as an off-road
mapper in the OSM community in the UK.
Mike Harris
-Original Message-
From: Martin Koppenhoefer [mailto:dieterdre...@gmail.com]
Sent: 13 August 2009 23:26
To: Roy Wallace
Cc: osm
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] [Fwd: Re: Proliferation of path vs. footway]
2009/8/14 Roy Wallace waldo000
-Original Message-
From: Martin Koppenhoefer [mailto:dieterdre...@gmail.com]
Sent: 14 August 2009 02:51
To: Roy Wallace
Cc: osm
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] [Fwd: Re: Proliferation of path vs. footway]
2009/8/14 Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 8:26 AM, Martin
You seem to be implying that increasing the amount of data in OSM is a
bad thing???
Increasing the amount of _implicit_ data surely is. There are good reasons, why
putting implicit data into databases is usually avoided.
Of course, llama access restrictions probably aren't a top priority,
The core issue here (that I believe we agree on) is that if tags have
inconsistent implications, they must be made explicit.
Absolutely true: explicit in the wiki ;-)
I don't think the wiki is a good place for that. Keep in mind that these
defaults would be nice to have in a
On 13/08/2009 18:20, Norbert Hoffmann wrote:
David Earl wrote:
So I say: keep it simple, keep it compatible. Carry on with the simple,
established tags we already have, but just clarify the default use
classes which apply to each highway tag, PER COUNTRY, and tag exceptions
to these
On 08/13/2009 01:24 PM, David Earl wrote:
realise we are missing a use case (say we discover motorways in Ecuador
permit learner drivers to use them [please don't tell me this isn't the
case - it's only an example]) we have to add tags to every other highway
you don't even have to go that far
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 13:37, Alex Mauerha...@hawkesnest.net wrote:
On 08/13/2009 01:24 PM, David Earl wrote:
realise we are missing a use case (say we discover motorways in Ecuador
permit learner drivers to use them [please don't tell me this isn't the
case - it's only an example]) we have
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 8:24 PM, David Earlda...@frankieandshadow.com wrote:
So what you're saying is that
- each editor and data consumer has to have its own set of national
rules and defaults rather than defining them centrally (so inevitably
they'll end up different);
- we have to
David Earl wrote:
So what you're saying is that
- each editor and data consumer has to have its own set of national
rules and defaults rather than defining them centrally (so inevitably
they'll end up different);
The editors must have some way to set defaults, the consumers will get a
full
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 11:45 PM, Roy Wallacewaldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
You seem to be implying that increasing the amount of data in OSM is a
bad thing???
If it is millions time the same thing, yes. Look another thread
speaking about TIGER import clean-up.
Of course, llama access
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 8:03 AM, Pierenpier...@gmail.com wrote:
Of course, llama access restrictions probably aren't a top priority,
but it IS a GOOD THING to have llama restrictions in the database.
Yes, it is. In PERU.
I'd be quite happy to know whether I can ride my llama down my street
2009/8/14 Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com:
Absolutely true: explicit in the wiki ;-)
We have a database, let's populate it. The wiki is to help instruct
people how to best populate the database - it should not be a part of
the database itself.
but this is not real map-information but it is
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 8:26 AM, Martin
Koppenhoeferdieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/8/14 Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com:
but this is not real map-information but it is legal information you
could also get from different sources. If a way is legally a cycleway,
all the laws and
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 9:46 AM, Roy Wallacewaldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
The general format, which could be extended to all kinds of access
restrictions, is:
X:K = L;V, where
X = the standard tag (maxspeed, or access, or bicycle, etc.)
K = the kind of condition
L = the value of the
2009/8/14 Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 8:26 AM, Martin
Koppenhoeferdieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/8/14 Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com:
but this is not real map-information but it is legal information you
could also get from different sources. If a way is
15 matches
Mail list logo
