Re: [talk-ph] [HOT] OpenUnpavedStreetMap, South continents, Colombia, soon Philippines

2011-12-21 Per discussione Jean-Guilhem Cailton
Hi, The Philippines are now covered: http://osm.arkemie.org/ousm/philippines/ The GeoRSS feeds available are the ones indicated by Maning: - from Department of Social Welfare and Development (DSWD) 2.0 Citizen Interactive Portal [1] - from PhilippineDisasterWatch [2] - from One For Iligan [3]

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Informal meeting in STUK Leuven on January 6th

2011-12-21 Per discussione Jo
I am going to 'nieuwjaarsborrel' in Utrecht on Sunday the 22nd of January. This involves hitching a ride on Friday the 20th and staying with the organiser of the Geo Freedom day for a few days. So the 20th doesn't work for me anymore. I'm sorry. Jo 2011/12/21 Ivo De Broeck ivo.debro...@gmail.com

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] feedback requested

2011-12-21 Per discussione ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen
I think it's relevant that node changes as suggested should involve stand alone nodes only (such as POI). Once they are part of a structure of say a building or a road, water or any area, the nodes should be considered a composition rather then 4 nodes. While the underlying structure is a

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] feedback requested

2011-12-21 Per discussione andrzej zaborowski
On 20 December 2011 21:27, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote: Dear All, LWG would like feedback on a couple of items relating to cleaning tainted data as we all prepare for the data base transition. Draft minutes are here.

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] feedback requested

2011-12-21 Per discussione Ed Avis
I think the test must be the same as for any other data which OSMF does not have permission to use. If a mapper added a node by copying from Google Maps, but then another mapper moved it to a different position using a permitted data source, is it okay to keep that node in the database? -- Ed

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] feedback requested

2011-12-21 Per discussione Martin Koppenhoefer
2011/12/21 ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen g.grem...@cetest.nl: I think it's relevant that node changes as suggested should involve stand alone nodes only (such as POI). Once they are part of a structure of say a building or a road, water or any area, the nodes should be

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] feedback requested

2011-12-21 Per discussione Ed Avis
A common way to adjust a node position is to move it halfway between the old one and the new one. For example, if there is already a way on the map traced from GPS but you have a new GPS trace for it which is a bit different, it would be unwise to adjust it to exactly fit your new trace. But you

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] feedback requested

2011-12-21 Per discussione Ed Avis
Richard Weait richard@... writes: We consider that the creation of an object and its id to be a system action  rather than individual creative contribution. However, 'the creation of an object and its id' never occurs by itself. At a minimum, you create an object with id and lat/lon, and that

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] feedback requested

2011-12-21 Per discussione Simon Poole
Please don't confuse the matter by treating tagged and untagged notes the same. If somebody is improving the geometry of a way because he is interpolating from the available information (may that be GPS traces of other ways) then he is doing exactly that, just because he is reusing an

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] feedback requested

2011-12-21 Per discussione Ed Avis
Simon Poole simon@... writes: If somebody is improving the geometry of a way because he is interpolating from the available information (may that be GPS traces of other ways) then he is doing exactly that, That is exactly it: improving the geometry of a way. Not replacing it. If you take an

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] feedback requested

2011-12-21 Per discussione andrzej zaborowski
On 21 December 2011 12:43, Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com wrote: andrzej zaborowski balrogg@... writes: - is a mapper declaration of odbl=clean interesting and helpful in reconciling the data base? Definitely, and I think odbl=no would also be useful to mark objects that are known to come from

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] feedback requested

2011-12-21 Per discussione Simon Poole
Am 21.12.2011 13:34, schrieb Ed Avis: Simon Poolesimon@... writes: If somebody is improving the geometry of a way because he is interpolating from the available information (may that be GPS traces of other ways) then he is doing exactly that, That is exactly it: improving the geometry of a

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] feedback requested

2011-12-21 Per discussione Ed Avis
Simon Poole simon@... writes: If you take an existing tainted way and move it they way is still going to go, so what is your point again? Are we not talking about the following situation: - mapper A (who has agreed to the CTs) creates a way - mapper B (who has not agreed) adjusts the

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] feedback requested

2011-12-21 Per discussione Simon Poole
Am 21.12.2011 14:15, schrieb Ed Avis: Simon Poolesimon@... writes: If you take an existing tainted way and move it they way is still going to go, so what is your point again? Are we not talking about the following situation: - mapper A (who has agreed to the CTs) creates a way -

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] feedback requested

2011-12-21 Per discussione Simon Poole
Am 21.12.2011 14:50, schrieb Ed Avis: Simon Poolesimon@... writes: In general we have assumed that for example tracing from aerial imagery and similar sources does not create a derived work in which the creator of the imagery has rights (not that I necessarily agree with that). The

