On 26/10/14 19:02, Andy Street wrote:
On Sun, 26 Oct 2014 13:11:39 +
Will Phillips wp4...@gmail.com wrote:
My understanding has always been that addr:place is similar to
addr:street, except when the unit in question isn't a street but some
other grouping of addresses such as a business
On 26/10/14 21:58, Andy Street wrote:
On Sun, 26 Oct 2014 19:27:11 +
Chris Hill o...@raggedred.net wrote:
We in OSM can do SO much better and we must not use the imaginary,
spurious and wholly wrong concept of Royal Fail's postal town. Postal
towns are not real and have no place in OSM
I have already notified tye data working group. The user was contacted, his
imaginary work was not reverted and he was not blocked, he continues to add
complete junk from his armchair. He needs to be stopped.
On 18 August 2014 10:59:22 GMT+01:00, SomeoneElse li...@mail.atownsend.org.uk
wrote:
I can't find a way to enter anything using the Android browser or Chrome for
Android. Phone support seems vital for such an app.
It works well on my laptop and gave good results for the few I tried.
On 14 August 2014 09:30:40 GMT+01:00, Christoph Lingg | komoot
christ...@komoot.de wrote:
Dear
for the feedback.
Cheers
Chris Hill schrieb
I can't find a way to enter anything using the Android browser or
Chrome for Android. Phone support seems vital for such an app.
It works well on my laptop and gave good results for the few I tried.
On 14 August 2014 09:30:40 GMT+01:00
On 31/07/14 17:41, Stuart Reynolds wrote:
Many thanks - some interesting viewpoints there.
I think it is safe to say that things will have improved from 2009,
but also fair to admit that some data is not structured in the way
that even I would like. Yorkshire is a particular problem for us.
On 03/07/14 17:51, John Baker wrote:
The first thing I am worried about is the copyright of the various
plans. Some/many seem to be derived from OS maps.
A legitimate concern.
Now I am no expert on the copyright situation here and dialogue is
difficult they know little about OSM really. He
I'd go for not:name, because the abbreviation is not the real name and it is
the convention established soon after the OS Opendata was released.
Where OS suddenly get these strange names from seems odd to me. It's almost as
though they want their Opendata to be hard to use.
---
cheers, Chris
I've tried to find the link to blogs.openstreetmap.org on the new layout and
couldn't find it. I wonder if the 'User Diaries' menu might be renamed to
'Community' and the diaries, blogs and possibly a link for the Foundation be on
a dropdown from there? The blogs is a useful link to what is
On 22/10/13 21:58, Derry Hamilton wrote:
Hi,
Is there a current/acceptable method for mapping climbs? Each time I
go to a new area and spend ages squinting at bits of rock that vaguely
look like the guidebook illustration I think I must map this
properly. Mainly, that's been mapping the
On 16/10/13 14:45, Andy Allan wrote:
Hi all,
I've sat down and created an updated version of the OpenStreetMap
Promotional Leaflets that many of you will have seen at some point or
another. They now have the correct licence and logo, for a start, (the
old ones date to 2010) but have also been
On 05/10/13 21:10, Andy Mabbett wrote:
I've just created this relation:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/3247604
for a terrace of listed houses.
How could I have done that better?
The source quoted points to a copyright page. Do English Heritage supply
OSM-friendly data?
--
Why do you suppose OS Streetview is correct? I find that compared to multiple
GPS tracks it is not always well aligned and more recent Bing imagery is often
better.
OpenStreetmap HADW osmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10 September 2013 10:09, o...@k3v.eu wrote:
This has been discussed on the list
Many people believe the amenity key is already over used. office=probation or
office=probation_service might used. An operator=* tag would be useful as well
as a name if there is one. Discussion and documentation is good, but you can
tag the offices with something that seems good to you (you
Do you mean a [turn] restriction?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction
Martin Schafran mar...@ampelmeter.com wrote:
what's the english expression for a relation from-(via)-to on a
junction
in context of traffic engineering?
I guess it might be turn relation or
route or
On 18/05/13 13:31, malenki wrote:
There are abot 33.000 objects in OSM which have google in the one
way or another in their source tag:
http://malenki.ch/d/2013-05-18_142122_scr_source_google.png
Just type google in the value-field:
http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/source#values
Any
I'd like to respond to Tom's points:
On 26/04/13 10:12, Tom Chance wrote:
I worry a bit about the view put across by Chris Hill, among others,
that we should always assume every tag has been put in place with the
greatest of care and so shouldn't be changed; that little-used tags
On 25/04/13 17:00, John Baker wrote:
Wow creating a storm here.
