On 07/30/13 at 06:52pm, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 12:46:22AM +0800, WANG Chao wrote:
On 07/31/13 at 12:32am, WANG Chao wrote:
On 07/30/13 at 03:46pm, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 09:43:16AM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
[CC
On Tuesday 2013-07-30 20:41, Vivek Goyal wrote:
FYI, I don't see any CC's on the original mail as displayed on GMane via
NNTP...
Neither do I, with a normal (non-NTTP, non-Gmail) setup.
I am CCed in original mail and that's why I got a copy of it in my Inbox.
If you did, you should be able
On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 12:15:32PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On Tuesday 2013-07-30 20:41, Vivek Goyal wrote:
FYI, I don't see any CC's on the original mail as displayed on GMane via
NNTP...
Neither do I, with a normal (non-NTTP, non-Gmail) setup.
I am CCed in original mail and
'Twas brillig, and WANG Chao at 01/08/13 06:36 did gyre and gimble:
On 07/30/13 at 04:40pm, Tom Gundersen wrote:
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 4:13 PM, Harald Hoyer har...@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/30/2013 03:46 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
Maybe rootfsflags=nofail could do be used as this
[Resend because I fail at reply-all]
'Twas brillig, and WANG Chao at 01/08/13 06:36 did gyre and gimble:
On 07/30/13 at 04:40pm, Tom Gundersen wrote:
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 4:13 PM, Harald Hoyer har...@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/30/2013 03:46 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
Maybe
On 08/01/13 at 08:49am, Colin Guthrie wrote:
[Resend because I fail at reply-all]
'Twas brillig, and WANG Chao at 01/08/13 06:36 did gyre and gimble:
On 07/30/13 at 04:40pm, Tom Gundersen wrote:
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 4:13 PM, Harald Hoyer har...@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/30/2013 03:46
On 07/30/2013 09:14 PM, Vivek Goyal wrote:
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 12:46:22AM +0800, WANG Chao wrote:
On 07/31/13 at 12:32am, WANG Chao wrote:
On 07/30/13 at 03:46pm, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 09:43:16AM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
[CC harald]
Not sure if this
'Twas brillig, and Harald Hoyer at 31/07/13 11:19 did gyre and gimble:
On 07/30/2013 09:14 PM, Vivek Goyal wrote:
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 12:46:22AM +0800, WANG Chao wrote:
On 07/31/13 at 12:32am, WANG Chao wrote:
On 07/30/13 at 03:46pm, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 12:19:06PM +0200, Harald Hoyer wrote:
On 07/30/2013 09:14 PM, Vivek Goyal wrote:
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 12:46:22AM +0800, WANG Chao wrote:
On 07/31/13 at 12:32am, WANG Chao wrote:
On 07/30/13 at 03:46pm, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 09:44:01AM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 12:19:06PM +0200, Harald Hoyer wrote:
On 07/30/2013 09:14 PM, Vivek Goyal wrote:
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 12:46:22AM +0800, WANG Chao wrote:
On 07/31/13 at 12:32am, WANG Chao wrote:
On 07/30/13 at
On 07/30/13 at 04:40pm, Tom Gundersen wrote:
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 4:13 PM, Harald Hoyer har...@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/30/2013 03:46 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
Maybe rootfsflags=nofail could do be used as this flag?
rootfsflags=nofail sounds ok, if it is not used for
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 1:53 PM, WANG Chao chaow...@redhat.com wrote:
If specified kernel command line rd.weak_sysroot, fstab-generate will
generate a weaker version of sysroot.mount:
- It's not required by initrd-root-fs.target.
- It's not before initrd-root-fs.target.
So that failure in
On 07/30/13 at 02:05pm, Tom Gundersen wrote:
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 1:53 PM, WANG Chao chaow...@redhat.com wrote:
If specified kernel command line rd.weak_sysroot, fstab-generate will
generate a weaker version of sysroot.mount:
- It's not required by initrd-root-fs.target.
- It's not
[CC harald]
Not sure if this is right way to do or not but I will give more
background about the issue.
This assumption seems to be built into initramfs and systemd that root
should always be mountable. If one can't mount root, it is a fatal
failure.
