[sqlite] System.Data.SQLite version for SQLite 3.7.16

Hi, The latest version of System.Data.SQLite in the download page is 1.0.84.0, which appears to have been done for SQLite version 3.7.15.2. Is that correct? If so, is there a plan to update System.Data.SQLite with the latest SQLite version? Do Ineed to wait for a later version of

Re: [sqlite] : C# access to SQLite and Windows 8

Have you looked at this? http://timheuer.com/blog/archive/2012/08/07/updated-how-to-using-sqlite-from-windows-store-apps.aspx Thanks for that link. Yes, I have looked at it before. Just to make it clear, I know that, according to that blog, sqlite-net will work from Metro and desktop. I

[sqlite] C# access to SQLite and Windows 8

Hi, If you have seen this message already, please ignore it. I received some sort of email about message content type from the forum, and I am resending it as text just in case. Currently at my job I am writing code to access SQLite from C# using System.Data.SQLite. We are also looking at

[sqlite] System.Data.SQLite and .NET 4.5

Hi, Does System.Data.SQLite support .NET 4.5? The downloadable binaries only come in 3.5 and 4.0 flavors (although it is possible for assemblies to support multiple .NET versions). Thanks, Nick ___

Re: [sqlite] sqlite3_complete always returning 1?

round is easy enough, but I am just curious if I have some setting or something wrong. Thanks, Nick > On 12/16/2009 5:22 PM, Jay A. Kreibich wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 04:52:16PM -0500, Nicolas Rivera scratched on the > wall: > >> Thanks for your reply Dr. Hipp. &

Re: [sqlite] sqlite3_complete always returning 1?

in reason for having this function, but it does not seem to work as I would have expected for that particular scenario. Thanks, Nicolas > On 12/16/2009 4:14 PM, D. Richard Hipp wrote: > > > On Dec 16, 2009, at 4:10 PM, Nicolas Rivera wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I think I am mis

[sqlite] sqlite3_complete always returning 1?

Hi, I think I am missing something really simple (some macro or something), because I cannot make sqlite3_complete() to return anything other than 1. Even when I pass it "" (an empty string), it still returns 1. I even tried to call sqlite3_initialize() before (although to my knowledge this

[sqlite] advantages of Not using shared cache mode

mory usage and I/O, why is it not the default? What is the advantage of not using it? Thanks, Nicolas Rivera ___ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users

Re: [sqlite] multiple threads with shared cache mode

So then only one write transaction at a time is allowed per database. Which means there is no advantage, in terms of concurrency, with using shared cache mode. Right? > On 11/24/2009 4:17 PM, Pavel Ivanov wrote: > > Indeed, it's weird. And I've just realized that if we have two > simultaneous

[sqlite] multiple threads with shared cache mode

in reading uncommitted data. Thanks in advance, Nicolas Rivera ___ sqlite-users mailing list sqlite-users@sqlite.org http://sqlite.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users