- Original Message -
From: Anthony o...@inbox.org
To: OSM Fork osm-f...@googlegroups.com; openstreetmap
talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Friday, July 08, 2011 9:24 PM
Subject: [OSM-talk] offering adapted databases
This is an except from a message I sent to Steve. But hopefully
- Original Message -
From: Jaakko Helleranta.com jaa...@helleranta.com
To: Licensing and other legal discussions. legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Monday, July 04, 2011 8:42 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] license change effect on un-tagged nodes
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 12:53 PM,
: jhelleranta
-Original Message-
From: David Groom revi...@pacific-rim.net
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2011 11:37:51
To: Licensing and other legal discussions.legal-t...@openstreetmap.org
Reply-To: Licensing and other legal discussions.
legal-t...@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] license
- Original Message -
From: Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com
To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 2011 11:19 AM
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] OS OpenData and ODbL OK
Michael Collinson mike@... writes:
Ordnance Survey has explicitly considered any licensing conflict between
- Original Message -
From: Michael Collinson m...@ayeltd.biz
To: OSM talk-gb talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Monday, July 04, 2011 1:53 PM
Subject: [Talk-GB] OS OpenData and ODbL OK
Good news.
I hope that helps a number of UK contributors who have been uncertain as
to whether
- Original Message -
From: Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net
To: legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 10:19 AM
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Exception in OpenDataLicense/Community
Guidelines for temporary file
David Groom wrote:
We also have be mindful
11:55, David Groom wrote:
- Original Message - From: Richard Fairhurst
Jonathan Harley wrote:
Really I'm at a loss to see the point of the share-alike clause (4.4).
I can't think of a use-case for OSM where processing the database
doesn't reduce the amount of information.
The canonical
- Original Message -
From: Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net
To: legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2011 10:53 AM
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Exception in Open DataLicense/Community
Guidelines for temporary file
Jonathan Harley wrote:
Really I'm at a
- Original Message -
From: ThomasB toba0...@yahoo.de
To: legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 2:18 PM
Subject: [OSM-legal-talk] Exception in Open Data License/Community
Guidelines for temporary file
Dear Legal-list,
My question applies to all kind of
- Original Message -
From: John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com
To: Licensing and other legal discussions. legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 5:40 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] [OSM-talk] License/CT issues: Let's not punish
the world's disadvantaged, pls.
- Original Message -
From: Jaakko Helleranta.com jaa...@helleranta.com
To: John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com
Cc: Licensing and other legal discussions. legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 6:37 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] [OSM-talk] License/CT issues:
When goes a community guideline change rather than explain a licence?
There are a number of community guideline pages on the wiki.
Some of these pages do clearly seem simply to explain how the ODbL should be
interpreted, such as We can clearly define things that are USUALLY Produced
Works:
- Original Message -
From: ThomasB toba0...@yahoo.de
To: legal-t...@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 3:03 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Exception in Open Data License/Community
Guidelines for temporary file
David Groom wrote:
As far as I can see, ignoring
- Original Message -
From: NopMap ekkeh...@gmx.de
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Monday, June 20, 2011 8:09 AM
Subject: [OSM-talk] Pitiful proceedings - as usual
Hi!
First of all: I am in favour of the licence change itself, I have agreed a
long time ago and I was actually
- Original Message -
From: John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com
To: Licensing and other legal discussions. legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Sunday, June 19, 2011 11:33 AM
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] [talk-au] Statement from nearmap.com regarding
submission of derived works from
of derived works from PhotoMaps to
OpenStreetMap
Hi,
David Groom wrote:
From reading section 4.6 of ODbL[1] my understanding is no. There is no
mention of it only applying if you change the data, the requirement seems
to hold whenever
You Publicly Use a Derivative Database or a Produced
Word in quotes below relate to the meanings given them by ODbL
Assume I use jxapi to download an extract of the main OSM database . Is the
downloaded extract a Derivative Database, or since the download was
provided by OSM does the downloaded data qualify as simply a Database?
Regards
:09 PM, David Groom revi...@pacific-rim.net
wrote:
Word in quotes below relate to the meanings given them by ODbL
Assume I use jxapi to download an extract of the main OSM database . Is
the
downloaded extract a Derivative Database, or since the download was
provided by OSM does the downloaded data
- Original Message -
From: Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net
To: legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 9:58 AM
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] data derived from UK Ordnace Survey
(continuing from previous message, d'oh)
In the event of a future
- Original Message -
From: Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net
To: legal-t...@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 2:25 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] data derived from UK Ordnace Survey
David Groom wrote:
However your argument above completely fails to refer
Michael
Thank you for such a full explanation
- Original Message -
From: Michael Collinson m...@ayeltd.biz
To: talk-gb talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 5:50 PM
Subject: [Talk-GB] OS OpenData and accepting the new contributor terms
[snipped]
regretfully
- Original Message -
From: Ben Last ben.l...@nearmap.com
To: OpenStreetMap Learned Discussions t...@openstreetmap.org; OSM
Australian Talk List talk...@openstreetmap.org; Licensing and other
legal discussions. legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 2:30 AM
Subject:
As a slightly supplementary question of what to do with data from those
users who have not agreed to the CT's can I make the following suggestion.
