Re: [Tinyerp-users] Screencast New Open ERP Ergonomy Proposition

2009-06-03 Thread forum-user
Hello Luc, - add a new filter (ok) - modify a filter - delete a filter - define a filter as a public of private one - give security on filters (can define which groups have access to the filter) Yes, delete a filter is managed. Modify is not (yet). We have a link, like for shortcuts

Re: [Tinyerp-users] Screencast New Open ERP Ergonomy Proposition

2009-06-03 Thread forum-user
Hello Fabien, I would like to propose you a request for search and filter developpement, there are 3 years, there was a topic about autocompletion, show a dynamic listing of results when I type letter, word : http://www.openobject.com/forum/topic1944.html?highlight=autocompletion the code

Re: [Tinyerp-users] Screencast New Open ERP Ergonomy Proposition

2009-06-03 Thread forum-user
Hello, It has been integrated. See the country field on the partner. But we can not integrate this by default, has it loads all the data on the init, which is very slow and consume lots of bandwidth.. m2f --

Re: [Tinyerp-users] Screencast New Open ERP Ergonomy Proposition

2009-06-03 Thread forum-user
Thanks for info. have a good day A+ 8) Sauvegardons la banquise, sinon les pingouins vont disparaitre ! m2f -- http://www.openobject.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=37433#37433 m2f

Re: [Tinyerp-users] Screencast New Open ERP Ergonomy Proposition

2009-06-03 Thread forum-user
for completion it's ok for the client GTK, not for for the client web, even if there is completion in field modified in the code source of the page. is it normal? A+ [Laughing] [Crying or Very sad] Sauvegardons la banquise, sinon les pingouins vont disparaitre !

Re: [Tinyerp-users] Screencast New Open ERP Ergonomy Proposition

2009-06-03 Thread Fabien Pinckaers
forum-u...@tinyerp.org wrote: for completion it's ok for the client GTK, not for for the client web, even if there is completion in field modified in the code source of the page. is it normal? A+ [Laughing] [Crying or Very sad] As I said, the completion is not very usefull as we can not

Re: [Tinyerp-users] Screencast New Open ERP Ergonomy Proposition

2009-06-03 Thread Ovnicraft
2009/6/3 Fabien Pinckaers f...@tinyerp.com forum-u...@tinyerp.org wrote: for completion it's ok for the client GTK, not for for the client web, even if there is completion in field modified in the code source of the page. is it normal? A+ [Laughing] [Crying or Very sad] As I said, the

Re: [Tinyerp-users] Screencast New Open ERP Ergonomy Proposition

2009-06-02 Thread Luc Maurer
Hello Fabien, Improving search and filter is really a big need. And like you have done it in your screencast make sense. Concerning filter = just pay attention not to do like for exporting on the 4.2 version = we should be able to : - add a new filter (ok) - modify a filter - delete a filter -

Re: [Tinyerp-users] Screencast New Open ERP Ergonomy Proposition

2009-06-01 Thread forum-user
Fabien: About the stuff you showcased in the screencast, I find that it's a simple improvement that totally makes sense: it's not bloated, it's simple yet provide really welcome additional features: congrats for the idea. Now a suggestion: I think the way records are linked together and how

Re: [Tinyerp-users] Screencast New Open ERP Ergonomy Proposition

2009-06-01 Thread Fabien Pinckaers
I'm sure you could end up with a more consistent way of displaying related records. I should say I like the right side links but may be their should be better way to organize their display. Also may be that as soon as you show related records in a tab, may be those should also be available

Re: [Tinyerp-users] Screencast New Open ERP Ergonomy Proposition

2009-06-01 Thread forum-user
May be we could add the number of available records between right side links. Like: Sales Orders (32), Purchase Orders (16), ... Yeah, it would be nice but IMHO the speed penalty is not worth it. Or may be you would have an option to force to pre-loading of the number (in the action

Re: [Tinyerp-users] Screencast New Open ERP Ergonomy Proposition

2009-06-01 Thread forum-user
Personally, I don't like screen changing color continuously... I prefer color be embedded on application so you don't even realize there is any color... I don't know if I'm explaining right. Usability improvements really good. I agree with Raphael on unifying sales and purchase operating way.