-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
It actually seems that when system journal rotates then this error also
appears on newly created journal files, just checked
W dniu 2015-01-08 o 14:18, Michał Zegan pisze:
Hello, I am running archlinux with systemd 218.
My journal is sealed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello, I am running archlinux with systemd 218.
My journal is sealed.
But, when I try to verify it giving a verification key, then when user
journals are verified, I always get the error bad message.
This happens only for user journals, system
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello.
I have just removed my journal files and restarted journald. I then
generated sealing keys, saved the verification key. The system worked
for maybe an hour or less, I had to power it off, then it was
restarted. I tried to verify the journal.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Any chance it may be related to copy on write or whatever?
W dniu 2015-04-22 o 00:28, Michał Zegan pisze:
Hello.
I have just removed my journal files and restarted journald. I
then generated sealing keys, saved the verification key. The system
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello.
I have discovered how to add resource limits for the user, like how
much memory the user can use, or how much cpu time.
Here is the problem: /tmp seems a way for the user to circumvent this
restriction. Is there a way to protect it too?
...@poettering.net mailto:lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Tue, 28.04.15 12:03, Michał Zegan (webczat_...@poczta.onet.pl
mailto:webczat_...@poczta.onet.pl) wrote:
(sorry, I haven't sent a reply to the list) What about
namespacing and mounting tmpfs per user? You can specify a
filesystem size when
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello.
How can I make bus connections using libsystemd and can I actually use
them, or is it in development?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJVSKdZAAoJEHb1CzgxXKwY73gP/3tQoRVOF0xviFwBcBPS3LMK
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Are audit messages in _TRANSPORT=audit in systemd 219, or later only?
W dniu 2015-06-22 o 23:07, Lennart Poettering pisze:
On Sat, 20.06.15 00:57, Michał Zegan (webczat_...@poczta.onet.pl)
wrote:
Hello.
I am curious if it is possible
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello.
I am curious if it is possible or planned to add support for pattern
matching and/or negation matching in journal? for example I would like
to view everything except audit entries.
Actually, when we are at it, are audit entries actually
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello.
What is the most correct way to disable ctrl+alt+delete keys? I mean
disable, not redefine.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJVZ4cVAAoJEHb1CzgxXKwY2n0QAKQ+xDNG+t0NgOCiBhSEWF1s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hey. I would like to ask about service vs scope units, both can be
created programmatically, so what is a difference/usage scenario for
programmatically created service vs scope units if service would have
type simple?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Well, actually, are things like ip rules never used?
It could be a specific use case, but is this a category of never used
stuff, or legacy stuff? I do not use them myself, but I am curious.
W dniu 16.08.2015 o 15:09, Lennart Poettering pisze:
On Fri, 14.08.15 19:50, Michał Zegan (webczat_
Hello.
I have the newest arch, systemd version 224.
The thing that I wonder about is that sometimes, when I press
ctrl+alt+f1..f6, ttys do not appear and I do not see the login prompt.
Like there is an initial tty1, but when I start a gui, it is freed.
Other ttys often just do not appear.
Seems like this does not apply. I said that terminals do not start, and
this is random, sometimes they do. n_auto_vts = 6.
W dniu 18.08.2015 o 20:28, Philip Müller pisze:
Am 18.08.2015 um 20:24 schrieb Michał Zegan:
Hello.
I have the newest arch, systemd version 224.
The thing that I wonder
Hello.
I believe, although may be wrong, that session buses were used to
enforce single instances of programs, like a program registered a name
on dbus and another instance of the same program could not run.
How would it affect user buses in case of multiple graphical user sessions?
Unfortunately, SELinux is not namespace/whatever aware and such a setup
is not possible. Unless I suddenly became wrong in this area.
W dniu 23.08.2015 o 14:10, arnaud gaboury pisze:
Here is my setup:
Host: Archlinux systemd 224-1
Container: Fedora 22 systemd 219
The container is a server
.
