On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 5:59 AM Tod Fitch wrote:
>
> For background, I a 40 year resident of California and have lived, worked
> and/or performed volunteer work in five of the “six Californias”. At
> present I live in Orange County (part of the Six California’s “South
> California” and perform
Hi, Martijn-
Are there particular skills or perspectives the current board thinks would
be useful to add to the board? In my experience, discussing those can help
bring out candidates that might not otherwise apply.
Luis (not fishing, I've got my hands full helping the legal working group :)
On
ker+...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 9 September 2016 at 18:19, Luis Villa <l...@lu.is> wrote:
> > Can you elaborate on the second point, Simon? Are you referring to the
> > "third party rights the Information Provider is not authorised to
> license"
> > language? If so
Can you elaborate on the second point, Simon? Are you referring to the
"third party rights the Information Provider is not authorised to license"
language? If so, I'm afraid they've merely made explicit what is implicit
in all licenses - if there is third party material in a work that the open
And a timely (no pun intended) reminder that state lines can be fluid too:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/altered-state-border-redraw-leaves-16-in-different-carolina/2016/05/29/9b2d1908-25ae-11e6-8329-6104954928d2_story.html
On Mon, May 30, 2016, 9:57 AM John F. Eldredge
It's not just the disputed border; the bill as proposed would make it
illegal to possess "geospatial data", i.e., copies of OSM, without a
license:
http://geoawesomeness.com/problems-with-the-geospatial-information-regulation-bill/
Luis
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 3:35 PM Mr. Stace D Maples
been on my last business card.)
Luis
On Fri, Apr 1, 2016, 9:31 PM Greg Morgan <dr.kludge...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Luis Villa <l...@lu.is> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 11:55 AM Steve Coast <st...@asklater.com> wrote:
>>
>>
On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 11:55 AM Steve Coast wrote:
>
> > On Apr 1, 2016, at 12:42 AM, Paul Norman wrote:
> >
> > On 4/1/2016 12:22 AM, Greg Morgan wrote:
> >> I would think that the US Board should add another board member to be a
> communications manager.
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 10:25 AM Bill Ricker wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 11:37 AM, Ian Dees wrote:
>
>> Slack offers an irc gateway if you'd prefer to connect to slack from your
>> irc client. Just sign up for the slack team and look in the
+0.5 to Slack. It's clearly better than IRC on a number of fronts, but if
it replaces publicly browseable/searchable interfaces, information can be
lost for the casual folks who are the lifeblood of a community. (Meeting
announces there won't be seen by the public, for example.) This usually
isn't
Just a data point, if OSM is anything like Wikimedia: anywhere outside of
the US and Western Europe, mapper conversations are likely already
happening *primarily* (and possibly even *exclusively*) on Facebook. And in
the US and Western Europe, mapper conversations among people who joined in
the
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 1:58 PM Tom Lee wrote:
> Martin,
>
>
> Is there a problem with the current license? Is it not clear from a legal
> point of view, how it should be interpreted?
>
>
> Correct--it's currently unclear how the license applies to many important
> use cases.
Agreed that clearly these edits need to be reverted and the account
probably blocked, but just curious: is there no alternate service (akin to
the historical maps project) for this person to play in?
Luis
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 2:13 PM Elliott Plack
wrote:
> It looks
in traditional/proprietary licenses
as well, but in those cases, you may be able to negotiate better terms
depending on the situation.) OSMF could, of course, negotiate further
assurances outside of OGL with specific data providers if there was a
particular concern.
Luis
--
Luis Villa
Deputy General Counsel
, others-
Is there a formal description somewhere of the roles/responsibilities of
the WG? That would help me evaluate to what extent (if at all) I can
participate in WG activities.
Thanks-
Luis
--
Luis Villa
Deputy General Counsel
Wikimedia Foundation
415.839.6885 ext. 6810
*This message may
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 1:46 PM, Paul Norman penor...@mac.com wrote:
On 11/18/2014 10:11 AM, Luis Villa wrote:
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Michael Collinson m...@ayeltd.biz
wrote:
I would also like to highlight that we also now welcome associate members
who can help us
WMF's position with a grain of salt when using
Wikipedia's content. But I'd be surprised if this was a problem, especially
in a situation like this one where it is particularly clear that what is
being used is the underlying fact rather than a copy of a specific
expression of the fact.
Luis
--
Luis
given year. Or both. :)
Luis
--
Luis Villa
Deputy General Counsel
Wikimedia Foundation
415.839.6885 ext. 6810
*This message may be confidential or legally privileged. If you have
received it by accident, please delete it and let us know about the
mistake. As an attorney for the Wikimedia
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
--
Luis Villa
Deputy General Counsel
Wikimedia Foundation
415.839.6885 ext. 6810
*This message may be confidential or legally privileged. If you have
received it by accident, please delete
detailed use cases :)
Just that a lot of progress could be made by walking through more basic
ones as well.
Luis
--
Luis Villa
Deputy General Counsel
Wikimedia Foundation
415.839.6885 ext. 6810
NOTICE: /This message may be confidential or legally privileged. If you
have
contributions) and
risking some loopholes, since the people interested in the loopholes are
likely to not contribute back anyway. But that is a judgment call and there
is no 100% right answer.
Luis
--
Luis Villa
Deputy General Counsel
Wikimedia Foundation
415.839.6885 ext. 6810
NOTICE: *This message may
/2013-June/007553.htmland
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/2013-June/007554.html
Which isn't to say that people shouldn't describe detailed use cases :)
Just that a lot of progress could be made by walking through more basic
ones as well.
Luis
--
Luis Villa
Deputy General
@openstreetmap.orghttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
--
Luis Villa
Deputy General Counsel
Wikimedia Foundation
implying that many important uses are not going to be quantitatively
substantial?), but I'm really not sure. I would clarify or remove that.
Hope this is helpful-
Luis
--
Luis Villa
Deputy General Counsel
Wikimedia Foundation
415.839.6885 ext. 6810
NOTICE: *This message may be confidential
://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
--
Luis Villa
Deputy General Counsel
Wikimedia Foundation
415.839.6885 ext. 6810
NOTICE: *This message may be confidential or legally privileged. If you
have received it by accident, please delete it and let us know about the
mistake. As an attorney
Wikipedia(tm) articles from deletion
http://SpeedyDeletion.wikia.com
Mozilla Rep https://reps.mozilla.org/u/h4ck3rm1k3
___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
--
Luis Villa
/Open Data Commons could simplify the problem by declaring
that CC 4.0 is a compatible license under ODBL 4.4(a)(iii), but there
would still be some complexities to work through.
Luis
--
Luis Villa
Deputy General Counsel
Wikimedia Foundation
415.839.6885 ext. 6810
NOTICE: *This message may
27 matches
Mail list logo