Re: [Talk-it] Venezia-gerarchia degli highway

Ho lavorato un anno per Venezia, con a tracolla la borsa degli attrezzi... Saranno stati 10kg, ma a vent'anni non si sentivano molto. Oggi avrei da ridire qualche cosa sulla delibera. ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Land-use mapping with OSM in Belgium

Personally, i put Nature reserve on a special relation, as it is described on the wiki, like this one : http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/7130732#map=17/50.68519/4.70461 And the forest or other landuses are just part of this multipolygon. In this example, i also have a multipolygon for the

Re: [OSM-talk-be] old notes: sometimes useful

Good job, Joost! We can solve that kind of issue by creating a node with "shop=vacant". That way, we can close the note once and for all. Moreover, this "vacant" tag is useful when a shop closes down because that way we can keep the node—and preserve the history—instead of removing it. Cheers.

[Talk-it] Import CTR Veneto 5 anni fa

Segnalo dei problemi qui: http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/45.80020/12.89355 scoperto per caso. Non sono del posto quindi non saprei come fissare i problemi, ma sono evidenti. Sembra che tutto risale a un import 5 anni fa. Ciao, Martin ___ Talk-it

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Land-use mapping with OSM in Belgium

On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 10:03 AM, joost schouppe wrote: > So then you need to decide if a park in a residential area is a park or a > residential area. aren't park and residential area 2 different "layers" ? I hope that one day we can map a park as landuse=recreation

Re: [Talk-it] Import CTR Veneto 5 anni fa

Il 27/04/2017 12:49, Martin Koppenhoefer ha scritto: Segnalo dei problemi qui: http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/45.80020/12.89355 scoperto per caso. Non sono del posto quindi non saprei come fissare i problemi, ma sono evidenti. Sembra che tutto risale a un import 5 anni fa. Ciao, Martin

Re: [Talk-is] OSM Iceland road network data analysis

Hæ! One possible reason for the difference could be that Vegagerðin's file only includes the road segments they deem themselves responsible for. If the road itself continues and under the same name, it could affect the results. Sometimes we don't have any information to indicate a name change or

Re: [Talk-it] Funzione per trasferire una posizione dal PC allo Smartphone

Mi ha detto che trova molto utile nella preparazione di un viaggio segnare vari posti (hotel, ristoranti, musei, mete montane, ecc) nella mappa sul pc e trovarseli poi nella mappa dello smartphone. Dato che utilizza Osmand ho consigliato di creare un file gpx con i luoghi di interesse (con JOSM è

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Land-use mapping with OSM in Belgium

2017-04-27 13:14 GMT+02:00 Marc Gemis : > On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 10:03 AM, joost schouppe > wrote: > > So then you need to decide if a park in a residential area is a park or a > > residential area. > > aren't park and residential area 2 different

Re: [Talk-it] Venezia-gerarchia degli highway

2017-04-27 12:27 GMT+02:00 Andrea Musuruane : > Su questo argomento, vi ricordo queste discussioni fatte in passato: > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-it/2008-Decem > ber/004726.html > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-it/2011-July/023175.html >

Re: [OSM-talk] Finding duplicate cycleways

For years the danish community has generally been following this recommendation: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Da:Cykelstivejledning on when to use cycleway=track and when to use separate cycleways. I'd like to express the opinion that cycleway=track is NOT bad and actually in many

Re: [Talk-it] Venezia-gerarchia degli highway

2017-04-26 19:36 GMT+02:00 Martin Koppenhoefer : > come vogliamo procedere? Non vi siete espressi in molti. Mi piacerebbe > sentire altri pareri. > > Avete visto la discussione sul changeset? > Su questo argomento, vi ricordo queste discussioni fatte in passato:

Re: [Talk-it] Funzione per trasferire una posizione dal PC allo Smartphone

Ciao, solitamente io per trasferire le coordinate da pc a osmand utilizzo un generatore di qrcode. Copio da OSM le coordinate (geo:xx.,y.) e le incollo nel generatore, poi leggo il codice da telefono che le riconosce e mi apre osmand. Esistono anche generatori di codice qr che hanno

Re: [OSM-talk] Finding duplicate cycleways

On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 12:27 PM, Tobias Zwick wrote: > Hi > > I wonder, does anyone know a QA tool out there that finds duplicate > cycleways? > > With duplicate, I mean cycleways that are both > - tagged as cycleway=* on a highway=* way and > - mapped as a separate way

