are
expressly prohibited.
Now, it would be possible to implement *just* the file upload part using
filters, as a Servlet-2.3-only chunk, but I would rather see us
approaching all of the services to be provided together from a design
point of view.
Heath
Craig
-Original Message-
From: Craig R
a lot more pluggable and flexible.
Well, it's likely that they *will* do this if we base the implementation
on filters :-).
Craig
-Original Message-
From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 11:39 AM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject
On Thu, 4 Apr 2002, Torgeir Veimo wrote:
Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2002 14:15:09 +0200
From: Torgeir Veimo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: mapped properties and jndi's Attributes
I would like to use
On Thu, 4 Apr 2002, Nicolas De Loof wrote:
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2002 16:40:57 +0200
From: Nicolas De Loof [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: strust.taglib.bean proposal
I didn't know about this cache
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
===
Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
- It's commonly necessary to generate slightly different HTML for
different user agents, to deal with the inevitable differences.
One approach is to build the knowledge of these differences into
every tag
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
===
Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
One potential gotcha, especially if you like MVC architectures like the
one Struts advocates -- filters are only invoked on the original request,
not on RequestDispatcher.forward() methods. In retrospect, that probably
On Fri, 5 Apr 2002, Tim Moore wrote:
One potential gotcha, especially if you like MVC
architectures like the one Struts advocates -- filters are
only invoked on the original request, not on
RequestDispatcher.forward() methods. In retrospect, that
probably wasn't the best approach
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Konstantin Priblouda wrote:
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2002 08:15:03 -0700 (PDT)
From: Konstantin Priblouda [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Is FormBean
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Tim Moore wrote:
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2002 11:56:22 -0400
From: Tim Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Is FormBean mandatory???
-Original Message-
From: Craig R
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, Tim Moore wrote:
It's still nice that you can use integer properties, though, for
things like select fields and radio buttons...anything that doesn't
allow free-form text input.
How do *you* know that your Struts client is actually a
browser (and
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Steven D. Monday wrote:
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 08:30:33 -0500
From: Steven D. Monday [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Servlet 2.3 filter
Craig R
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002, Jing Zhou wrote:
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 16:42:13 -0500
From: Jing Zhou [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: The Semantic of 'Cancel' Button
In STRUTS, the 'Cancel' button (the html
On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, Hans-Joachim Matheus wrote:
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 12:36:25 +0200
From: Hans-Joachim Matheus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Struts Tags for Visual HTML Components / Java Server
On Mon, 22 Apr 2002, Struts-dev Newsgroup wrote:
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 16:25:01 -0700
From: Struts-dev Newsgroup [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 1.1 new build needs setter for every getter?
Subject: 1.1 new build needs
On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, Jing Zhou wrote:
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 13:29:40 -0500
From: Jing Zhou [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Another way to find mapped properties
Struts 1.1 will introduce mapped
Message -
From: Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 3:04 PM
Subject: Re: Another way to find mapped properties
On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, Jing Zhou wrote:
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 13:29:40 -0500
From: Jing
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Nicolas De Loof wrote:
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 17:29:25 +0200
From: Nicolas De Loof [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ActionServlet re-populates form upon Actoin = Action call
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Tim Moore wrote:
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 14:22:04 -0400
From: Tim Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: forEach compared to logic:iterate
c:forEach var=pageInfo
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Jing Zhou wrote:
[snip]
[Craig said]
If we are going to adopt the JSTL (and JSP 1.3) expression language
syntax, I believe we should adopt all of it, not just a subset. For
example, consider the bean:write tag, where you use the name and
property (plus optional
: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 2:34 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: RE: forEach compared to logic:iterate
On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, Tim Moore wrote:
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 14:22:04 -0400
From: Tim Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Thu, 25 Apr 2002, Jing Zhou wrote:
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 15:09:31 -0500
From: Jing Zhou [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Another way to find mapped properties
I browsed the Appendix A for
On Tue, 30 Apr 2002, Jean Fotovat wrote:
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 14:28:30 +0200
From: Jean Fotovat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: treeview...
hello community,
has somebody implements a treeview on struts framework ?