Note that this is already half-broken, because some of those programs
actually *expect* to be unique *per user* – e.g. dconf-daemon for
writing to the dconf db – and having two copies of it in two sessions
might be bad…
On Sat, Aug 22, 2015, 13:36 Michał Zegan webczat_...@poczta.onet.pl
at 11:55 PM, Michał Zegan
webczat_...@poczta.onet.pl wrote:
Seems like this does not apply. I said that terminals do not start, and this
is random, sometimes they do. n_auto_vts = 6.
Can you provide more details about this? How do you reproduce it? What
are you running on your machine? What other
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello.
I am trying to use systemd to run wildfly application server. It is
being run by a shell script that runs a java vm in a separate process.
So, killing the script does not kill the other process.
The service is a simple type service, and I am
Michał Zegan
webczat_...@poczta.onet.pl пишет:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
Hello.
I am trying to use systemd to run wildfly application server. It
is being run by a shell script that runs a java vm in a separate
process. So, killing the script does not kill the other
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thanks, tracking it.
W dniu 2015-07-30 o 20:41, Andrei Borzenkov pisze:
В Thu, 30 Jul 2015 20:07:03 +0200 Michał Zegan
webczat_...@poczta.onet.pl пишет:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
Here is a log from appserver.service
, is in my own session.
Actually it is sometimes confusing to see utmp entries saying
different things than loginctl ;)
W dniu 2015-07-31 o 05:35, Andrei Borzenkov pisze:
В Fri, 31 Jul 2015 00:19:06 +0200 Michał Zegan
webczat_...@poczta.onet.pl пишет:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
, 30 Jul 2015 14:51:44 +0200 Michał Zegan
webczat_...@poczta.onet.pl пишет:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
Actually when I have sent the question I had systemd-222. now it
is 223 and result is the same. Unit file is at
http://webczatnet.pl/webczat/appserver.service
18:23, Andrei Borzenkov pisze:
В Thu, 30 Jul 2015 14:51:44 +0200 Michał Zegan
webczat_...@poczta.onet.pl пишет:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
Actually when I have sent the question I had systemd-222. now it
is 223 and result is the same. Unit file is at
http://webczatnet.pl
, Spencer Baugh (sba...@catern.com) wrote:
Colin Guthrie gm...@colin.guthr.ie writes:
Michał Zegan wrote on 31/07/15 12:37:
The thing is, if the user does it, then after he leaves, the
process is running under the user's session. If I log in to
my own account, su to the other user and start
address. Checked/tested.
W dniu 2015-08-09 o 18:21, Tomasz Torcz pisze:
On Sun, Aug 09, 2015 at 05:58:40PM +0200, Michał Zegan wrote:
It seems that systemd-networkd can not handle any kind of
advanced network configurations, that is: It cannot handle policy
routing and additional routing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello.
I was trying to install archlinux with linux 4.1, systemd-224 on the
uefi machine.
At the end of system installation, I issued bootctl install command
from within chroot, but the command has failed because I did not have
access to efi
with efibootmgr.
W dniu 2015-08-14 o 19:45, Mantas Mikulėnas pisze:
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 8:42 PM, Michał Zegan
webczat_...@poczta.onet.pl mailto:webczat_...@poczta.onet.pl
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
Hello.
I was trying to install archlinux with linux 4.1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Actually what is a procedure for more complicated network
configuration, where you do not have something in networkd?
W dniu 2015-08-14 o 19:33, Lennart Poettering pisze:
On Sun, 09.08.15 18:23, Michał Zegan (webczat_...@poczta.onet.pl)
wrote
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello.
It seems that systemd-networkd can not handle any kind of advanced
network configurations, that is:
It cannot handle policy routing and additional routing options like
setting a src address,
It does not ensure address ordering (if I have two
It seems that it works, and also seems that it does not require udev
itself to be running with support for this although i am not sure. just
that the way of making such a test is not obvious, unfortunately.
