Hi!
There were some approvals in recent days.
Please don't forget to add them to
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Approved_features (simply moving
the according line from the proposed to approved page will do the trick).
I've added place=locality, but there might be others ...
Hi List!
The voting about shop=dry_cleaning ended with 7 approvals and no
disapprovals.
I've moved it from the proposed to the approved pages and also added it
to the map features page.
Regards, ULFL
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
Ulf Lamping schrieb:
There's an RFC about shop=laundromat, please have a look at:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Proposed_features/Laundromat
There were some comments and talk on the list about Laundromat vs.
Launderette vs. Laundry.
I've changed the proposal to
http
Robin Paulson schrieb:
On 04/01/2008, Brent Easton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You don't need any more votes. If there are no negative votes, then 6 Yes's
is enough to approve it.
it is? oh, i thought it was 10. 6 seems awfully low
thanks though, wil move it across to approved
Robin Paulson schrieb:
On 04/01/2008, Michael Collinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
is there an acknowledged way of removing them, without going through
the whole comments/opinions/voting process?
Ye, it would certainly be good to be more aggressive in cleaning up
up the Proposals
Robin Paulson schrieb:
could the person who proposed:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Proposed_features/Rest_Camp
please provide some more information on the proposal?
it is unclear what it is actually for, beyond duplicating a range of other
tags
failing that, could it be
Hi!
The corresponding RFC is now more than two weeks ago, with no
substantial problems shown up (since it was updated 2007-12-31).
Voting is opened for the next two weeks at
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Proposed_features/Laundry
Regards, ULFL
Geoff Richards schrieb:
The voting period on my Pillbox proposal is finished (it's had two weeks
now), with 8 votes for and none against. I'll now do the necessary
editing and add it to the Map_Features page.
Hi!
Please don't simply remove the discussion / voting from a proposal if it
Geoff Richards schrieb:
On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 09:38:15PM +0100, Ulf Lamping wrote:
Please don't simply remove the discussion / voting from a proposal if it
get's aproved!
Sorry, I was just copying what others had done on previous proposals.
Your just the first one, when I had
David Earl schrieb:
Has anyone got a Nokia N810? (This is a Linux internet tablet with a
built in GPS - http://europe.nokia.com/A4568578 - that someone mentioned
on this list a while back, and is now available).
If so, how easy is it to get at the raw data and/or a GPX file for the
GPS.
Igor Brejc schrieb:
Hello everyone,
As I promised a while back, Kosmos can now print OSM maps on multiple
pages. For those interested more info is here:
http://igorbrejc.net/openstreetmap/kosmos/kosmos-v19-printing-maps-inspecting-elements-and-more
Hi Igor!
I just wanted to have a
Igor Brejc schrieb:
Hello Ulf,
On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 11:27 PM, Ulf Lamping [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Igor!
I just wanted to have a short look at the Kosmos source code, just out
of interest. But I couldn't find it in the OSM svn or on your own
Marc Schütz schrieb:
I have now created two proposals:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Proposed_features/wayside_shrine
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Proposed_features/wayside_cross
Hi Marc!
First of all, I'm not against putting these things into OSM as they
often can
Frederik Ramm schrieb:
At the time, I thought we had somewhat of a consensus that we should
either create an extra list or have one condensed voting issues
posting per week (or so).
I don't think that 'or' is the right word here. If we want to split
these topics into a seperate list, we
Frederik Ramm schrieb:
Hi,
Well, if nobody wants to write digests, then IMHO it's just not a good
idea to move to a seperate mailing list.
Well in that case I'd say let's just bin the whole voting process and
live happily ever after ;-)
Hopefully I'm too well behaved to answer
Robin Paulson schrieb:
from now on, until someone creates an extra tagging list, i'll include
[tagging] in every tag proposals e-mail, to let those of you who
aren't interested, filter out this stuff easily. every e-mail client
has filter capabilities, so this shouldn't be a problem.
i'll
Etric Celine schrieb:
Hi everyone,
as you may or may not have noticed i have recently worked a bit on the
existing Tagwatch script and changed a few things.
My changes includes
* the use of a template parsing engine and thus a better looking website
* use of the Osmarender 6 rules file
Igor Brejc schrieb:
Is there somewhere a repository of totally free general-purpose icons
such as this? I'm asking because I would like to extend Kosmos rendering
rules with some nice icons.
