On Wed, 05 Dec 2007 23:29:00 +0100 Dick Gevers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 18:50:33 +, Dick Gevers wrote about Re:
For anyone interested: it was indeed a kernel bug, discovered due
to use of unhide and is now fixed.
Thanks for dealing with this problem!
Best regards,
Gordy wrote:
Thanks for the accuracy and amount of feedback on the issue I raised
earlier. But I confess I
should have read the man page more closely as you already mentioned
the r switch.
I may get around to write a mini howto but to refreshmy last
email stated My objective is to
I've been meaning to ask this since rkh 1.3.0 came out, but never got
around to it.
When one of the checked binaries changes, obviously a warning appears,
which goes away if I run rkh with '--propupd'.
There's one set of exceptions:
[23:50:37] /bin/rpm [
On Thu, 2007-12-06 at 17:49 +, Dick Gevers wrote:
I've been meaning to ask this since rkh 1.3.0 came out, but never got
around to it.
When one of the checked binaries changes, obviously a warning appears,
which goes away if I run rkh with '--propupd'.
There's one set of exceptions:
John Horne wrote:
On Thu, 2007-12-06 at 23:50 +0800, Uwe Dippel wrote:
Please, please bring back a default mail pointing to the reason for
the warning !
I'm a bit lost with this. What was the default mail that you used to
receive before? Have you used the '--report-warnings-only' option?
On Fri, 2007-12-07 at 09:22 +1100, Dave wrote:
John Horne wrote:
On Thu, 2007-12-06 at 23:50 +0800, Uwe Dippel wrote:
Please, please bring back a default mail pointing to the reason for
the warning !
I'm a bit lost with this. What was the default mail that you used to
receive before?
On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 21:42:53 +, John Horne wrote about Re:
[Rkhunter-users] baffling warning:
Hmm, this doesn't make much sense. The warnings are caused by the RPM
package manager saying that the files are NOT correct.
Yes, but the rpmdb changes when packages are upgraded. So rkh needs a new
Dick Gevers wrote:
On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 21:42:53 +, John Horne wrote about Re:
[Rkhunter-users] baffling warning:
Can you run 'rpm
-Vf /usr/bin/who' and let me know what the output is (if any) please.
Of course:
# rpm -Vf /usr/bin/who
S.5T c /etc/DIR_COLORS
S.5T c /etc/pam.d/su
On Fri, 7 Dec 2007 00:15:32 +0100, Nils Breunese (Lemonbit) wrote about Re:
[Rkhunter-users] baffling warning:
Of course:
# rpm -Vf /usr/bin/who
S.5T c /etc/DIR_COLORS
S.5T c /etc/pam.d/su
.MG./usr/bin/who
Looks okay to me. But I'll appreciate any ideas.
For the first
On Thu, 2007-12-06 at 23:01 +, Dick Gevers wrote:
On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 21:42:53 +, John Horne wrote about Re:
[Rkhunter-users] baffling warning:
Hmm, this doesn't make much sense. The warnings are caused by the RPM
package manager saying that the files are NOT correct.
Yes, but the
On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 23:57:05 +, John Horne wrote about Re:
[Rkhunter-users] baffling warning:
If you look at the 'rpm' man page, under the verification section it
will tell you what the various letters mean. For the 'who' file the
mode/permissions and group ownership have changed from what
11 matches
Mail list logo