Interesting idea. But I'd really like to get 1.1 out the door before
adding lots of new functionaltiy ...
One of the things I learned, in watching the development of JSTL, is that
tags with lots and lots of optional attributes, and different operating
modes, can be really hard to understand --
On Thu, 2 May 2002, Jean Fotovat wrote:
Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 13:46:59 +0200
From: Jean Fotovat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: urgent:struts 1.1 and jsp ?.?
hello community,
which version of
On Fri, 10 May 2002, David Cherryhomes wrote:
Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 15:14:34 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Cherryhomes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Scalability question
I'm sorry, maybe I was
, with no locking or allocation
overhead.
* You must program your Action instances in a thread-safe manner.
The most important rule is to not store any per-request state
information in instance variables in the Action class.
Craig R.
McClanahan
On Mon, 13 May 2002, Steven D. Monday wrote:
Date: Mon, 13 May 2002 08:52:38 -0500
From: Steven D. Monday [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Scalability question
Hal,
Thanks for the reply. I
On Wed, 12 Jun 2002, Struts-dev Newsgroup wrote:
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2002 15:25:02 -0700
From: Struts-dev Newsgroup [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: FormBeans ... as an Interface.
Subject: Re: FormBeans ... as an
On Tue, 11 Jun 2002, James Young wrote:
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2002 21:40:05 -0700 (PDT)
From: James Young [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Path-mapped action and Struts 1.1 beta
As mentioned by Craig in
On Wed, 12 Jun 2002, Martin Cooper wrote:
Finally, I don't understand If people use JSTL Then use formbeans as
model. JSTL is very cool, and I plan on taking full advantage of it in
future apps, but I'm certainly not planning on using form beans as my model.
Perhaps you're referring
On Thu, 13 Jun 2002, John Yu wrote:
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 11:53:59 +0800
From: John Yu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: FormBeans ... as an Interface.
At 03:28 pm 12-06-2002 -0700, you wrote:
On Thu, 13 Jun 2002, John Yu wrote:
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 17:18:31 +0800
From: John Yu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: FormBeans ... as an Interface.
At 09:54 pm 12-06-2002 -0700, you wrote:
On Fri, 14 Jun 2002, Struts-dev Newsgroup wrote:
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 09:25:01 -0700
From: Struts-dev Newsgroup [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: FormBeans ... as an Interface.
Subject: Re: FormBeans ... as an
+1
Craig
On Tue, 18 Jun 2002, Ted Husted wrote:
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 07:33:44 -0400
From: Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [VOTE] Proposed Committer James Holmes
James is a
On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, Shawn Bayern wrote:
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 19:36:56 -0400 (EDT)
From: Shawn Bayern [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: JSTL
Struts developers,
I've just announced the final 1.0 release of the Standard
On Sat, 22 Jun 2002, James Holmes wrote:
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2002 17:38:37 -0700 (PDT)
From: James Holmes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 9756] - Bug in example build.xml
At long last, as agreed long ago, I'm going to merge Tiles (and its
associated webapps) into the mainline source tree. I should be able to
avoid breaking things for anyone else, but there might be some temporary
instabilities while this is going on.
Craig
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On Tue, 25 Jun 2002, Ted Husted wrote:
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 11:24:55 -0400
From: Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Nightly Build JavaDocs
My understanding
On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, Ted Husted wrote:
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 11:48:55 -0400
From: Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Tiles And Struts
Note that Struts1.1 also require the
I'd like to continue swatting the remaining bugs in 1.1, and improve the
existing documentation, with a goal to release a beta 2 of Strust 1.1 in
the near future (ideally by July 8 or so). Part of my motivation for the
timing is that Sun is shutting down next week, so I will have some quality
On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, James Holmes wrote:
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 11:02:52 -0700 (PDT)
From: James Holmes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Tiles And Struts
While we're on the subject of Struts
(which, in JSP 1.2, has very clear
lifecycle diagrams showing how it works, in section 10.1) and ensure that
our tags take advantage of everything the spec lets us do to improve
performance.