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] feedback requested

2011-12-21 Per discussione mike
Quoting Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com: Simon Poole simon@... writes: - mapper A (who has agreed to the CTs) creates a way - mapper B (who has not agreed) adjusts the way's geometry, creating some new nodes - mapper C (who has agreed) adjusts the position of those nodes In this

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] feedback requested

2011-12-21 Per discussione Ed Avis
Sorry, I appreciate your taking the time to go through the arguments on this but I think I have said all I have to say about node positions. I'll let others decide whether what I wrote makes sense. -- Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com ___ legal-talk

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] feedback requested

2011-12-21 Per discussione Ed Avis
mike@... writes: 2) good faith - are we making a reasonable effort to remove the IP of folks who have not given us permission to continue? I certainly agree with Ed that we should treat ex-contributors no differently to any IP owner ... but feel we are already doing that in this and other

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] feedback requested

2011-12-21 Per discussione mike
Quoting Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com: mike@... writes: 2) good faith - are we making a reasonable effort to remove the IP of folks who have not given us permission to continue? I certainly agree with Ed that we should treat ex-contributors no differently to any IP owner ... but feel we are

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] feedback requested

2011-12-21 Per discussione mike
Quoting Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com: mike@... writes: 2) good faith - are we making a reasonable effort to remove the IP of folks who have not given us permission to continue? I certainly agree with Ed that we should treat ex-contributors no differently to any IP owner ... but feel we are

[OSM-legal-talk] Apologies for misleading munin graphs

2011-12-21 Per discussione Frederik Ramm
Hi, as you probably know I'm running statistics on the raw count of objects processed by the OSMI view and making Munin graphs of them here: http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/munin.html I'm afraid that there has been an error in some of the graphs (example graph with problem shown here

Re: [OSM-talk] [osmosis-dev] Osmosis replication fails

2011-12-21 Per discussione Brett Henderson
On 18 December 2011 10:12, Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org wrote: On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Paul Norman penor...@mac.com wrote: When switching between minutely and hourly you have to change the sequenceNumber in state.txt Thanks -- how do you figure out the new sequence number

Re: [OSM-talk] [osmosis-dev] Osmosis replication fails

2011-12-21 Per discussione Richard Weait
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 7:19 AM, Brett Henderson br...@bretth.com wrote: On 18 December 2011 10:12, Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org wrote: On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Paul Norman penor...@mac.com wrote: When switching between minutely and hourly you have to change the sequenceNumber in

Re: [OSM-talk] Vista eTrex 10,20,30 series

2011-12-21 Per discussione Ed Loach
Mike asked: A common method of photo surveying in OSM is to take a picture of the GPS while it displays the GPS Satellite time. On the eTrex 30, I can only display the time to the nearest minute. Has anyone found a screen to display the seconds? If not, it is useless as a reference

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] feedback requested

2011-12-21 Per discussione Simon Poole
I belive there are two parts to this - one the specific action of moving a (untagged) node - the more general statement, that an OSM object does not per se carry any IPR. An analogon if you like, would be a pre-numbered sheet of paper. This covers reuse of OSM-objects which have essentially

Re: [OSM-talk] Vista eTrex 10,20,30 series

2011-12-21 Per discussione Mike N
On 12/21/2011 4:29 AM, Ed Loach wrote: Do any of the 4 alternatives in the Amazon review here help? Yes - A direct link to the review with 4 alternatives is here: http://www.amazon.com/review/R3RAKYFG6DOERN/ref=cm_cr_pr_perm?ie=UTF8ASIN=B00542NVS2nodeID=tag=linkCode=

Re: [OSM-talk] Editing of content that will be deleted on April 1st

2011-12-21 Per discussione andrzej zaborowski
Hi, On 13 December 2011 23:03, David Earl da...@frankieandshadow.com wrote: [...] What are the precise, numeric criteria for proceeding? At the moment even by a vague definition I don't see how one could describe it as a critical mass. I'm responding to this old thread because now I think

Re: [OSM-talk] Editing of content that will be deleted on April 1st

2011-12-21 Per discussione Ed Loach
Andrzej wrote: On 13 December 2011 23:03, David Earl da...@frankieandshadow.com wrote: [...] What are the precise, numeric criteria for proceeding? At the moment even by a vague definition I don't see how one could describe it as a critical mass. I'm responding to this old thread

[OSM-talk] Idle thought time, PBF and JOSM

2011-12-21 Per discussione john whelan
Since JOSM can now read PBF files could JOSM request the area of the map to be downloaded to be in PBF format? It would lower the bandwidth requirements. I think it could still return any edits or additions in OSM format but I think more bandwidth is consumed downloading than adding a couple of

Re: [OSM-talk] Idle thought time, PBF and JOSM

2011-12-21 Per discussione Mike Dupont
I think that is a great idea! is that not why google developed PBF so you can use it for streaming? mike On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 7:09 PM, john whelan jwhelan0...@gmail.com wrote: Since JOSM can now read PBF files could JOSM request the area of the map to be downloaded to be in PBF format? It

[OSM-talk] US Golf Courses from GNIS

2011-12-21 Per discussione Golf Geek
After reviewing the Import/Guidelines wiki,  I realize I did not properly communicate about a data import I did, so here's a quick 'after action report'. Better late than never. :) I noticed that although USGS GNIS data had been imported into OSM in the past, the US golf course locations

Re: [OSM-talk] Splitting a way may completely hide a taint

2011-12-21 Per discussione Nathan Edgars II
On 12/21/2011 8:01 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote: Sounds like a policy decision to me - you can either be too cautious or too careful but probably never do it exactly right. And we really need to know how the OSMF is treating these common cases before we start the process of minimizing damage.

