Hello Roelof,
Friday, October 28, 2005, 3:57:01 AM, you wrote:
RO Hallo Jack,
RO On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 21:09:13 -0500GMT (28-10-2005, 4:09 +0200, where I
RO live), you wrote:
JSL Roelof, your suggestion looked considerably more elegant and I tried
JSL to make it work but, alas, it wouldn't. I
Hello Roelof,
Thursday, October 27, 2005, 6:11:10 AM, you wrote:
RO Hallo Jack,
RO On Wed, 26 Oct 2005 05:47:41 -0500GMT (26-10-2005, 12:47 +0200, where
RO I live), you wrote:
JSL I see that I have accidently mislead everyone by the content of my
JSL original text. I used the words individual
Hello Mica,
Tuesday, October 25, 2005, 9:38:04 AM, you wrote:
MM -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
MM Hash: RIPEMD160
MM***^\ ._)~~
MM ~( __ _o Was another beautiful day, Tue, 25 Oct 2005,
MM@ @ at 05:58:49 -0500, when Jack S. LaRosa wrote:
I can't seem to figure out how
Hello Bill,
Tuesday, October 25, 2005, 11:46:01 AM, you wrote:
BM On Tue, 2005-10-25, Jack S. LaRosa wrote:
I can't seem to figure out how to get a single filter to route
incoming mail to individual folders based on the sender field. I have
one name in the RULE tab under FILTERING STRINGS
Hello Thomas,
Tuesday, October 25, 2005, 7:50:27 AM, you wrote:
TF Where are you?
TF I go to Account / Sorting Office. I go to Incoming Mail and I have a
TF General tab, not a Rules tab. I do not have an Alternatives tab.
He is using version 2.11.02 which uses the old filtering system. I
Currently we're testing release candidate 5 for TB 3.01, so I guess
the most waiting has been done.
Sorry but that info means nothing to me - do you mean there is never
an RC6 or that there isn't usually, or...
And do you _know_ that the filter business has been sorted in 3.01?
--
Marten
A And do you _know_ that the filter business has been sorted in 3.01?
Nobody is complaining about non functional filters anymore in the beta
list, that's the only thing I can say. I think they're right, but
'knowing' it, is something else.
I'm holding my breath...
...
...
...gasp...
maybe
I was having a lot of trouble with filters prior to RC3 but now they have
gone away.
What were your problems ?
They are not working! They will work if each individual folder is
manually re-filtered, but leave them to themselves and they don't -
seems to be mainly the Common Filters (yes, I
Hello Roelof,
--
Tuesday, September 14, 2004, 3:54:02 PM, you wrote:
Hallo Joe,
On Tue, 14 Sep 2004 14:53:30 -0400GMT (14-9-2004, 20:53 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
J I some noce filters build. I have to make some changes to them for
J various
Hi Roelof,
Thursday, September 9, 2004, 2:55:34 PM, you wrote:
RO Hallo Stuart,
SM Filters are driving me potty.
RO Don't despair.
Aargh!!! I am trying.
SM namely a *ist D - a stupid name I know.
RO But a nice camera
Indeed.
SM However, what I really want to do, is delete any messages
SM
On Thursday, August 28, 2003, 9:25 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote re:
editing an inbox message:
PJ If there is now a way to do so I would be thrilled to learn how!
R Well, actually it is possible, but not solely with TB:
R Export the message
R Edit the subject with Notepad or another text editor.
R
Thursday, August 28, 2003, 11:32:17 AM, MAU wrote:
M As you say, it is probably the easiest method. However, you
M must be aware that this method does change some of the
M original RFC-822 header lines.
Good point. The solution is not perfect, but likely suffices in
most situations. I solve
Hello MAU,
Monday, July 28, 2003, 3:23:18 PM, you wrote:
I am receiving masses of spam emails every day through my inbox. I
have gone into the specials tools and set lots and lots of filters to
capture this rubbish. But the next mail-out just comes to me without
filtering out what I don't want.