Given that we obviously want to move forward with a clean database untainted
by any data which might be incompatible with future licences, AND
- Original Message -
From: Ben Last ben.l...@nearmap.com
To: David Groom revi...@pacific-rim.net; OSM Australian Talk List
talk...@openstreetmap.org; Licensing and other legal discussions.
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 12:48 AM
Subject: Re: [talk-au
- Original Message -
From: Andy Street m...@andystreet.me.uk
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 11:44 AM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Announce: Beginning of Phase 4 of license change
process
On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 22:33 +0200, Michael Collinson wrote:
As per
- Original Message -
From: David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au
To: Josh Doe j...@joshdoe.com
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org; Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 11:23 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Announce: Beginning of Phase 4 of license change
process
- Original Message -
From: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason ava...@gmail.com
To: OpenStreetMap blather talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 12:06 AM
Subject: [OSM-talk] Can I say yes to the ODbL if I can't account for
100%of my data?
Back in 2006 I wrote the following when
- Original Message -
From: Ben Last ben.l...@nearmap.com
To: OpenStreetMap Learned Discussions t...@openstreetmap.org; OSM
Australian Talk List talk-au@openstreetmap.org; Licensing and other
legal discussions. legal-t...@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 2:30 AM
Subject:
- Original Message -
From: Ben Last ben.l...@nearmap.com
To: David Groom revi...@pacific-rim.net; OSM Australian Talk List
talk-au@openstreetmap.org; Licensing and other legal discussions.
legal-t...@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 12:48 AM
Subject: Re: [talk-au
- Original Message -
From: David Groom revi...@pacific-rim.net
To: OSM Australian Talk List talk-au@openstreetmap.org; Licensing and
other legal discussions. legal-t...@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 1:16 AM
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Statement from nearmap.com regarding
- Original Message -
From: Geza Gyuk gg...@adlerplanetarium.org
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2011 8:10 PM
Subject: [OSM-talk] tile downloads
Hi,
I'm a little unclear if this is the method I should be using to ask about
acceptable use of the
- Original Message -
From: Andreas Perstinger andreas.perstin...@gmx.net
To: legal-t...@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 1:35 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] CTs are not full copyright assignment
On 2011-06-08 03:25, David Groom wrote:
Why do you and some others
- Original Message -
From: Andreas Perstinger andreas.perstin...@gmx.net
To: legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 10:33 AM
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] CTs are not full copyright assignment
On 2011-06-07 10:35, Ed Avis wrote:
Frederik Rammfrederik@...
- Original Message -
From: David Fitzhugh davidttfitzh...@yahoo.co.uk
To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2011 9:26 PM
Subject: [Talk-GB] OS Vector Map District
While browsing in the area of Fakenham, Norfolk, UK, I came across some
entries with the source = OS
Mikel
I cant see anything in the Contributor Terms which state that if you are only
adding non-substantial and non-systematic data then it is OK to import
non-compatible data. So one question is, will the import be carried out
through an account which has agreed to the CT's, in which case
- Original Message -
From: Richard Weait rich...@weait.com
To: OSM Australian Talk List talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2011 3:50 PM
Subject: Re: [talk-au] How many NearMap users do you think have accepted the
new CTs and ODbL?
