Johannes Renner wrote:
% On 06/04/2012 08:47 PM, Miroslav Suchy wrote:
% So here is the latest version of the patches.
%
% Committed (with some white space and check style fixes). Thanks for
contribution.
%
% Thank you very much, here is already a first follow up patch:
%
% Replace default
On 06/04/2012 08:47 PM, Miroslav Suchy wrote:
So here is the latest version of the patches.
Committed (with some white space and check style fixes). Thanks for
contribution.
Thank you very much, here is already a first follow up patch:
Replace default string with the new constant
On 29.5.2012 17:35, Johannes Renner wrote:
. Not sure if
I solved your quiz though,
Yes, you did :)
So here is the latest version of the patches.
Committed (with some white space and check style fixes). Thanks for
contribution.
Mirek
___
On 05/16/2012 01:33 PM, Johannes Renner wrote:
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/simple/%{name}-%{version}.zip
Thanks, I didn't know that. Changed it in our specfile as well.
Regards,
Johannes
We don't do it that way all the time, because sometimes we use bznew and
convert upstreams tar.gz
On 18.05.2012 17:11, Miroslav Suchy wrote:
Why default format (DiskFormat) does not show up in list of images. I
can see XEN, VMX in list, but not DiskFormat (which is probably usefull
for KVM).
Additionally I could not see Preloaded ISO and OVF image.
Is it filtered out on purposse.
the
On 05/21/2012 10:35 AM, Uwe Gansert wrote:
the reason we only support kvm and xen images
Ehm, how do you support KVM?
I anticipate that for KVM is supposed DiskImage format. But it does not
show up in Spacewalk WebUI, although it is created in SuseStudio.
--
Miroslav Suchy
Red Hat
On 21.05.2012 13:19, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
the reason we only support kvm and xen images
Ehm, how do you support KVM?
I anticipate that for KVM is supposed DiskImage format. But it does not
show up in Spacewalk WebUI, although it is created in SuseStudio.
with the vmware/virtualbox/kvm
On 05/21/2012 01:45 PM, Uwe Gansert wrote:
On 21.05.2012 13:19, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
the reason we only support kvm and xen images
Ehm, how do you support KVM?
I anticipate that for KVM is supposed DiskImage format. But it does not
show up in Spacewalk WebUI, although it is created in
On 05/18/2012 05:11 PM, Miroslav Suchy wrote:
I still have to test the client part.
in spec:
Requires: python-curl
In Fedora/RHEL the package is called python-pycurl, please fix it using %if
After image is scheduled, you land on:
/rhn/systems/details/virtualization/VirtualGuestsList.do
I
On 21.05.2012 14:15, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Any problem with DiskImage? Can you add it to list of valid Images?
hm, it's not so easy to add and I'm not sure if you really want that.
The disk image-type in Studio is an image type that boots, formats a
harddisk and then dumps itself onto the
On 05/21/2012 02:17 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
On 05/18/2012 05:11 PM, Miroslav Suchy wrote:
I still have to test the client part.
in spec:
Requires: python-curl
In Fedora/RHEL the package is called python-pycurl, please fix it using %if
No problem.
After image is scheduled, you land
On 21.5.2012 15:29, Uwe Gansert wrote:
The vmdk image (that we already support) is a complete virtual harddisk
that contains the image and can be booted directly by kvm.
Aha, I just find that too. It is not intuitive IMHO.
But OK.
Mirek
___
In patch 0001 - schema db - you are missing upgrades for table
suseCredentialsType.
And upgrades for table suseCredentials differs from clean install.
Mirek
___
Spacewalk-devel mailing list
Spacewalk-devel@redhat.com
On 05/18/2012 02:45 PM, Miroslav Suchy wrote:
In patch 0001 - schema db - you are missing upgrades for table
suseCredentialsType.
And upgrades for table suseCredentials differs from clean install.
Oh yeah, sorry, I forgot to revise the upgrade files. I can come up with another
patch fixing
On 18.5.2012 16:01, Johannes Renner wrote:
Oh yeah, sorry, I forgot to revise the upgrade files. I can come up with another
patch fixing that, or maybe rather with a new version of 0001.
New version of 0001.
But hold on, I will send another issues to fix, so you can fix it in one
bunch.
