On 06/10/2023 14:23, Martin Trautmann wrote:
On 23-10-06 14:24, Tom Hughes wrote:
Maybe it would be easy to avoid and maybe it wouldn't but until
we know what the actual problem is we can't tell and none of the
developers are likely to have such an old browser to reproduce
it even
On 06/10/2023 12:53, Martin Trautmann wrote:
On 23-10-06 13:41, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 06/10/2023 12:12, Martin Trautmann wrote:
On 23-10-06 12:55, Tom Hughes via talk wrote:
No it was released in June 2020. October 2021 was the last
security patches.
To answer the original question there have
On 06/10/2023 12:12, Martin Trautmann wrote:
On 23-10-06 12:55, Tom Hughes via talk wrote:
No it was released in June 2020. October 2021 was the last
security patches.
To answer the original question there have been any deliberate
changes that I know but given the error it's entirely possible
ng list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
h
s overseas.
Looking at their "custom iD editor" repository there is actually
a single commit from today to add their imagery which was done by
a user with a visiosoft.com.tr address so possibly they are the
people really behind it?
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.n
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
st
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On 14/12/2020 18:54, Niels Elgaard Larsen wrote:
Google services was down for an hour today. I noticed that at the same
time I could not push my edits with JOSM due to "internal server error"
Was that a coincidence or do we somehow depend on Google?
It was a coincidence.
Tom
--
, 18:37 by j...@liotier.org:
From looking at the Mailman Chef cookbook at
https://github.com/openstreetmap/chef/tree/master/cookbooks/mailman
<https://github.com/openstreetmap/chef/tree/master/cookbooks/mailman>,
Tom Hughes is the person you should ask. I
com/openstreetmap/chef/tree/master/cookbooks/mailman>,
Tom Hughes is the person you should ask. If you have mailman
administration experience, maybe you could make it happen.
On 12/14/20 7:18 PM, ipswichmapper--- via talk wrote:
I was wondering if all the lists on
ists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
<https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk>
___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal
e:
https://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/ui/details.html?osmtype=N=21279378=place
Well it doesn't for me. Do you have your browser languages set to
prefer Latin or something (that's the name:la for the UK relation).
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://
port requests that should be going to Faceboook.
Something about the way Facebook attributes causes their users to
think that we are responsible for whatever problems they are having...
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
talk mail
, at 9:41 AM, Tom Hughes wrote:
If we assume that a new copyright is created by the scanning (which is
a complicated question) then there is no way it expires next year.
What exactly do you think the term is for this copyright and when do
you think it starts from?
I don't think it's relevant
penstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing
the start or end point is on the flare why would a
router do that over the shorter route on the roundabout... I mean
maybe there are a few cases where the flare is shorter somehow?
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing
dy turning off which should exclude it from
any consideration by a router?
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
On 24/09/2020 10:18, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
it contains changesets, notes, etc. but not diary posts or changeset
comments (correct me if I’m wrong).
You're wrong:
https://planet.openstreetmap.org/planet/discussions-latest.osm.bz2
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu
Hopefully I've fixed them on TW for the next update.
Tom
On 16/09/2020 12:44, Tom Hughes via Talk-GB wrote:
That would be because somebody on TranslateWiki has added a bunch
of bogus strings to the en-GB translation:
https://github.com/openstreetmap/openstreetmap-website/blob/master/config
fo/talk-gb
_______
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
9/products/OCB-1179.jpg
Mark
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing li
hway-code
BCC to DWG because of the impact in cycle routing.
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
as I can see?
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
e suggests?
It doesn't say you shouldn't change them - it says that such a change
is an automated edit that should follow the automated edit rules.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap
le, you've to
copy and paste his name written with such font, searching with
osm.org/user/mastro <http://osm.org/user/mastro> give no results.
Isn't this an anomaly?
So we shouldn't allow people who don't use the latin
alphabet to register using names in their native language?
Tom
our Q site help.openstreetmap.org is dying (Tom Hughes)
3. Re: our Q site help.openstreetmap.org is dying (Lester Caine)
4. Re: our Q site help.openstreetmap.org is dying (Simon Poole)
5. Re: our Q site help.openstreetmap.org is dying (Tobias Wrede)
6. Re: our Q site help.openstreetmap.org is dying (Fre
it shouldn't be an issue. I've
been through the process with another site.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
streetmap.org>
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
talk mailing
On 14/03/2020 11:37, Dan S wrote:
Op za 14 mrt. 2020 om 11:20 schreef Tom Hughes via Talk-GB
:
On 14/03/2020 11:13, Rob Nickerson wrote:
As may have seen in Simon's response it sounds like we currently lack
list moderators. If this is something you would like to do please email
this mailing
the situation
with them before attempting a putsch.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
etmap.org <mailto:talk@openstreetmap.org>
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
--
Tom Hughes (t...@c
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org <mailto:Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org>
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/l
__
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
processing personal data
on the consent basis.
