Hi Pete,
Watch out for today's spam storm -- it's a lot bigger than we've seen
in a long while. 48 hour image attached.
This has low priority but. I've tried to find a live version of that
graph you've sent but I cannot find it at
Nothing too out of the ordinary here - ~17,000 blocked messages between
10-11 AM EST. Yesterday same time frame was ~16,000.
- greg
-Original Message-
From: Message Sniffer Community [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Computer House Support
Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2006 10:35 AM
To:
For a couple days I have seen a increase in general spam (lots of male
enhancements), but particularly Nigerian letters.
John C
-Original Message-
From: Message Sniffer Community [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Computer House Support
Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2006 9:35 AM
To: Message
Tuesday, May 23, 2006, 10:35:01 AM, you wrote:
Dear Sniffer Friends,
Our servers are really getting slammed with spam. Is anyone else seeing a
hugh spam storm right now?
Hello Michael Sniffer Folks,
http://reports.messagesniffer.com/Performance/FlowRates.jsp
Logs since about 0523.0100
in the IMail archive and/or the
IMail knowledge base.
Bill
-Original Message-
From: Glenn Ratliff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 29, 2005 6:15 PM
To: 'sniffer@SortMonster.com'
Subject: RE: [sniffer] Spam Storm Alert...
This is question is a little off subject, but do you
Hmmm, a day and a half later this shows up on the list...???
Bill
-Original Message-
From: Landry William
Sent: Saturday, January 29, 2005 6:51 PM
To: sniffer@SortMonster.com
Subject: RE: [sniffer] Spam Storm Alert...
My only suggestion for QM is to disable DNS Cache and Failed Domain
31, 2005 9:19 AM
To: sniffer@SortMonster.com
Subject: RE: [sniffer] Spam Storm Alert...
Hmmm, a day and a half later this shows up on the list...???
Bill
-Original Message-
From: Landry William
Sent: Saturday, January 29, 2005 6:51 PM
To: sniffer@SortMonster.com
Subject: RE: [sniffer] Spam
This is question is a little off subject, but do you have any
recommendations for Imail queue manager settings? We are running Sniffer
with declude 1.82 under Imail 8.15 and the server seems to bog down
sometimes.
Thanks,
Glenn
--
From: Pete McNeil[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For what it's worth, I'm definitely seeing an increase in volume over
the weekend (double the spam, actually), and I believing it is tapering
off already.
In addition to the volume of separate messages, the number of recipients
is generally up.
The messages look generally like the kind of jobs
At 01:57 AM 3/26/2004, you wrote:
I once noticed that transferring data through TCP/IP is NOT error-free, if
the connection is very slow. At least not if it is going through Microsoft's
software (Windows).
Me 2.
One possibility that has been suggested is that we could gzip these files.
That
]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 26, 2004 2:17 AM
Subject: RE: [sniffer] Spam storm?
At 02:50 AM 3/26/2004, you wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Pete McNeil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Normally our bandwidth is sufficient. We have considered mirror sites
also,
and we have plans
At 03:39 AM 3/26/2004, you wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Pete McNeil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Since we're both up at this insane hour. Would you mind making a test?
I've just shut down the Sprint line - so we're running through Savvis
exclusively. If I'm right about the connectivity
At 07:42 AM 3/26/04 -0500, Russ Uhte (Lists) wrote:
Pete,
Just wanted to interject a couple observations. I'm connected to the
Internet through a 15Mb frac ds/3 from ATT and a T1 from Sprint. I of
course of no way of telling which pipe our automated downloads are coming
from. However, I too
At 07:42 AM 3/26/2004, you wrote:
Pete,
Just wanted to interject a couple observations. I'm connected to the
Internet through a 15Mb frac ds/3 from ATT and a T1 from Sprint. I of
course of no way of telling which pipe our automated downloads are coming
from. However, I too have noticed
] Behalf Of Pete McNeil
Sent: Friday, March 26, 2004 8:53 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [sniffer] Spam storm?
At 07:42 AM 3/26/2004, you wrote:
Pete,
Just wanted to interject a couple observations. I'm connected to the
Internet through a 15Mb frac ds/3 from ATT and a T1 from Sprint. I
, Vice President
EI8HT LEGS Web Management Co., Inc.
http://www.getafreewebsite.com
877-483-3393
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kevin Stanford
Sent: Friday, March 26, 2004 10:22 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [sniffer] Spam storm?
I
It's starting to come together now.
Wget on windows + errors on the Sprint line since the move = corrupted
downloads for folks who end up routing through sprint along the way?
Could be.
We use Windows 2k, Wget and have our connection at our end from Sprint...
Sheldon
Sheldon Koehler,
: Sheldon Koehler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2004 3:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [sniffer] Spam storm?
Well it may not be a spam storm. Log file shows:
nsx4b3eh 20040324200108 De90392330028271a.SMD 421 0 ERROR_BAD_MATRIX 71 0 0
2 5
nsx4b3eh 20040324200117
This has been a bad week here!
A big increase in total email volume, a huge increase in false positives as
well as a huge increase in spam getting past our filters.
Sheldon
Sheldon Koehler, Owner/Partnerhttp://www.tenforward.com
Ten Forward Communications 360-457-9023
, 2004 6:05 PM
Subject: Re: [sniffer] Spam storm?
This helps narrow things down. Specifically we know that the rulebase files
are not corrupted on the server but during the download. That explains why
I haven't been able to recreate a problem in the lab.
I have a suspicion that wget may
PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2004 2:52 PM
Subject: Re: [sniffer] Spam storm?
Big uptick of new and broken spam.
Half way through the day and already at 445 new rules.
We may be getting it under control though... (fingers crossed).
_M
At 06:02 PM 3/24/2004, you wrote:
Am
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2004 8:43 PM
Subject: RE: [sniffer] Spam storm?
I see over a 1000 of these ERROR_BAD_MATRIX entries in my Sniffer log
file
today, as well. Is this due to the ruleset issue from earlier today?
Bill
-Original Message
, March 25, 2004 7:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [sniffer] Spam storm?
This helps narrow things down. Specifically we know that the rulebase files
are not corrupted on the server but during the download. That explains why
I haven't been able to recreate a problem in the lab.
I have a suspicion
]
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2004 8:43 PM
Subject: RE: [sniffer] Spam storm?
I see over a 1000 of these ERROR_BAD_MATRIX entries in my Sniffer
log file
today, as well. Is this due to the ruleset issue from earlier
today?
Bill
-Original Message-
From: Sheldon
At 06:51 PM 3/25/2004, you wrote:
Looks like a bandwidth issue to me, since even doing the download manually,
my connection stalled 5 times before I could complete a successful download.
And the download speeds were atrocious, many times in bytes/second rather
than even kb/second - and my
there will be no choice but to change the format in order
to prevent this possibility.
_M
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Pete McNeil
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2004 7:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [sniffer] Spam storm
26 matches
Mail list logo