--
Martin Cooper
Craig
-Original Message-
From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL
-
From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 12:45 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: RE: Planning for 1.1 beta 2
On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, Martin Cooper wrote:
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 11:49:49 -0700
From: Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, Ted Husted wrote:
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 19:44:48 -0400
From: Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Planning for 1.1 beta 2
For the docs, do
On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, James Holmes wrote:
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 17:44:35 -0700 (PDT)
From: James Holmes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 1.1 Config File DTD discrepancy
Was just updating some code in Struts Console and
On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, James Holmes wrote:
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 17:44:35 -0700 (PDT)
From: James Holmes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 1.1 Config File DTD discrepancy
Was just updating some code in Struts Console and
Message-
From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 4:44 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: RE: Planning for 1.1 beta 2
On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, Martin Cooper wrote:
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 15:55:19 -0700
From: Martin Cooper [EMAIL
On 27 Jun 2002, Arron Bates wrote:
Date: 27 Jun 2002 14:33:11 +1000
From: Arron Bates [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Planning for 1.1 beta 2
Meanwhile, I've set up a diff section in the
On Thu, 27 Jun 2002, Ted Husted wrote:
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 06:37:07 -0400
From: Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Tiles And Struts
Craig R. McClanahan
. Would it
be possible to take the static portions of the Tiles documentation and
merge them into struts-documentation, and keep all the dynamic stuff that
requires execution in a tiles-tutorial or tiles-example webapp?
Cedric
Craig
Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, Ted
On Thu, 27 Jun 2002, Cedric Dumoulin wrote:
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 18:26:27 +0200
From: Cedric Dumoulin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Tiles And Struts
Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
Would
This will get picked up by the next push of the struts-documentation
webapp to the website.
I'm going to see if I can get that done automatically as part of my
nightly build scripts as well -- should work, but haven't ever tried it
that way.
Craig
On Sat, 29 Jun 2002, James Holmes wrote:
On Sat, 29 Jun 2002, James Holmes wrote:
Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2002 10:30:41 -0700 (PDT)
From: James Holmes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newsletter] some topics
+1, looks really good. I think
There are at least a couple of issues that I can pull out of your problem
description -- here's my thoughts on them.
REUSE OF FORM BEANS
You only have to worry about reuse of the same physical form bean on
multiple requests if you are using session scope to save them in. If you
are using
On Mon, 1 Jul 2002, James Mitchell wrote:
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2002 09:23:24 -0400
From: James Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: cvs commit:
support, that don't rely on them?
Jing
Craig
- Original Message -
From: Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 11:54 AM
Subject: Re: Security issues with Struts
There are at least a couple of issues
On Mon, 1 Jul 2002, Ted Husted wrote:
Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2002 16:26:43 -0400
From: Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Subapps and /WEB-INF (was: Re: DO NOT REPLY
[Bug 10268] -
Sub-apps need context-relative option for 'input' of an Action)
Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
inputForward might sound like you are referring to an ActionForward
(which might also be a feature worth considering).
This is actually the intent -- the controller would
)
and $PATH$ gets replaced by the value of the path attribute. The
default pattern (consistent with 1.1-b1 behavior) would simply be
$PREFIX$$PATH$.
Does that make sense?
--
Martin Cooper
Craig
-Original Message-
From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday
action and Struts 1.1 beta
-Original Message-
From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 3:46 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: Path-mapped action and Struts 1.1 beta
Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
No ... and (this time at least) not because
- Original Message -
From: Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 11:54 AM
Subject: Re: Security issues with Struts
There are at least a couple of issues that I can pull out of your problem
description -- here's my
Offhand, it looks like you don't have Xalan in your $ANT_HOME/lib
directory, of that you're trying to mix in a Xalan from a different
version (Ant 1.4 ships with the parser from JAXP/1.1, and you should use
the Xalan from the same release versus something later).