Re: [OSM-talk] Idle thought time, PBF and JOSM

2011-12-21 Per discussione john whelan
So continuing idle thoughts, two servers, the first set up to handle PFB only, looks at its own local cached database which would be tiled in PFB format with a tag to say either dirty or clean. If clean it would serve up the data as pre-compressed PBF tiles if dirty it would pass through the

Re: [OSM-talk] Idle thought time, PBF and JOSM

2011-12-21 Per discussione Mike Dupont
you could also use a different base user or api/pfb or something. api.openstreetmap.org/pbf/ On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 2:52 AM, john whelan jwhelan0...@gmail.com wrote: So continuing idle thoughts, two servers, the first set up to handle PFB only, looks at its own local cached database which

Re: [OSM-talk] Splitting a way may completely hide a taint

2011-12-21 Per discussione Toby Murray
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 12:13 AM, Russ Nelson nel...@crynwr.com wrote: Oh, and, could we convince r_coastlines to accept the license? I've put a LOT of work into fixing the coastlines (which were utter CRAP in the first place), and I'm unenthusiastic about having them lost. OSMInspector is

Re: [OSM-talk] Splitting a way may completely hide a taint

2011-12-21 Per discussione Toby Murray
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 12:33 AM, Russ Nelson nel...@crynwr.com wrote: Russ Nelson writes:   Easiest fix is for r_coastlines to accept. Wait a second ... there is no such user. What's going on here? The changeset doesn't show any user name. I'm guessing this means it is an anonymous user?

[talk-au] Strained relations

2011-12-21 Per discussione Nick Hocking
Hi, Whilst replacing tainted data with good data (in areas that I have personally surveyed), I'm sure that I have broken some relations. So firstly, apologies to the guy/s in Canberra that have done some magnificant work with relations here. I have been attempting to fix any relations that I

Re: [talk-au] Strained relations

2011-12-21 Per discussione Nick Hocking
Alex wrote The data.gov.au ODbL re-licencing means we could reimport the ACT bus route relations from: Thanks Alex, yes that's a bit of a relief. I'll still try to fix them as I break then since it's good practice but I guess we should import them periodically anyway to remain current. Nick

[talk-au] Remapping Sydney's railways

2011-12-21 Per discussione Ben Johnson
Just a heads up... I've started remapping Sydney's railway lines, given about 80% of them are marked to be wiped. I am a CityRail train driver and regularly travel over most of these train lines and have intimate knowledge of them - including track direction, electrification details,

Re: [talk-au] Remapping Sydney's railways

2011-12-21 Per discussione Ian Sergeant
On 22 December 2011 15:16, Ben Johnson tangarar...@gmail.com wrote: I just want to add, that I think the original v1 creator of Sydney's railways (JohnSmith) had done a fantastic job, and I had shown a few people at RailCorp who were very impressed with the level of detail - so I want it on

Re: [talk-au] Remapping Sydney's railways

2011-12-21 Per discussione Nick Hocking
Ian Wrote Regardless, I'm sure your remapping will be superior. Absolutely agree - on the ground mapping from someone in the business is as good as it can get. It will always be spot on accurate and also up-to-date. I'd remap Canberra Railway station except that they are going to shove it out

Re: [talk-au] Strained relations

2011-12-21 Per discussione Peter Watson
If the Relation was set up by a contributor who has disagreed what happens? I assume it would need to be removed. I don't know how to tell who put in a relation. Peter W34 ___ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Talk-br] Dados dos Correios são públicos?

2011-12-21 Per discussione Jose Carlos Medeiros
Arlete, Se for apenas para comparação acho que no site você consegue, faz a pesquisa por rua, pega o bairro e depois pesquisa por bairro, assim aparece todas as ruas do bairro e os ceps. Claro, vai dar trabalho, pois você tem que pegar todos os bairros. A base dos correios não é um arquivo só,

Re: [Talk-br] Dados dos Correios são públicos?

2011-12-21 Per discussione Arlete Meneguette
Oi, José Carlos O CEP da UNESP em Presidente Prudente é 19060900. Entrei em http://www.buscacep.correios.com.br/servicos/dnec/consultaEnderecoAction.do e resultou em LogradouroBairro Localidade UF CEP Universidade Estadual Paulista - Campus PresVila Santa Helena

Re: [Talk-br] Dados dos Correios são públicos?