W dniu 19.10.2015 o 16:49, Colin Guthrie pisze:
Michał Zegan wrote on 17/10/15 20:32
Hello.
On non systemd systems, or on systems with disabled ifnames, is it
possible to somehow check what would be the interface name after rename
by default?
I would need this for example in case when I installed a system into a
chroot environment, while the host is for example not a systemd
Hello.
I have a kvm vps running archlinux with systemd-225, I have just
upgraded systemd and probably restarted most of the systemd components.
I am trying machinectl shell from my ordinary user session over ssh. it
gives me the possibility to authenticate as admin, then says that it
Hello.
Is systemd-nspawn intended to eventually become usable for full system
containers/general use with enough security to run things like vps
hosting? How much is missing to be able to do that, or maybe it already
can? Like you have user namespaces support that probably adds more
security
Well, actually I believe you could mess with unit configuration
overrides, couldn't you?
I was experimenting once by giving the user test 1% of cpu using cgroup
controls.
W dniu 06.09.2015 o 16:14, Lennart Poettering pisze:
On Thu, 03.09.15 14:57, Benjamin Rose (benr...@math.princeton.edu)
9.15 17:05, Michał Zegan (webczat_...@poczta.onet.pl) wrote:
Well, actually I believe you could mess with unit configuration overrides,
couldn't you?
I was experimenting once by giving the user test 1% of cpu using cgroup
controls.
Well, you can of course configure limits on individual sessions
Hello.
Before you stated that containers are not a security feature right now.
It is required to manually shift uids/gids on images etc.
What are other known problems with containers that use ALL namespaces?
Like if not counting the problem of uid allocation and manual shifting
of them.
W dniu 16.09.2015 o 15:08, Martin Pitt pisze:
Michał Zegan [2015-09-16 14:41 +0200]:
I actually believe that debian does some splitting, for example pam-systemd
module is in a separate package. Actually I feel that particular case is
wrong, but it happens there. I mean debian jessie
Hello.
It seems that I am able to change a hostname with hostnamectl
set-hostname name without any problems, even logged in as unprivileged
user, and I did not get any authentication requests.
I did not modify polkit rules to allow this, not sure about the default
ones, but they probably
Hello.
I encountered a really strange behaviour, and I am not sure if this is
kernel, systemd or arch specific. Could you please try to explain to me
what happens there? Here it is:
I log into gnome desktop using the x server, x erver is running on tty2,
everything works. I run a terminal
Hello, I have encountered a very interesting problem: I have a wired
ipv4 network configured via systemd-network, and an ipv6 sit tunnel.
The problem is it does not start. trying to restart systemd-networkd
gives the error like both local and remote addresses of the tunnel are
incompatible. I
121.100.5
Remote=216.66.80.162
ipv6.network:
[Match]
Name=ipv6
[Network]
Address=2001:470:71:796::1/128
IPv6AcceptRouterAdvertisements=false
[Route]
Destination=::/0
PreferredSource=2001:470:71:796::1
W dniu 27.05.2016 o 18:37, Tom Gundersen pisze:
> On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 5:11 PM, Mic
The only thing seems to be you cannot go low latency with system mode
pulseaudio
W dniu 10.01.2016 o 18:53, Reindl Harald pisze:
Am 10.01.2016 um 18:42 schrieb Tom Yan:
Ugh I am not talking about system units, but user units...
P.S. Although not really relevant here, but I am using the
symlink it in /etc/udev/rules.d to /dev/null.
W dniu 28.02.2016 o 11:40, Łukasz Stelmach pisze:
> Hi,
>
> One of the default rules supplied by systemd (v215 in Debian) is
> responsible restoring the state of rfkill switches.
>
> SUBSYSTEM=="rfkill", TAG+="systemd",
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi, I'll add to this:
W dniu 17.02.2016 o 14:56, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek pisze:
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 02:35:55PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> We are using systemd to supervise our NoSQL database and are
>> generally happy.
