Re: Spell Checker Oddity ?

2000-01-26 Thread Fred Weissman
On Tuesday, January 25, 2000, 1:54:34 PM, Nick Andriash wrote: I have "auto correct" enabled A clarification on the above statement... I have "Automatic Checking" enabled, as "Auto Correct" doesn't work for me, and never has. Good point. I can't find anything in the help file that states

Re: Spell Checker Oddity ?

2000-01-26 Thread Fred Weissman
On Tuesday, January 25, 2000, 2:09:00 PM, Fred Weissman wrote: "Ignore All" as I understand it, tells the checker to ignore all occurrences of that word for -this- message (or use) only. Since it's not being added to the user dictionary, it will flag it as unknown/incorrect the next time

Re: Spell Checker Oddity ?

2000-01-26 Thread Nick Andriash
On Wednesday, January 26, 2000, 7:15:11 AM, Fred Weissman wrote: Methinks the right-click version of 'ignore all' isn't connected to anything. IOW, it doesn't work. And I hope the guys at RIT are reading this. I sent off a letter yesterday to RIT Research Labs about the problem... for me,

Re: Spell Checker Oddity ?

2000-01-26 Thread Nick Andriash
On Wednesday, January 26, 2000, 7:19:26 AM, Fred Weissman wrote: I can't find anything in the help file that states exactly what 'auto correct' is -supposed- to do. Because now that you mention it, I'm not so sure it's doing anything right now. Fred, it's supposed to automatically correct

Re: Spell Checker Oddity ?

2000-01-26 Thread Nick Danger
In Reference to "Spell Checker Oddity ?" From Nick Andriash: NA Fred, it's supposed to automatically correct common mistyping's ;o) such NA as Febuary... in which case, as soon as you are finished the word _and_ NA the word exists in the correct.tlx Dictionary, then the word would/should NA

Re: Spell Checker Oddity ?

2000-01-26 Thread Allie Martin
On Wed, 26 Jan 2000 08:38:10 -0800, Nick Andriash wrote: ==8 Fred, it's supposed to automatically correct common mistyping's ;o) such as Febuary... in which case, as soon as you are finished the word _and_ the word exists in the correct.tlx Dictionary, then the word would/should

Re: Spell Checker Oddity ?

2000-01-26 Thread Fred Weissman
In Reference to "Spell Checker Oddity ?" From Nick Andriash: NA Fred, it's supposed to automatically correct common mistyping's ;o) such NA as Febuary... in which case, as soon as you are finished the word _and_ NA the word exists in the correct.tlx Dictionary, then the word would/should NA

Re: Spell Checker Oddity ?

2000-01-26 Thread Nick Andriash
On Wednesday, January 26, 2000, 10:13:28 AM, Allie Martin wrote: I see under the spellchecker menu, an option for automatic checking. Where's this autochecking option? I don't see it anywhere. :-/ Well the option is invoked if you simply choose the option off the Spell Checker Menu, and

Re: Spell Checker Oddity ?

2000-01-26 Thread Nick Andriash
On Tuesday, January 26, 1999, 8:54:45 AM, Nick Danger wrote: It's there, just quirky. If you type Febuary you'll notice a more squared off underline than the usual zigzag type for misspelling. For those words a double right click will "auto correct". I think there is also a keyboard

Re: Spell Checker Oddity ?

2000-01-26 Thread Nick Danger
In Reference to "Spell Checker Oddity ?" From Nick Andriash: It's there, just quirky. If you type Febuary you'll notice a more squared off underline than the usual zigzag type for misspelling. For those words a double right click will "auto correct". NA Thanks Nick... always saw the bolded

Re: Spell Checker Oddity ?

2000-01-26 Thread Fred Weissman
NA Thanks Nick... always saw the bolded line, but didn't realize that double NA right clicking would do the trick... such a "feature" isn't documented NA anywhere. :o) It's there under Spell Checking: "- Intelligent suggestions for misspelled words - SSCE can locate suggested replacements

Re: Spell Checker Oddity ?

2000-01-26 Thread Nick Andriash
On Wednesday, January 26, 2000, 11:28:57 AM, Nick Danger wrote: It's there under Spell Checking: quoted snipped ...but kind of hidden in gobs of text! Well, I'll be darned!! I must have read that section a dozen times, and it STILL didn't register with me!! ;o) Thanks Nick... Nick --

Re: Spell Checker Oddity ?

2000-01-26 Thread Nick Andriash
On Wednesday, January 26, 2000, 6:35:50 PM, Januk Aggarwal wrote: But that's not exactly -auto- in my mind. Auto should mean no user intervention. Not necessarily. I think it is far better this way, since I may have a valid reason for typing a misspelled word in a given message. I

Re: Spell Checker Oddity ?

2000-01-26 Thread Januk Aggarwal
Hello Nick, On Wednesday, January 26, 2000 at 19:49:47 GMT -0800 (which was 7:49 PM where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: On Wednesday, January 26, 2000, 6:35:50 PM, Januk Aggarwal wrote: But that's not exactly -auto- in my mind. Auto should mean no user intervention. Not

Re: Spell Checker Oddity ?

2000-01-25 Thread Fred Weissman
I have "auto correct" enabled, and if I see a word that's been underlined because of a spelling error, but decide not to add the word to my User's Dictionary... or correct it, and choose "Ignore All"... if I happen to type the word again, the Spell Checker will underline it yet again, as if