Hello Bill,
Sunday, July 27, 2003, 10:00:15 PM, you wrote:
BM How about an example of a filter that doesn't work along with the
BM appropriate fields of an email that it didn't work on. BTW, make sure
BM you test it at the top of the list of filters so you are sure other
BM filters are not
Hello Alexander,
Sunday, July 27, 2003, 11:05:34 PM, you wrote:
A The main set is always AND. You won't receive an email that contains all
A of the addresses you've specified.
A You have to specify the other addresses on the Alternatives tab with the
A Add set button. It will look like...
A
Hello Thomas,
Monday, March 17, 2003, 10:28:12 PM, you wrote:
So the rules are ANDed? How do I get them to be ORed?
TF If they are all on the first tab (Rule, then they are ANDed. If you
TF put conditions onto the second tab (Alternatives), each alternative
TF is ORed to the first tab and to
Tuesday, March 18, 2003, 3:31:33 AM, you wrote:
PH I have 1.60 and am happy with it. Does 1.62 represent an important
PH improvement?
RO The most important improvement for you would be that you'd have a
RO help-file.
Well, if someone would email me the help file, I could save a download
and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Thomas,
On Tue, 18 Mar 2003, at 10:28:12 [GMT +0700]
(which was 18/03/2003 (D/M/Y) 4:28 where I live) you wrote:
TF so that
TF this dot-asterisk is interpreted as any characters
I do not see the need of .*
If tbudl is present,
Hello Roelof,
Monday, March 17, 2003, 7:17:41 PM, you wrote:
RO Hallo Pete,
RO On Mon, 17 Mar 2003 18:46:08 -0500GMT (18-3-03, 0:46 +0100, where I
RO live), you wrote:
PH Filters have me stumped!
PH I have strings set up as follows:
PH TheBat Text
PH batSubject
PH TBUDL
Hello ~John,
Friday, February 21, 2003, 6:22:26 PM, you wrote:
~ Paul Smithson wrote:
P Why you would include a £ symbol
~ Why would you use that symbol in a subject line ?
You make a very valid point :)))
Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL
Hello Paul Smithson,
On or about Friday, February 21, 2003 at 18:00:16GMT + (which was
1:00 PM in the tropics where I live) Paul Smithson postulated,
ruminated and made these points on the subject of Filters for Spam:
PS Hello John,
PS Friday, February 21, 2003, 5:23:51 PM, you wrote:
~
Hello Miguel A. Urech,
On or about Friday, February 21, 2003 at 19:45:04GMT +0100 (which was
1:45 PM in the tropics where I live) Miguel A. Urech posted:
[strings]
£
MAU You would drop many messages from me if you and I exchanged business
MAU e-mail :)
If you send me mail with $, £ or any
Hi Paul,
Friday, February 21, 2003, 6:00:16 PM, you wrote:
PS Hello John,
PS Friday, February 21, 2003, 5:23:51 PM, you wrote:
~ Here is a filter that gets rid of alot of spam for me:
~ [strings]
~ £|¥|¤|§|«|»|À|Á|Å|µ|¿
PS Why you would include a £ symbol.
PS As a Brit I feel pretty
Hi Miguel,
Friday, February 21, 2003, 6:45:04 PM, you wrote:
MAU Hello ~John,
Here is a filter that gets rid of alot of spam for me:
[strings]
£
MAU You would drop many messages from me if you and I exchanged business
MAU e-mail :)
Well, no, because if you have any sense you make messages
Hi St,
Saturday, February 22, 2003, 1:59:18 AM, you wrote:
You would drop many messages from me if you and I exchanged business
e-mail :)
SMN Can't see why since this is what a whitelist would and should fix.
Try replying to the right person. You just piggybacked my reply ;-)
--
Best
Hello Miguel,
Wednesday, January 29, 2003, 11:08:36 PM, you wrote:
MAU Yes, try Selective Download filters.
It worked,thanks
--
Best regards,
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL
In reply to Thomas's message 'Filters for both in and out boxes' on Mon,
16 Dec 2002 11:53:38 +0700 from [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Thomas,
TF I therefore suggested repeatedly that these filter functions
TF (incoming, outgoing, read, replied) should not be seperated into
TF different
Hello Chris,
On Thursday, October 24, 2002, 3:52:32 PM, you wrote:
CW I've got a few in there that I've now turned to manual.
