On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 10:04:35PM -0700, Harry Putnam wrote:
> Hope I didn't typo earlier; the exact hub is DS108.
You said "Netgear 108"; there are several Netgear hubs with "108" as the
number, but some are 10Mb-only - the DS108 is the 10/100 hub.
> It says it is a
> dual speed hub `auto 10/
Guy Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Perhaps this hub is different and is a 10/100 hub; the Ethereal FAQ does
> list 10/100 hubs as another source of problems when sniffing.
Hope I didn't typo earlier; the exact hub is DS108. It says it is a
dual speed hub `auto 10/100 Mbps'. So apparentl
Guy Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 06:32:34PM -0700, Harry Putnam wrote:
>> So I now have
>>
>>Internet
>> |
>> dsl modem
>> |
>>dsl/router/switch (.1)
>> |
>> _NEW SIMPLE 8 port hub___
On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 10:06:46PM -0400, Andrew Mann wrote:
> Possibly a stab in the dark, but is it a 10/100 hub, and is one
> machine using a 10 mbit card (or negotiating down to 10mbit for some
> reason) and the other using 100 mbit? My experience with every 10/100 hub
> I've ever
Possibly a stab in the dark, but is it a 10/100 hub, and is one
machine using a 10 mbit card (or negotiating down to 10mbit for some
reason) and the other using 100 mbit? My experience with every 10/100 hub
I've ever used has been that traffic is actually switched between the 10
mbit
On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 06:32:34PM -0700, Harry Putnam wrote:
> So I now have
>
>Internet
> |
> dsl modem
> |
>dsl/router/switch (.1)
> |
> _NEW SIMPLE 8 port hub__
> | | || | |
> mach2 m3
Guy Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
>> Now fire up a browser on .7 ... and I see nothing at all.
>
> What happens if you just run "tcpdump" with no arguments?
>
>> root # tcpdump host 192.168.0.4
>> tcpdump: listening on eth0
>> 14:47:42.738413 arp who-has fw.local.lan tell satellite.l
On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 02:50:46PM -0700, Harry Putnam wrote:
> In that config running tcpdump on .5 like this:
>root # tcpdump host 192.168.0.7
> tcpdump: listening on eth0
>
> Now fire up a browser on .7 ... and I see nothing at all.
What happens if you just run "tcpdump" with no argumen
Harry Putnam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
Guy Harris wrote:
>> If you're not running tcpdump on satwin.local.lan, the problem may be
>> that satwin.local.lan is on a switched network or a 10/100 hub, so that
>> not all traffic to and from it is seen by the machine on which you're
>> running
Guy Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 08:34:09PM -0700, Harry Putnam wrote:
>> I'll admit I'm not the sharpest tool in the shed but my feeble reading
>> man tcpdump indicates that this command should show traffic on a
>> specific host:
>> tcpdump host 192.168.0
On Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 08:34:09PM -0700, Harry Putnam wrote:
> I'll admit I'm not the sharpest tool in the shed but my feeble reading
> man tcpdump indicates that this command should show traffic on a
> specific host:
> tcpdump host 192.168.0.7
> And in fact if I start a ping of the host
I'll admit I'm not the sharpest tool in the shed but my feeble reading
man tcpdump indicates that this command should show traffic on a
specific host:
tcpdump host 192.168.0.7
And in fact if I start a ping of the host from local machine
192.168.0.5 I do see the traffic. But if I slide ov
12 matches
Mail list logo