But in case of kdump initramfs, this
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 09:43:16AM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
[CC harald]
Not sure if this is right way to do or not but I will give more
background about the issue.
This assumption seems to be built into initramfs and systemd that root
should always be mountable. If one can't mount root,
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 2:27 PM, WANG Chao chaow...@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/30/13 at 02:05pm, Tom Gundersen wrote:
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 1:53 PM, WANG Chao chaow...@redhat.com wrote:
- It's not before initrd-root-fs.target.
In case of kdump, 2nd kernel initrd is used to mount non-root
On 07/30/2013 03:46 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 09:43:16AM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
[CC harald]
Not sure if this is right way to do or not but I will give more
background about the issue.
This assumption seems to be built into initramfs and systemd that
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 4:02 PM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 2:27 PM, WANG Chao chaow...@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/30/13 at 02:05pm, Tom Gundersen wrote:
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 1:53 PM, WANG Chao chaow...@redhat.com wrote:
- It's not before initrd-root-fs.target.
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 02:05:08PM +0200, Tom Gundersen wrote:
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 1:53 PM, WANG Chao chaow...@redhat.com wrote:
If specified kernel command line rd.weak_sysroot, fstab-generate will
generate a weaker version of sysroot.mount:
- It's not required by
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 04:02:17PM +0200, Tom Gundersen wrote:
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 2:27 PM, WANG Chao chaow...@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/30/13 at 02:05pm, Tom Gundersen wrote:
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 1:53 PM, WANG Chao chaow...@redhat.com wrote:
- It's not before initrd-root-fs.target.
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 4:13 PM, Harald Hoyer har...@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/30/2013 03:46 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
Maybe rootfsflags=nofail could do be used as this flag?
rootfsflags=nofail sounds ok, if it is not used for booting the initial
system.
Yeah, you are right, this
On 07/30/13 at 09:51am, Vivek Goyal wrote:
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 07:53:11PM +0800, WANG Chao wrote:
If specified kernel command line rd.weak_sysroot, fstab-generate will
generate a weaker version of sysroot.mount:
- It's not required by initrd-root-fs.target.
- It's not before
On 07/30/13 at 04:02pm, Tom Gundersen wrote:
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 2:27 PM, WANG Chao chaow...@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/30/13 at 02:05pm, Tom Gundersen wrote:
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 1:53 PM, WANG Chao chaow...@redhat.com wrote:
- It's not before initrd-root-fs.target.
In case of
On 07/30/13 at 03:46pm, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 09:43:16AM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
[CC harald]
Not sure if this is right way to do or not but I will give more
background about the issue.
This assumption seems to be built into initramfs and
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 12:46:22AM +0800, WANG Chao wrote:
On 07/31/13 at 12:32am, WANG Chao wrote:
On 07/30/13 at 03:46pm, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 09:43:16AM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
[CC harald]
Not sure if this is right way to do or not but
'Twas brillig, and Vivek Goyal at 30/07/13 15:26 did gyre and gimble:
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 02:05:08PM +0200, Tom Gundersen wrote:
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 1:53 PM, WANG Chao chaow...@redhat.com wrote:
If specified kernel command line rd.weak_sysroot, fstab-generate will
generate a weaker
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 07:34:01PM +0100, Colin Guthrie wrote:
'Twas brillig, and Vivek Goyal at 30/07/13 15:26 did gyre and gimble:
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 02:05:08PM +0200, Tom Gundersen wrote:
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 1:53 PM, WANG Chao chaow...@redhat.com wrote:
If specified kernel
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 8:41 PM, Vivek Goyal vgo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 07:34:01PM +0100, Colin Guthrie wrote:
'Twas brillig, and Vivek Goyal at 30/07/13 15:26 did gyre and gimble:
FYI, I don't see any CC's on the original mail as displayed on GMane via
NNTP...
I am
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 12:46:22AM +0800, WANG Chao wrote:
On 07/31/13 at 12:32am, WANG Chao wrote:
On 07/30/13 at 03:46pm, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 09:43:16AM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
[CC harald]
Not sure if this is right way to do or not but
29 matches
Mail list logo
