Just a small matter my ISP is soon to implement a program to screen out
spam. The program associates text all in capitals, as in Michael's letter
below, as spam and deletes it without sending it through to me. This one got
through but a previous one was marked as 'SPAM'. It got through
Bruce,
Thank you for your reply to mine, and sorry that I have not responded. I'm
still mulling over it.
Jessop
-
On Sunday 26 January 2003 10:57, you wrote:
At 09:22 AM 25/01/03 +0200,
Jessop Sutton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Subject: [SOCIAL CREDIT] P. W. Martin
Date
February 2003 03:41, you wrote:
Message 1.
I have interspersed my comments after each of your questions.
- Original Message -
From: Jessop Sutton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 01, 2003 10:21 PM
Subject: Re: [SOCIAL CREDIT] effective demand
Sorry to be a nuisance, but my system won't open .pdf files. Could you 'copy
'n paste' the text into the body of an e-mail for me?
Thanks
Jessop.
-
On Wednesday 05 February 2003 20:44, you wrote:
Attached is a reformatted version of the original that
My wish-list is based on suggestions I have made to leaders of political
parties, other individuals and institutions, over the years. I do not think
the aims are far removed from the aims of Social Credit, SANE, and other
contributors to this list. My suggestions are 'raw', as they would be
On Sunday 16 February 2003 21:33, Chick Hurst you wrote:
The problem of course is that we
have been fighting over the purity of the theory, or the exact following of
the theoretician and/or the theory, and what exactly they were trying to
get across, rather than learning from each and all and
of their operating capital.
Chick Hurst
- Original Message -
From: Jessop Sutton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 10:25 AM
Subject: [SOCIAL CREDIT] Some questioning
Myself when young did eagerly frequent
Doctor and Saint, and heard great argument
On Friday 21 February 2003 02:05, you wrote:
MB:
Churches will also adopt such principals. Hierarchies will be replaced by
assemblies of lay deacons who are hired by their congregations. Bishops
will not administer property or institutions, but will stick to teaching
and ministry. Freed
On Sunday 23 February 2003 11:07, Wally Klinck wrote:
Wally comments in reply to Sue's questions and observations:
I would sincerely suggest that before you engage in all sorts of
speculations and imaginings about Social Credit that you do a thorough
reading of authoritative Social Credit
I think my response to yours would be embodied in the following (rather
lengthy) posting to the SANE Network. Substantially I agree with the Pope
statement, but I do not see the philosophy is embodied in the organisation he
heads. The Pope and Cardinals, Bishops, etc is a political entity
need assistance in
the form of social pensions
Beneficiation, Wholesaler mark-up and Retailer mark-up
can be lower because no Tax provision
More money could be spent on control over SPENDING since
no money is spent on tax collection
Jessop Sutton.
E
Michael
I'm afraid you'll need to explain a bit further because I can't see how this
is how economy works -- at least, not in the way I interpret my own
experience.
If we do a Standstill at Time 0 :-
I am paid at Time 0
I go across the road and buy a chair at Time 0
The chair was completed in
There are times when I think I have the A + B theorem, and then I lose it
again. It becomes very confusing to a non-academic, but that shouldn't be so
because it affects us all equally. Can I just ask a couple of questions?
1. Supposing that new credit (new money) is authorised or issued only
13 matches
Mail list logo
