Re: [OSM-talk] Let's prepare to Fork OSM to a CCBYSA 2.0continuation

2010-08-22 Thread John F. Eldredge
as President for life. ---Original Email--- Subject :Re: [OSM-talk] Let's prepare to Fork OSM to a CCBYSA 2.0continuation From :mailto:deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com Date :Sun Aug 22 06:27:41 America/Chicago 2010 On 22 August 2010 21:12, Robert Scott li...@humanleg.org.uk wrote: On Sunday 22 August

Re: [OSM-talk] Let's prepare to Fork OSM to a CCBYSA 2.0continuation

2010-08-22 Thread john whelan
This is also one of my concerns, especially when using imports. I don't think this has been discussed at all well. Cheerio John On 22 August 2010 09:13, John F. Eldredge j...@jfeldredge.com wrote: My largest complaint is that, if you click yes, you not only are agreeing to the current new

Re: [OSM-talk] Let's prepare to Fork OSM to a CCBYSA 2.0continuation

2010-08-22 Thread Serge Wroclawski
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 9:13 AM, John F. Eldredge j...@jfeldredge.com wrote: My largest complaint is that, if you click yes, you not only are agreeing to the current new license, but you are also agreeing in advance to any future license changes, without being able to know what those new

Re: [OSM-talk] Let's prepare to Fork OSM to a CCBYSA 2.0continuation

2010-08-22 Thread Serge Wroclawski
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 9:22 AM, john whelan jwhelan0...@gmail.com wrote: This is also one of my concerns, especially when using imports.  I don't think this has been discussed at all well. The issue of imports and data has been discussed at length in places like the US where imports are a big

Re: [OSM-talk] Let's prepare to Fork OSM to a CCBYSA 2.0continuation

2010-08-22 Thread Peteris Krisjanis
2010/8/22 Serge Wroclawski emac...@gmail.com: On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 9:22 AM, john whelan jwhelan0...@gmail.com wrote: This is also one of my concerns, especially when using imports.  I don't think this has been discussed at all well. The issue of imports and data has been discussed at

Re: [OSM-talk] Let's prepare to Fork OSM to a CCBYSA 2.0continuation

2010-08-22 Thread David Earl
On 22/08/2010 14:13, John F. Eldredge wrote: My largest complaint is that, if you click yes, you not only are agreeing to the current new license, but you are also agreeing in advance to any future license changes, without being able to know what those new license terms will be. It is the

Re: [OSM-talk] Let's prepare to Fork OSM to a CCBYSA 2.0continuation

2010-08-22 Thread John F. Eldredge
, even though it will take a two-thirds majority to select a new license. ---Original Email--- Subject :Re: [OSM-talk] Let's prepare to Fork OSM to a CCBYSA 2.0continuation From :mailto:da...@frankieandshadow.com Date :Sun Aug 22 08:46:20 America/Chicago 2010 On 22/08/2010 14:13, John F

Re: [OSM-talk] Let's prepare to Fork OSM to a CCBYSA 2.0continuation

2010-08-22 Thread Robert Kaiser
John F. Eldredge schrieb: According to the summaries that have been published thus far, those who click yes are licensing data already entered not only under the current new license, but are agreeing in advance to any future licenses. You won't have the right to choose not to license the

Re: [OSM-talk] Let's prepare to Fork OSM to a CCBYSA 2.0continuation

2010-08-22 Thread Liz
On Sun, 22 Aug 2010, Serge Wroclawski wrote: 2. Much more stringent requirements are put on lots of projects You may have heard of the GNU project. Are you aware that all contributors to GNU project must sign over not just license agreements, but copyright assignments? Just this week a