Re: [OSM-talk] Finding duplicate cycleways

> On Apr 27, 2017 9:24 AM, "joost schouppe" wrote: > > > > So not all of the cases are an error, but many of them. So is there any tool available to answer OP? Or do you have to write your own solution? > > Since no-one said so yet, I suppose there isn't. There is, the

Re: [OSM-talk] Finding duplicate cycleways

So not all of the cases are an error, but many of them. So is there any tool available to answer OP? Or do you have to write your own solution? Since no-one said so yet, I suppose there isn't. Here's a quick visual check: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/oEm I think I found a nice example of a messed

Re: [OSM-talk] Finding duplicate cycleways

There are very good arguments for both sides of this discussion. Is there a wiki article where both views are really confronted with all the arguments? (I've seen a long article about why you should use separate ways to make wheelchair routing possible, but can't find it now. But I don't remember

Re: [OSM-talk] Finding duplicate cycleways

2017-04-27 9:19 GMT+02:00 joost schouppe : > So not all of the cases are an error, but many of them. I would like to come to a common agreement and document that highway=cycleway on distinct geometry is preferable to having just a cycleway=track attribute on a road.

Re: [OSM-talk] Finding duplicate cycleways

+1 > On 27 Apr 2017, at 7:39 PM, Volker Schmidt wrote: > > I fully agree on this. Please do not remove separate cycleways, unless they > are wrongly mapped cycle lanes (an error which I encounter from time to time) ___ talk mailing

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Land-use mapping with OSM in Belgium

Hi Julien, * How would you feel about building a proposal about forest_management_style=* ? To my great surprise, I noticed I kind of like mingling in the endless discussions at the tagging mailing list. So I would be willing to help out. * Quantitative analysis of landuse mapping in Belgium: I

[OSM-talk-be] old notes: sometimes useful

Hi, I decided to take the bike from Brussels-North to Brussels-Midi instead of the train yesterday, and tried to fix some of those controversial notes by Math1985. I thought the best way to get them out is by fixing them. Anyway, there were a couple of shops where Math marked them as "couldn't

Re: [OSM-talk] Finding duplicate cycleways

> > > Yes, there are arguments for both ways of mapping, but as long as we don't > prefer one over the other, mappers will edit back and forth without much > sense. > I just think it's too complicated an issue to just decide here and now. So a good and neutral guideline is probably the first

Re: [OSM-talk] Finding duplicate cycleways

> > http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/oEm Nice tool, thanks! Unfortunately it does not (yet)catch also the segregated and not-segregated foot-cycle-paths that are tagged using the JOSM presets (highway=path, foot=designated, bicycle=designated, segregated=yes|no) I am not an Overpass-Turbo expert and

Re: [OSM-talk] Finding duplicate cycleways

2017-04-27 10:21 GMT+02:00 joost schouppe : > There are very good arguments for both sides of this discussion. I forgot another two pro distinct geometry: 4. consistency. There is a general rule that separate carriageways should be mapped separately. Why would we do

Re: [OSM-talk] Finding duplicate cycleways

Just curious, do you apply the same arguments to map separate sidewalks and sidewalks separate from cycle ways ? Or are there reasons to treat sidewalk differently ? m On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > 2017-04-27 9:19 GMT+02:00 joost

Re: [OSM-talk] Finding duplicate cycleways

On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 7:58 AM, Marc Gemis wrote: > Just curious, do you apply the same arguments to map separate > sidewalks and sidewalks separate from cycle ways ? Or are there > reasons to treat sidewalk differently ? > Yes, if it's separated by a curb or median from

Re: [Talk-it] Import CTR Veneto 5 anni fa

Benvenuto nel Paese della Meraviglie di OSM (nel Veneto)! 2017-04-27 12:49 GMT+02:00 Martin Koppenhoefer : > Segnalo dei problemi qui: > http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/45.80020/12.89355 > > scoperto per caso. Non sono del posto quindi non saprei come fissare i >

Re: [Talk-it] Venezia-gerarchia degli highway

http://nuovavenezia.gelocal.it/venezia/cronaca/2016/10/25/news/stop-alle-bici-non-si-potra-neanche-portarle-a-mano-1.14306923 2017-04-27 13:47 GMT+02:00 Martin Koppenhoefer : > > 2017-04-27 12:27 GMT+02:00 Andrea Musuruane : > >> Su questo argomento,