2011-12-21 Per discussione Arlindo Pereira
Independentemente da cobrança ou gratuidade, tem que ver a questão da licença dos dados. Não temos uma lei como a estadunidense, que determina que dados produzidos por órgãos públicos são necessariamente de domínio público salvo disposições contrárias. []s On Dec 20, 2011 5:32 PM, vitor

Re: [Talk-br] Dados dos Correios são públicos?

2011-12-21 Per discussione Diogo W Nunes
Ter a base antiga não quer dizer que você pode importar estes dados à base do OSM. É melhor tirar as dúvidas com os Correios, sobre qual a licensa de uso destes dados, senão teremos de fazer reversão depois. Da última vez que verifiquei, o uso DO SITE era somente para uso pessoal, para consulta

Re: [Talk-br] Dados dos Correios são públicos?

2011-12-21 Per discussione Jose Carlos Medeiros
Diogo, A base antiga não sei se tinha alguma licença, mas pode ser que seja igual a que existe hoje. Esta base agora chama DNE e dei uma olhada na licença, é bem restritiva e certamente não poderemos utilizar. Mais informações neste link:

Re: [Talk-br] Dados dos Correios são públicos?

2011-12-21 Per discussione Arlete Meneguette
José Carlos O CEP da Unesp em Prudente é especial (19060-900) e portanto é válido para todos os prédios. Não há nomes nas vias internas ao campus e todas as correspondências são centralizadas na Seção de Comunicações. Se alguma pessoa faz a busca no Google Maps pelo endereço (R. Roberto Simonsen,

Re: [Talk-br] [ABEC-SP] DADOS SOBRE POPULAÇÃO / SETORES CENSITÁRIOS / CENSO 2010

2011-12-21 Per discussione Arlete Meneguette
José Carlos Veja se estas informações são úteis pra vc. Arlete --- Mensagem Original Assunto: Re: [ABEC-SP] DADOS SOBRE POPULAÇÃO / SETORES CENSITÁRIOS / CENSO 2010 De:      Silvana Camboim silvanacamb...@gmail.com Data:    Ter, Julho 26, 2011

Re: [Talk-br] Dados dos Correios são públicos?

2011-12-21 Per discussione Arlindo Pereira
Segundo a legislação brasileira, sem licença = copyright restritivo escroto = NÃO pode importar no OSM. []s 2011/12/21 Jose Carlos Medeiros j...@psabs.com.br: Diogo, A base antiga não sei se tinha alguma licença, mas pode ser que seja igual a que existe hoje. Esta base agora chama DNE e dei

Re: [Talk-br] Dados dos Correios são públicos?

2011-12-21 Per discussione Arlete Meneguette
Arlindo Concordo com vc, não podemos importar os dados dos Correios no OSM. Mas quais são as bases oficiais que podemos importar e que nos forneçam o detalhamento necessário e confiável ? Os dados do Censo 2010 do IBGE estão disponíveis em formato SHP em LatLong Sirgas2000. Mas o máximo de detalhe

Re: [Talk-de] Sinnhaftigkeit Oxomoa-Schema

2011-12-21 Per discussione Wolfgang
Hallo, Am Dienstag, 20. Dezember 2011 07:34:48 schrieb Andre Joost: Am 19.12.2011 18:07, schrieb Bartosz Fabianowski: Noch erschließt sich nicht jedem der Sinn darin, alle Varianten zu mappen. Aber ich für meinen Teil plädiere dennoch dafür, es zu tun. Wir schaffen mit OSM Daten und

Re: [Talk-de] Rechtlich bedenkliche Grenzen in Berlin

2011-12-21 Per discussione g0ldfish
Ich hatte den Betreffenden auch auf verschiedenen Wegen versucht zu kontaktieren und habe dann begonnen, die als Duplikate importierten rechtlich zweifelhaften Grenzen zu löschen, wenn sie mir untergekommen sind. Die CCby-Daten sind soweit ich weiß noch nicht importiert, hier steht noch die

Re: [Talk-de] Sinnhaftigkeit Oxomoa-Schema

2011-12-21 Per discussione Andre Joost
Am 21.12.2011 09:18, schrieb Wolfgang: Was spricht dagegen, die Relationen so aufzuteilen, dass es für jede befahrene Linie für jede Richtung genau eine Relation gibt? eigentlich nichts ;-) Gruß, André Joost ___ Talk-de mailing list

Re: [Talk-de] Name für Bahnhof?

