Re: [Rails] Why do basic forms not work in Rails 6 without binding events to each form?

I understand your complain, what I'm saying is that I have some rails 6 projects using form_for remote and form_with and I didn't have to bind to the ajax events. rails-ujs and jquery_ujs both expect you to render a view with .js format and both libraries executes your response's javascript. Are

[Rails] Re: Why do basic forms not work in Rails 6 without binding events to each form?

I don't think you can blame Rails 6 for that. It is a weird default, but it is like that from the very beginning. I never use the method, so, I guess, it can be considered as somewhat obscure. It seems to appear in Rails version 5.1 and no change since. Normally, I would use ActiveModel for a

[Rails] Delayed job :: URGENT

Hi, I am bit confused in rails delayed job 1) what is workers 2) what is process? 3) both workers and processes are same ??? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails

[Rails] Delayed job::WORKERS

Hi, I have around 25000, records and I want to save it into database using rails delayed job. but its taking around 45-50 min, can anyone suggest me how can I do it faster. Thanks. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To

Re: [Rails] Delayed job::WORKERS

https://github.com/zdennis/activerecord-import may be helpful to you, Shubham. On Tue, 18 Feb 2020 at 22:21, Shubham Thakur wrote: > Hi, > > I have around 25000, records and I want to save it into database using > rails delayed job. > > but its taking around 45-50 min, can anyone suggest me how

Re: [Rails] Why do basic forms not work in Rails 6 without binding events to each form?

Can you share some code to reproduce the problem? (a github repo with a simple rais app would be greate) El mar., 18 feb. 2020 a las 14:24, Ariel Juodziukynas () escribió: > I have a few rails 6 projects and remote forms works out of the box with > no event binding. Can you reproduce that

Re: [Rails] Why do basic forms not work in Rails 6 without binding events to each form?

And also (sorry for the multiple responses), you are showing jquery code, rails moved out of jquery a long time ago (I think docs are outdated though), something might be wrong with your setup. El mar., 18 feb. 2020 a las 14:25, Ariel Juodziukynas () escribió: > Can you share some code to

Re: [Rails] redirect shown in log, but browser not redirecting

Nicholas, With all due respect, if you "wrote the docs on form_with," I would refer you to my previous thread in which I am complaining about Turbolinks being default (I think it shouldn't be). You will also note that the only place local: true appears on the form_with documentation is in a

Re: [Rails] Why do basic forms not work in Rails 6 without binding events to each form?

Incorrect. You HAVE to bind your Ajax events, or else there is no functionality. (the page does not refresh and gives no user interaction). I do not think that expecting user interaction is an abnormal expectation in a modern web app. On Sunday, February 16, 2020 at 5:39:20 PM UTC-5, Ariel

Re: [Rails] Why do basic forms not work in Rails 6 without binding events to each form?

I have a few rails 6 projects and remote forms works out of the box with no event binding. Can you reproduce that problem with a clean rails app? maybe you have some other js messing up rails' ajax handers. El mar., 18 feb. 2020 a las 14:22, Momeas Interactive () escribió: > Incorrect. You HAVE

Re: [Rails] Why do basic forms not work in Rails 6 without binding events to each form?

Yes, I was discussing this in the Slack channel yesterday in the #coding room You're right that Rails no longer installs JQUery by default, but lots of things just go ahead and encourage it anyway. (which Is fine and not what I'm complaining about) This guide, for example, as I said above,

Re: [Rails] //= require stylesheet with webpacker

Fugee- when you switch from css to scss, you need to rename application.css to application.scss and do the following: *stop using //= require* instead use @import always and from now on when using scss. Do not use *//= require *syntax anymore this is explained in the "IMPORTANT NOTE" at the

[Rails] Re: Setting model association `source_type` to polymorphic object

I don't think polymorphism in Rails can work that way did you try `has_many :users_following, through: :active_relationships, source: :followable, source_type: "FollowableUser"` `has_many :projects_following, through: :active_relationships, source: :followable, source_type:

[Rails] Re: Setting model association `source_type` to polymorphic object

On Tuesday, February 18, 2020 at 6:59:15 PM UTC+1, Momeas Interactive wrote: > > I don't think polymorphism in Rails can work that way > > did you try > > > `has_many :users_following, through: :active_relationships, source: > :followable, source_type: "FollowableUser"` > > `has_many