The collection of OSM icons in SVN [0] is quite usable and should
contain most of what you need.
Igor Brejc schrieb:
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 2:39 AM, Ulf Lamping [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would be nice if Kosmos would use the
same icons for the same things as JOSM does.
P.S: I still consider Kosmos to be closed source, so be careful
Robin Paulson schrieb:
this has been open for two weeks, and currently has 10 yes votes and 1 no
votes.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Proposed_features/Power_plants
could i request some more votes please, to push it one way or the other.
unless ulf wants to re-consider his
Robert Vollmert schrieb:
Hello,
On Feb 3, 2008, at 20:20, Robin Paulson wrote:
taking on board one of Frederic's comments from last week: there are a
lot of proposed 'shop' tags on the proposals page, something which is
overwhelming and time-consuming to solve using our current method of
Hi!
As someone pointed out on the german list.
The zoo tag in map features is under tourism:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Map_Features#Tourism
But the corresponding proposal is clearly using leisure:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Proposed_features/Zoo
or see:
Karl Newman schrieb:
Appallingly, that icon seems to be omitted from the Garmin POI types.
You'll have to substitute a different type, or maybe create your own icon.
Or maybe one of the bicycle icons from:
http://www.gpsdrive.de/development/map-icons/overview_lic.en.shtml,
especially
Mike Collinson schrieb:
At 04:25 PM 9/02/2008, Lauri Hahne wrote:
On 09/02/2008, Dermot McNally [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PS: I'd still love to see those lighthouses we do map appearing on the
rendered output.
Usually that requires pressuring the right guys in irc.
Hi!
Ich hab mich auch mal in der hohen Kunst des T-Shirt Designs versucht ;-)
Bei meinen Experimenten hab ich einiges ausprobiert, z.B. auch eine
bildliche Kausalkette versucht - also Bilder von Satellit, GPS
Receiver, Computer, Karte - das sieht aber dann irgendwie wegen der
vielen Details
Rahkonen Jukka schrieb:
Hi,
When I am looking at the Scandinavian data loaded into PostGIS database with
the fine osm2pgsql utility (thanks, Artem) I can simply find hundreds or
thousands of logical errors in data. For example this is an excerpt from the
list of highway tags used in the
Colin Marquardt schrieb:
Rahkonen Jukka [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
When I am looking at the Scandinavian data loaded into PostGIS
database with the fine osm2pgsql utility (thanks, Artem) I can
simply find hundreds or thousands of logical errors in data. For
example this is an excerpt from
Alex S. schrieb:
Ulf Lamping wrote:
place_of_warship, ...
Shouldn't that be naval_yard? ;)
Hmm, full tagging should be:
amenity=place_of_warship
religion=military
denomination=U.S.Navy
;-)))
Regards, ULFL
___
talk mailing list
talk
Stephen Gower schrieb:
Voting is now open on the Skyhook proposal - please add your
support:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Proposed_features/Skyhook
s
I'm still not sure if this proposal was actually *intended* to
discourage anyone spending his time to work on the
Chris Hill schrieb:
The Map_Features page has really suffered. Having a single page with
a list of all the tags was easy to search, now there are various
places to search. Can we put it back to a single page plse.
FULL ACK - the current page is a PITA!
Regards, ULFL
P.S: If the templates
wiseLYNX schrieb:
Stephen Gower wrote:
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 12:54:53PM +0100, Pieren Pieren wrote:
FULL ACK - the current page is a PITA!
+1
I restored the single page.
-1
The full page has got way too long to actually be useful. In my
opinion, it
Frederik Ramm schrieb:
BUT:
The way we usually do things around here is those who do the work get
to decide how it's done. You are, and not for the first time, talking
about how to control what OTHERS do and how they do it (your example
is not whether you tag in miles or kilometres, but
Frederik Ramm schrieb:
Interestingly, your vineyard example is exactly working that way. YOU
have decided that you want to have vineyards in the way you like it. YOU
have implemented it into osmarender to be shown on the map. So in effect
YOU control how others do theirs - by setting the
Alex Mauer schrieb:
Voting is now open on tagging for the sport of shooting.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Proposed_features/Shooting
Please record your vote.