Specifically although the default is 16 some countries including
the UK have set that at 13 instead.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https
to check on it.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On 18/08/2019 08:35, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 18/08/2019 02:22, John Whelan wrote:
Apparently some Fire brigades ask people who are lost on moors etc to
download What3words then tell them their location.
In the UK any even vaguely modern smartphone will send location data
with a 999 call anyway
that press
the other day:
https://twitter.com/edparsons/status/1162766686912700417
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
s "open data" to you?
What it says to me is "copyright for 50 years from the end of
the year when it was published" so unless there is some license
allowing it's use then no, it can't be used.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
talk@openstreetmap.org <mailto:talk@openstreetmap.org>
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
--
Tom H
On 19/07/2019 14:17, David Woolley wrote:
On 19/07/2019 13:37, Tom Hughes wrote:
I would say the logical consequence of that argument is that no road
should be mapped as tertiary, as, unless taken from OS, it is a
subjective judgement and can't be consistently verified.
That doesn't follow
tertiary, unclassified and residential on a more subjective
basis.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
mal criteria.
That redirect was setup many years and and it's highly
unlikely we would do it now, at least other than with the
direct approval of the board.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetm
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
t.
Could someone with moderator abilities take a look please?
Done, but for future reference he will find it works a lot better
if he subscribes to the list first...
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing li
.
Once I decompress and re-compress the file on Linux, osmosis seems to be
just fine with said file:
I've recompressed the copy on the server now...
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap
On 04/02/2019 10:10, Maarten Deen wrote:
On 2019-01-30 17:45, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 30/01/2019 16:22, Maarten Deen wrote:
Are there different rendering servers for those regions? I know that
there are different tileservers, but I didn't know the rendering was
also different
five render servers.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
be somewhere below
Cheshunt and west of Waltham Abbey.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org
outlandish ideas I've heard in OSM tagging circles, and that's
saying a lot.
To be fair "addr:city=Chipping Norton" would be outlandish even for
an address *in* Chipping Norton...
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-
).
There is a simplified algorithmic transformation but a fully
accurate conversion requires the OSTN02 data.
I'm not sure what the current status is but they certainly used
to claim various IP rights over it.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu
On 18/01/2019 09:49, Brian Prangle wrote:
Has anyone else noticed problems with edits failing to render?. Stuff I
did 2 days ago still not showing up
Replication had stalled on one of the render servers - it is catching
up now but will take a few hours to get everything.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes
.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
tmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
l have any correlation with Land
Registry. I'm guessing .gov isn’t that joined up.
Cheers
Andy
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://
for that
border.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
to rationalise
that decision in the eventual statement.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
telligence:
https://twitter.com/jonobennett/status/1065232930883145728
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
f road, and that is marked:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25365715
Because that is the only vehicular access to the area it has the effect
of controlling traffic in the whole area.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
T
ist
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org <mailto:Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org>
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.
ts are public but the ordering it not.
The "trackable" level extends that to include ordering.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
quot; or "public" which are not meant to be
ordered were in fact being returned in order and several editors
were taking advantage of that.
The bug was fixed and as a result data from those traces is
displaying in a confusing way in JOSM and (until a few hours
ago) in Potlatch 2.
Tom
--
T
t it's a stupid idea, so please don't...
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
a particular building has.
I am not bulk adding these (I do not have the technical knowledge or
time) I am just adding postcodes to properties as I add them.
So how are you working out which postcode to use? Sometimes it is
fairly obvious from the centroid location but it often isn't.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes
On 03/11/2018 15:50, Colin Smale wrote:
The coastline ways with source=PGS are really old and inaccurate. I am
not sure of their exact provenance but I think they were traced from
some primitive aerial imagery.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:source%3DPGS
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t
is, hey, not totally
standards-compliant, since it'll go through DATA before deciding whether
or not to accept or reject, but very workable to give the sender some
idea what happened.
Once it has gone through the list it appears to be being sent from
our mail server.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t
to
see a bounce.
So the real problem is subscribers to the list using services
like yahoo mail which ignore the reality of how email works and
think they can specify exactly where yahoo.com email should
appear to come form.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.n
Nothing to do with me, that's the carto team.
Tom
On 17/08/18 18:49, Dave F wrote:
Thanks for letting us know. Wasted half an hour checking it wasn't just
me & providing examples.
How about not posting until it's been deployed in future?
DaveF
On 17/08/2018 18:35, Tom Hughes w
.0...v4.13.0
As always, we welcome any bug reports at
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http:
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
rg/listinfo/talk
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstr
uot; at all:
https://maps.compton.nu/view#18/50.82039/-0.13968/os2500
https://maps.compton.nu/view#18/50.82039/-0.13968/os1250
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
ons.