2011-12-21 Per discussione bkmap
Am 20.12.2011 19:20, schrieb Manuel Reimer: Hallo, wo wir es hier gerade von Namen haben: Wie genau wird ein Bahnhof korrekt genannt? Bei bahn.de nach dem Bahnhof suchen und diesen Namen übernehmen? Oder gibt es dann Lizenzprobleme? Bei Bahnhöfen würde ich den Namen nehmen der am Schild

Re: [Talk-de] Sinnhaftigkeit Oxomoa-Schema

2011-12-21 Per discussione Martin Koppenhoefer
Am 21. Dezember 2011 09:18 schrieb Wolfgang wolfg...@ivkasogis.de: Was spricht dagegen, die Relationen so aufzuteilen, dass es für jede befahrene Linie für jede Richtung genau eine Relation gibt? Damit wird jeder Weg wie bisher mit genau einer Relation pro Richtung belastet (und nicht mit 50),

Re: [Talk-de] Sinnhaftigkeit Oxomoa-Schema

2011-12-21 Per discussione Andre Joost
Am 21.12.2011 13:18, schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer: Am 21. Dezember 2011 09:18 schrieb Wolfgangwolfg...@ivkasogis.de: Was spricht dagegen, die Relationen so aufzuteilen, dass es für jede befahrene Linie für jede Richtung genau eine Relation gibt? Damit wird jeder Weg wie bisher mit genau einer

Re: [Talk-de] Sinnhaftigkeit Oxomoa-Schema

2011-12-21 Per discussione Bartosz Fabianowski
Für mich gibt es hier zwei Fragen die sich stellen: 1. Frage an jeden persönlich: Bis zu welchem Detailgrad möchte ich Varianten abbilden? 2. Allgemeine Frage an die Gemeinschaft: Wenn jemand jede Variante als separate Relation mappen möchte, ist das in Ordnung oder schadet er dem

[Talk-de] Meer ist falsch - coastline

2011-12-21 Per discussione Markus
Wer kann helfen und das korrigieren: Hier führen Strassen mitten durchs Meer, aber da müsste eigentlich eine Insel sein: http://www.openstreetmap.org/?zoom=15lat=12.04063lon=92.99033 Die richtige Ansicht ist in z=13 zu sehen. Der Fehler taucht nur in z=14..18 auf. Die Ursache finde ich

Re: [Talk-de] Meer ist falsch - coastline

2011-12-21 Per discussione Bartosz Fabianowski
Da war an den Daten etwas falsch, scheint aber bereits behoben zu sein. Ich habe testweise per /dirty einige Tiles neu rendern lassen - die sehen richtig aus, bei allen Zoomstufen. Gruß, - Bartosz ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Talk-de] Meer ist falsch - coastline

2011-12-21 Per discussione Georg Feddern
Moin, Am 21.12.2011 16:36, schrieb Markus: Hier führen Strassen mitten durchs Meer, aber da müsste eigentlich eine Insel sein: http://www.openstreetmap.org/?zoom=15lat=12.04063lon=92.99033 Die richtige Ansicht ist in z=13 zu sehen. Der Fehler taucht nur in z=14..18 auf. die Daten sind wohl

[Talk-de] [WISY-Spam]Fwd: OSM2GEO - Converting OSM files as GeoJSON

2011-12-21 Per discussione Jan Tappenbeck
Hi ! nachfolgendes Posting habe ich gerade in der [OSM-Dev] gefunden - vielleicht interessiert es einen von den Web-Bastlern. Gruß Jan .-) Hello Fellow OSMers, I have been playing with OSM data for quite sometime and found Polymaps a really good library for rendering maps in SVG. It had

Re: [Talk-de] Neue OpenStreetMap Deutschland Webseite ist online!

2011-12-21 Per discussione Walter Nordmann
Wie lange dauert das Rendern auf openstreetmap.de? Mein Eindruck tendiert zu es wird garnicht gerendert - und das seit Wochen Könnte man da bitte mal etwas näheres erfahren? Gruss Walter - Wenn du den Wald vor lauter Bäumen nicht siehst, fälle die Bäume und du wirst sehen, dass da kein

Re: [Talk-de] Neue OpenStreetMap Deutschland Webseite ist online!

2011-12-21 Per discussione Frederik Ramm
Hi, On 12/21/2011 09:38 PM, Walter Nordmann wrote: Wie lange dauert das Rendern auf openstreetmap.de? http://munin.openstreetmap.de/mercator/mercator.html#Tirex - die aeltesten Tiles sind 600 Stunden alt. Bye Frederik -- Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09

Re: [Talk-de] Sinnhaftigkeit Oxomoa-Schema

2011-12-21 Per discussione Andre Joost
Am 21.12.2011 15:12, schrieb Bartosz Fabianowski: * Einen weiteren sehr wichtigen Punkt sehe ich darin daß die Informationen, nach Varianten aufgegliedert, in einer vorgekauten Version vorliegen. Wenn jemand eine interessante Anwendung hat die einzelne Varianten referenzieren oder abbilden

Re: [Talk-de] Neue OpenStreetMap Deutschland Webseite ist online!