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 9:24 AM,
- Original Message -
From: Thomas Davie tom.da...@gmail.com
To: David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2011 8:09 AM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] License graph
On 19 Apr 2011, at 01:15, David Murn wrote:
On Mon, 2011-04-18 at 11:53 -0700,
- Original Message -
From: Thomas Davie tom.da...@gmail.com
To: David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2011 8:09 AM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] License graph
On 19 Apr 2011, at 01:15, David Murn wrote:
On Mon, 2011-04-18 at 11:53 -0700,
- Original Message -
From: Thomas Davie tom.da...@gmail.com
To: David Groom revi...@pacific-rim.net
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2011 10:09 AM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] the 70% , was Re: License graph
On 19 Apr 2011, at 09:41, David Groom wrote
- Original Message -
From: Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org
To: David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au
Cc: Talk Openstreetmap talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Friday, April 15, 2011 12:08 AM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetMap License Change Phase 3 begins Sunday
Hi,
David Murn wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Friday, April 15, 2011 12:11 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetMap License Change Phase 3 begins Sunday
Hi,
On 04/15/2011 10:13 AM, David Groom wrote:
There's also a third kind
- Original Message -
From: Robert Whittaker (OSM) robert.whittaker+...@gmail.com
To: Licensing and other legal discussions. legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2011 8:54 AM
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Questions about CTs 1.2.4
On 13 April 2011 23:06, Francis
- Original Message -
From: andrzej zaborowski balr...@gmail.com
To: john whelan jwhelan0...@gmail.com
Cc: OpenStreetMap talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2011 7:34 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetMap License Change Phase 3 begins Sunday
On 14
- Original Message -
From: John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com
To: Nick Hocking nick.hock...@gmail.com
Cc: talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011 4:59 AM
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Fwd: [OSM-dev] To OSM editor authors
On 11 April 2011 13:45, Nick Hocking
- Original Message -
From: Elizabeth Dodd ed...@billiau.net
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2011 10:19 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] the coastline
On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 21:59:20 -
Andy Robinson ajrli...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd place the coastline at the low water
- Original Message -
From: Michael Collinson m...@ayeltd.biz
To: Licensing and other legal discussions. legal-t...@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2011 4:23 PM
Subject: [OSM-legal-talk] Someone ought to do something ... dealing with
violations of OSM's geodata license
- Original Message -
From: Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org
To: OSM Talk talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Friday, February 25, 2011 4:03 PM
Subject: [OSM-talk] Coastline updates
Hi!
I have edited coastlines in Cornwall last summer and they are still not
updated on the main map. (Easy to
- Original Message -
From: Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org
To: OSM Talk talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Friday, February 25, 2011 4:03 PM
Subject: [OSM-talk] Coastline updates
Hi!
I have edited coastlines in Cornwall last summer and they are still not
updated on the main map. (Easy to
- Original Message -
From: David Paleino da...@debian.org
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Friday, February 25, 2011 5:57 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Coastline updates
David
the way you refer to was last edited on 1 Feb 2011, I would not necessarily
expect to see the results of
On the wiki under phase 4 of the licencing plan [1] it says Final cut-off.
Community Question: What do we do with the people who have declined or not
responded?
Who is the community in the above context, or more to the point who gets
to decide who the community is?
Regards
David
[1]
- Original Message -
From: Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org
To: legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2011 6:46 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] OpenStreetMap copyright credits
Hi,
On 02/16/11 18:56, David Groom wrote:
On the wiki under phase 4
- Original Message -
From: Andrew Gregory andrew.greg...@gmail.com
To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2011 1:39 PM
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Relicensing per changeset?
On 7 February 2011 11:05, 4x4falcon i...@4x4falcon.com wrote:
it will also be in fosm.org
- Original Message -
From: Anthony o...@inbox.org
To: Jean-Marc Liotier j...@liotier.org
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2011 11:35 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Fwd: Re: collateral damage (was: What the license
change is going to do to the map)
On Thu, Feb
- Original Message -
From: Andrew Gregory andrew.greg...@gmail.com
To: OSM Australian Talk List talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Saturday, February 05, 2011 5:30 AM
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Relicensing per changeset?
On 3 February 2011 08:38, Stephen Hope slh...@gmail.com wrote:
On
- Original Message -
From: Peter Watson peter.bmwk7...@gmail.com
To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2011 10:40 AM
Subject: [talk-au] waterway=coastline
Hi Everyone,
I have noticed that all the Gold Coast canals are taged with
waterway=coastline. I
- Original Message -
From: Peter Miller peter.mil...@itoworld.com
To: Jerry Clough : SK53 on OSM sk53_...@yahoo.co.uk
Cc: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2011 11:11 AM
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Adding a further 250,000 UK roads quickly using a
Bot?
Thanks for
- Original Message -
From: Richard Weait rich...@weait.com
To: Licensing and other legal discussions. legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2011 9:38 PM
Subject: [OSM-legal-talk] per changeset relicensing
There have been previous discussions regarding per changeset
- Original Message -
From: Mike Collinson m...@ayeltd.biz
To: Licensing and other legal discussions.
legal-t...@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 1:56 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] UK mapping authority switches to Open
Government Licence (was: CTs and the 1 April
Licence
At 02:47 PM 7/01/2011, David Groom wrote:
- Original Message - From: Mike Collinson m...@ayeltd.biz
In the case of the UK OS, there is a switch from a potential requirement
for
level 4 attribution to a clear requirement for level 1, so the Open
Government Licence is definitely good
- Original Message -
From: Richard Mann richard.mann.westoxf...@gmail.com
To: Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 1:13 PM
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] OS have switched to Open Government License today...