I cannot believe we are have so much discussion about grass. I have
had some before not about this type...
See! Discussion is needed. There are points of view that you don't
understand and didn't find out about because you
On 18/04/13 14:14, Shaun McDonald wrote:
On 18 Apr 2013, at 13:01, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
On 18/04/2013 12:52, Shaun McDonald wrote:
Updates are a lot harder to do as you have to deal with differences
When you say differences, do you mean within the tags? Does it need to do
On 18/04/13 16:40, Oliver Jowett wrote:
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 3:02 PM, Chris Hill o...@raggedred.net
mailto:o...@raggedred.net wrote:
On 18/04/13 14:14, Shaun McDonald wrote:
On 18 Apr 2013, at 13:01, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com
mailto:dave...@madasafish.com wrote
On 18/04/13 18:12, Oliver Jowett wrote:
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 4:57 PM, Chris Hill o...@raggedred.net
mailto:o...@raggedred.net wrote:
I followed the guidelines in the wiki [1]
That seems to boil down to don't modify naptan: tags except
naptan:verified, so hopefully we won't have
I've just had an email from Leo, who wrote the piece and it seems he may
add to it including a reference to the closed nature of OSM and
acknowledging OSM. I also pointed him to RichardF's tweet describing
crowd-serfing https://twitter.com/richardf/status/296244090415239168
--
Cheers, Chris
Sorry, that should, of course, been the closed nature of Google data.
On 11/04/13 12:49, Chris Hill wrote:
I've just had an email from Leo, who wrote the piece and it seems he
may add to it including a reference to the closed nature of OSM and
acknowledging OSM. I also pointed him
Some railway bridges near me have already been added to a bridge relation, not
by me, that includes the reference. See
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/446579 as an example. I don't know
if this a good idea or not, nor if the number is what you have in mind.
Cheers, Chris
OSM User
In a recent email I stated that in exchanges with Mauls I suggested that
he could seek help from various sources such as help.osm, a a mailing
list, IRC etc. This is not true. Further more I stated that Mauls was
rude in his reply. This is also not true.
I wish to apologise for this
How did the mapper get this info? What licence is it under? FoI for example is
copyright and so still needs to be released under a suitable licence. AFAIK
local authorities are responsible for naming roads not the DfT.
Cheers Chris
John Baker rovas...@hotmail.com wrote:
I had a response.
On 20/02/13 20:15, Kevin Peat wrote:
On 20 Feb 2013 19:38, Dudley Ibbett dudleyibb...@hotmail.com
mailto:dudleyibb...@hotmail.com wrote:
...I certainly wouldn't defend his attitude...
I don't know Mauls from Adam but how would you feel if you had been
contributing to the project for
Maybe a few of you braver than the brave, loud-mouthed, armchair lawyers
should just STFU and give the board a break.
When some of you have had as much abuse and hassle in an unpaid job they
volunteered for, in their spare time, maybe then you would understand
how hard it is to please all of
On 02/02/13 22:07, Paweł Paprota wrote:
On 02/02/2013 10:23 PM, Chris Hill wrote:
Threats to leave the project remind me of the bullshit thrown around
during licence-change when hardly anyone actually had the balls to
follow through. If people are so unhappy then go, but do so quickly
On 31/01/13 22:06, Steve Bennett wrote:
Hi all,
We'd like to produce a high quality bike map, to be printed. I'm
looking at the various renderers and wondering if anyone has a
recommendation?
Requirements
- looks good (eg, labels on wiggly labels aren't too wiggly, some
ability to avoid
Report the problem to your local authority who have a legal obligation to sort
it out with the landowner. My local councils do sort it out, occasionally they
need a reminder, but it is worth the effort.
I only add a PRoW if I have surveyed it on the ground, so if it is impassable I
would not
On 16/01/13 22:33, Christian Quest wrote:
The current legal requirement is only about a text because no official
icon was existing.
If one is chosen, what prevents us to upgrade the requirements to
leave the choice between the © OpenStreetMap contributors or the new
chosen icon ?
To me
On 13/01/13 15:21, Aidan McGinley wrote:
Been toying with some ideas for how to use the ONS Postcode data[1].
One idea that I have been exploring is to check if the value for the
centre of the postcode is inside a closed way, and if so then tag that
way with the appropriate addr:postcode. I
On 01/01/13 11:15, Dudley Ibbett wrote:
I must admit I don't map land use if it is farmland. To me if it
isn't mapped it is farmland. It would seem a reasonable default.