2011-12-21 Per discussione Andre Joost
Am 22.12.2011 00:03, schrieb Frederik Ramm: Hi, On 12/21/2011 09:38 PM, Walter Nordmann wrote: Wie lange dauert das Rendern auf openstreetmap.de? http://munin.openstreetmap.de/mercator/mercator.html#Tirex - die aeltesten Tiles sind 600 Stunden alt. klappt den bei euch auch die

Re: [Talk-it] RICHIESTA: traduzione siti OSM

2011-12-21 Per discussione sabas88
Il giorno 20 dicembre 2011 23:05, Simone Cortesi sim...@cortesi.com ha scritto: Ciao, mi chiedono (OSMF) se c'e' qualcuno che abbia interesse nel tradurre i post di http://blog.osmfoundation.org/ in lingua italiana. gia' altri, in altri stati, stanno traducendo in alcune lingue straniere a

Re: [Talk-it] Fwd: [OSM-legal-talk] License Change View on OSM Inspector

2011-12-21 Per discussione Alberto Nogaro
-Original Message- From: totera [mailto:g...@hotmail.it] Sent: domenica 18 dicembre 2011 13:33 To: talk-it@openstreetmap.org Subject: Re: [Talk-it] Fwd: [OSM-legal-talk] License Change View on OSM Inspector c'è poi un utente (Paolo Molaro) che è intervenuto anche in lista ed è quindi

Re: [Talk-it] Svuotamento di amenity= e highway=

2011-12-21 Per discussione David Paleino
On Tue, 20 Dec 2011 19:34:40 +0100, sabas88 wrote: Fare una proposta articolata? Cioè, si fa una pagina nelle Proposals che elenca il nuovo sistema di tag (ufficiali) in modo da poterla presentare direttamente alla prova dei fatti. Certo. L'unico scoglio che incontro al momento è una chiave

[Talk-it] grafico odbl free

2011-12-21 Per discussione Simone Cortesi
Un grafico che mostra l'andamento delle way/nodi CT-free: http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/munin.html -- -S ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

[Talk-it] Movimento lento, Federparchi ed OSM

2011-12-21 Per discussione niubii
FYI: http://www.movimentolento.it/it/resource/news/il-movimento-lento-nei-parchi-italiani/ ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it

Re: [Talk-it] Svuotamento di amenity= e highway=

2011-12-21 Per discussione David Paleino
On Wed, 21 Dec 2011 21:13:17 +0100, David Paleino wrote: On Tue, 20 Dec 2011 19:34:40 +0100, sabas88 wrote: Fare una proposta articolata? Cioè, si fa una pagina nelle Proposals che elenca il nuovo sistema di tag (ufficiali) in modo da poterla presentare direttamente alla prova dei fatti.

Re: [Talk-co] Resumen de Talk-co, Vol 41, Envío 17

2011-12-21 Per discussione Aquilino Torres
Buenos días: Con el FunCube, un software y un PC, se puede recibir los satélites NOAA. Este sirve además para decepcionar múltiples satélites, que en nuestro caso no estamos interesado. Otra opción es un radio de VHF, que recepcione alrededor de 137.600 khz, una antena autoconstruida

Re: [Talk-dk] Fugro 2005 billedlag nede?

2011-12-21 Per discussione Jens Winbladh
Virker fint her, både i JOSM og Potlatch. /Jens 2011/12/21 Anders Lund and...@alweb.dk Hej, Jeg ville kigge på nogle skoler i mit lokalområde, men kan ikke få fugro2005 billedlaget til at spille med i aften. Er det et kendt problem? Anders

Re: [Talk-dk] Fugro 2005 billedlag nede?

2011-12-21 Per discussione Anders Lund
On Onsdag den 21. december 2011, Jens Winbladh wrote: Virker fint her, både i JOSM og Potlatch. Tak, det er måske et lokalt problem af en eller anden slags. Jeg kan kun få billeder på et lavt zoomlevel, så jeg kan ikke fx tegne bygninger ind efter det. Det gælder både josm og vistnok potlatch

Re: [Talk-gb-midanglia] Licence Change

2011-12-21 Per discussione Richard Moss
On 21 December 2011 at 14:21 Malcolm Scott m...@lcolm.org.uk wrote: At 14:14 today, Richard Moss wrote: If you can't be bothered with any of this and have given up with OSM, an alternative would be for you to give me your account. I don't particularly want to do that, but it's an

Re: [Talk-gb-midanglia] Licence Change

2011-12-21 Per discussione David Earl
I did the same around Teversham/Cherry Hinton last week, and also looked at what I'd need to do to replace unlicensed contributions. I've written personally to the following: smncrsk Martin Green user_4538 Roman Robert Duncan Dave Tracey NickF HendrikG Simon Proven of which only the last has

Re: [Talk-es] Herramienta de fusión de los datos actuales con el catastro

2011-12-21 Per discussione Jaime Crespo
No lo ignores, haced caso a sergio y al pirado de jynus y no repitáis etiquetas del multipolígono en las vías. Un jardin o una valla no es un edificio, sino lo que hay entre el outer y el inner. -- Jaime Crespo El 20/12/2011 22:43, andrzej zaborowski balr...@gmail.com escribió: 2011/12/20