CW How do I trigger a bunch of filters together rather than running 1 at a
CW time?
I think this is what you are looking for:
You can do this on a per folder basis
Hello Chris,
On Thursday, October 24, 2002, 5:25:18 PM, you wrote:
PG You can do this on a per folder basis by right clicking the folder
PG select Re-filter messages, select the appropriate rule sets and check
PG manual filter only.
CW Okay, what's the difference between adding addresses in
Hello Thomas,
On Thu, 10 Oct 2002 at 23:05:44[GMT +0700](which was 17:05 where I
live) you wrote:
TF If you are talking about addressbook groups, I suspect you may have
TF your own address in that group too. So when you send a message to the
TF whole group, you'll get it as an incoming mail, of
Hello Thomas,
On Wed, 9 Oct 2002 at11:31:35[GMT +0700](which was 05:31 where I live)
you wrote:
RW Even more baffled. So, if I send a mail to someone who is not in my
RW address book or on a mailing list, I have to CC it to myself to get a
RW copy?
TF It has nothing to do with your
Wednesday, October 9, 2002, 8:22:54 AM, you wrote:
MO On Wednesday, October 9, 2002, 08:25, Richard Wakeford wrote:
Until yesterday all my sent mail came back to the Inbox without a CC
or rule.
MO Could it be your ISP automatically adding a BCC to you on every mail you
MO send? Ask them!
Hello Gerard,
On Wed, 9 Oct 2002 at09:42:44[GMT +0200](which was 08:42 where I live)
you wrote:
RW Then some messages started not showing up in the Inbox or the other
RW reader and I'm now told, obviously correctly, that I have to put a
RW rule in the Outbox redirecting my mail to the Inbox so
Hello Thomas,
On Tue, 8 Oct 2002 at11:43:36[GMT +0700](which was 05:43 where I live)
you wrote:
TF I filter mailing lists only at incoming time. Outgoing filters are
TF important for normal mail, where your sent message doesn't come back
TF to you.
Oh, I thought *all* mail comes back to me, at
Hello Thomas,
On Tue, 8 Oct 2002 at22:40:47[GMT +0700](which was 16:40 where I live)
you wrote:
TF No, I mean a mail that I sent just to a recipient, not to a list. For
TF example if I send a message directly to your address. It will not come
TF back to me, unless I include my own address as
Hello Marck,
On Wed, 9 Oct 2002 at02:37:59[GMT +0100](which was 02:37 where I live)
you wrote:
MW Are you saying you want *another* copy sent to you?
RW Well some of my mail (most if it actually) comes to the inbox
RW anyway so why doesn't it all so that it can all automatically
RW get
Hello Mark,
On Mon, 7 Oct 2002 at12:12:36[GMT -0700](which was 20:12 where I live)
you wrote:
MW I think one of the main things that people trip over is that the
MW strings in the Filtering strings box are treated as AND clauses
MW rather than OR clauses. In other words, if you have more than
Hello Gerard,
On Mon, 7 Oct 2002 at19:14:54[GMT +0200](which was 18:14 where I live)
you wrote:
G - You need to determine a UNIQUE filtering characteristic that does not
G change over time.
G The simplest being the email address a person.
I thought I had but I've been told one answer, the
Hello Thomas,
On Tue, 8 Oct 2002 at01:35:27[GMT +0700](which was 19:35 where I live)
you wrote:
TF Check whether this is always true. Is sender the group? I believe in
TF this group, it isn't.
Now you've got me thinking. As my name is not in the group or the
address book I assumed sender was
Hello Leif,
On Mon, 07 Oct 2002 at20:00:27[GMT -0600](which was 03:00 where I
live) you wrote:
LG Just wanted to check. Have you read:
LG http://www.pcwize.com/thebat/filtering.shtml
Yes I have but it's all far too complicated and for me and leaves me
half way down page one!
--
Best
Monday, July 22, 2002, 5:24:16 PM, you wrote:
[snip]
Hi Allie -
ACM Sounds like you need to invest in one of those
ACM specialist spam filtering tools that have been
ACM mentioned on this list now and then, like Spam Weasel
ACM or SpamCop.