>>
>> A few
From what I understand, directories such as /usr/lib and stuff are
properly used even in case of a corrupted ld.so cache. like ldconfig
does not affect those directories at this time.
W dniu 20.05.2016 o 14:06, Vasiliy Tolstov pisze:
> 2016-05-20 15:01 GMT+03:00 Florian Weimer
Hello.
There is, it seems, a problem with the hardware clock. That is, the
systemd does not care about it. Neither systemd nor udev rules set the
system time using the hardware clock.
From what I know, if the clock is a cmos rtc, the kernel always sets
time during bootup. In any other case, it
Hello. I have installed systemd version 231 from arch repos. actually it
is systemd-selinux from aur. now, the problem:
the system boots. but some services fail to start, notably
systemd-journald and systemd-networkd, not sure if others fail too.
When checking what happened using dmesg as journald
But how to check what is happening? and I am still not sure why my
normal laptop with systemd works properly and starts journald.
W dniu 14.08.2016 o 06:56, Andrei Borzenkov pisze:
> 14.08.2016 04:58, Michał Zegan пишет:
>> Hello. I have installed systemd version 231 from arch repos.
journal.
W dniu 12.07.2016 o 11:36, Lennart Poettering pisze:
> On Sat, 09.07.16 22:45, Michał Zegan (webczat_...@poczta.onet.pl) wrote:
>
>> Hello.
>>
>> I believe administrators, like groups wheel and adm at least, have
>> access to read system journal and journa
well, did not know about that! it actually seems to work, thank you very
much.
W dniu 12.07.2016 o 12:57, Lennart Poettering pisze:
> On Tue, 12.07.16 12:47, Michał Zegan (webczat_...@poczta.onet.pl) wrote:
>
>> uhm the real question was: If I am already in the wheel group, how
Hello.
There is a problem with current audit support in journald. it listens
for audit events, but those same audit events go to dmesg, making a lot
of garbage.
Also, in case of a selinux enabled system, it generates huge amount of
audit output even if you do not want that, for example, pam
One thing to say: I heard, at least once, that systemd's timer are more
complicated because in order to make a timer you need two files instead
of creating one, especially in comparison to cron where you need just
one line although I always forget the order of fields. I would say a
timer section
08.07.2016 o 18:06, Lennart Poettering pisze:
> On Fri, 08.07.16 15:42, Michał Zegan (webczat_...@poczta.onet.pl) wrote:
>
>> One thing to say: I heard, at least once, that systemd's timer are more
>> complicated because in order to make a timer you need two files instead
service units this way.
W dniu 08.07.2016 o 20:29, Lennart Poettering pisze:
> On Fri, 08.07.16 18:17, Michał Zegan (webczat_...@poczta.onet.pl) wrote:
>
>> well, that makes sense, thanks. about a timer section shortcut, could it
>> be done in a different way? like, it is a sh
I say for new timer units, but you would need extra logic
to handle changing and reloading those timer units, or removing them
maybe, so hmm well, may be more complicated than I thought.
W dniu 08.07.2016 o 21:04, Andrei Borzenkov pisze:
> 08.07.2016 21:40, Michał Zegan пишет:
>> Well, I
Hello.
I believe administrators, like groups wheel and adm at least, have
access to read system journal and journals of all users.
journalctl can show the journal of the current user, system journal or
merge both of them. Could you please add the possibility to see the logs
of others, if not
W dniu 09.02.2017 o 15:52, Lennart Poettering pisze:
> On Tue, 17.01.17 12:29, Michał Zegan (webczat_...@poczta.onet.pl) wrote:
>
>> Hello.
>>
>> I am aware of the fact that systemd relies on the kernel to set system
>> clock from hardware clock, and that
W dniu 09.02.2017 o 18:49, Lennart Poettering pisze:
> On Thu, 09.02.17 16:14, Michał Zegan (webczat_...@poczta.onet.pl) wrote:
>
>> Btw, about the argument that the kernel should set rtc time because of
>> wrong timestamps in logs, so I should compile the rtc into the kernel
Hello.
