how to disable jk2 and enable jk1 on Tomcat5 with Apache 1.3

On Tomcat startup there is info message that indicates that tomcat starts using jk2. As I understand, that cames from that line in server.xml: Connector port=8009 enableLookups=false redirectPort=8443 debug=0 protocol=AJP/1.3 / How to disable jk2 and prevent tomcat to use jk1.2 ?

Re: how to disable jk2 and enable jk1 on Tomcat5 with Apache 1.3

alebu wrote: On Tomcat startup there is info message that indicates that tomcat starts using jk2. As I understand, that cames from that line in server.xml: Connector port=8009 enableLookups=false redirectPort=8443 debug=0 protocol=AJP/1.3 / How to disable jk2 and prevent tomcat to use jk1.2

Unable to redirect from Windows 2003 server 64 bit and IIS 6.0 to Tomcat 4.1.31 using JK2 ajp1.3

and requests directly to Tomcat via 8080 work. We have the same environment working ok on Windows 2003 server 32 bit. Has anyone got Tomcat, JK2/ajp1.3 OR JK 1.2.14 working with IIS 6.0 under Microsoft 2003 Windows 64 bit? Thanks for your experience and ideas! Steve Environment Installed

mod_jk or jk2??

Hello everyone, I see lots of posts saying that they are using or implementing jk2? For what I understand, that has been replaced by mod_jk... so which one is better or what is recommended?? I also have found better documentation related to jk2 so that adds to the puzzle. Regards, Luis

RE: mod_jk or jk2??

I thought the jk2 is newer... but I can be wrong... MC From: Luis Torres [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Users List tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org To: Tomcat Users List tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org Subject: mod_jk or jk2?? Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2005 13:47:42 -0500 Hello everyone, I see

Re: mod_jk or jk2??

You want to use mod_jk. JK2 has been deprecated and is no longer in active development. On 8/3/05, MC Moisei [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I thought the jk2 is newer... but I can be wrong... MC From: Luis Torres [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tomcat Users List tomcat-user@jakarta.apache.org

Re: Apache2+JK2+Tomcat-5.028 URI UTF-8 problem

: | |Subject: Apache2+JK2+Tomcat-5.028 URI UTF-8 problem

Re: Apache2+JK2+Tomcat-5.028 URI UTF-8 problem

-user@jakarta.apache.org | |cc: | |Subject: Apache2+JK2+Tomcat-5.028

Re: Apache2+JK2+Tomcat-5.028 URI UTF-8 problem

| |cc: | |Subject: Apache2+JK2+Tomcat-5.028 URI UTF-8 problem

Apache2+JK2+Tomcat-5.028 URI UTF-8 problem

It's about apache-tomcat configuration with UTF-8. I added URI encoding to the tomcat configuration and I set defaultcharset utf-8 in apache2. Im using mod_jk2. It doesnt work when I use special characters like áéíóúñ... If I use URL with port 8080 (tomcat answers) It's fine but If I use the

RE: Module jk2 and jk Connectormodules

Université du Québec Canada -Message d'origine- De : Andreas Bauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoyé : 7 juin 2005 09:49 À : 'Tomcat Users List' Objet : Re: Module jk2 and jk Connectormodules Hello! Btw, here is another link: http://www.dynamicobjects.com/d2r/archives/002574.html

RE: Module jk2 and jk Connectormodules

I've configured lately such a configuration. I first tried to use the jk2 module, but soon discovered that it was deprecated and much more complex to use. I really recommend using jk. There are big differences in the configuration directives required in the httpd.conf by jk and jk2. Since I've

Re: Module jk2 and jk Connectormodules

Hello! Btw, here is another link: http://www.dynamicobjects.com/d2r/archives/002574.html After doing this script, jk2 works for me in win xp, but not in Suse 9.2. I hope, it helps you anyway and you can use it somehow. I have still questions. LoadModule jk_module modules/mod_jk.so Jk suse 9.1

Module jk2 and jk Connectormodules

Hello! I'm trying to configure a Tomcat-Apache connection with jk2. I tried the jk2 module in Suse(.so) without succeed, in windows(.dll) with succeed. With Tomcat 5.5. and Apache 2.0. My httpd.conf with jk2: LoadModule jk2_module modules/mod_jk2.so Location /*.jsp JkUriSet worker ajp13

Tomcat5+jk2... /manager/html

and status with multiprocess servers. file=C:\Inetpub\tomcat\bin\jk2.shm size=1048576 [workerEnv] info=Global Server Options timing=0 debug=debug loger=logger.file:default sslEnable=0 ver=200505271645 [logger.file:default] info=Hauptlogkonfig ver=200505271645 file=C:\Inetpub\tomcat\log\jk2.log level

Tomcat5+jk2... /manager/html

and status with multiprocess servers. file=C:\Inetpub\tomcat\bin\jk2.shm size=1048576 [workerEnv] info=Global Server Options timing=0 debug=debug loger=logger.file:default sslEnable=0 ver=200505271645 [logger.file:default] info=Hauptlogkonfig ver=200505271645 file=C:\Inetpub\tomcat\log\jk2.log level