+1
Smothering the countryside with landuse when it's farmland seems well
over the top to me. Marking a single field
On 30/12/12 21:53, Frederik Ramm wrote:
It would be great if you could find your name on the list and do a
quick sanity check in your head whether this looks right or not.
The numbers for me look about right.
--
Cheers, Chris
user: chillly
___
On 23/12/12 15:41, Stan Berka wrote:
Yesterday, I did navigation to my work place here in Warsaw using
Osmand o my G2. The route I was given led through Warsaw Old Town.
The problem with this is, the Old Town is closed to most vehicles,
year long, except for special vehicles (shop supply,
On 05/11/12 17:27, David Prime wrote:
All,
I was looking at the tesco store finder page and noticed their API was
very simple: a lat/lon and a radius in miles to specify a search
circle for the results. I set the radius to 1000 miles and put the
centre in London and got all the Tesco
On 05/11/12 14:19, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) wrote:
Oops. I hadn't spotted that. It looks like ONS is getting just as
confused as I am with the different licenses. It seems that the
license ONS is providing the data under is fine for OSM then. :-)
(I'd still suspect that there is some
On 31/10/12 13:58, Kev js1982 wrote:
Does this set include BT (northern Ireland) , postcodes like nspd open
did? If so that is one way it's better than code point open
I have just finished processing the BT codes, so Northern Irish post
codes are now available too. I haven't been able to
On 31/10/12 18:37, Richard Bullock wrote:
On 31/10/12 13:58, Kev js1982 wrote:
Does this set include BT (northern Ireland) , postcodes like nspd open
did? If so that is one way it's better than code point open
I have just finished processing the BT codes, so Northern Irish post
codes are
On 16/10/12 13:25, davespod wrote:
Other recent dubious edits by the same person include this one:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/179146263
Evidently a joke with reference to:
Sorry, youre right. Memory let me down :-(
SomeoneElse li...@mail.atownsend.org.uk wrote:
Chris Hill wrote:
We have had problematic edits from that young man before. He seems to
have changed his OSM ID (from TomPopple)
For the avoidance of confusion, and not blocking the wrong user
Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk wrote:
OK
I'm buried deep into this and getting totally lost ...
I'm using http://layers.openstreetmap.fr/ to check what needs doing
We have 'admin?' levels
5=Regions ... so West Midlands
6=Counties ... But Manchester and some Welsh ones are missing?
7=Not used
John Sturdy jcg.stu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Philip Barnes p...@trigpoint.me.uk
wrote:
Have just spotted this changeset, which has globally changed footway
tags to sidewalk, the area covers the UK.
Any thoughts, to me sidewalk is one of those American words that
On 10/08/12 12:08, Peter Wendorff wrote:
Am 10.08.2012 12:29, schrieb Andrew:
Peter Wendorff wendorff at uni-paderborn.de writes:
one open question would be how to deal with units in this combination:
mph, m/h, km/h, and the usual errors mp/h, kmh, and so on, but I think
even that should be
On 25/07/12 22:16, Chris Baines wrote:
I have been playing around with OSM on my university's campus [1], I
have most of the buildings and their names on OSM, but not the
numbers. My university are quite good with data, you can see the
building numbers (they are not really numbers, but
On 06/07/12 14:30, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
I'm slowly getting a headache from trying to find out wheter the
use of ASTER data (for hillshading) in the creation of CC-BY-SA
licensed map tiles is permissible or not.
There are people who say that ASTER is only free for science and
about spirit of the document. I'm open to change title
of the document, if you have good one.
Rgs,
Pekka
Pekka Sarkola – pekka.sark...@gispo.fi – www.gispo.fi
-Original Message-
From: Chris Hill [mailto:o...@raggedred.net]
Sent: 3. heinäkuuta 2012 20:51
To: pekka.sark...@gispo.fi
On 03/07/12 17:02, Pekka Sarkola wrote:
Dear Friends,
I have prepared with National Land Survey of Finland Memorandum of
Understanding (MoU) about usage of their datasets by OpenStreetMap
activists. Hare is current draft text for everybody to comment:
Memorandum of Understanding
This
Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk wrote:
We still NEED some usable mechanism to maintain historic information.