Page says: voting is not open yet, proposed for 2008-02-12
Regards, ULFL
Dave Stubbs schrieb:
I think the problem is the use of the language in regard to the
feature itself. A single person approving of a tag is obviously fine,
but once a vote happens, and about 10 people approve of it, the tag
then becomes an Approved Tag... or at least some people think it
Andy Allan schrieb:
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 9:02 PM, Alex Mauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sven Geggus wrote:
To be serious, I don't like this pseudo object-oriented
railway:incline:traction= stuff at all.
Huh? object oriented? It's like that in order to prevent potential
Matt Williams schrieb:
On Sunday 06 April 2008 12:38:59 Steven te Brinke wrote:
Hello,
The current mapnik rules will render amenity=bus_stop, but the map
features define it as amenity=bus_station.
Well, in my mind a bus stop and a bus station are different amenities. A bus
stop
Frederik Ramm schrieb:
Hi,
stumbled across a quote by David D Clark (of Internet
architecture fame) today. He said:
We reject: kings, presidents and voting. We believe in: rough
consensus and running code.
Not that I'm into gurus and such but it's nice to see that I am not
the
Frederik Ramm schrieb:
Hi,
Hmmm, you and some other guys effectively sabotaged voting several
times.
This is not the first time you use the word sabotage in this
context. I think it's rather strong language; I have openly expressed
my opinion that's all.
I just use the wording that I
Richard Fairhurst schrieb:
Frederik Ramm wrote:
Is the fact that Potlatch does live editing a design decision, or are
there technical reasons behind it (i.e. it would be much more
difficult to have a Flash editor with a save button)?
It's a design decision. If you do buffered
Hi!
As some people using the latest JOSM versions already noted, I'm
currently (again) trying to improve the JOSM rendering output to be
even more useful to our valuable mappers ;-)
So if you update JOSM to the latest nightly build, you'll get:
- more tags now shows an icon: amenity, shop,
Chris G schrieb:
I'm after a GPS system which I can use to provide data for OSM maps
and as a 'normal' GPS system to tell me where to go when I'm on my
motorbike. Is there anything which can provide both facilities or
should I give up and buy two separate devices?
It's doubtful (to me) if
Stefan Baebler schrieb:
It's nice seeing changing road width with zoom also in the legend!
It would be also interesting to hide features that are not appearing
in the map currently being shown.
Sure it would require a bbox query, but it would be much more user
friendly (eg when matching 2
Tom Hughes schrieb:
On 14/07/09 08:30, Bernhard zwischenbrugger wrote:
Now we have the changesets like
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/1815935
It's relative easy to identify bad edits.
Is it possible to add an undo request button or spam button to this
page?
What are you
Shaun McDonald schrieb:
On 14 Jul 2009, at 09:50, Ulf Lamping wrote:
Tom Hughes schrieb:
because in general terms it won't work - reverting
will often need manual intervention to resolve conflicts.
I've heard this argument many times before, but no prove that it is
actually true. Why
Tom Hughes schrieb:
The whole home page needs a redesign, and I don't really want to start
fiddling with little things like this when we should be doing the job
properly.
There are also issues with search at the moment which mean we don't
actually want to make it too prominent.
Since
Martin Koppenhoefer schrieb:
2009/8/2 John Smith delta_foxt...@yahoo.com:
list but before annoying everyone on that list, I thought
that which is the
preferred tag should be decided.
JOSM has numerous tags that aren't official
Speaking of which, can anyone think of a better way to put
Martin Koppenhoefer schrieb:
2009/8/2 Ulf Lamping ulf.lamp...@googlemail.com:
Well, when I introduced doctors in JOSMs mappaint (and Christoph to the
Presets), there was a clear majority of doctors and not doctor.
If people use the term doctors, we shouldn't force them to use doctor just
OJ W schrieb:
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 10:03 PM, Marc Coevoetsintsix...@gmail.com wrote:
You can try the quadcopter too..
how would launching a quadcopter into orbit help?
That's a small step for openstreetmap,
one giant leap for quadcopters
;-)
Regards, ULFL
Frederik Ramm schrieb:
Hi,
Tom Chance wrote:
1 – Nobody can actually agree what highway=path means so it is being used
in different senses all over the world, which reduces its usefulness to
near zero
Perhaps it really *is* useless and it was good that our process
demonstrated that?
Roy Wallace schrieb:
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 8:05 PM, Emilie Laffrayemilie.laff...@gmail.com
wrote:
We should stop reinventing the wheel.