But (unless I've missed something)
- Original Message -
From: Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net
To: legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2011 4:48 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] CTs and the 1 April deadline
John Smith wrote:
Thanks for the clarification. In your opinion, what would be
- Original Message -
From: Stephan Knauss o...@stephans-server.de
To: Licensing and other legal discussions. legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2011 6:08 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] CTs and the 1 April deadline
Peter Miller writes:
I will currently be
- Original Message -
From: John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com
To: Licensing and other legal discussions. legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2011 6:18 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] CTs and the 1 April deadline
On 5 January 2011 04:08, Stephan Knauss
- Original Message -
From: Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com
To: talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Sunday, December 26, 2010 1:42 PM
Subject: [Talk-GB] Street name disagreement - whose right or wrong?
Hi
I have a street in my area whose name is being contest by another mapper.
To
),
David Groom wrote:
I've repeatedly asked where is the explicit permission to use Bing
Imagery to create derived works, all the only answer is we have it. As
I've said before if its there please show us where it is.
Just out of interest; why are we having this conversation? Is it just to
determine
For the record
1) I accept that the Microsoft Licence[1] to use Bing imagery is an early
version, and we have been told it will be revised
2) I suspect that Microsoft do intend that Bing imagery may be used to
update OSM
However:
- Original Message -
From: Rob Myers
14:40, David Groom revi...@pacific-rim.net wrote:
The licence PDF states:
Any updates you make to the OpenStreetMap map via the
Application (even if not published to third parties) must be contributed
back to openstreetmaps.org.
Which is NOT the same as stating Microsoft have directly stated
- Original Message -
From: Rob Myers r...@robmyers.org
To: legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Sunday, December 19, 2010 4:34 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Someone already had a look at the Bing Terms
of Use?
On 12/19/2010 02:40 PM, David Groom wrote:
For the record
1) I
- Original Message -
From: pec...@gmail.com
To: legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2010 10:01 AM
Subject: [OSM-legal-talk] CT clarification: third-party sources
Hi everyone!
To clarify my criticism/confusion with CT:
1) I'm not against ODbL. It is nice
- Original Message -
From: Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org
To: Licensing and other legal discussions.
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2010 7:14 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] CT clarification: third-party sources
Peter,
pec...@gmail.com wrote:
1) I'm
- Original Message -
From: Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org
To: Licensing and other legal discussions.
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Friday, December 10, 2010 12:16 AM
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] CT clarification: third-party sources
Hi,
David Groom wrote:
Your above
this thread goes any further,Yes, a cock-up I believe, possibly
mine. The un-highlighted text should be the same as CT 1.0. Thank you fx99 for
pointing it out. Will investigate.
Mike
At 03:39 PM 3/12/2010, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
David Groom wrote:
If the OSMF board wish to move
- Original Message -
From: Serge Wroclawski emac...@gmail.com
To: Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com
Cc: Open Street Map mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Monday, December 06, 2010 1:55 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Unsetting CT flag
This should really be taking place on the legal
Original Message -
From: Anthony o...@inbox.org
To: Licensing and other legal discussions. legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Friday, December 03, 2010 12:10 AM
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] New phrase in section 2
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 6:42 PM, David Groom revi...@pacific-rim.net
- Original Message -
From: Francis Davey fjm...@gmail.com
To: Licensing and other legal discussions.
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Friday, December 03, 2010 2:43 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] New phrase in section 2
[snipped for brevity]
Yes. I am fairly clear that some
- Original Message -
From: Anthony o...@inbox.org
To: Licensing and other legal discussions. legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2010 3:43 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] New phrase in section 2
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 3:00 AM, Francis Davey fjm...@gmail.com
- Original Message -
From: Sebastian Klein basti...@googlemail.com
To: legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 9:54 AM
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] some interesting points from the bing license
Mike Dupont wrote:
I have highlighted and commented on points
- Original Message -
From: Anthony o...@inbox.org
To: Licensing and other legal discussions.
legal-t...@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 01, 2010 12:10 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] some interesting points from the bing
license
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 6:34 AM, David
like
(to the contributor) it is compatible with the OSMF's current licence
- there is no need for the contributor to be sure about this, but OSMF
makes it clear that this is what it would like
I think I have the same question about this as David Groom:
Yes , you do.