Thanks. That's a call handled by cgimap so this is likely related
to the fact that there is currently increased latency between the
application server and the database for those calls.
There is a pending pull request for cgimap that may help.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http
to know exactly which API call you are referring to
here as it may be that (long term at least) there is something
here which should be fixed but it rather depends if it is a call
being handled by rails or one being handled by cgimap.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu
On 18/02/18 18:40, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 12:31 PM, Tom Hughes <t...@compton.nu
<mailto:t...@compton.nu>> wrote:
On 18/02/18 18:05, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 11:58 AM, Grant Slater
<openstreet..
ap GeoCoders?
How about search against multiple geocoders instead of just Nominatim
and GeoNames?
We have all the infrastructure to do that if you have suggestions
about other geocoders we could use.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
n't /meant/ to be used as the product itself, just a
demonstration, but we really should be putting our best foot forward there.
I can't comment about how the algorithm works because I don't know
anything about it. I'm just saying that we do tell it the viewbox
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compto
On 18/02/18 17:45, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 18/02/18 17:34, Paul Johnson wrote:
On the OSM homepage, can we use the visible area (or maybe that plus
an exploded offset to a larger surrounding bounds) as a bonding box to
be passed to Nominatim for some context when searching? This
animation
/master/app/controllers/geocoder_controller.rb#L115
Which encodes the bounds as the viewbox parameter which is then passed
through when calling Nominatim.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
streetmap.org>
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
That said I will certainly agree that what you're doing is far better
than what many companies trying to get their clients locations into OSM
have done in the past.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing li
what exactly has
the fact you can't post as a non-OSMF member to do with being or not
being listed on listinfo?
Op 20 dec. 2017 12:57 a.m. schreef "Tom Hughes" <t...@compton.nu
<mailto:t...@compton.nu>>:
On 19/12/17 22:51, Sérgio V. wrote:
but I can't
perhaps considering join it.
Or, at least, why isn't it listed in listinfo?
As I explained yesterday it is a private list open only to OSMF members.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
n anything
but.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
esting discussions there,
but I can't find the link to osmf-talk in the listinfo.
It's a list for OSMF members that they are subscribed to when they join
and it's open for public subscription.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://comp
) is there any reason we can't do such imports
without discussion with/permission from the company concerned?
Just a small thing called copyright and/or database right.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB
On 25/11/17 16:45, Colin Smale wrote:
On 2017-11-25 17:31, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 25/11/17 15:37, Colin Smale wrote:
On 25 November 2017 16:04:45 CET, "Éric Gillet" <gill3t.3ric+...@gmail.com
<mailto:gill3t.3ric+...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Another point : This password i
's basically a
completely different piece of software. Or rather it's now about five
separate pieces of software that you have to install and connect up.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
talk mailing list
ta
invented by using some
algorithm to draw a polygon that happens to encapsulate all those
delivery points.
Depending on the algorithm that may or may allow for overlapping
polygons and in general you may get different answer depending on the
details of the algorithm used.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t
s version 3 you want for every one?
It sounds like you're making an assumption that all these objects have
only been edited in a particular way by some automated process and that
nobody has ever touched one by hand and hence added an extra version.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.n
On 30/08/17 10:26, Tom Hughes wrote:
As best I can tell from wikipedia the new bridge is the M90 and under
motorway conditions with the old bridge presumably expected to carry
non-motorway traffic as the A9000.
So from
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-edinburgh-east-fife-41086779
to carry
non-motorway traffic as the A9000.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
On 23/08/17 17:43, jun meguro wrote:
This conference is 10th anniversary conference, and also this is first
"2nd time" conference in 1 country.
Actually both Manchester and Birmingham were in the same country ;-)
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://
On 11/04/17 07:08, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 11/04/17 00:35, Yuri Astrakhan wrote:
Does anyone know of an open source language map - basically a set of
geoshapes with the corresponding language code? Country boundaries are
not needed - e.g. Canada and USA would be English with the exception
to guesstimate what language the "name" tag is in.
There's some data in CLDR for mapping countries/regions to default
languages I think, which you could combine with shapes from OSM.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
__
On 23/02/17 10:43, Maarten Deen wrote:
On 2017-02-23 11:23, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 23/02/17 09:48, Jochen Topf wrote:
Every larger system that allows user contributions has a "report this as
spam" button. If a few people click on that, an admin reviews and
handles this. Sounds like
f the work to
implement it.
Note that the button is the easy bit really, there is much more work
behind that to implement some sort of moderation queue where the
information can be stored and presented to moderators.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://
is equivalent to the answer
being negative - any one person could answer positively but nobody can
answer negatively without knows the state of mind of every other person.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
talk mailing list
talk
.
Mostly these seem to be id edits so I'm guessing perhaps a University course
or something.
I suspect Pokemon Go is a more likely explanation.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https
1 - 100 of 918 matches
Mail list logo
