-20120110/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
route into OSM but it would be nice
to be able to do so when the time is ripe.
Cheers
Andy
[1] http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-16485263
[2] http://www.dft.gov.uk/publications/hs2-maps-20120110/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http
Thanks, I was able to use http://osm.virtuelle-loipe.de/history browser
successfully. It took me 21 minutes to analyse manually but that could
be sped up by putting the declined/undecided/accepted status next to the
user in the first results view, (am emailing author Langläufer). I guess
it
On 10/01/2012 11:44, Peter Miller wrote:
Is there no way in this case to formally 'claim' the IPR for this
features on the basis that we have moved them and edited all the
surrounding features?
Exactly the question I raised on talk on Monday. I don't think you even
need to have moved
Peter Miller wrote:
Is there no way in this case to formally 'claim' the IPR for
this features on the basis that we have moved them
and edited all the surrounding features?
Yes, there is - tag it with odbl=clean.
To replace a single node that forms a junction might
involve unstitching 3
On 10/01/2012 13:43, Peter Miller wrote:
On 10 January 2012 12:07, David Earl da...@frankieandshadow.com
mailto:da...@frankieandshadow.com wrote:
On 10/01/2012 11:44, Peter Miller wrote:
Is there no way in this case to formally 'claim' the IPR for this
features on the
On 10 January 2012 13:19, Michael Collinson m...@ayeltd.biz wrote:
**
On 10/01/2012 13:43, Peter Miller wrote:
On 10 January 2012 12:07, David Earl da...@frankieandshadow.com wrote:
On 10/01/2012 11:44, Peter Miller wrote:
Is there no way in this case to formally 'claim' the IPR for
Michael Collinson wrote:
+1 to Richard's suggestion odbl=clean
Just a tiny little clarification - this isn't something I've dreamed up,
it's a real live tag with 9,000 occurrences in the database already, and
which is being used by status visualisations such as OSM Inspector. :)
cheers
Richard
On 10/01/2012 13:46, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
Michael Collinson wrote:
+1 to Richard's suggestion odbl=clean
Just a tiny little clarification - this isn't something I've dreamed up,
it's a real live tag with 9,000 occurrences in the database already, and
which is being used by status
On 10 January 2012 13:53, David Earl da...@frankieandshadow.com wrote:
On 10/01/2012 13:46, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
Michael Collinson wrote:
+1 to Richard's suggestion odbl=clean
Just a tiny little clarification - this isn't something I've dreamed up,
it's a real live tag with 9,000
On 10/01/2012 15:13, Peter Miller wrote:
On 10 January 2012 13:53, David Earl da...@frankieandshadow.com
mailto:da...@frankieandshadow.com wrote:
On 10/01/2012 13:46, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
Michael Collinson wrote:
+1 to Richard's suggestion odbl=clean
Hi,
On 01/10/12 14:53, David Earl wrote:
Yes, the trouble is when Frederik pointed this out and referred to the
page, it says it is for cases where the suspect edit has been wiped out,
not simply verified from other sources. How can you change the name from
itself to itself and actually have
Hi,
On 01/10/12 15:37, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Yes, the trouble is when Frederik pointed this out and referred to the
page, it says it is for cases where the suspect edit has been wiped out,
not simply verified from other sources. How can you change the name from
itself to itself and actually have
On 10/01/2012 14:53, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
On 01/10/12 15:37, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Yes, the trouble is when Frederik pointed this out and referred to the
page, it says it is for cases where the suspect edit has been wiped out,
not simply verified from other sources. How can you change the
David Earl wrote:
Why does pressing the keys make any
difference whatsoever? The original contributor doesn't own the
copyright in the name, only their contribution, and by marking it
odbl clean I'm making an alternative contribution which asserts
the source is now legitimate.
I think
On 10/01/2012 16:05, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
David Earl wrote:
Why does pressing the keys make any
difference whatsoever? The original contributor doesn't own the
copyright in the name, only their contribution, and by marking it
odbl clean I'm making an alternative contribution which asserts
Back to the original thread, good news. Three of the top UK undecided
contributors have responded to my messages and kindly accepted the new
terms. York, South Wales and High Wycombe looking much better now.
Mike
___
Talk-GB mailing list
I'd just like to add that one of the top contributors down as declined is
actually undecided due to Ordnance Survey OpenData compatibility concerns, not
sure why he's down as declined, whether that was a mistake on his part.
I've emailed him to get him to decide one way or the other, but as I
-maps-20120110/
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo
Can anyone provide more detailed info on the final stance of the of the top
decliners? Looking at one of the websites, some are Guy, Ed Avis, Andy
Street, Simon Ward, Paul Martin and ulfl.
I'd given a bit of though to mapping some of the areas that are to be
affected by the loss of 'Guy's data in
On 10/01/12 18:19, Peter Miller wrote:
Regarding OS copyright, the OS do not claim derived copyright any more
for 3rd party content that is displayed on an OS map just so long as
they do not present that sort of feature on their mapping. As such any
copyright infringement would be with the
Personally, I am still working to find a way forward so that OSM can
remain compatible with Creative Commons. I joined OSM to help make a
free Creative Commons (or compatible) map of the world and that
remains my goal. There are a couple of avenues I am working on which
I'd be happy to talk
Ed,
On 01/10/2012 08:22 PM, Ed Avis wrote:
I joined OSM to help make a
free Creative Commons (or compatible) map of the world
...
I really don't want to just give up and go home unless every possibility has
been
exhausted. It is not too late.
What you really should do is first agree to
On Tue, 10 Jan 2012, Ed Avis wrote:
Personally I've tagged source=OS when relying only on OpenData and not
additional ground survey or aerial photos; however, there is still
some 'sweat of the brow' involved since matching up the streets
against OS involves some judgement calls and common
OK how many of you are having trouble editing for more than 10 minutes?
I've lost as much work as I've done this evening with potlach just freezing :(
I had the same problem at the weekend, but put it down to finger trouble, know I
know it is software.
--
Lester Caine - G8HFL
Lester Caine wrote:
OK how many of you are having trouble editing for
more than 10 minutes? I've lost as much work as
I've done this evening with potlach just freezing :(
I had the same problem at the weekend, but put it
down to finger trouble, know I know it is software.
If you _know_
Richard Fairhurst wrote:
OK how many of you are having trouble editing for
more than 10 minutes? I've lost as much work as
I've done this evening with potlach just freezing:(
I had the same problem at the weekend, but put it
down to finger trouble, know I know it is software.
If
27 matches
Mail list logo