Let's work on those definitions first to make sure that everyone and every
languages are on the same wavelength.
Agreed. I think:
step 1) Work out
marcellobil...@gmail schrieb:
Deal all,
I'd like to propose a new tag:
geological=palaeontological_site.
I would welcome comments on the Proposed Features page:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/geological=palaeontological_site
Hi Marcello!
In my years of tagging
John Smith schrieb:
--- On Wed, 12/8/09, Kate maps2w...@gmail.com wrote:
At the last DC mapping party in
Silver Spring, Maryland, I came across
a giant acorn that should be marked on OSM, but not sure
the best way
to tag it:
tourism=viewpoint ?
To qoute Map Features about viewpoint:
A
Vikas Yadav schrieb:
I made this icon for JOSM.
My not an artist.
This is the top with walls on both sides.
Hi Vidas!
I'm not an artist as well.
Anyway, I've took your icon as an inspiration (your icon looked blurred
when scaled down to 16*16 pixels) and added a similar one to the JOSM
Patrick Petschge Kilian schrieb:
Hi,
Am I missing something, But it would help if the Reply-to header on
all messages that go through the list(s) gets set to the list email,
so that when we hit reply the message goes to the list by default.
In short you missed
Jonathan Bennett schrieb:
Tobias Knerr wrote:
How about offer reliable service with good uptimes? After the recent
maintenance weekend it was stated that our services are not really
intended for the public (at least if they need them and don't just
experiment with them) and we are only about
andrzej zaborowski schrieb:
2009/9/5 Apollinaris Schoell ascho...@gmail.com:
For any external use like SFD it makes sense to stay with a commercial
solution where they can get paid support and customization if needed.
My only issue with this is that it places OSM behind Google, because
when
Robert (Jamie) Munro schrieb:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ulf Lamping wrote:
Please also note, that it's really easy to switch from OSM to Google
maps (and back) if you're using openlayers. But you have to rewrite your
javascript code (completely?) if you want to go
Serge Wroclawski schrieb:
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 12:59 PM, Ulf Lampingulf.lamp...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Please also note, that it's really easy to switch from OSM to Google
maps (and back) if you're using openlayers. But you have to rewrite your
javascript code (completely?) if you want to
Hi!
The openlayer wiki examples in [1] links to none existing example files
at [2].
Have the files moved somewhere else or are they gone due to the recent
dev server changes?
Regards, ULFL
[1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenLayers
[2]
Tom Hughes schrieb:
On 08/09/09 00:24, Thomas Wood wrote:
My apologies, I meant to change the links.
Try errol.openstreetmap.org/...
Please don't do that, both because it doesn't work and because we don't
have to get people used to referring to the machine by that name.
You jumped the
Craig Wallace schrieb:
On 09/09/2009 22:00, David Earl wrote:
On 09/09/2009 21:43, Valent Turkovic wrote:
Is grave_yard tag used? I don't see it in JOSM. Why is the wiki so
confusing for this simple thing to map.
I think the original distinction was that a graveyard is the burial
Craig Wallace schrieb:
On 10/09/2009 01:21, Ulf Lamping wrote:
Well, it's simply a bad thing to indicate stuff by something that's
nearby. What's nearby? 1m/10m/100m/1000m? Is it indicated by a
place_of_worship, a building=church or xy?
But why does it matter whether there is a church
John Smith schrieb:
2009/9/12 Sarah Hoffmann lon...@denofr.de:
I dare say that most of the ele tags in Switzerland are taken from
the hiking posts at the moment, so I'd keep the CH1903 data for
consistency. Maybe we should add a note in the wiki somewhere?
Actually that would make the
Frederik Ramm schrieb:
Hi,
Maning wrote:
Can we request permission use the design to produce mugs locally?
I will check with them and report back.
Ken wrote:
and to perhaps print out and laminate the design for use as a general
OSM cheatsheet? ;-)
Like this:
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason schrieb:
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 1:21 PM, dom Team OiD d...@team-oid.de wrote:
Hi,
I'm sure such a tool is really cool stuff. I already experimented with
easy installer, whcih is creating msi packaes for windows.
I didn't use your installer, so this question comes up.
Chris Hill schrieb:
Yeah, OK Dave, we've got the message, you don't free-format tags.
Unfortunately you're going to have to get used to it, because it is the
basis of the OPENstreetmap and, in my opinion, one of the reasons it is
as successful as it is.