On the whole the map is just growing, so just a valid start date is all
that is needed. But increasingly we have modern history where roads are
remodelled, and moving the history of those
Robert Whittaker (OSM) robert.whittaker+...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11 June 2012 18:12, Chris Hill o...@raggedred.net wrote:
That is not true. LWG did not get 'specific agreement' from OS. We
are
simply using OS OpenData in compliance with the OS OpenData licence
and OS
confirmed:
The Ordnance
On 11/06/12 17:16, David Groom wrote:
- Original Message - From: Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com
To: Licensing and other legal discussions.
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 1:38 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Response from Hampshire County Council
On 09/06/12 00:02, Rob Nickerson wrote:
Fantastic use of the data Nick!
Is there any guides for how to do something similar? I was trying to
visualise the Natural England data using Leaflet but failed miserably
as the shapefile is too big. Your website appears to load just the bit
needed.
On 08/06/12 17:30, Robert Whittaker (OSM) wrote:
And I don't think we can assume that the special permission we have
to use OS OpenData would cover this additional data
[...]
It has been repeated many times on these lists, by a very small number
of people, that we have 'special permission'
On 29/05/12 15:29, Steve Bennett wrote:
We'd be vulnerable to exactly the same kind of attack, right? Do we
have any mechanisms to detect or prevent it?
A community!
Steve
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 12:21 AM, Toby Murraytoby.mur...@gmail.com wrote:
Hmm I seem to recall a stnav company
On 29/05/12 16:00, Tom Chance wrote:
Most boundaries follow existing features like roads, rivers, etc.
Not always by any means. Many urban boundaries follow roads, but many
rural ones run alongside roads and have little jinks in them where they
cross to the other side of the road. This allows
On 29/05/12 18:10, Tom Chance wrote:
On 29 May 2012 17:19, Chris Hill o...@raggedred.net
wrote:
They need to be
manually entered as relations sharing nodes with those
features
On 29/05/12 20:16, Tom Chance wrote:
On 29 May 2012 18:52, Chris Hill o...@raggedred.net
wrote:
My question is: how do you know the boundary aligns with an
existing object?
Aha! A very good point.
I suppose
On 16/05/12 04:35, AJ Ashton wrote:
Hi Richard everyone,
This started off simply as an effort to improve our display London
Underground stations using existing OSM data, but was scope-creeped
into much more and apparently we messed up.
We've found that the lack of familiar London Underground
On 07/05/12 10:34, Jonathan Harley wrote:
On 06/05/12 17:22, Andrew M. Bishop wrote:
Andy Streetm...@andystreet.me.uk writes:
On Fri, 2012-05-04 at 14:32 +0100, Andrew Chadwick wrote:
I'd agree that generic consumers will struggle with highway=path,
designation=* but that is a wider OSM
On 02/05/12 16:29, Andrew Chadwick wrote:
designation=* has been evolving recently, and has added some open land
classifications:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:designation#UK_Protected_Areas
With the proliferation of these designation codes, would it make sense
to begin coming up with
Ed Loach e...@loach.me.uk wrote:
Chris wrote:
I've just updated the postcode layer using the latest Codepoint
Open
data. You can see how to use them in editors and info about the
postcode
finder that uses the data here: http://codepoint.raggedred.net
While I've used the layer often in the
I've just updated the postcode layer using the latest Codepoint Open
data. You can see how to use them in editors and info about the postcode
finder that uses the data here: http://codepoint.raggedred.net
--
Cheers, Chris
user: chillly
___
Talk-GB
I imported some OS OpenData coastline stuff not long after they came
out. I wrote up a wiki page about using the OS OpenData vector stuff
here: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Using_OS_Shapefiles . I expect
there are better ways than this now.
I know that tracing Bing can be better in some
On 23/03/12 13:14, Andy Allan wrote:
On 23 March 2012 12:58, Nick Whiteleggnick.whitel...@solent.ac.uk wrote:
Incidentally, is just knowing the footpaths evidence enough to tag with
odbl=clean? Or is there the risk that the footpath was created with iffy
sources?
Use odbl=clean to clear
Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
Iván Sánchez Ortega wrote:
Looks like they're using a old (pre-2011) planet dump for the data.
Yep, we've now pinned it down to 1st-7th April 2010.
cheers
Richard
_
talk mailing list
On 07/03/12 15:45, andrzej zaborowski wrote:
I was wondering why people think that. Even trying to put myself in
place of someone who thinks the license change is the best thing since
sliced bread I still can't see the reasons for remapping. First of
all it costs more work than adding data
On 02/03/12 22:07, Frans Thamura wrote:
i wish OSM can provide like what GMAP API can :0
rather using this model.