I may resort to that, but looking at some of the
Monday, July 22, 2002, 3:28:25 PM, you wrote:
so do I list this as 'sender', or as 'kludges', or
what?
DAC I'm using sender for those.
Hmmm .. then I think my current problems must be mostly
the order.
Thanks,
Lynn
--
1.60q on Win2kPro SP2
[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * *Aun
Tuesday, July 23, 2002, 10:13:11 AM, you wrote:
RO Hallo Lynn,
RO On Tue, 23 Jul 2002 09:01:08 -0700GMT (23-7-02, 18:01 +0200GMT, where
RO I live), you wrote:
LT Because, as I mentioned in a previous mail, either I have
LT to put them in my 'personal' AB, where I don't want them,
LT even as
Hi all -
I just want to thank everybody who helped out with this
filtering. I think it's working fairly well now, though it
could use some tweaking. I'm hoping to do that without
hollering help, though :-)
Lynn
--
1.60q on Win2kPro SP2
[EMAIL PROTECTED] * * *Aun Aprendo
I'd
Monday, July 22, 2002, 8:49:10 AM, you wrote:
[snip]
TM I would suggest a little different approach. Put all your spam
TM addresses in a 'spamers' AB group, then have your filter process
TM against that AB group. That way you don't need to modify your filter
TM each time you want to add a
Monday, July 22, 2002, 8:11:39 AM, you wrote:
JA Yes... I think you're making a long AND query... so ALL the
JA addresses
JA would have to be listed. Move all but the first one to the
JA alternatives page, and try running the filter again.
I did that - moved all but the first address to the
Monday, July 22, 2002, 1:03:51 PM, you wrote:
[snip]
LG It has, I'm sure about that. This setting has been there for quite a
LG while now (as far back as my TB experience goes, which must be 1.47
LG Halloween Edition, IIRC). There is also a scroll bar on this tab which
LG allows one to scroll
Monday, July 22, 2002, 1:04:51 PM, you wrote:
MDP Completely. In build 'q' of 1.60. 1.61 was 100% stable and 1.62
MDP is
MDP now in beta. Keep up!! ;-)
MDP - --
MDP Cheers -- .\\arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator
Honey, if I could reduce this damn spam to a sensible
level, I might be able
Monday, July 22, 2002, 1:14:55 PM, you wrote:
[snip]
JA You use Add Set. I think alt-ins adds an AND to the OR statement.
JA So it'd be like this:
JA A or B AND C
OK, I thought that might be the way it worked.
JA Hrm... no idea.
I'll go over them again .. who knows what I might have
Monday, July 22, 2002, 1:36:41 PM, you wrote:
[snip]
DAC First, is there some advantage to having one filter with all the
DAC alternative spam items, instead of a number of filters.
I don't know .. but my filter list is so long that if I
want to find one for some reason, it's an awful pain,
El miércoles 26 de junio de 2002, 12.49, Roelof Otten decía:
RO Selective download filters are only being used with the mail
RO dispatcher.
I think you're wrong here. I remember using selective download filters
some time ago, and they worked with the 'normal' 'Get new mail',
independently from
Hello Adam,
Wednesday, June 26, 2002, 2:38:43 PM, you wrote:
RO Outgoing filters are triggered when the condition is met on an
RO outgoing message.
A Are Outgoing filters very commonly used? Do people often have
a A number of folders and not send to sent-mail?
I use outgoing filter to save
Hello Leif,
Monday, April 8, 2002, 8:05:15 AM, you wrote:
Thank you for your reaction, and also Jan, thanks to you I finally got
it right!
M In the manual it says to adjust the path in de templates and the
M filters, but I don't seem to be able to find where to do so.
M That might be the
Thanks Marcus,
I went back to recreate so that I could be sure I had it correct before
I posted it here. When I did I found that it works properly if there
is a string in the Rules side. Remove that string and just run with
the alternative and it will trap every thing that has not been
Thank you, Peter. That worked, I hadn't cleared the password in
the one account.
Elaine
Have you, when deleting access password, cleared _both_ fields?
--
Regards
Peter Palmreuther
--
Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Thank you very much, copying the files worked perfectly.
