Re: [VOTE] JK 1.2.14.1

2005-07-19 Thread Jean-Jacques Clar
Please vote: [X] Stable -- good build [ ] Alpha -- something serious is wrong: what is it? Functional and stress tested against 2.0.54, and 2.1.6 on NetWare 6.5 SP3 and SP4 on MP server (4 CPUS). Only stress test for apache 1.3. Using Tomcat 4.1.30. Thank you, JJ

mod_jk 1.2.14-dev testing status report

2005-06-10 Thread Jean-Jacques Clar
Tested mod_jk 1.2.14-dev with nb_connect() and setsockopt() enabled for NetWare in jk_connect.c: (all testing on NetWare 6.5 SP3 and SP4) 2.0.52 and Tomcat 4.1.30: build correctly and stress tested, 2.0.54 and Tomcat 4.1.31: build correctly, stress and functional testing done, 2.1.x: build

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jni/native/common/jk_connect.c

2005-06-10 Thread Jean-Jacques Clar
clar2005/06/10 13:31:49 Modified:jk/native/common jk_connect.c Log: Enabling nb_connect() and setsockopt for apache build with LibC (2.0.x) on NetWare. Revision ChangesPath 1.61 +4 -4 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/common/jk_connect.c Index:

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/apache-1.3 Makefile.netware

2005-06-10 Thread Jean-Jacques Clar
clar2005/06/10 09:24:35 Modified:jk/native/apache-1.3 Makefile.netware Log: mod_jk is not MT safe for NetWare on Apache 1.3.x Revision ChangesPath 1.7 +1 -1 jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/native/apache-1.3/Makefile.netware Index: Makefile.netware

Re: JK shutdown problem

2005-05-23 Thread Jean-Jacques Clar
, but it takes more than 16 loops to get a JK_SOCKET_EOF. Apache is using 30 for MAX_SECS_TO_LINGER. Any objection why mod_jk cannot use the same value? Thanks, --JJ [EMAIL PROTECTED] 5/20/2005 12:21 PM Jean-Jacques Clar wrote: Hi, file: jk_connect.c in jk_shutdown_socket(); when reading

JK shutdown problem

2005-05-20 Thread Jean-Jacques Clar
Hi, file: jk_connect.c in jk_shutdown_socket(); when reading data from tomcat in the while loop, the variable ttl is incremented every time by one, until breaking out of the loop: snippet: line 505 *- /* Read all data from the peer until we reach end-of-file (FIN

Re: JK 1.2.13 TAGGED - ws_write call to ap_rflush in mod_jk.c

2005-05-18 Thread Jean-Jacques Clar
I really like being able to do: write(8K)*n + flush(). +1 on adding a FlushPackets config option set to off by default. Thank you Mladen and Jean-Frederic. Jean-Jacques [EMAIL PROTECTED] 5/18/2005 7:41 AM Henri Gomez wrote: good idea. Which state by default ? off (-FlushPackets).

[Q/PATCH] ws_write call to ap_rflush

2005-05-12 Thread Jean-Jacques Clar
Callingap_rflush() at the end of ws_write() in mod_jk.c is causing me problems when doing downloads from the server toa client. Performance degradation and, less importantly, memory usage, are the problems. During calls to ap_rwrite() in ws_write, a brigade is created and used to move

Re: Tagging 1.2.12

2005-05-09 Thread Jean-Jacques Clar
Build and run on NetWare with apache 2.0.54. JJ [EMAIL PROTECTED] 5/6/2005 6:31 AM Hi, It's been a week since 1.2.11 has been tagged and released. Because of bug in wc_close, and sice no other bugs have been reported for a week, I plan to tag the 1.2.12 tomorrow morning, 10:00 GMT. Any

Re: Tagging 1.2.12

2005-05-09 Thread Jean-Jacques Clar
details in my report, but I was reporting a fact not more, not less.But from what I could do, 1.2.12 is good. --JJ [EMAIL PROTECTED] 5/9/2005 2:28 PM At 02:30 PM 5/9/2005, Jean-Jacques Clar wrote: Build and run on NetWare with apache 2.0.54. Woot! And thank you for the example, Jean-Jacques

Re: [ANN/VOTE] JK 1.2.11 Released

2005-04-30 Thread Jean-Jacques Clar
Turk [EMAIL PROTECTED] 4/30/2005 12:09 AM Jean-Jacques Clar wrote: It looks like wc_close() is called twice when JK is unloading and destroying its memory pools resulting in trying to free the same mutex twice. Anyway, I have to run to the airport, but will look at it tomorrow sometime. I've

Re: [ANN/VOTE] JK 1.2.11 Released

2005-04-29 Thread Jean-Jacques Clar
I just put 1.2.11 on my server and is having a problem with an invalid parameter passed from pthread_mutex_destroy() to kMutexFree(). pthread_mutex_destroy() is called within wc_close() when unloading jk. I am just getting started on trying to find the source of the problem. I don't see that

Re: [ANN/VOTE] JK 1.2.11 Released

2005-04-29 Thread Jean-Jacques Clar
It looks like wc_close() is called twice when JK is unloading and destroying its memory pools resulting in trying to free the same mutex twice. Anyway, I have to run to the airport, but will look at it tomorrow sometime. Sorry about the delay, JJ [EMAIL PROTECTED] 4/29/2005 2:57:11 PM I just

Re: Tagging JK 1.2.9 on 3/17/2005

2005-03-17 Thread Jean-Jacques Clar
Greetings, As Norm did, I was able to build and test against 2.1.4 beta and 2.0.52 for NetWare. I ran load testing against 1.2.9dev today with 400 virtual clients requesting JSPs and Servlets on a dual proc p4 with HT enabled. It is looking solid. The test will run overnight. I will find time

[PATCH] NetWare threading using pthreads

2004-12-23 Thread Jean-Jacques Clar
OK.I'm also waiting Jean-Jaques Clar for a Netware threading patch. Here you go. NetWare has now a pthreads library. Thank you for your help and patience Mladen. It has been running on a 4 CPUS box for now over an hour. As far as performance, I will benchmark it against 1.2.6 after the holidays

JK 1.2.7 Beta3 Page Fault

2004-12-17 Thread Jean-Jacques Clar
Greetings, I did a clean co of jtc w/ JK_1_2_7_BETA_3 tag. I am building for NetWare with ap2.0.52. Running stress test on a 2 procs machine. Doing request to simple JSPs and servlets using WebBench with up to 250 virtual clients. It takes between few minutes and an hour to reproduce, this is

[PATCH] /apache-2.0/NWGNUmakefile

2004-12-02 Thread Jean-Jacques Clar
The patch allows mod_jk to build for NetWare with APR existing outside of the httpd/srclib file structure for apache 2.1.x. Could someonecommitthat change tocvs. Thank you, Jean-Jacques --- jk/native/apache-2.0/NWGNUmakefile9 Apr 2004 20:00:18 -1.2+++ jk/native/apache-2.0/NWGNUmakefile1