In WebUI patch please do s/SUSE Manager/@@PRODUCT_NAME@@/
When I enter credentials for Suse studio they are not validated. Can you
later add some code to do some validation? I.e. do tome test connection
and warn if it do not work?
Why default format (DiskFormat) does not show up in list of
On 05/15/2012 09:29 PM, Miroslav Suchy wrote:
On 15.5.2012 14:28, Johannes Renner wrote:
On 05/15/2012 01:25 PM, Miroslav Suchy wrote:
+Requires: susestudio-java-client
This will require susestudio-java-client rpm? It is not present in neither
in Fedora nor in
jpackage.
Can I take:
On 16.5.2012 11:01, Johannes Renner wrote:
I guess we could have some %if (0%?rhel/?suse_version) %else ... though, if
you prefer that.
Ok, I will put there %if and for license as well.
simple-xml.src: W: invalid-url Source0: simple-xml-2.6.2.zip
Fixed that and put a URL. Not a valid one
On 05/16/2012 12:49 PM, Miroslav Suchy wrote:
On 16.5.2012 11:01, Johannes Renner wrote:
I guess we could have some %if (0%?rhel/?suse_version) %else ... though,
if you prefer that.
Ok, I will put there %if and for license as well.
Good, let me see how that looks like and I will change add
On 16.5.2012 13:33, Johannes Renner wrote:
Good, let me see how that looks like and I will change add it to our package as
well.
--- simple-xml.spec.orig2012-05-16 16:36:42.0 +0200
+++ simple-xml.spec 2012-05-16 15:20:19.0 +0200
@@ -21,8 +21,13 @@
Summary:
On 15.5.2012 11:39, Johannes Renner wrote:
Hi Miroslav,
attached please find a new version of our patches. We considered most of your
advices,
see my comments below and the patches itself, of course.
Hi,
I spent just 10 minutes on preliminary review. Please give me few days
for complete
On 05/15/2012 01:25 PM, Miroslav Suchy wrote:
+Requires: susestudio-java-client
This will require susestudio-java-client rpm? It is not present in neither in
Fedora nor in jpackage.
Can I take:
On 15.5.2012 14:28, Johannes Renner wrote:
On 05/15/2012 01:25 PM, Miroslav Suchy wrote:
+Requires: susestudio-java-client
This will require susestudio-java-client rpm? It is not present in neither in
Fedora nor in jpackage.
Can I take:
On 04/13/2012 10:24 AM, Uwe Gansert wrote:
+def _md5(path):
Could not you flip to sha1 or sha256?:
I know that md5 is not state of the are anymore but we need to use that
because Studio provides the checksum in md5.
We should change that in Studio but for now it's like that.
OK. I expected
On 03/30/2012 04:46 PM, Johannes Renner wrote:
On 03/27/2012 02:53 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
I'm looking forward to see your patches.
Ok, here they are. They apply to spacewalk master and I tried to not forget
anything.
The last patch is about fixing checkstyle issues only, while the other
On 03/30/2012 04:46 PM, Johannes Renner wrote:
Oh yes, there is two new required jar files, while RPM packages + spec files
can be
found here:
-https://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=susestudio-java-clientproject=Java%3Abase
Hello,
We recently added a feature to our branch of Spacewalk that enables users to
deploy images that were built with SUSE Studio [1] to registered virtual host
systems.
The feature involves a new action type to be put in table rhnActionType, which
we chose to give the ID 500 for now (just to
Hi Johannes.
We recently added a feature to our branch of Spacewalk that enables users to
deploy images that were built with SUSE Studio [1] to registered virtual host
systems.
Will this feature be committed to the upstream or will it only be
available in the SUSE branch?
Bye, Christian.
--
On 03/27/2012 10:27 AM, Johannes Renner wrote:
The feature involves a new action type to be put in table rhnActionType, which
we chose to give the ID 500 for now (just to make sure there will be no clash in
the near future). Would you maybe want to provide us with an ID for this action
that we
On 03/27/2012 11:35 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
On 03/27/2012 10:27 AM, Johannes Renner wrote:
The feature involves a new action type to be put in table rhnActionType,
which
we chose to give the ID 500 for now (just to make sure there will be no
clash in
the near future). Would you maybe
30 matches
Mail list logo