Re: [Talk-it] Venezia-gerarchia degli highway

2017-04-27 15:30 GMT+02:00 Volker Schmidt : > http://nuovavenezia.gelocal.it/venezia/cronaca/2016/10/25/ > news/stop-alle-bici-non-si-potra-neanche-portarle-a-mano-1.14306923 > grazie Volker, allora è chiaro (suppongo che hanno poi approvato la delibera). Conviene comprarsi

Re: [Talk-it] Venezia-gerarchia degli highway

Monopattini e pattini per quanto ne so sono vietati così come i pattini... Credo si chiuda un occhio per i bambini :-) Pensate che c'era stata una delibera o qualcosa del genere anche per le valigie perché con le ruote fanno troppo rumore

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Land-use mapping with OSM in Belgium

On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 1:50 PM, joost schouppe wrote: > The examples you give are already hard work to think about. Much more basic > mistakes are made too: e.g. a forest is also a nature reserve. But then > someone turns the forest into a multipolygon, because there is

Re: [Talk-it] Venezia-gerarchia degli highway

2017-04-27 15:47 GMT+02:00 Alessandro Sarretta < alessandro.sarre...@gmail.com>: > Pensate che c'era stata una delibera o qualcosa del genere anche per le > valigie perché con le ruote fanno troppo rumore ( > http://www.huffingtonpost.it/2014/11/21/vietati-trolley- >

Wochennotiz Nr. 353 18.04.2017–24.04.2017

Hallo, die Wochennotiz Nr. 353 mit vielen wichtigen Neuigkeiten aus der OpenStreetMap-Welt ist da: http://blog.openstreetmap.de/blog/2017/04/wochennotiz-nr-353/ Viel Spaß beim Lesen! ___ Talk-at mailing list Talk-at@openstreetmap.org

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Land-use mapping with OSM in Belgium

the landuse under roads should be highway, this has been discussed in the past. Never got popular. Alternative is area:highway, which is more popular I believe. But you won't split the current residential areas on each street, would you ? I think overlaying landuse=residential with leisure=park

Re: [OSM-talk] Finding duplicate cycleways

http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/oEm Thank you for the link. Unfortunately it does not (yet)catch also the segregated and not-segregated foot-cycle-paths that are tagged using the JOSM presets (highway=path, foot=designated, bicycle=designated, segregated=yes|no)

Re: [Talk-at] GPX-Daten glätten

Ich seh den Sinn am Glätten nicht. GPS daten sind Rohdaten und sollten deshalb auch unverfälscht dargestellt werden. Es ist nicht Sinn der Sache, einen GPS track 1:1 als Straße oder Pfad zu übernehmen. Das "glätten" muss deshalb von Hand gemacht werden, weil man dann auch das ganze mit

Re: [OSM-ja] どなたか修正をお願いします(京都丹後鉄道宮福線)

浅野です。 全線のほぼ中央で重複した2路線のノードが結合されていて、分解する際にリレーションが切れてしまいます。 分離はしたのですが、リレーションが2つに分割したので、更新せずに、リタイアします。 すみません。 ___ Talk-ja mailing list Talk-ja@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ja

Re: [OSM-co] Edición mapa de Bogotá

Andres muy amable por responder, En lenguaje coloquial podría decir que aún no he visto ciudades cartografiadas en OSM que tengan vías destinadas para transporte público de color azul. Como lo indiqué en el primer mensaje se utilizó una símbología no acorde al tipo de vía. Adjunté la URL del wiki

Re: [OSRM-talk] [API] Role of profile

On 27 April 2017 at 15:37, Jäger, Frank (KRZ) wrote: > It seems to me, that every beginner spend some hours to learn this lesson. > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/osrm-talk/2017-March/001406.html Interesting. Google did not included this thread in the three pages of

[Talk-lb] mapping Beirut

Hello, Is there anyone in Lebanon interested in mapping Beirut? ___ Talk-lb mailing list Talk-lb@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lb

Re: [Talk-us] Best practice in Lane Editing

On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 4:19 AM, Horea Meleg wrote: > Hy guys, thanks for your responses. > Do you think that is better to move motorway_junction where continuous > line begins? In real life you can't cross a continuous line, so I think it > should be the same in OSM.

