I hate correcting myself. You do not need the --export-all-symbols
Using it will cause all non-static symbols to be exported (even without a
specific dllexport) just like using -shared on unices.
---
Theory is when you know everything but nothing works. Practice is when
everything works but
This are basically compiler switches as far as I understand.
I am not a C programmer, so also quite difficult for me to link the library
statically.
This is what I can read about it here:
[
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/apps/jj657973.aspx#binscope_2
](
Please find here under the test results.
Best regards,
Maarten MOSTERT
28 Av Alphonse Denis
83400 Hy?res, France
+33 676411296
[ http://stakepoint.com/ ]( http://stakepoint.com/ )
==
Windows App Certification Kit - Test Results
Windows App
HI,
If I may...
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 4:25 PM, Richard Hipp wrote:
> On 4/2/15, Random Coder wrote:
>>
>> I'd recommend the SQLite team turn them on for the version of the DLL
>> they distribute, but I'm honestly not sure if there are negative side
>> effects to doing so.
>
> That's not
BTW, I have verified that these options all work as described and the options
are recognized and processed properly by Windows, and that BinScope is happy:
Failed checks
d:\source\sqlite\sqlite3.dll - SafeSEHCheck ( FAIL )
Passed checks
d:\source\sqlite\sqlite3.dll - NXCheck ( PASS )
add the following linker options with MinGW:
-static-libgcc -Wl,-Bstatic,--nxcompat,--dynamicbase,--export-all-symbols
You may or may not need -static-libgcc or the linker -Bstatic options unless
you are also enabling things that require MingW DLL runtime support (such as
using the -mthreads
Hi Everyone,
I am new here, and have a question.
For my application that relies on Sqlite I am seeking Windows 8 certification
in accordance with the following article.
[ https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/desktop/hh749939.aspx ](
2015-04-02 15:15 GMT+02:00 Richard Hipp :
> A draft of the 3.8.9 website is found at http://www.sqlite.org/draft/
> and in particular the change log can be seen at
> https://www.sqlite.org/draft/releaselog/3_8_9.html
I would have expected to find this change somewhere in the
release log:
On 4/2/15, Random Coder wrote:
>
> I'd recommend the SQLite team turn them on for the version of the DLL
> they distribute, but I'm honestly not sure if there are negative side
> effects to doing so.
That's not possible, unfortunately, We compile the published DLL
(the 32-bit DLL at least)
On Wed, 1 Apr 2015 14:26:15 -0700, Mark Romero wrote:
> Thank you all for all your help.
>
> I have been soliciting advice from all sorts of Lightroom forums / adobe
> forums / Dell computer forums and other forums more specific to hardware
> and Lightroom, and they all ended up in a dead end.
>
On 4/2/15, maarten.mostert at stakepoint.com
wrote:
>
> WARNING
> Binary analyzer
> Warning: The binary analyzer test detected the following errors:
> File C:\Program Files\StakePoint\sqlite3.dll has failed the NXCheck check.
> File C:\Program Files\StakePoint\sqlite3.dll has failed the DBCheck
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 10:58 AM, wrote:
>
> This are basically compiler switches as far as I understand.
>
> I am not a C programmer, so also quite difficult for me to link the library
> statically.
These tests basically map to the /SAFESEH, /DYNAMICBASE, and /NXCOMPAT
linker flags. Though,
Ryan, Simon, thank you both for the help.
The script works fine, and I now also understand how to use this bail
mechanism. It is great!
once more: THANK YOU!
gert
2015-04-01 23:17 GMT+02:00 Simon Slavin :
>
> On 1 Apr 2015, at 8:09pm, Gert Van Assche wrote:
>
> > But this is definitely not
On 4/2/15, maarten.mostert at stakepoint.com
wrote:
>
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I am new here, and have a question.
>
> For my application that relies on Sqlite I am seeking Windows 8
> certification in accordance with the following article.
>
> [
Zaumseil Ren? wrote:
> I have a separate table for each parameter with time stamp and value.
> The time stamp is used as "integer primary key asc".
> [...]
> It is also possible to go back in time and then start from there.
> Currently I remove all values from the tables after the specified time.
Thank you Kess for the suggestions:
Number of photos per directory: I tried this but it seems to have had no
benefit. i went from 200 photos in one directory down to 50 photos in four
directories, and there was no change.
I will try your other suggestions (disable automatic re-catalogging and
SQLite version 3.8.9 is now in testing. When the status board at
https://www.sqlite.org/checklists/3080900/index goes all green, we
will cut the release. If you have any concerns about the current
code, please speak up soon!
A draft of the 3.8.9 website is found at http://www.sqlite.org/draft/
Ad 1)
You may be able to speed up deletion if you can partition your logging tables
by time, e.g. each table holds the changes within a certain time frame or a
fixed number of changes.
When you jump back in time, dropping the tables created after the target
timestamp is faster than deleting
Some suggestions:
1) Check your temp folder and remove chaff.
2) Download CCleaner and check your registry integrity.
3) Review updates that have been applied and try removing them one at a time
or in a targeted fashion. You should be able to see what updates were
applied around the time you
Hi there,
I have used sqlite to store parameter changes with a time stamp in a simulation
environment.
Because of the number of parameters (2000+) and the max. change rate up to 50ms
I have a separate table for each parameter with time stamp and value.
The time stamp is used as "integer
20 matches
Mail list logo