Craig
On Tue, 2 Jul 2002,
On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Jens Viebig wrote:
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2002 10:50:52 +0200
From: Jens Viebig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: LinkTag Extension to url encode SessionId
I included a
On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, Hal Deadman wrote:
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2002 18:39:13 -0400
From: Hal Deadman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Struts Developers List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 7202] - Add
, by
adding a URL pattern for each action URL you want to protect.
Craig
Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
On Mon, 1 Jul 2002, Jing Zhou wrote:
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2002 14:41:25 -0500
From: Jing Zhou [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers
On Fri, 5 Jul 2002, Xiaogang Cao wrote:
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2002 10:07:33 +0800
From: Xiaogang Cao [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Will Servlet Filter replace servlet as Controller in Struts
I just completed the initial check-in of the tiles-documentation webapp as
a part of the standard Struts directory structure, instead of being built
from contrib/tiles. Not surprisingly, the size of the CVS report
exceeded the limits set for the mailing list -- here's the initial part of
the
On Sun, 7 Jul 2002, James Mitchell wrote:
Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2002 01:31:43 -0400
From: James Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: cvs commit: jakarta-struts STATUS
I
On Sun, 7 Jul 2002, Chris Nokleberg wrote:
Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2002 09:53:09 -0700
From: Chris Nokleberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Implementing canProcess method in RequestDispatcher
I have a servlet 2.3 filter that
Do you have a hot off the presses commons-beanutils.jar file? There
were some changes that Struts relies on since the last official release.
Craig
On Sun, 7 Jul 2002, Martin Cooper wrote:
Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2002 13:28:47 -0700
From: Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts
Message-
From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, July 07, 2002 3:02 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: Problems running JUnit unit tests
Do you have a hot off the presses commons-beanutils.jar file? There
were some changes that Struts relies
On Sun, 7 Jul 2002, Martin Cooper wrote:
Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2002 18:16:30 -0700
From: Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Logging in RequestProcessor
There are two log() methods in
On Mon, 8 Jul 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 10:30:00 -0700
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Action handler problem.
I am sorry James, but I have to disagree with you
On 9 Jul 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: 9 Jul 2002 01:47:17 -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: cvs commit: jakarta-struts/doc/resources articles.xml
jholmes 2002/07/08 18:47:17
Modified:
On Tue, 9 Jul 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2002 12:19:51 +0100
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Implementing canProcess method in RequestDispatcher / struts
error handling
As a general
Nightly builds of Struts are always compiled from the latest source code
in CVS -- both for Struts itself and for all of the commons-x
dependencies. There are definitely features and bugfixes in the commons
libraries that the current code in Struts depends on. The only exception
for Apache
shame-faced
OK, OK, I just committed a fix based on this to eliminate having to set
the stupid dynamic attribute for DynaActionForm subclasses. It shoulda
never been there in the first place.
/shame-faced
Craig
On 10 Jul 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: 10 Jul 2002 18:38:39 -
From:
Doing the fix for 7751, I ran into a case where the undo of the / adding
change caused the unit tests to fail, because I'd added some tests for the
new behavior. I've commented those tests out until we figure out what to
do about that particular situation.
I'd like to ask all Struts committers
what to do.
James Mitchell
Software Engineer\Struts Evangelist
Struts-Atlanta, the Open Minded Developer Network
http://www.open-tools.org/struts-atlanta
Craig
-Original Message-
From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 4:38 PM
Message -
From: Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 9:16 AM
Subject: Re: Bugzilla protocol question
On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Joe Germuska wrote:
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2002 23:34:23 -0500
From: Joe Germuska [EMAIL
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Jesper Pedersen wrote:
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 10:34:47 +0200
From: Jesper Pedersen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RFF: type attribute in html:text
Hi.
First of all: sorry if
concerned with 3.2, because it is so
ancient.