Re: [Talk-es] Herramienta de fusión de los datos actuales con el catastro

2011-12-21 Per discussione andrzej zaborowski
2011/12/21 Jaime Crespo jy...@jynus.com: No lo ignores, haced caso a sergio y al pirado de jynus y no repitáis etiquetas del multipolígono en las vías. Un jardin o una valla no es un edificio, sino lo que hay entre el outer y el inner. Me refiero al caso donde la subparcela tiene dentro otra

Re: [Talk-ee] maakaart.ee koduleht

2011-12-21 Per discussione Jaak Laineste
Ma kahtlen kas mergemine tehniliselt võimalik on, kasutajanimi on ju kõikides ajaloolistes planeetides sees. Pigem peaks accepti tegema selle alt. Kui mingil põhjusel on võimatu, nt ei saa mailile ligi, siis adminid saavad parooli resettida. Kirjuta help-lehele kysimus kui varem pole,

Re: [Talk-ee] maakaart.ee koduleht

2011-12-21 Per discussione Jaak Laineste
Ps. ma olen natuke Frederiku usku läinud, et haldamata andmed on kasutud andmed ja kui keegi oma sisuga ei tegele siis olekski õigem see maha võtta ja teistel ymber kaardistada. Matt ( vist) rääkis mingist oma vidinast mis võimaldab leida musta litsensiga infot su lähedal ylekaardistuseks.

[Talk-ee] KMKR number baasis?

2011-12-21 Per discussione Joosep-Georg Järvemaa
Viidatud OSM Inspectorit torkides avastasin, et baasi on pandud KMKR numbreid, võtmega vat_ref. Tundub, et tegu on igati liiaste andmetega, seda enam, et puudub samas ettevõtte ametlik nimetus ja registrinumber. Ka ei kujuta ette, et keegi, selle asemel, et KMKR numbrit kontrollida EMTA lehelt,

Re: [Talk-ee] KMKR number baasis?

2011-12-21 Per discussione Joosep-Georg Järvemaa
http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/ View: [ Tagging ] Ilmuvad tumesinised kolmnurgakesed, sisse suumides hakkab ka näha olema, mida vigaseks peetakse. -- Joosep-Georg ___ Talk-ee mailing list Talk-ee@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Talk-ee] maakaart.ee koduleht

2011-12-21 Per discussione Andres Kaaber
Seda küll jah, et kaardi kasutajatele anda tagasisidet, kui värsked andmed on, see on normaalne. Mina hetkel ei taha vana kontot taastada vaid jah ühendada muudatused ... aga väga head lingid kohe uurin. 2011/12/21 Jaak Laineste j...@nutiteq.com:  Vt näiteks

Re: [Talk-ee] maakaart.ee koduleht

2011-12-21 Per discussione Margus Värton
Kuupäeval 21. detsember 2011 10:27 kirjutas Jaak Laineste jaak.laine...@gmail.com: Ps. ma olen natuke Frederiku usku läinud, et haldamata andmed on kasutud andmed ja kui keegi oma sisuga ei tegele siis olekski õigem see maha võtta ja teistel ymber kaardistada. Andmed, mida on hiljem teised

Re: [Talk-pt] Fim das SCUT

2011-12-21 Per discussione Pedro Venâncio
Boa tarde, Estive a levantar os pórticos da A25 sobre o Bing, no sentido Vilar Formoso Aveiro, e no final verifico que marquei mais 3 estruturas, que aparentemente ainda não estão portajadas.  Envio em anexo o KML e o GPX. Alguém consegue confirmar se os pórticos estarão bem identificados? A

Re: [Talk-lv] Brāļu tautas turpina rīkoties: Somija nākošā gada maijā atvērs savus kartogrāfijas datus

2011-12-21 Per discussione Rich
On 12/21/11 21:48, pec...@gmail.com wrote: Sveiki! Awesome news! National Land Survey of Finland will publish its map and air photo data for free use by both citizens and companies in May. free use, bet kaadiem meerkjiem un kaada licence ? :) ar to vien visu var pamatiigi samudzhinaat...

[Talk-cz] Path pro cyklostezky v JOSM

2011-12-21 Per discussione Petr Dlouhý
Ahoj, když se v JOSM vybere z předvoleb Stezka pro pěší a cyklisty, tak se way otaguje jako highway=path. Podle definice na wiki se tak má path tagovat všechno co není footway, cycleway ani bridleway nebo track - tedy hlavně pěšiny, pro které se to většinou používá. Stezka pro pěší a cyklisty

Re: [Talk-cz] Path pro cyklostezky v JOSM

2011-12-21 Per discussione Karel Volný
zdravím, když se v JOSM vybere z předvoleb Stezka pro pěší a cyklisty, opravdu pro *pěší*? tak se way otaguje jako highway=path. Podle definice na wiki se tak má path tagovat všechno co není footway, cycleway ani bridleway nebo track - tedy hlavně pěšiny, pro které se to většinou používá.