Apache - JK2 - Tomcat Question

I have a 'newbie' jk2 / Tomcat question. I am running Tomcat behind Apache with mod_jk2 interfacing the two. If I hit the URL www.myserver.com/contextname I get the JSP/servlet that I am hoping for. I am using the correct mapping ([URI:/contextname/*]) in the workers2.properties and everything

RE: Apache - JK2 - Tomcat Question

Subject: Apache - JK2 - Tomcat Question I have a 'newbie' jk2 / Tomcat question. I am running Tomcat behind Apache with mod_jk2 interfacing the two. If I hit the URL www.myserver.com/contextname I get the JSP/servlet that I am hoping for. I am using the correct mapping ([URI:/contextname

RE: Apache - JK2 - Tomcat Question

Geoff Wiggs wrote: I have a 'newbie' jk2 / Tomcat question. I am running Tomcat behind Apache with mod_jk2 interfacing the two. snip Just so you are aware, jk2 is deprecated in favor of jk. As of version 1.2.10 of jk, most useful features in jk2 should be in jk. See http://jakarta.apache.org

jk2 for Apache2 and Tomcat 4

Hi, we want to use Apache2 (2.0.53) as a frontend for out Tomcat (4.1.31) and don't get the right configuration for our jk2 (2.0.4). This all runs with Java 1.4.2_06 on Debian Sarge x86. We want to serve two or three different applications through our apache2. Each one gets its own VirtualHost

Re: jk2 for Apache2 and Tomcat 4

Paul Puschmann wrote: Hi, we want to use Apache2 (2.0.53) as a frontend for out Tomcat (4.1.31) and don't get the right configuration for our jk2 (2.0.4). This all runs with Java 1.4.2_06 on Debian Sarge x86. Do not use JK2. Use JK instead. See: http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/connectors-doc/news

Re: jk2 for Apache2 and Tomcat 4

Mladen Turk wrote: Paul Puschmann wrote: Hi, we want to use Apache2 (2.0.53) as a frontend for out Tomcat (4.1.31) and don't get the right configuration for our jk2 (2.0.4). This all runs with Java 1.4.2_06 on Debian Sarge x86. Do not use JK2. Use JK instead. See: http

RE: jk2 for Apache2 and Tomcat 4

1.2.6 is the latest and should work with Apache 2 so you don't have to go back to apache 1. Ta Matt -Original Message- From: Paul Puschmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 14 March 2005 12:28 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: jk2 for Apache2 and Tomcat 4 Mladen Turk wrote: Paul

Re: jk2 for Apache2 and Tomcat 4

Dale, Matt wrote: 1.2.6 is the latest and should work with Apache 2 so you don't have to go back to apache 1. Ta Matt Okay, but I don't get jk1 for apache2 as a ready debian-package. I prefer ready-built packages, because otherwise I could miss some important compiling options or get some

RE: jk2 for Apache2 and Tomcat 4

Okay, but I don't get jk1 for apache2 as a ready debian-package. I prefer ready-built packages, because otherwise I could miss some important compiling options or get some version-dependancy-errors or such. It is an open bug in debian. For a reason I don't know, they made a correlation

Re: jk2 for Apache2 and Tomcat 4

Paul Puschmann a écrit : Dale, Matt wrote: 1.2.6 is the latest and should work with Apache 2 so you don't have to go back to apache 1. Ta Matt Okay, but I don't get jk1 for apache2 as a ready debian-package. I prefer ready-built packages, because otherwise I could miss some important

Re: jk2 for Apache2 and Tomcat 4

Sébastien GALLET wrote: Paul Puschmann a écrit : Dale, Matt wrote: 1.2.6 is the latest and should work with Apache 2 so you don't have to go back to apache 1. Ta Matt Okay, but I don't get jk1 for apache2 as a ready debian-package. I prefer ready-built packages, because

JK2 URI configuration

I can't figure out, or find any documentation on how to map a uri in workers2.properties to something other than its webapp directory name. For instance, I want to make the directory $CATALINA_BASE/webapps/mywebappv2.0.23 respond as though it were $CATALINA_BASE/webapps/mywebapp. I'm certain

jk2 problem

It seems as though my jk2 configuration isn't failing over properly. If a tomcat machine drops, it compensates properly. However, if a single application on one of the tomcat machines fails then apache/jk2 keeps that faulty app in the mix. When a user gets directed to a tomcat instance where

JK2 Failover Problem

I'm having trouble with the failover functionality of JK2. I have apache connected to two back-end tomcat engines running on separate machines. The failover works just fine when a tomcat engine dies. The node is not given any requests and the webapp continues to function normally. However, when

jk vs. jk2

If jk2 is abandoned, why would I use it over jk_1.2.8? Platform reasons? Feature reasons? Performance reaosns? Other? Anyone? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: jk vs. jk2