API wrapper to TILE will be interesting
I think you are confusing what Google call their API with what OSM call
our API. They are not the same thing.
What Google call their API
On 02/03/12 14:35, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
If you have some free time over the next few weeks, do go and remap.
P2 and JOSM both have licence status displays. Bing and OS StreetView
are immensely useful resources (my P2 prefs have them assigned to
function keys F1 and F2 for easy reference).
If there are no rails perhaps there is a track (highway track) or even an
informal path (highway path) running along the old trackbed. If there is you
could add that, with bridge tags. I am not advocating tagging for the renderer,
only tag what really is there.
Cheers, Chris
User chillly
Blog
On 15/02/12 09:43, Norbert Wenzel wrote:
On 15.02.2012 06:41, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
Is there a way (in JOSM or otherwise) to find all dead-ends (nodes
contained in only one highway way) without highway=turning_circle or
noexit=yes in an area?
Shouldn't keepright[0] report these as errors?
I
On 15/02/12 16:06, Morten Kjeldgaard wrote:
On 15/02/2012, at 10.46, Frederik Ramm wrote:
What's even more problematic is if people try to automatically change
a large number of objects away from what they consider deprecated
to some new tagging scheme. This requires a much broader approval
On 07/02/12 07:36, Graham Jones wrote:
On 7 February 2012 05:34, Simone Cortesi sim...@cortesi.com
mailto:sim...@cortesi.com wrote:
Our default action should be: if somebody doesn't answer, then
relicence
I completely agree - we should assume that no response is equivalent
to
Robert Norris rw_nor...@hotmail.com wrote:
Seeing as it's Charles Dicken's 200th Birthday soon,
http://www.charlesdickensbirthplace.co.uk/charles-dickens/charles-dickens-200
I thought I should get around to mapping the Blue and other Coloured Plaques in
my area of Portsmouth, especially as
On 13/01/12 16:36, Tom Chance wrote:
2012/1/13 Tim François sk1pp...@yahoo.co.uk
mailto:sk1pp...@yahoo.co.uk
Oh bummer - didn't mean to send to Talk-GB, just the local Bristol
mappers! Oh well, it's out there now...
I think it's good to get everyone thinking about this for their
On 10/01/12 18:30, john whelan wrote:
May I suggest that the clean way to deal with the data in OSM is to
basically remap the roads using Bing and the JOSM or whatever plugin
so the data is labelled as coming from Bing. Bing is available and it
would give a much more consistent and accurate
On 10/01/12 18:19, Peter Miller wrote:
Regarding OS copyright, the OS do not claim derived copyright any more
for 3rd party content that is displayed on an OS map just so long as
they do not present that sort of feature on their mapping. As such any
copyright infringement would be with the
I have used the latest OS OpenData Codepoint data, released in November,
to update the tiles overlay showing GB postcodes.
You can see more at http://codepoint.raggedred.net/
--
Cheers, Chris
user: chillly
___
Talk-GB mailing list
On 13/12/11 11:05, Ed Avis wrote:
In some parts of the country there are waterways traced from out-of-copyright
OS maps or from Street View tiles. Getting the shapes from OS VectorMap will
certainly be an improvement on that. In my opinion it will also be an
improvement compared to not having
On 11/12/11 11:26, Borbus wrote:
First of all, when I say import I mean a manual import: reprojection of
OS shapefiles, conversion to OSM data and careful processing in JOSM
before uploading.
I'd really like to get all the water features from OS into OSM. It's
very useful data and also makes
Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
Also, in my opinion, unmarked bus stops are a daft concept to begin
with, seemingly dreamed up to make life harder than it needs to be!
+1 Why would you have a stop without a sign as a deliberate strategy? It
completely defies the idea of bus stops
opposite the terminus (now signed on the route I
know best as its no longer a terminus for most services!).
On Nov 24, 2011 9:22 AM, Chris Hill o...@raggedred.net
mailto:o...@raggedred.net wrote:
Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com
mailto:gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
Also, in my
On 22/11/11 22:26, Graham Jones wrote:
Hi,
I just found a node tagged with lots of things to do with naptan. It
looks like it should be a bus stop, but there is no highway=bus_stop
tag on it. (http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/471495304).
I just wonder what to do with it - can either
On 12/10/11 13:33, Jonathan Gray wrote:
Hi all,
We're thinking of having a big census of open government data
initiatives from around the world next week [1], to coincide with Open
Government Data Camp 2011 in Warsaw [2].