Successful in what way?
Jonathan Bennett schrieb:
Russ Nelson wrote:
On the other side you have mappers who want to create useful data, not
a pile of random rubbish.
No-one wants to create random rubbish. What people do want is to be able
to describe what they've just mapped without needing prior approval from
Roy Wallace schrieb:
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Ulf Lamping ulf.lamp...@googlemail.com
wrote:
What you and others simply fail to explain is why the success story from
three years ago with a fraction of mappers and data must be the best
solution for the situation we have today
Gervase Markham schrieb:
On 01/10/09 04:26, John Smith wrote:
I still like Shaun's idea of a committee
We really, really need a committee to decide what values we are going to
standardize for binary true and false?
If that's true, we are doomed. How on earth are we going to make any
ed...@billiau.net schrieb:
Frederik said
All this is possible *within* the existing OSM framework and without any
strong leader telling us where to go. I really do encourage you and all
those calling for leadership to get together, form your own advisory
board or tagging committee or
DavidD schrieb:
If that isn't good enough what other method is there?
How do you get from where OSM is now to the goal? Until someone starts
coming up with ideas that have some connection to reality this will
get nowhere. At the moment it is not much more than a bunch of people
yelling this
Anthony schrieb:
Disused canal, fine. Disused railway, sure. Disused building, no
problem. Disused quarry, yes.
But disused cafe? A cafe is a building, or part of a building, which
is *used* as a cafe. The use is part of the definition.
Well, yes and no.
People might remember that
Peter Childs schrieb:
Yes But,
If a Pub is tagged
amenity=pub
disused=yes
The thing looks like a put (ie large pub like lables) hence
works relatively well as a land mark, it just happens to be closed and
does not sell Beer anymore. Its still useful if its a landmark. same as
a
Someoneelse schrieb:
Ulf Lamping wrote:
A former cafe can be helpful as a landmark as well. Especially when
it's a free standing building (e.g. in a forest) near a larger city,
which is not that uncommon in germany.
Whether you think it's still a café (or a pub) or not might depend
Shalabh schrieb:
Hi,
Just to bring to the group's notice. I added a few mountain passes a
couple of days ago along with the hiking trails and waypoints
Indrahar Pass at N32 17.852 E76 22.872, elevation 4342 metres
Jalsu Pass at N32 10.929 E76 41.018, elevation 3425 metres
Bhubhu Pass at
Dodi schrieb:
Ulf wrote:
Shalabh schrieb:
Hi,
Just to bring to the group's notice. I added a few mountain passes a
couple of days ago along with the hiking trails and waypoints
When I now check on OSM, while the trails are there along with the
waypoints, the passes are missing. However,
Dave G schrieb:
sorry that should read:
ele=1234m
mountain_pass=yes
name=Harman Pass
place=locality
as in:
iframe width=425 height=350 frameborder=0 scrolling=no
marginheight=0 marginwidth=0
Stefan de Konink schrieb:
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009, Valent Turkovic wrote:
http://forums.x-plane.org/index.php?showtopic=40148
what to do with OSM mappers like these guys in this post?
They say that they are using Google Earth images :(
In some countries factual information is a legal source
Russ Nelson schrieb:
Peteris Krisjanis writes:
Anyway, to resume all this discussion - PLEASE don't trace from photo
without permission for OSM, whatever your temptations are.
E, no. The USGS Digital Ortho Quads are in the public domain; no
permission necessary to trace off of
Patrick Kilian schrieb:
Hi all,
Just to bring to the group's notice. I added a few mountain passes a
couple of days ago along with the hiking trails and waypoints
When I now check on OSM, while the trails are there along with the
waypoints, the passes are missing. However, when I
Mario Salvini schrieb:
Hi Sam,
man_made=lighthouse tells us something about the physical issue of this
building.
seamark=lighthouse tells us something about the role as a naval
navigation mark.
the same problem we have with man_made=beacon.
Without any further information nobody can
Lambertus schrieb:
I hope this effort in collecting readily available software will be useful
in validating/improving the data, inspire further software developement and
attract new contributors. Please give it a try and tell me what you think:
Hendrik T Voelker schrieb:
Am 16.09.2008 um 22:46 Uhr schrieb leblatt:
But if I try to convert from kml to gpx with GPSBabel, I get a
trackfilter-init: Found track point without time! error, and no conversion
occurs.
