, environmentalism, and
on and on. These are ideals that suffer greatly under islamofascism.
Kurt Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 10:30:56 -0700 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:
sustainablelorgbiofuel@sustainablelists.org Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Fascists at
it again modern? see Roman symbol
http
the people you say you're replying to actually
said.
Here are the originals, just for the record:
http://www.mail-archive.com/sustainablelorgbiofuel@sustainablelists.org/msg72690.html
2008/05/27 Re: [Biofuel] Fascists at it again Chris Burck
http://www.mail-archive.com/sustainablelorgbiofuel
in the Quran, however, as practiced, Sharia law seems at great odds
with any form of freedom that westerners are accustomed to. Date: Wed, 7
May 2008 06:14:49 +0900 To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Fascists at it again
Hello Kurt I am too lazy
After a quick google, I think the numbers show that China in absolute numbers
is much more likely to kill its prisoners than the US or any other country. I
would suppose a fundamental difference is the amount of publicity surrounding
each execution depending upon the country.
The exact number
very interesting.
--- On Tue, 5/27/08, Keith Addison lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]gt; wrote:
From: Keith Addison lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]gt;
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Fascists at it again
To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Received: Tuesday, May 27, 2008, 9:35 AM
Hello Kurt
Thanks for the response. But it's
You're quite right, some confusion there - my apologies, and thanks
for the correction.
Best
Keith
After a quick google, I think the numbers show that China in
absolute numbers is much more likely to kill its prisoners than the
US or any other country. I would suppose a fundamental
:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Fascists at it again
Hello Kurt I am too lazy to double check myself! Lazier than that I
think, totally fast asleep maybe. You honestly think (?) Islam is an idea
that's in a moral decline? LOL! How else could you define a government
that recognizes
form of freedom that westerners are accustomed to. Date: Wed, 7 May 2008
06:14:49 +0900 To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Fascists at it again Hello Kurt I am too lazy to
double check myself! Lazier than that I think, totally fast asleep maybe
Hi Chip
Keith Addison wrote:
| How about Neo-con Fascist.
|
| Chris
|
| That sounds serviceable. I suppose some people would stick pig on
| the end, it fits quite well. Fine critters, pigs. I never met a pig
| who was a Fascist. I think Orwell gave them a bad press.
|
| Best
|
| Keith
Agreed.
Keith
Of course there's a lot to be said
for ease of communication, but people tend to see how like us other
creatures are or aren't as a measure of their superior worth, or of
their uselessness, which is odious.
That applies as much between humans as between humans and other species. How
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Keith Addison wrote:
| How about Neo-con Fascist.
|
| Chris
|
| That sounds serviceable. I suppose some people would stick pig on
| the end, it fits quite well. Fine critters, pigs. I never met a pig
| who was a Fascist. I think Orwell gave them a
PROTECTED]
To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Sent: Fri, 9 May 2008 8:28 am
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Fascists at it again
(oh, dear, you got me started. . .)
:-) That's nice.
how about corpiracy (inflicted on
us by the neoprivateers-nice little double entendre)? probably not.
too cutesy
(oh, dear, you got me started. . .)
:-) That's nice.
how about corpiracy (inflicted on
us by the neoprivateers-nice little double entendre)? probably not.
too cutesy.
Not bad. Corpiracy is good, needs the right pronunciation though;
neoprivateers is nice but it's not headline language (too
How about Neo-con Fascist.
Chris
-Original Message-
From: Keith Addison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Sent: Fri, 9 May 2008 8:28 am
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Fascists at it again
(oh, dear, you got me started. . .)
:-) That's nice.
how about
Keith Addison wrote:
Hi Chip, Chris and all
This is the famous Mussolini quote: Fascism should more properly be
called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate
power. -- Benito Mussolini
But Public Eye reckons he never said it. See:
Hi Chip
Keith Addison wrote:
Hi Chip, Chris and all
This is the famous Mussolini quote: Fascism should more properly be
called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate
power. -- Benito Mussolini
But Public Eye reckons he never said it. See:
(oh, dear, you got me started. . .)how about corpiracy (inflicted on
us by the neoprivateers-nice little double entendre)? probably not.
too cutesy. if a new word emerges, it'll most likely come from the
street. meanwhile, oligarchy works for me, too. that, or babylon.
On 5/7/08, Keith
Chris Burck wrote:
well, when terms like islamo-fascist get slung about, yeah, you bet
the meaning has been degraded. that's precisely the purpose for which
such terms have been coined. that extreme notwithstanding, and though
the pejorative use of the word exists, it has been far less
Hi Chip, Chris and all
This is the famous Mussolini quote: Fascism should more properly be
called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate
power. -- Benito Mussolini
But Public Eye reckons he never said it. See:
http://www.publiceye.org/fascist/corporatism.html
Mussolini on
.
Kurt Date: Sun, 4 May 2008 21:28:30 -0700 From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] To:
sustainablelorgbiofuel@sustainablelists.org Subject: Re: [Biofuel]
Fascists at it again The Fascist State organizes the nation,
but leaves a sufficient margin of liberty to the individual; the
latter is deprived of all
For some reason Wikipedia definition of fascism has lost its references to
merging corporatism with the state (it's what I don't like about Wikipedia).
However, some common threads can be seen here.
14 Points of fascism: The warning signs
http://oldamericancentury.org/14pts.htm
AK
The
Good URL Andy. Everyone should look at it.
Most politicians seem to be a sick breed of cat. Power mad sociopaths. How
they can be so toxic and not even have a hint of their pathology is beyond me.
Kirk
Andy Karpay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For some reason Wikipedia definition of fascism
the wiki articles place too much emphasis imho on fascism as a
philosophy, though they do discuss corporatism,
production/productivism, and strong government intervention in favor
of the economic elites.
On 5/5/08, Kirk McLoren [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good URL Andy. Everyone should look at it.
Chris Burck wrote:
the wiki articles place too much emphasis imho on fascism as a
philosophy, though they do discuss corporatism,
production/productivism, and strong government intervention in favor
of the economic elites.
im(not so -h)o that has to do with the fact that it's a pejorative
well, when terms like islamo-fascist get slung about, yeah, you bet
the meaning has been degraded. that's precisely the purpose for which
such terms have been coined. that extreme notwithstanding, and though
the pejorative use of the word exists, it has been far less abused
than the barbs
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Chip Mefford
Sent: Monday, May 05, 2008 3:52 PM
To: sustainablelorgbiofuel@sustainablelists.org
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Fascists at it again
Chris Burck wrote:
the wiki articles place too much emphasis imho on fascism as a
philosophy, though they do discuss corporatism
Was that fascist as in /extreme/ nationalism?
Or is that fascist as in pejorative label applied
to things we don't like, without any real definition
or meaning?
___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
The Fascist State organizes the nation, but leaves a sufficient margin of
liberty to the individual; the latter is deprived of all useless and possibly
harmful freedom, but retains what is essential; the deciding power in this
question cannot be the individual, but the State alone
28 matches
Mail list logo