[Talk-cz] WeeklyOSM CZ 352

Ahoj, je dostupné vydání 352 týdeníku WeeklyOSM: http://www.weeklyosm.eu/cz/archives/9007 * Bude Elbe-Labe 2017 v CZ? * Konec pokut za špatný název. * Lepší tagování toalet. * Analýza OSM editorů. * Hosting Tool pro maphatony. * Konec landuse=farm. * OSM pro MHD v Helsinkách. Pěkné počtení ...

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Carte collaborative des arbres fruitiers

Le site en question met son fichier en "open data", parait-il... https://fallingfruit.org/data?c=forager%2Cfreegan=fr Mais sous licence CC-BY-SA-NC, donc pas compatible OSM. On peut qualifier "open data" une licence CC-BY-SA (qui n'est plus compatible OSM), mais pas avec la restriction "NC".

[OSM-ja] どなたか修正をお願いします(京都丹後鉄道宮福線)

福知山から宮津に行く宮福線ですが、たぶん全線に渡って 二重に描画されています(単線なので2重に描画する必要は無い)。 そこで、片方を削除しようとしたのですが、リレーションの エラーとなってうまく削除できません。 どなたか、宮福線の重複を削除していただけないでしょうか。 ribbon ___ Talk-ja mailing list Talk-ja@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ja

Re: [Talk-ar] Reunion por rutas Argentinas

Mando rectificación, la entrada es por Cabildo 301, la entrada para los autos, ya que la de 381, a esa hora se encontrará cerrada. Saludos Hernan El mié., 26 abr. 2017 a las 12:05, Hernán Javier López (< hernan.lo...@gmail.com>) escribió: > Estimados: > > El dia viernes 12 de mayo a las 18:00h,

Re: [Talk-cz] Čištění landuse=farm

Čistka dokončena, všechny landuse=farm v ČR jsou opraveny. Jak se ukázalo, tak k tomu určený nástroj NoFarm je na naše mikropolíčka krátký a tak přišel na řadu osvědčený overpass-turbo. Farmy a pole jsou už rozděleny, co budeme dělit dál, vodní plochy landuse=reservoir? To si užijeme :) Milan

Re: [Talk-de] Ein-Phshing-Versuch: Re:☯have you .... that already? (michael)

Hallo, mit den Angaben „Band.../Eintrag...“ kann ich zwar nichts anfangen, aber auch mir fiel eine sachfremde Nachricht auf, am 22.04.2017 00:50. Ein crossposting in drei newsgroups. Der angegebene Link wird von der Webseite sofort umgeleitet und man landet auf einer Seite für

Re: [Talk-de] Ein-Phshing-Versuch: Re:☯have you .... that already? (michael)

sent from a phone > On 27. Apr 2017, at 09:07, Andreas Schmidt > wrote: > > Der angegebene Link wird von der > Webseite sofort umgeleitet und man landet auf einer Seite für > Nahrungsergänzungsmittel. mein Tip wäre, den Spam grundsätzlich nicht anzuklicken ;-)

Re: [Talk-cz] Čištění landuse=farm

Tak v tom případě ti díky. Marián -- Původní e-mail -- Od: Tom Ka Komu: OpenStreetMap Czech Republic Datum: 27. 4. 2017 8:26:11 Předmět: Re: [Talk-cz] Čištění landuse=farm "Ahoj, hlavne v Čechách je to proto, ze na Moravě a

Re: [Talk-se] Trafikverket (igen)

Det finns idn men de är mer som relationer i osm termer för de behöver inte vara kontinuerliga och många av nvdb attributlagrens segment har inga egna idn utan använder förälderidt. 2017-04-27 8:46 GMT+02:00 Henrik Larsson : > Det skall finnas permanenta id, ja (osäker

[Talk-de] Ein-Phshing-Versuch: Re:☯have you .... that already? (michael)

Hallo Liste, eine vergleichbare nichtssagend Nachricht (Hyroglyphe am Beginn des Betreffs und dann eigentlich nichts mehr außer einem Weblink) war bereits in "Band 129/Eintrag 20" in der Nachrichtenliste vorhanden. Ich wäre dankbar, wenn sich ein technikaffiner User unter Euch mal überprüfen