I am aware of the fact that systemd relies on the kernel to set system
clock from hardware clock, and that requires compiling rtc drivers into
the kernel, not as modules.
I am also aware that doing it othervise would mix timestamps in log entries.
The question is: if I have rtc driver as a
Hello, when you use machinectl shell, you get your own pseudoterminal,
don't you? but it is owned by root.
Problem is when some background process tries to open this terminal when
this background process runs from the spawned shell, like gpg-agent,
because it has no permissions to do so and fails.
Hello.
Does systemd-nspawn intent to be a full secure container technology? or
it maybe already is? what is missing?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Fri, 11.11.16 19:36, Michał Zegan (webczat_...@poczta.onet.pl) wrote:
>
>> Why do you turn off keyrings? at least manpages say that userns
>> virtualizes keyrings or something similar...
>
> That'd be a new feature then...
>
> Lennart
>
signature.asc
Descr
audit/autofs are not properly virtualized, I know. But I thought
keyrings and cgroups are.
W dniu 11.11.2016 o 18:28, Lennart Poettering pisze:
> On Fri, 11.11.16 16:41, Michał Zegan (webczat_...@poczta.onet.pl) wrote:
>
>> Thank you for your answers!
>>
>> What I me
Why do you turn off keyrings? at least manpages say that userns
virtualizes keyrings or something similar...
W dniu 11.11.2016 o 19:24, Lennart Poettering pisze:
> On Fri, 11.11.16 19:21, Michał Zegan (webczat_...@poczta.onet.pl) wrote:
>
>> audit/autofs are not properly virtual
But he coul use a .link file to give a persistent interface name based
on some property, wouldn't it be a nice thing to do?
W dniu 16.11.2016 o 17:11, Greg KH pisze:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 03:33:42PM +0200, Pekka Sarnila wrote:
>> On 'Predictable Network Interface Names' it states as a benefit
probably do not intent it to be done by
overriding container's scope unit settings, for example?
W dniu 11.11.2016 o 13:52, Lennart Poettering pisze:
> On Wed, 09.11.16 18:24, Michał Zegan (webczat_...@poczta.onet.pl) wrote:
>
>> Hello.
>>
>> Does systemd-nspawn in
Hello.
I have archlinux with systemd (currently the newest released).
Hibernation works properly in this computer. however, after few
hibernations (or maybe something else triggers this condition?) it
suddenly stops working. trying to do systemctl hibernate in the terminal
says something like
I have probably discovered the cause, and it is, that the memory image
would be too large to fit in the swap space, and I would have to
increase the swap space.
W dniu 25.04.2017 o 05:34, Andrei Borzenkov pisze:
> 25.04.2017 04:45, Michał Zegan пишет:
>> Hello.
>>
>> I have a
Hello.
I came across the following:
The manpage reboot(2) says, that inside of a pid namespace, a reboot
call that normally would trigger restart actually triggers sending
sighup to the init of a namespace, and sigint is sent in case of
halt/poweroff.
I have verified that reboot actually triggers
W dniu 28.05.2017 o 20:43, Mike Gilbert pisze:
> On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 2:51 PM, Michał Zegan
> <webczat_...@poczta.onet.pl> wrote:
>> Hello.
>>
>> I came across the following:
>> The manpage reboot(2) says, that inside of a pid namespace, a reboot
>>
W dniu 29.05.2017 o 11:37, Lennart Poettering pisze:
> On Sat, 27.05.17 20:51, Michał Zegan (webczat_...@poczta.onet.pl) wrote:
>
>> Hello.
>>
>> I came across the following:
>> The manpage reboot(2) says, that inside of a pid namespace, a reboot
>> call
Hello.
My laptop does spuriously wake up from suspend.