This would involve having a basic mechanism to add title, URL, brief
The terms of use say only for non-commercial use, which is not acceptable for
use in OSM
Arun Ganesh arun.plane...@gmail.com wrote:
Regarding the administrative boundaries, why is there no mention of the
GADM
dataset[1] as a potential data source? Its the most accurate and
detailed
public
I want to map part of the Trans Pennine Trail (TPT) [1]. Much of the
ways already exist in OSM because it uses NCN routes much of the way.
South of Manchester there is the NCN 62 which has a name=Trans Pennine
Trail [2]. This may be part of the TPT, but is not the whole route at all.
I would
On 08/09/11 19:48, Thomas Davie wrote:
Hi,
Today I experimented with using OSM maps on my Garmin sat-nav. The
one thing that I noticed was that roundabouts do not work well. The
problem seems to be the slip roads entering the roundabout. The
sat-nav recognises them as a roundabout in
their
licence agreement or copyright. This was discussed in an OS blog about the
Public Sector Mapping Agreement. I hope this applies to public rights of way,
but I'm not sure.
I'll make some enquiries.
Cheers,
Chris Hill
Nick Whitelegg nick.whitel...@solent.ac.uk wrote:
To: Nick Whitelegg
On 26/07/11 11:59, Curon Davies wrote:
Back in January there was a discussion regarding Forestry Commission
data, I've had a quick look and couldn't see anything since. It looks
like the data was released last month:
http://www.forestry.gov.uk/datadownload
The license looks a bit problematic at
On 05/07/11 17:03, Oleg wrote:
Hi All
Seems like this is a good place to tell about a new way to add places
to the map. There is a lot of people who use twitter actively with
their mobile phones, which has a gps on board. Now you can use
location-based tweets to add POIs to the map :)
The
On 22/06/11 11:19, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen wrote:
Since recently was decided that in NL
cookies are subject to explicit permission of
the users, I'd think that Openstreetmap provides
information on what information and settings are
actually used by
On 20/06/11 16:03, TimSC wrote:
On 20/06/11 15:53, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
NopMap wrote:
Yeah, sure, I'll just burn some incense, look deep into my
crystal ball and guess what everybody has been doing.
Why do you need to do that? Why don't you e-mail LWG and say: I think
you've been having
On 20/06/11 17:47, TimSC wrote:
On 20/06/11 16:39, Chris Hill wrote:
Maybe part of the reason that these volunteers are working too hard
is because some people demand individual attention. Imagine if
everyone made their own demands of the LWG ...
Are you seriously saying that a handful
On 13/06/11 18:19, Rob Truxler wrote:
Hi Everyone
Does anyone know a map tile web service that produces transparent
tiles with just roads and their labels and icons on them? I'm hoping
to use this layer with a background tileset that I already have. I'm
open to using anything that is not in
Andy
-Original Message-
From: Chris Hill [mailto:o...@raggedred.net]
Sent: 08 June 2011 22:01
To: Talk GB
Subject: [Talk-GB] Code point updates
I have finished loading the latest OS CodePoint to create the post code
overlays for England, Scotland and Wales. More info here:
http
Since it looks likely that a bot is going to be run to add OS Locator
names to unnamed British roads - something I strongly disagree with, but
I can't stop - I demand that it is tagged with a common-sense, clear tag
to show where this has happened. This should not be the bonkers cock-up
that
I have finished loading the latest OS CodePoint to create the post code
overlays for England, Scotland and Wales. More info here:
http://codepoint.raggedred.net/
--
Cheers, Chris
user: chillly
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
On 08/06/11 21:20, Brian Prangle wrote:
I'm firmly of the opinion that this is not work for a bot unless a tag
is added such as verified=no so we humans can search for what hasn't
been surveyed.
Wholly agree.
A bot will just replicate the OS errors and then we'll never find them!
Also
On 01/06/11 21:26, David Fitzhugh wrote:
While browsing in the area of Fakenham, Norfolk, UK, I came across
some entries with the source = OS Vector Map District ( look at the
woodland). As I had not heard of this before I tried to look it up on
the web and could not make sense of the OS
On 14/04/11 11:42, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
Peter Miller wrote:
So the proposal is now:
maxspeed:type=GB:national_single|GB:national_dual|GB:motorway|GB:restricted
I may be missing the point on all of this, but:
Why are we doing this?
In OSM we optimise for the mapper, not the data
101 - 200 of 456 matches
Mail list logo