Re: [Talk-cz] Čištění landuse=farm

Ahoj, hlavne v Čechách je to proto, ze na Moravě a ve Slezku jsem to až na podivné případy s vhodností kontroly na místě poopravoval :-) Dne 27. dubna 2017 0:21 Pavel Machek napsal(a): > Ahoj! > >> A co čert nechtěl, stačily tři kliky a narazil jsem na tuhle perlu: >> >> >> >>

Re: [Talk-cz] Čištění landuse=farm

-- Původní e-mail -- Od: Pavel Machek Komu: OpenStreetMap Czech Republic Datum: 27. 4. 2017 0:22:57 Předmět: Re: [Talk-cz] Čištění landuse=farm "Ahoj! > A co čert nechtěl, stačily tři kliky a narazil jsem na tuhle perlu: > > > > Zdeňku

[Talk-us] Signpost editing in Detroit

Hello all, While editing signposts in Detroit, my Telenav collegues and I found some inconsistencies in the OSM data, and we were wondering how to manage them. The cases we encountered are on our github page, at the comments section : https://github.com/TelenavMapping/mapping-projects/issues/1.

Re: [Talk-us] Best practice in Lane Editing

Hy Paul, Thanks for your reply. Can you give us an example of how exactly you’re approaching this, to understand better (some coordinates maybe). Also can you please tell us how you think our presented case, should be processed: [cid:image003.jpg@01D2BF4B.C520A8B0] From: Paul Johnson

Re: [Talk-de] Ein-Phshing-Versuch: Re:☯have you .... that already? (michael)

sent from a computer Hallo Martin, bei eindeutig illegalen Angeboten (z.B. rezeptpflichtige blaue Pillen) bestelle ich gerne mal ein 100er-Pack per Versandadresse Niedersächsisches Ministerium für Gesundheit Hannah-Arendt-Platz 2 30159 Hannover Die freuen sich immer über nette Kostproben

Re: [OSM-ja] どなたか修正をお願いします(京都丹後鉄道宮福線)

ribbon さん 宮福線の重複を確認しました。 ちょいっとチャレンジしてみます。 -- ** 浅野 和仁 helicobacter_y...@hera.eonet.ne.jp ** 2017年4月27日 20:23 ribbon : 福知山から宮津に行く宮福線ですが、たぶん全線に渡って

[OSM-talk-fr] Nationale N79 ("RCEA") : trunk ou primary ?

Salut à tous, j'ai une super question : comment doit on tagguer la nationale N79 (https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=14/46.4819/3.8335) qui est principalement une route bi-directionnelle dénivelée et classée "route pour automobiles" ? Elle était tagguée en "trunk" et quelqu'un vient de la

Re: [OSRM-talk] [API] Role of profile

It seems to me, that every beginner spend some hours to learn this lesson. https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/osrm-talk/2017-March/001406.html It may be a good idea to write it to http://project-osrm.org/docs/v5.6.4/api/#route-service Frank > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von:

Re: [Talk-es] ¿Abreviar nombres de colegios, universidades etc..?

¡Qué buena idea! El otro día, cerca de Huelva, no encontraba las instalaciones del INTA, y era justamente porque lo buscaba así, como "INTA", en lugar del nombre largo (Instituto Nacional de Técnicas Aeroespaciales) Editaré la ubicación y añadiré el short_name ;) Un saludo, Jonás. On Apr 13,

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Projet du mois - Panneaux électoraux

On est à 604 objets de référencés : on se motive pour la fin du mois pour avancer les panneaux électoraux : go go go ! Le 17 avril 2017 à 13:11, a écrit : > Tout comme on ne met les adresses que si le système ne peut les déduire > par la géométrie, les panneaux

[Talk-tr] Invitation to participate in State of the Map Asia 2017 in Kathmandu

Dear OSM community members, We want to welcome you to State of the Map Asia 2017, which will be organized in Kathmandu, Nepal on September 23 - 24, hosted by Kathmandu Living Labs and OSM community of Nepal. The event website is now live at: http://stateofthemap.asia/ A call for session

[OSM-talk-fr] Rencontre mensuelle parisienne 27 avril 19h30

Bonjour, La traditionnelle rencontre du dernier jeudi de chaque mois à 19h30 c'est ce soir! C'est ici: FPH, Fondation Charles-Léopold Mayer pour le Progrès de l'Homme 38 rue Saint-Sabin Paris 11 Pour le reste des infos, c'est par là: http://www.agendadulibre.org/events/13826 Sinon sur le forum.

