-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob Doolittle
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 3:05 PM
To: SunRay-Users mailing list
Subject: Re: [SunRay-Users] Utselect between solaris and
linux not working
It certainly looks to me like
Bemis, Suzanna K wrote:
I assumed because the auth.props has enableMulticast=true commented out,
that that implies enableMulticast=false. But not the case. I explicitly
set enableMulticast=false on all three and now ALL computers see and
switch between each other.
For the record - the
Bemis, Suzanna K wrote:
I think so too. But I don't see a problem with using -A,
what problem do you see? Craig is right that she'll have to
use the 192.* addresses instead of the public IP addresses,
however. Is this what you were referring to? That's the one
advantage to using the
This is going to be a problem, once you get things working
smoothly. Unless you take special measures it'll be a roll
of the dice as to what server you'll connect to.
I recommend you follow OttoM's suggestion to revert to an
Interconnect config (although I disagree with several of his
It certainly looks to me like your network is flaky. Hopefully it's
an artifact tickled by the multicast functionality, which will resolve
itself once you change to broadcast...
-Bob
Bemis, Suzanna K wrote:
This is going to be a problem, once you get things working
smoothly. Unless you take
, February 20, 2007 6:30 AM
To: SunRay-Users mailing list
Subject: Re: [SunRay-Users] Utselect between solaris and linux not
working
Note that utselect will *never* display hosts outside of the local
FOG, is this perhaps what you are seeing? You can run it with the
-R
option to get a text-input
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob Doolittle
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 6:30 AM
To: SunRay-Users mailing list
Subject: Re: [SunRay-Users] Utselect between solaris and linux not
working
Note that utselect will *never* display hosts outside of the local
FOG, is this perhaps what you
. Utswitch and utselect work between
linux boxes.
Thanks,
Suzie
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob Doolittle
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 6:30 AM
To: SunRay-Users mailing list
Subject: Re: [SunRay-Users] Utselect between solaris and linux
: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 6:30 AM
To: SunRay-Users mailing list
Subject: Re: [SunRay-Users] Utselect between solaris and linux
not working
Note that utselect will *never* display hosts outside of the
local FOG, is this perhaps what you are seeing? You can run it
with the
-R
option to get
.
Thanks,
Suzie
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob Doolittle
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 6:30 AM
To: SunRay-Users mailing list
Subject: Re: [SunRay-Users] Utselect between solaris and linux not
working
Note that utselect will *never
ottomeister wrote:
On 2/21/07, Bob Doolittle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
utadm -l should report everything.
Typically there's no point in mixing LAN and Interconnect, however.
A cleaner config would be utadm -A 192.168.132.0, as I suggested
earlier.
That's the right thing to do *IFF*
I think so too. But I don't see a problem with using -A,
what problem do you see? Craig is right that she'll have to
use the 192.* addresses instead of the public IP addresses,
however. Is this what you were referring to? That's the one
advantage to using the Interconnect - it will
Note that utselect will *never* display hosts outside of the local FOG,
is this perhaps what you are seeing? You can run it with the -R option
to get a text-input field where you can type a server name, but that's the
most you can do to deal with extra-FOG hosts - you can't get a chooser
that
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob Doolittle
Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 6:30 AM
To: SunRay-Users mailing list
Subject: Re: [SunRay-Users] Utselect between solaris and linux not
working
Note that utselect will *never* display hosts
On 2/19/07, Bemis, Suzanna K [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have SRSS 3.1.1 on 2 Linux sunray servers (pablo and skb-linux) and SRSS
2.0 on Solaris 9 (ndssr01). 'utselect' won't work between a Linux SR server
and the solaris 9 server ...
In what way doesn't it work? (What do you see when you run
15 matches
Mail list logo
