From: Pavel Pisa [mailto:ppisa4li...@pikron.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2012 3:01 AM
To: legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] importing ODBl data
I (for myself strongly demand) that my former and future change sets can
be exported from OSM under CC-BY-SA but I
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 4:06 PM, David Groom revi...@pacific-rim.net wrote:
I'm not sure I understand what you mean by convince people to add the odbl
clause to people providing data.
I mean I asked people to give us the data under cc-by-sa, and now i
would have to go back and ask for the odbl
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Mike Dupont
jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com wrote:
that is different than to ask for the CT which is my eyes basically a
copyright assignment to the osmf, I cannot understand that or explain
And to add in one more point, I dont want to have to go back again and
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 4:41 PM, Stephan Knauss o...@stephans-server.de wrote:
This is a good reason to have contributor terms.
the contributor terms introduce more problems, like the fact that it
prevents anyone from importing any derived works.
lets say i download the new cc-by-sa+odbl
On 20/09/2012 07:32, Mike Dupont wrote:
Hi there,
I have a question about imports and the ODBl,
I see that some sources have decided to dual license the data
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue
But how can some third parties data be compatible when the CT says it
can change
On 20/09/2012 09:13, Stephan Knauss wrote:
On 20.09.2012 07:32, Mike Dupont wrote:
How can a contributor import any data and keep the data open to
license change? How can you keep any imports at all from people who
have not agreed to the CT directly?
I agree with you in this point.
If we
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 5:26 PM, Michael Collinson m...@ayeltd.biz wrote:
() The CTs where written carefully to say, If you contribute Contents, You
are indicating that, as far as You know, You have the right to authorize
OSMF to use and distribute those Contents under our current licence
Mike Dupont writes:
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 4:41 PM, Stephan Knauss o...@stephans-server.de wrote:
This is a good reason to have contributor terms.
the contributor terms introduce more problems, like the fact that it
prevents anyone from importing any derived works.
lets say i download the
On Sep 20, 2012, at 3:13 AM, Stephan Knauss o...@stephans-server.de wrote:
On 20.09.2012 07:32, Mike Dupont wrote:
How can a contributor import any data and keep the data open to
license change? How can you keep any imports at all from people who
have not agreed to the CT directly?
I agree
that sounds more like my conclusion, it is the end of the road for
share alike and sharing for osm.
basically it is turning into a dead end road.
well guys please help bekim, i have sent him to you,
mike
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 9:18 PM, Alex Barth a...@mapbox.com wrote:
Mike, I think we should
On 09/20/2012 08:46 PM, Mike Dupont wrote:
that sounds more like my conclusion, it is the end of the road for
share alike and sharing for osm.
basically it is turning into a dead end road.
What in the hoof are you talking about?
- Rob.
___
- Original Message -
From: Mike Dupont jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com
To: Licensing and other legal discussions. legal-t...@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2012 6:32 AM
Subject: [OSM-legal-talk] importing ODBl data
Hi there,
I have a question about imports
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 3:03 PM, David Groom revi...@pacific-rim.net wrote:
Should the licence change to something other than CC-BY-SA 2.0 or ODbL 1.0,
OSMF have guaranteed that they will identify and remove any data
incompatible with that licence.
Incidentally, I believe that the burden OSMF
13 matches
Mail list logo