Well, maybe it would be enough to add timestamps to the KML file (by
DavidD schrieb:
2008/9/29 Ulf Lamping [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
P.S: While I was doing a lot of changes in the past weeks, you were the
only one complaining - any other reaction I got was simply positive ...
Here is another complaint from last month.
http://openstreetmap.org/api/0.5/way/25207084
Frederik Ramm schrieb:
Hi,
Frederik Ramm wrote:
I am in favour of setting up a code of conduct for automated edits.
I have now created
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Automated_Edits
with a sub-page for a code of conduct. Feel free to modify the text
until it reflects a
Frederik Ramm schrieb:
Hi,
paul youlten wrote:
The difference between pubs and restaurants is a getting a bit
blurred. But not so much between pubs and cafes.
[interesting details]
If a cafe or
restaurant wants to sell alcohol they have to apply for a licence just
like a pub or a
Richard Fairhurst schrieb:
Ulf Lamping wrote:
204 books (in obvious contrary to amenity=library)
A library lends books, a bookshop sells them.
As I said: obviously :-)
292 florist (BTW: in future, garden_centre seems to become the
value for
potted flower shops)
Generally
Martijn van Oosterhout schrieb:
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 8:47 PM, sylvain letuffe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, I know there are strong oppositions on this list to that way of doing,
some guys that have the power by the fact they own the renderer might be
unappy of changes they have to do on
Gervase Markham schrieb:
According to:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Browsing#Adding_a_Marker
this URL:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=51.64685mlon=-0.14641zoom=15layers=B000FFF
should have a marker in the middle, but it doesn't. Am I doing something
wrong, or is something
Erik Johansson schrieb:
I've been looking at the 100 or so turn restrictions[1] in use, and
most of them don't follow the spec set up on the wiki making the
description very confusing. Considering how complicated relations
feels I'm asking here instead of just changing the wiki:
Cartinus schrieb:
On Sunday 30 November 2008 03:07:02 Ulf Lamping wrote:
I've just added a table to that wiki page that tries to map existing
road signs to the corresponding restriction values.
I don't know if this is the same everywhere in Europe, but sign 7b (the only
square sign
David Earl schrieb:
On Sunday 30 November 2008 03:07:02 Ulf Lamping wrote:
I've just added a table to that wiki page that tries to map existing
road signs to the corresponding restriction values.
In most situations where you see these signs they are used in
conjunction with a No Entry
LeedsTracker schrieb:
Hello all,
I was out mapping on foot around town and found my bluetooth GPS was
getting poor reception in my coat pockets.
It was cold out, so I stuck the GPS on top of my head and pulled my
woolly hat over it.
Anyone looking closely might have seen a few flashing
Hi!
Again, I've added some more shop and amenity values to the map features
page (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Map_Features), derived
from the tagwatch usage statistics
(http://tagwatch.stoecker.eu/Europe/En/index.html).
I've added the following values - with the current tagwatch
Tanveer Singh schrieb:
I am getting a garmin in car unit($200)
Needless to day the following two functionalities are needed
1. Read OSM maps(all nuvi can read from SD card)
2. Write gpx data with altitude and timestamp info
The second point has gotten me stumped a bit, and I am torn between
Stephen Hope schrieb:
It's not hard to test. When I was unsure if my device was doing this
or not, I set it to snap to road, and then took it for a little walk
along the edge and then cut some corners in a park, then looked at the
tracks. For my specific device (not a Zumo), I discovered
Hi!
After a week of intensive work, I was able to *significantly* improve
the performance of JOSM mappaint (the standard way JOSM paints the OSM
data).
With the JOSM version of monday, I saw an improvement in my current
tests (machine: WinXp, Core Duo, 1.8GHz) from ~600ms to around ~150ms
Tobias Knerr schrieb:
Map Features as well as the info boxes on the individual pages list many
building amenities (cafe, cinema...) and other usually area-like
amenities (grave_yard) as node features, while others (brothel,
crematorium...) allow for node or area representation. In some cases,
Greg Troxel schrieb:
Sorry if this is on the wiki - I've tried to read the relevant parts.
I live in a semi-rural area where there are a lot of long driveways.
Some of these show up on the map, mostly due to MassGIS bulk imports.
For commercial places, and other places where the public
1 - 100 of 1330 matches
Mail list logo
