Dermot
There are two reasons why your tag combination ought to be able to
render correctly as is statement is not valid.
Firstly - as Thomas pointed out - mapnik likes one feature per way.
Secondly - landuse=grass is not rendered at the moment (because of the
vast disagreement on the whole
2008/8/28 Steve Chilton [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
There are two reasons why your tag combination ought to be able to
render correctly as is statement is not valid.
This is always a risk :)
Firstly - as Thomas pointed out - mapnik likes one feature per way.
Secondly - landuse=grass is not rendered
Steve Chilton wrote:
Dermot
There are two reasons why your tag combination ought to be able to
render correctly as is statement is not valid.
Firstly - as Thomas pointed out - mapnik likes one feature per way.
Secondly - landuse=grass is not rendered at the moment (because of the
vast
2008/8/28 robin paulson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Steve Chilton wrote:
Dermot
There are two reasons why your tag combination ought to be able to
render correctly as is statement is not valid.
Firstly - as Thomas pointed out - mapnik likes one feature per way.
Secondly - landuse=grass is not
2008/8/28 robin paulson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
this sounds a lot like you're using the same way to form the centre of
the road, and the boundary of the grass. wouldn't it be easier to use a
separate way to represent each?
That is what I'm doing. I don't do this in all cases, but some do lend
Steve Chilton wrote:
Dermot
There are two reasons why your tag combination ought to be able to
render correctly as is statement is not valid.
Firstly - as Thomas pointed out - mapnik likes one feature per way.
Secondly - landuse=grass is not rendered at the moment (because of the
-Original Message-
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 00:59:12 +0100
From: Thomas Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Mapnik handling of highways that are also
landuse...
To: Dermot McNally [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: osm talk@openstreetmap.org
Message-ID:
[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 11:06 AM, Dermot McNally [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/8/28 Steve Chilton [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
There are two reasons why your tag combination ought to be able to
render correctly as is statement is not valid.
This is always a risk :)
Firstly - as Thomas pointed out -
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 1:14 PM, Dave Stubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, technically, there are ways of handling this case (the way would
need duplicating on import, with some clever tag stripping). But they
aren't pretty, or I think, desirable.
FWIW, I've been planning to implement just
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 3:57 PM, Martijn van Oosterhout
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 1:14 PM, Dave Stubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, technically, there are ways of handling this case (the way would
need duplicating on import, with some clever tag stripping). But they
On Thu, 2008-08-28 at 16:57 +0200, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 1:14 PM, Dave Stubbs
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, technically, there are ways of handling this case (the way
would
need duplicating on import, with some clever tag stripping). But
they
aren't
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 8:47 PM, Jon Burgess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FWIW, I've been planning to implement just that at some point, just
havn't gotten around to it yet. The biggest problem is that the style
file needs to contain information like tag X applies only to
nodes/ways/areas and this
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 12:49 AM, Dermot McNally [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Folks - with reference to this:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=53.72339lon=-6.34273zoom=17layers=B00FTF
...which is a section of the Mapnik render of the outcome of the very
successful Drogheda Mapping Party in
13 matches
Mail list logo
