio
for leaders only.Ed Darrell DallasPaul Diamond [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A problem is that the Govt. enters the 'moral arena' in an ideological (not societal sense)in which a particular viewpoint is promoted. (ie. homosexuality is good, or not good). Either position tempers opposition.Thus, whilst
is already the law?Ed Darrell DallasSteven Jamar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: is this much different from Reagan's [in]famous proclamation that !
we are
Christian country? The resolution seems not to be any sort of law with impact -- just some hortatory language about how school-sponsored prayer
argument?Ed Darrell DallasPaul Finkelman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Creches on public property are only legal if surrounded by Santa,!
a few
clowns, candy canes and enough other junk to destroy the religious meaing; the 10 commandments on texas lawn was legal only becauase it is "not s
are? And, by the way -- do you know of any city that has put up a gay pride banner? How many times has this happened?Ed Darrell DallasRick Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:I read the text of the Mo resolution, and what I read there between the linesis notso much thedesire to make Christianity the national
how lawyers for each side might argue it affects such a case.Ed Darrell Dallas"David E. Guinn" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote (inter alia):This strikes me as theologically incoherent as well as constitutionally troubling (though more in terms of constitutional morality rathe
is not enough to preserve religious rights against a mob. I'm deeply troubled by that.Ed Darrell DallasRick Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Here is the way I look at it. "One poor kid" tried to censor his classmates with the help of a powerful legal ally, the ACLU.His clas
the issue.But it would be a good plot device for a novel: Murderer commits the crime in front of an atheist, then moves to disqualify the eyewitness account at trial on the basis of Article 19 of the Alabama Constitution . . .Ed Darrell DallasJoel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:From
't live up to the same high standards? Why not
follow the example of our founders, and avoid insulting the faiths of others?Ed Darrell DallasGordon James Klingenschmitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Perhaps Marty's right about one thing...our modern "enlightened" reading of the Constitution
for a church congregation to
watch an NFL game, but I wonder if the NFL hasn't overreached here, just a bit.
Your opinions?
Ed Darrell
Dallas
Louisville Courier-Journal:
http://www.courier-journal.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070201/SPORTS/70201053
Indianapolis Star
for the refreshments, how would I calculate
the dollar value of the different alternatives open?
Ed Darrell
Dallas
David E. Guinn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are several policy and politics issues arising in this
exception:
1) The reason that businesses have better
bellyache much more about
being only the second largest state in the union in land area, Alaska will
petition for splitting, making Texas the third largest. Not much chance of
that, either.
Ed Darrell
Dallas
Paul Finkelman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
alternatively, Texas admission can
who could explain
why there's little effect, if that's the case?
Ed Darrell
Dallas
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just an informational item.
The Department of Defense on June 19 withdrew from publication in the
CFR the regulations concerning conscientious objection, previously
found
it? If
West Virginia doesn't have a Blaine amendment in its constitution, doesn't its
state constitution require it, too?
Ed Darrell
Dallas
Volokh, Eugene [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any thoughts on this?
http://www.foxnews.com/wires/2007Aug25/0,4670,ReligionLawsuitScholarship
,00.html
of questions in elders' quorums,
queries from potential spouses' parents, and the general disapproval of
everyone a person knows, would think it's a voluntary sort of thing that is
optional, and no big deal.
People are encouraged to breathe, but it's not required . . .
Ed Darrell
Dallas
Brad
I thought it was a good discussion for the list. Drat!
Ed Darrell
Dallas
Steven Jamar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My apologies to the list -- I have no
idea how or why google put this
address into this private email!
Some bug in gmail I've run into once before.
Steve
On 9/23/07, Will Linden
Just out of curiosity, what happens in a hypothetical if the family of the
soldier claims the funeral is a religious service which deserves special
protection from such disruption? Let's assume the family has a long record of
attending church -- oh, heck, let's assume the soldier is himself a
what I get for responding while on hold with a government agency I was
arguing with.
Ed Darrell
Dallas
Steven Jamar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm sorry, Ed, but I'm missing the
problem. Free exercise or free
speech -- is that the conflict you are positing as in conflict? If
so, I assume
almost 8 minutes):
http://www.fdrlibrary.marist.edu/real/decwarsp.rm
Here's the text from the FDR Library:
http://www.fdrlibrary.marist.edu/decwart.html
That's the one Congress got.
Ed Darrell
Dallas
Alan Leigh Armstrong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have heard (hearsay) someone
say that FDR gave
think it's dropping,
in fact. Anybody got a current statistic?
Ed Darrell
Working in Dallas to get the curriculum planned out for 2008-2009, no thanks to
the State School Board
Gordon James Klingenschmitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ed writes about teaching
about the Bible (as an optional elective
grateful to say. Not my homework, either.