Now, how do I get rid of the password dialogue box? No one but me
uses computer and I don't need to authorize opening up an account
(managed somehow (it wouldn't send jpg without it) to set that in when I sent a jpg
from the desktop and
Thank you. I am up and running and registered and finally have given
TB default for all mail. OE has been sent to rest.
Elaine
Hello ETM,
17. januar 2002, 19:30:56, you wrote:
E How do I alphabetize the folders created to accommodate the filters?
Click on the [Name] column header.
On 9 December 2001 at 8:13 pm Lars wrote:
Hi Alastair,
On 9 Dec 2001 at 19:11:52 [GMT +], you wrote:
I'm new to TB! and am struggling to find a way to create a filter
which will leave any mail with attachments on the server (without
deleting it from the server).
AS (ii) in Account |
Hello,
Yes, it's the right way. The problem is that the default string may
contain (double quote, 22H) characters.
It does not help in my case. I reduced the default string from the
recipient (in a mailing list message) to optacon (the part of the
e-mail address before the @) and put the place
Hello Peter,
Well, I create filters i.e. by pressing strg-shift-f in the message
editor, modify the folder entry to where I want to place the message
and press ok. I guess I do everything according to the help text. Is
there a way to catch error messages about non-working filters?
TIA
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Marck,
You wrote on 3/28/2001, 6:54 PM:
Marck I have a theory that I'm longing to check out but I don't have
Marck a set up in which I can do so. It goes like this:
Marck Enable local delivery.
Marck In the secondary account, have a single
Hi, Bat folks,
on Wednesday, March 28, 2001 at 17:54:31GMT +0100 - which was 18:54 in Cologne,
Germany, where I live -
Marck D. Pearlstone wrote the following lines regarding "Filters for 2 accounts":
Marck Enable local delivery.
How can I do this, or how can I disable local delivery?
I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Ming-Li,
You wrote on 3/28/2001, 7:26 PM:
2) When experimenting, it was very easy to create a setup where
mail was autogenerating from Acc2 and redirected to Acc1 in an
alarming rate... It was most certainly a user error in my part, but
I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Allie,
You wrote on 3/18/2001, 1:04 PM:
Allie Create a quick template which contains only the macro %Clear.
Allie Give it a short handle name like 'cl'. Whenever you create a
Allie new message and wish not to use the template, just type 'cl'
Hey Marck,
Wednesday, January 17, 2001, 2:12:03 PM, you wrote:
F TO: "VS Big List" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MDP could enable RegEx here and test for:
MDP reply to: .VS Big List. \vsbiglist\@lists\.metrocenter\.com\
I love it! You get to use RegEx *and* keep all of the components of
the
Hello Nick,
Sunday, November 19, 2000, 9:35:33 PM, you wrote:
Nick Andriash Doug, do you think you can shorten your quote prefix? It makes it very
Nick Andriash difficult to read your messages when you use almost 25% of your
available
Nick Andriash sentence length, just for the quote prefix.
Hello JM14,
Thanks Jerry.
Doug
--
Doug Weller Moderator, sci.archaeology.moderated
Submissions to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Doug's Archaeology Site: http://www.ramtops.demon.co.uk
Co-owner UK-Schools mailing list: email me for details
--
Hi!
Allie Martin wrote at 3/24/2000, 1:17 :
AM On Fri, 24 Mar 2000 08:47:19 +0100, SyP wrote:
Is there any way for filters to work throughout accounts?
AM Not the way that you're indicating.
Then I guess multiple POP3 mailboxes for one account would do for
me... ;)
Bye: SyP
--
Hi Ali Martin,
On Donnerstag, 23. Dezember 1999 at 23:59:55 you wrote:
AM On Thu, 23 Dec 1999 23:08:25 +0100, Roel wrote:
just put 'explorer.exe' or 'explorer' in the field, that'll do it :-)
AM I included my windows directory as well and it also worked. shrug
It does work. I fell for
Hi Roel,
On Donnerstag, 23. Dezember 1999 at 23:08:25 you wrote:
OS Then I put "windowsdir\explorer.exe" in the edit
R just put 'explorer.exe' or 'explorer' in the field, that'll do it :-)
R if you want to use windows-variables, you should use them like this:
R %windowsdir%
Nice to
70 matches
Mail list logo