Re: [Talk-cz] Path pro cyklostezky v JOSM

2011-12-21 Per discussione Petr Dlouhý
Původní zpráva Od: Karel Volný ka...@seznam.cz Předmět: Re: [Talk-cz] Path pro cyklostezky v JOSM Datum: 21.12.2011 16:20:12 zdravím, když se v JOSM vybere z předvoleb Stezka pro pěší a cyklisty, opravdu pro *pěší*?

Re: [Talk-cz] Path pro cyklostezky v JOSM

2011-12-21 Per discussione jzvc
Dne 21.12.2011 16:38, Petr Dlouhý napsal(a): Původní zpráva Od: Karel Volný ka...@seznam.cz Předmět: Re: [Talk-cz] Path pro cyklostezky v JOSM Datum: 21.12.2011 16:20:12 zdravím, když se v JOSM vybere z předvoleb Stezka

Re: [Talk-cz] WMS data uzemn?hopl?nov?n?

2011-12-21 Per discussione pk
Zahlídnul jsem tenhle dotaz a připojuji se k němu... Územní plám je veřejně přístupný dokument, u nějž je žádoucí aby proniknul k co nejširímu počtu lidí a ti jej studovali, zevrubně zkoumali a pracovali s ním. WMS zpracování je dobrým krokem tímto směrem. Toliko teorie. V praxi jde spíše o

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] dessiner les limites administratives

2011-12-21 Per discussione Pieren
2011/12/21 Cyrille Giquello cyrill...@gmail.com: Bon, du coup là je crois que j'ai trouvé une erreur, non ? Dans la relation France Métropolitaine (1362232) il y a le membre nœud 17807753 dont le rôle est outer. N'est-ce pas une erreur ? Si. Le rôle devrait être 'admin_centre'. Et de toute

[OSM-talk-fr] affichage du nom des communes selon zoom

2011-12-21 Per discussione Cyrille Giquello
Salut, Je n'arrive pas à me souvenir ni à retrouver l'info: quels sont les critères d'affichage d'un nom de commune selon le zoom ? J'ai relu la page discussion du tag population mais chuis pas sûr que ce soit ce critère. Merci -- Cyrille. ___

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] dessiner les limites administratives

2011-12-21 Per discussione Marc SIBERT
Le 21 décembre 2011 00:18, Cyrille Giquello cyrill...@gmail.com a écrit : Le 20 décembre 2011 17:17, Marc SIBERT m...@sibert.fr a écrit : Le 20 décembre 2011 17:06, Cyrille Giquello cyrill...@gmail.com a écrit : Merci Marc, je comprends. ... Bon, du coup là je crois que j'ai trouvé une

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] dessiner les limites administratives

2011-12-21 Per discussione Cyrille Giquello
Le 21 décembre 2011 10:31, Marc SIBERT m...@sibert.fr a écrit : Le 21 décembre 2011 00:18, Cyrille Giquello cyrill...@gmail.com a écrit : Le 20 décembre 2011 17:17, Marc SIBERT m...@sibert.fr a écrit : Le 20 décembre 2011 17:06, Cyrille Giquello cyrill...@gmail.com a écrit : Merci Marc, je

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] affichage du nom des communes selon zoom

2011-12-21 Per discussione Vincent Pottier
Le 21/12/2011 10:20, Cyrille Giquello a écrit : Salut, Je n'arrive pas à me souvenir ni à retrouver l'info: quels sont les critères d'affichage d'un nom de commune selon le zoom ? J'ai relu la page discussion du tag population mais chuis pas sûr que ce soit ce critère. Merci Aucun ! On ne

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] affichage du nom des communes selon zoom

2011-12-21 Per discussione Pieren
2011/12/21 Cyrille Giquello cyrill...@gmail.com: Je n'arrive pas à me souvenir ni à retrouver l'info: quels sont les critères d'affichage d'un nom de commune selon le zoom ? J'ai relu la page discussion du tag population mais chuis pas sûr que ce soit ce critère. D'abord, il faut distinguer

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] dessiner les limites administratives

2011-12-21 Per discussione Pieren
2011/12/21 Cyrille Giquello cyrill...@gmail.com: Sinon, pourquoi admin_centre et pas admin_center ? Parce que les clés sont principalement rédigées en anglais... Pieren ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] affichage du nom des communes selon zoom

2011-12-21 Per discussione Cyrille Giquello
Le 21 décembre 2011 10:38, Pieren pier...@gmail.com a écrit : 2011/12/21 Cyrille Giquello cyrill...@gmail.com: Je n'arrive pas à me souvenir ni à retrouver l'info: quels sont les critères d'affichage d'un nom de commune selon le zoom ? J'ai relu la page discussion du tag population mais chuis

  1   2   >