Running ant test.tomcat.all will run the Cactus based tests against both
if you've defined tomcat.home.40 and tomcat.home.41 properties.
Cedric
Craig
Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
Doing the fix for 7751, I ran into a case where the undo
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Ted Husted wrote:
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 08:15:02 -0400
From: Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: $A$P - $M$P
In the syntax for the module path pattern, we originally
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Cedric Dumoulin wrote:
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 17:13:00 +0200
From: Cedric Dumoulin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Running Unit Tests Before Commits
Craig R. McClanahan
-
From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 8:52 AM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: Running Unit Tests Before Commits
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Cedric Dumoulin wrote:
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 12:36:50 +0200
From: Cedric Dumoulin
] at
org.apache.struts.action.TestDynaActionForm.setUp(TestDynaActionForm.java:165)
[junit]
[junit] Testcase: testBeanCreate
stop.tomcat.40:
[java] Stopping service Tomcat-Standalone
[runservertests] Server stopped !
Any ideas ?
Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Cedric Dumoulin wrote:
Date: Thu, 11
Cedric,
I'm getting compile errors on not being able to find
org.apache.struts.tiles.definition.ConfigurableDefinitionsFactory. Did
you perhaps forget to add it?
Craig
On 11 Jul 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: 11 Jul 2002 16:48:46 -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts
On Mon, 15 Jul 2002, Brian Topping wrote:
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 18:03:52 -0400
From: Brian Topping [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: initConfigDigester refactoring?
Hi all,
I'm working on a servlet that was subclassed
On Tue, 16 Jul 2002, Brian Topping wrote:
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 07:24:16 -0400
From: Brian Topping [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jeff Pennal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: initConfigDigester refactoring?
From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL
regards,
-b
Craig
-Original Message-
From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2002 11:25 AM
To: Brian Topping
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Jeff Pennal
Subject: RE: initConfigDigester refactoring?
On Tue, 16 Jul 2002, Brian Topping wrote:
Date: Tue
On 16 Jul 2002, David M. Karr wrote:
Date: 16 Jul 2002 19:42:46 -0700
From: David M. Karr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Subclass Struts tags to work with JSTL?
I don't know how much thought has yet gone into how
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Dienstag, 16. Juli 2002 13:24
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Jeff Pennal
Subject: RE: initConfigDigester refactoring?
From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
This is an interesting idea. I see a pretty serious
potential
On 17 Jul 2002, David M. Karr wrote:
Date: 17 Jul 2002 12:07:09 -0700
From: David M. Karr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Subclass Struts tags to work with JSTL?
Tim == Tim Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 22 Jul 2002, David M. Karr wrote:
Date: 22 Jul 2002 09:19:10 -0700
From: David M. Karr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Status of Struts-EL contrib project
I had talked last week about building a tag library, composed
On 22 Jul 2002, David M. Karr wrote:
Date: 22 Jul 2002 09:53:58 -0700
From: David M. Karr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Status of Struts-EL contrib project
Craig == Craig R McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
requirements.
Vic
Craig
David M. Karr wrote:
Craig == Craig R McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Craig On 22 Jul 2002, David M. Karr wrote:
It's occurred to me that if I'm building a tag library that would be used
alongside the JSTL, there's not much point
On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, Matt Raible wrote:
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 18:40:56 -0600
From: Matt Raible [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: NPE when setting values on DynaActionForm
I want to populate a DynaActionForm before
on DynaActionForm
--- Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, Matt Raible wrote:
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 18:40:56 -0600
From: Matt Raible [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: NPE when
The required changes to implement this has been checked in, and will be
available in nightly build 20020723 of Struts. The only difference is
that you need to call:
DynaActionForm requestForm =
DynaActionFormClass.getDynaActionFormClass(requestForm).newInstance();
instead of the
On Tue, 23 Jul 2002, Niall Pemberton wrote:
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2002 03:28:22 +0100
From: Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Status of Struts-EL contrib project
David,
From your
301 - 400 of 925 matches
Mail list logo