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Nationale N79 ("RCEA") : trunk ou primary ?

Coucou, Le 27/04/2017 à 15:45, djakk a écrit : > Salut à tous, > > j'ai une super question : comment doit on tagguer la nationale N79 > (https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=14/46.4819/3.8335) qui est > principalement une route bi-directionnelle dénivelée et classée "route pour > automobiles" ?

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Nationale N79 ("RCEA") : trunk ou primary ?

Un trunk est nécessairement en France à voies séparées. La RCEA était prévue pour devenir un "trunk" mais on le sait cela n'a jamais été réalisé hormis quelques tronçons, et seule une moitié de route est construite, avec donc un dangereux dévers pour ceux qui emprunte la voie en contre-sens sur

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Nationale N79 ("RCEA") : trunk ou primary ?

Note ce n'est pas un cas unique, on a la même chose sur la N 7. Ou sur l'ancienne N137 aujourd'hui départementilisée et avec aussi des sections "trunk" (notamment la partie bretonne dans son nouveau tracé, l'ancien étant resté aussi en départementale "secondary") et le reste en "primary" (au sud

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Nationale N79 ("RCEA") : trunk ou primary ?

>> Au rendu de faire la distinction … … entre route bidirectionnelle et vraie 2*2 voies -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Nationale-N79-RCEA-trunk-ou-primary-tp5895990p5896011.html Sent from the France mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Nationale N79

Par rapport à la remarque de Philippe a priori pertinente sur le fait qu'une voie de type trunk devrait avoir des chaussées séparées il est dit dans le wiki : Dispose /en général/ de 2x2 voies et d'une séparation centrale (rail de sécurité). Mais plus précisément pour la France : *France*

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Nationale N79

Par rapport à la remarque de Philippe a priori pertinente sur le fait qu'une voie de type trunk devrait avoir des chaussées séparées il est dit dans le wiki : Dispose /en général/ de 2x2 voies et d'une séparation centrale (rail de sécurité). Mais plus précisément pour la France : *France*

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Nationale N79 ("RCEA") : trunk ou primary ?

Je pense que les trunk ont le critère indispensable de séparation des sens de circulation. Clairement la RCEA n'en est pas, et celui qui a fait le changement a eu raison (et concernant les courtes sections où il y a des voies séparées, elles sont tellemetn courtes qu'elles ne méritent même pas

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Nationale N79

> Le 2017 Ebr. 27 à 21:14, osm.sanspourr...@spamgourmet.com a écrit : > > Par rapport à la remarque de Philippe a priori pertinente sur le fait qu'une > voie de type trunk devrait avoir des chaussées séparées il est dit dans le > wiki : > > Dispose en général de 2x2 voies et d'une séparation

Re: [OSM-ja] どなたか修正をお願いします(京都丹後鉄道宮福線)

いいだです。 urlでいうとどのあたりのオブジェクトでしょう？ 2017/04/28 午前7:19 "ribbon" : > On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 12:11:15AM +0900, 浅野和仁 wrote: > > 浅野です。 > > > > 全線のほぼ中央で重複した2路線のノードが結合されていて、分解する際にリレーションが切れてしまいます。 > > 分離はしたのですが、リレーションが2つに分割したので、更新せずに、リタイアします。 > > 分離して、一方を削ると、リレーションに矛盾が出来てしまって >

Re: [Talk-us] Best practice in Lane Editing

No problem, I've updated it and the adjacent frontage roads for how I handle this situation typically (Texas turnarounds and 4-carriageway freeway arrangements are common to frequent in my area). On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 3:45 AM, Horea Meleg wrote: > Hy Paul, > > Thanks

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Nationale N79 ("RCEA") : trunk ou primary ?