What should the parents do?
Ed Darrell
Dallas
___
To post, send message to Religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
To subscribe, unsubscribe, change options, or get password, see
http://lists.ucla.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo
No, I don't know the child's age. I am assuming, due to the nature of the
assignment, that the child is in a grade below 6th.
Interesting responses on this one. A lot of light in a very dark area.
Ed Darrell
Dallas
James Maule [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:I don't think
investigative boards (like the National
Conference of Bar Examiners, or whatever name it goes by these days), federal
regulation of hospitals and procedures, etc., etc.
A student's hair length is almost anarchic, in contrast.
Ed Darrell
Dallas
--- On Wed, 7/28/10, Paul Finkelman paul.finkel...@yahoo.com
line of work.
Ed Darrell
Dallas
--- On Wed, 7/28/10, Rick Garnett rgarn...@nd.edu wrote:
From: Rick Garnett rgarn...@nd.edu
Subject: Re: Augusta State University student sues school over requirement that
she undergo remediation due to her religious views
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
speech
contest?
Or am I barking up a telephone pole here?
Ed Darrell
Dallas
--- On Fri, 3/4/11, Volokh, Eugene vol...@law.ucla.edu wrote:
From: Volokh, Eugene vol...@law.ucla.edu
Subject: RE: Harassment
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
Date: Friday, March
scheduled the game to fit it in. Good, good news.
Ed Darrell
Dallas
From: Alan Brownstein aebrownst...@ucdavis.edu
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
Sent: Fri, March 2, 2012 3:35:05 PM
Subject: RE: Basketball tournaments
I once wrote to Milton Friedman to ask for examples he knew of where vouchers
had worked. I needed them for speeches I was writing.
Never did get an answer.
Is he the guy the Friedman Foundation is named for ?
Ed Darrell
Dallas
From: Pybas, Kevin M
Color photo here:
http://www.freedomforum.org/graphics/2000/09/photos/lemon.alton.9.21.00.jpg
Is it Alton T. Lemon?
Ed Darrell
Dallas
From: William Janssen wjans...@charlestonlaw.edu
To: religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
Sent: Tue, March
Good news, for a change!
If I had a dime for every time a rumor about some new form of repression from
the right turned out to be false, I'd have easily $1.50 t $2.00.
Ed Darrell
From: Steven Jamar stevenja...@gmail.com
To: Law Religion issues for Law
All he needs to do is decline the policy offered. This is not a case in
controversy. I predict dismissal.
Ed Darrell
Dallas
From: Penalver, Eduardo penal...@uchicago.edu
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu
Sent: Thursday
restaurants
for less than 50 cents. They chose the coffee.
He said with a wink that it was not a sin if he didn't enjoy it, too much.
There are alternative solutions well short of the legal system for a lot of
these issues, it seems to me.
Ed Darrell
Dallas
From
of reality like that seems
to me to fall into Sloth and Pride, especially when coming from theologians.
Sitting on the razor in my Texas congregation,
Ed Darrell
Dallas
On Sunday, September 28, 2014 9:45 PM, Finkelman, Paul
paul.finkel...@albanylaw.edu wrote:
[I posted this earlier
religious claims
against evolution.
So they shouldn't be made in science classes, by honest people of faith. IMHO.
Your mileage shouldn't vary.
Ed Darrell
Dallas
On Tuesday, September 30, 2014 6:36 AM, Eric Treene etre...@comcast.net wrote:
Marc also was asking about the flip side
government accommodation of speech or religion.
Ed Darrell
Dallas
From: "Volokh, Eugene" <vol...@law.ucla.edu>
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics <religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2015 7:53 PM
Subject: RE: Muslim-focused "refle
), the most
complaints we got was on chapel signage. Passengers found it difficult to
figure out where they were.
Ed Darrell
Dallas
From: Alan E Brownstein <aebrownst...@ucdavis.edu>
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics <religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, Oct
religious verse citations listed
on the soft-drink cups at In-n-Out Burgers.
Ed Darrell
Dallas
From: Justin Butterfield <jbutterfi...@libertyinstitute.org>
To: Law & Religion issues for Law Academics <religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2015 12:
m: Alan E Brownstein <aebrownst...@ucdavis.edu>
To: Ed Darrell <edarr...@sbcglobal.net>; Law & Religion issues for Law
Academics <religionlaw@lists.ucla.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2015 3:28 PM
Subject: RE: Muslim-focused "reflection room" in ai
How does Congress get around the first requirement of laws on religion, that
"Congress shall make no law?"
Interesting question, but like the computer said in War Games, perhaps "the
only way to win is not to play."
Ed DarrellDallas
From: Steven Jamar
To:
100 matches
Mail list logo