Can systemd be involved in this? I do not know any timer set to use a
wake alarm, but I may be wrong. I usually suspend by closing a lid, and
logind reports lid opened after wake up, but I do not know if it is just
because lid was
Hmm, why not to place such things in /etc/fstab?
W dniu 14.06.2017 o 09:30, Pascal K pisze:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I am new to this list and to udev (used mdev before).
>
> My goal: Mount a CFast card partioned with 2 partitions one FAT32 and
> one EXT4, the EXT4 I would like to mount with
Hello.
When systemctl is-active was added?
I need this to check if I can safely use it to check if unit is active
if I don't have prior knowledge about the systemd version I am running
this on, this is for an ansible playbook.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
I am not really sure if you are right and you can concatenate cpio
archives, just be ware! they may be compressed, and in this case you
would rather cat their uncompressed form... I think so at least.
W dniu 05.10.2018 o 09:10, David Anderson pisze:
> And of course, the law of asking questions on
Hello,
Does journald intent to replace auditd? Because it has ability to get
audit messages and uses it by default, also turning on audit.
On the other hand, it does not silence dmesg audit messages like auditd
seems to do, why?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Note that if systemd is running in the initramfs too, then journal logs
from the current boot will contain initramfs logs too.
W dniu 22.11.2019 o 16:25, Mantas Mikulėnas pisze:
> On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 5:18 PM Boyce, Kevin P [US] (AS)
> mailto:kevin.bo...@ngc.com>> wrote:
>
> Good Morning
W dniu 11.12.2019 o 08:17, Ulrich Windl pisze:
Michal Zegan schrieb am 10.12.2019 um 17:53 in
> Nachricht :
>
> [...]
>> Well. This specifically may be doable by checking if any file open by
>> process is marked deleted, but would not work if the file was just
>> rewritten...
>
> Did you
W dniu 10.12.2019 o 15:12, Ulrich Windl pisze:
Lennart Poettering schrieb am 10.12.2019 um 12:32
> in
> Nachricht <20191210113234.GA16721@gardel-login>:
>> On Di, 10.12.19 10:38, Ulrich Windl (ulrich.wi...@rz.uni‑regensburg.de)
> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> Two questions (In Linux it's
Hello,
My use case is the following: make a test of routing protocols without
having... enough real hardware. I decided to do that via containers
using systemd-nspawn, and because I may need many interconnected
networks and things like qos settings applied without dirty scripts, I
decided to try
W dniu 16.10.2019 o 16:26, Brian Reichert pisze:
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 07:43:10AM +, Zbigniew J??drzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 04:08:24PM -0400, Brian Reichert wrote:
>>> I initiated an unsubscribe from this web page:
>>>
>>>
Hi,
Curious what is the use case. For me emergency is used mostly when I run
the kernel with the emergency cmdline parameter or when something fails
and I have to debug it before everything else starts.
W dniu 07.04.2020 o 10:26, Matwey V. Kornilov pisze:
> Hi,
>
> I would like my system to
W dniu 08.04.2020 o 00:44, juice pisze:
> Dorian ROSSE kirjoitti 2020-04-08 01:37:
>> Sorry I was say an error
>>
>> I can't start them they happen crash
>>
>
> Normally the getty@ttyX.services are off and are automatically started
> when you start a session on a VT.
tty1 is usually explicitly
1. I am probably not a right person to say this, but please calm down,
because that way of discussing does not make sense.
2. The problem is that we literally do not understand what you are
saying. You ask for help about problems but at least I cannot (not at
all) decipher what is the question.
W
W dniu 08.04.2020 o 00:03, Dorian ROSSE pisze:
> I explain again the problem juice
>
> I can't use my monitor foe edit script
>
> Because console-getty et getty@tty1 service are disabled,
>
> I can start but I want both service become static,
>
> How to become both service as static ?
Oh,
^ often stands for ctrl, so this is ctrl+]
W dniu 20.04.2020 o 17:30, Damian Ivanov pisze:
> Hello!