"Most important"? Cette route est déclassée depuis longtemps, elle n'a jamais été terminée et l'Etat ne fait rien pour. Importante pour qui dans son état actuel? Ce n'est même pas dans l'état d'une vieille départementale. Certes dans quelques zones les conducteurs n'ont pas le choix que cette

[talk-au] Making the case for ODbL licensing of state government open data

Hello Australia OSM, I am a spatial science officer in Qld Transport and Main Roads, involved in the provision of Open Data for public consumption. Our data is generally released under a CC-BY license, but I have an opportunity to make a case for the ODbL to be a license option. Currently data

Re: [talk-au] Making the case for ODbL licensing of state government open data

One more link that has some info in relation to CC BY 4.0 https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2017/03/17/use-of-cc-by-data/ From: Nicholas G Lawrence [mailto:nicholas.g.lawre...@tmr.qld.gov.au] Sent: Friday, April 28, 2017 8:53 AM To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org Subject: [talk-au] Making the

Re: [OSM-ja] どなたか修正をお願いします(京都丹後鉄道宮福線)

hayashiです https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6014983 https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/1867928 上記の2つのリレーションですね リレーション；6014983には駅(stop)の情報も入っているので、6014983に統合するのが良いと思います。 幸いなことに、私、現在失業中で暇なので、統合作業にチャレンジしてみます。 2017年4月28日 8:54 浅野和仁 : > アサノです > > 重複ノードは

Re: [OSM-ja] どなたか修正をお願いします(京都丹後鉄道宮福線)

On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 12:11:15AM +0900, 浅野和仁 wrote: > 浅野です。 > > 全線のほぼ中央で重複した2路線のノードが結合されていて、分解する際にリレーションが切れてしまいます。 > 分離はしたのですが、リレーションが2つに分割したので、更新せずに、リタイアします。 分離して、一方を削ると、リレーションに矛盾が出来てしまって アップロードできないのですね。どうやったら解決できるのかなあ。 ___ Talk-ja mailing list

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Nationale N79 ("RCEA") : trunk ou primary ?

De plus il n'y a même pas 4 voies, ni 3 avec une voie centrale qui alterne régulièrement dans un sens ou l'autre pour permettre les dépassements C'est presque de bout en bout 2 voies parallèles (et étroites car la chaussée n'a pas été construite pour être en double-sens: ce devait être juste

Wochennotiz Nr. 353 18.04.2017–24.04.2017

Hallo, die Wochennotiz Nr. 353 mit vielen wichtigen Neuigkeiten aus der OpenStreetMap-Welt ist da: http://blog.openstreetmap.de/blog/2017/04/wochennotiz-nr-353/ Viel Spaß beim Lesen! ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org

Re: [OSM-ja] どなたか修正をお願いします(京都丹後鉄道宮福線)

アサノです 重複ノードは https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/35.4328/135.1582 です。 2017年4月28日 7:20 Satoshi IIDA : > いいだです。 > urlでいうとどのあたりのオブジェクトでしょう？ > > 2017/04/28 午前7:19 "ribbon" -- ** 浅野 和仁

Re: [OSM-ja] どなたか修正をお願いします(京都丹後鉄道宮福線)

hayashiです。 2つのリレーションを「6014983 」に統合しました。 変更セット https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/48213047 2017年4月28日 9:48 yuu hayashi : > hayashiです > > https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6014983 >

[Talk-lv] iespējamie lģia datu labojumi

Nez, lģia interesētu iespējami labojumi viņu datos ? Piemēram šis - https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2073694658/history Varbūt avota datos jau izlabots, varbūt vēl nav. -- Rihards ___ Talk-lv mailing list Talk-lv@openstreetmap.org

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Nationale N79 ("RCEA") : trunk ou primary ?

Moi je suis pour le "trunk" bidirectionnel, avec oneway=no : il faudrait distinguer la RCEA de la route "primary" mais basique Digoin - Autun. Au rendu de faire la distinction. Autre cas épineux : la N13 à l'arrivée sur Cherbourg, chaussée séparée MAIS des maisons au bord de la route

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Nationale N79 ("RCEA") : trunk ou primary ?

Le 27/04/2017 à 19:50, Philippe Verdy a écrit : Je pense que les trunk ont le critère indispensable de séparation des sens de circulation. Le wiki dit pourtant clairement "Need not necessarily be a divided highway"... Et cette

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Nationale N79

Il y a d'un côté la qualité de la route (largeur, sinuosité) et d'un autre côté sa quantité (nombre de véhicules) mais dans osm le tag highway mélange les 2 ... -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Nationale-N79-RCEA-trunk-ou-primary-tp5895990p5896017.html Sent from