The OSMF tells me that I'm
- Original Message -
From: Richard Weait rich...@weait.com
To: David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au
Cc: talk-au talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Monday, November 22, 2010 12:45 PM
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Fwd: license change map
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 7:34 AM, David Murn
- Original Message -
From: Richard Weait rich...@weait.com
To: David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au
Cc: talk-au talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Monday, November 22, 2010 12:45 PM
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Fwd: license change map
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 7:34 AM, David Murn
- Original Message -
From: Richard Weait rich...@weait.com
To: David Groom revi...@pacific-rim.net
Cc: talk-au talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Monday, November 22, 2010 4:58 PM
Subject: Re: [talk-au] CT / ODbL approval by changeset.
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 11:34 AM, David Groom revi
- Original Message -
From: Francis Davey fjm...@gmail.com
To: Licensing and other legal discussions. legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2010 2:50 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] [DRAFT] Contributor Terms 1.2
On 17 November 2010 13:30, David Groom revi
- Original Message -
From: Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org
To: legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2010 11:18 AM
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] [DRAFT] Contributor Terms 1.2
Hi,
On 11/17/10 10:46, ke...@cordina.org.uk wrote:
Looking at this the eyes or a
- Original Message -
From: Andy Street m...@andystreet.me.uk
To: Nick Whitelegg nick.whitel...@solent.ac.uk
Cc: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Monday, November 08, 2010 3:22 PM
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Footpath reference numbers
On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 14:37 +, Nick Whitelegg
- Original Message -
From: Andrew Harvey andrew.harv...@gmail.com
To: OSM Australian Talk List talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2010 11:51 PM
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Port Hacking (Bay v. Water)
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 11:34 PM, Markus_g marku...@bigpond.com
- Original Message -
From: Richard Weait rich...@weait.com
To: Licensing and other legal discussions.
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2010 11:32 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] legal FAQ license
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 4:05 PM, David Groom revi...@pacific
- Original Message -
From: Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com
To: Licensing and other legal discussions. legal-t...@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Monday, October 04, 2010 12:33 AM
Subject: [OSM-legal-talk] Checking if I understand correctly...
Hi,
Is the following statement correct: Under
- Original Message -
From: Elena ``of Valhalla'' elena.valha...@gmail.com
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 10:34 AM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Countries that have NOT had any imports?
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 02:41:12PM -0700, Kai Krueger wrote:
with all
- Original Message -
From: Grant Slater openstreet...@firefishy.com
To: ke...@cordina.org.uk; Licensing and other legal discussions.
legal-t...@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 1:21 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] OS Opendata amp; the new license
On 29 September
- Original Message -
From: Rob Myers r...@robmyers.org
To: legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 11:25 AM
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] OS Opendata the new license
On 09/17/2010 01:12 AM, 80n wrote:
That's a bit of a jump isn't it? Firstly, the CTs allow
- Original Message -
From: Rob Myers r...@robmyers.org
To: legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 5:03 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] OS Opendata the new license
On 09/17/2010 03:45 PM, David Groom wrote:
In what way are you suggesting OSMF would breach
- Original Message -
From: Francis Davey fjm...@gmail.com
To: Licensing and other legal discussions.
legal-t...@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 1:31 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] OS Opendata the new license
On 17 September 2010 13:22, David Groom revi
- Original Message -
From: Rob Myers r...@robmyers.org
To: legal-t...@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 1:33 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] OS Opendata the new license
On 09/17/2010 01:22 PM, David Groom wrote:
But your missing the point. The since the CT's
- Original Message -
From: Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com
To: Licensing and other legal discussions. legal-t...@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 1:35 PM
Subject: [OSM-legal-talk] OS Opendata the new license
Hi
- Original Message -
From: Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com
To: Licensing and other legal discussions. legal-t...@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 3:47 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] OS Opendata the new license
On 16/09/2010 15:08, David Groom wrote:
When you
- Original Message -
From: Richard Weait rich...@weait.com
To: OSM Australian Talk List talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2010 11:11 PM
Subject: Re: [talk-au] NearMap
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 5:48 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 16
- Original Message -
From: Rob Myers r...@robmyers.org
To: legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2010 4:40 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Noise vs unanswered questions
On 09/02/2010 04:16 PM, Maarten Deen wrote:
There was some
discussion on how the group
- Original Message -
From: Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2010 1:09 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] ODbL vs CC-by-SA pros and cons
Grant Slater openstreetmap at firefishy.com writes:
The vote has been dropped, so don't expect to be
In the implementation plan under phase 4 it asks Final cut-off. Community
Question... What do we do with the people who have Declined or not
responded? [1]
In order to speed up the final phases of the implementation plan, and in
particular the move from PHASE 4 to DONE, would it be best to
101 - 200 of 318 matches
Mail list logo