>
> Please enlighten me: which key is ^]
>
> Br,
> Damian
> ___
> systemd-devel mailing list
> systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
>
W dniu 09.04.2020 o 10:23, Pekka Paalanen pisze:
> On Thu, 9 Apr 2020 09:46:08 +0200
> Lennart Poettering wrote:
>
>> On Fr, 03.04.20 10:28, Pekka Paalanen (ppaala...@gmail.com) wrote:
>>
My (maybe bad) guess is that it would need to be addressed in the kernel
though
And the
I am not quite sure what you mean, but... generally these are symlinks
in /etc/systemd/system/multi-user.target.wants/ so you could delete them
manually if your intention is to make the actual os image with this
disabled from the start...
W dniu 17.04.2020 o 12:10, www pisze:
>
> I mean that
Seems like rtc drivers as module is quite often a thing for embedded.
But not sure where this should be solved, maybe at initramfs? If one is
unwilling to build all rtc drivers into the kernel (the case of generic
kernels where you would have to build all of them in)...
W dniu 31.03.2020 o 16:29,
I have used the embedded term unfortunately, but it seems to affect at
least some devices like raspberry pi, odroid c2, like sbc's.
W dniu 31.03.2020 o 17:57, Lennart Poettering pisze:
> On Di, 31.03.20 17:39, Michał Zegan (webczat_...@poczta.onet.pl) wrote:
>
>> Seems like rtc drive
e to solve this problem.
>
>
> thanks,
> Byron
>
>
>
>
> At 2020-04-17 19:44:48, "Michał Zegan" wrote:
>>I am not quite sure what you mean, but... generally these are symlinks
>>in /etc/systemd/system/multi-user.target.wants/ so you could
As a workaround I am almost sure you can instruct dracut to include the
file, can't you?
W dniu 16.10.2020 o 17:45, Lennart Poettering pisze:
> On Fr, 16.10.20 16:26, Daniel J. R. May (daniel@danieljrmay.com) wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 2020-10-16 at 15:16 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>>> So the
Note there is an easy way to override term type.
The default serial-getty@.service at least here has no TERM set by
default, but uses it to set term type when launching getty.
You can use kernel command line and add TERM=screen for example, or
things like that, and it should be picked up,
The thing that loads kernel and initramfs must itself be able to read
the fs, and systemd-boot delegates to uefi for that.
So things should be in ESP or you should use grub2 on uefi too and have
the grub image itself on ESP only.
Not sure about the current required partition structure I.E. where
For me it is pretty logical, as in: the service started in relation to
socket unit gets the respective socket.
If service is already started there is no way to pass additional socket
to it without restarting it.
It may even listen exactly on the socket specified, just creating it on
it's own.
W
Someone should really find a way to make it cooperate well with modular
rtcs.
It's popping up over and over and over and over again and no one is/will
build all rtc drivers into the kernel.
W dniu 01.03.2021 o 13:04, Mantas Mikulėnas pisze:
> Normally I think systemd expects the kernel to do this
. Fleming pisze:
> It's fairly simple to add a one-shot service unit to use 'hwclock' to
> read from the RTC and set the kernel's real-time clock. I do this on
> my RPis which use modules for their RTCs.
>
> On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 9:02 AM Michał Zegan
> wrote:
>>
>&
W dniu 01.03.2021 o 16:59, Lennart Poettering pisze:
> On Mo, 01.03.21 14:52, Michał Zegan (webczat_...@poczta.onet.pl) wrote:
>
>> Someone should really find a way to make it cooperate well with modular
>> rtcs.
>> It's popping up over and over and over a
W dniu 01.03.2021 o 17:01, Lennart Poettering pisze:
> On Mo, 01.03.21 15:38, Michał Zegan (webczat_...@poczta.onet.pl) wrote:
>
>> There are problems with log timestamps when you do that, and it is
>> probably why it was not done.
>> I am wondering if the only
1 - 100 of 114 matches
Mail list logo