On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 02:57:48PM -0500, Matt wrote: : If jk2 is abandoned, why would I use it over jk_1.2.8? : Platform reasons? Feature reasons? Performance reaosns? Other? : Anyone? Depends on how you define use -- continue using an existing JK2 install -- either because you're

Re: jk vs. jk2

: : If jk2 is abandoned, why would I use it over jk_1.2.8? : Platform reasons? Feature reasons? Performance reaosns? Other? : Anyone? Depends on how you define use -- continue using an existing JK2 install -- either because you're in the process of migrating off JK2 but haven't finished

Re: jk vs. jk2

Matt wrote: If jk2 is abandoned, why would I use it over jk_1.2.8? Platform reasons? Feature reasons? Performance reaosns? Other? Anyone? Well, for one, it works and I have a ready to run config files. Nix. - To unsubscribe

Re: jk vs. jk2

So does jk_1.2.8, so, for new installs, why would I use it? The overwhelming answers that I've gotten offline have been don't bother, so that seems to be the best answer. Thanks, -Matt On Mon, 21 Feb 2005, Nikola Milutinovic wrote: Matt wrote: If jk2 is abandoned, why would I use it over

RE: Tomcat's JK2 connector

Yes, Tomcat uses ajp13 and is compatible with the mod_jk2 connector. Yes, jk2 is deprecated and is in the process of being replaced by the ajp13 proxy in Apache 2.1. Apache 2.1 is a development release only and this should show up in Apache 2.2. Yes, you can use Apache with rewrite rules

Tomcat's JK2 connector

Hello, I am evaluating JSF and need to test my component in clustered environment so I need Apache or Tomcat running as a front-end proxy server between users and JBoss'es instances, and I have some questions: 1) Whether Tomcat contains JK2 connector? I have one PC with Tomcat installed and I

SAXParseException - Apache 2.0 +JK2 w/ tomcat

We sometimes have issues where individual XML POSTs fail when using jk2 w/ Apache 2.0 and Tomcat 5.0.16. We have re-run the posts using just tomcat on port 80, and the post are then successful. We think the problem is within the AJP13 conversation at this time... The error we receive when

jk2.properties Query

Hi: I noticed the following on the catalina.out: Feb 15, 2005 9:19:13 AM org.apache.jk.server.JkMain start INFO: Jk running ID=0 time=1/37 config=/local/jakarta-tomcat-5.0.28/conf/jk2.properties Does Tomcat 5.0.28 have mod_jk on by default

RE: jk2.properties Query

From: Hari Mailvaganam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: jk2.properties Query Does Tomcat 5.0.28 have mod_jk on by default? The default server.xml has an AJP13 connector defined on port 8009; it's been that way for a long time. You should comment it out if you don't need it. - Chuck

Tomcat 5.0.28/IIS 5.0/jk2

Hi, I have configured IIS 5.0 with jk2 (isapi_redirector2.dll) + Tomcat 5.0.28. My main problem is that the log entry being written to IIS just logs GET /jakarta/isapi_redirector2.dll 200 ... for all URLs being redirected. All requests not redirected log as expected. Is there a way to log

Session Replication jk2

:localhost:8011] channel=channel.socket:Tomcat2 #load balancing [lb:balanced] worker=ajp13:localhost:8009 worker=ajp13:localhost:8011 timeout=90 attempts=3 recovery=90 StickySession=0 noworksMsg=Server busy please retry after some time [shm] file=/etc/httpd/conf/jk2.shm size=100 [uri

JK / JK2 and IIS6 Authentication Problem solved

Hi all, everyone who isn't able to access the manager / admin applications (access denied message) or try to use basic auth with IIS6 and Tomcat 4.x / 5.x should read further. We had exactly this problem while using the jk2 isapi redirector. HOW TO SOLVE: - use the JK ISAPI-Redirector

Apache JK2 negative match

Hi, I am trying to get Apache 2.0 to forward all requests to a load balanced Jetty pair via mod_jk2 EXCEPT static resources such as .jpg files. Has anyone done this? What I would like is some kind of negative match Location !~ /.*\.(jpg|gif|css) JkUriSet group ajp13:localhost:8009

RE: Apache JK2 negative match

Jk2 is deprecated, so you may want to switch to mod_jk 1.2.8 which now has all the jk2 features. Since that can be rather involved for some people, you can use PCRE in Apache 2.x. I haven't tried this, but it should work. LocationMatch ^/.*\.(?!(jpg|gif|css)) This definitely works for leading

core dump when start Apache 2.0.52 with jk2 module in AIX 5.2 HELP!

Hi, I build Apache 2.0.52 and jk2 connector (jakarta-tomcat-connectors-jk2-2.0.4-src.tar.gz) in AIX 5.2 without any problem, but after I start Apache with jk2 module, it generated Segmentation fault(coredump). Here is I run dbx: # dbx httpd core Type 'help' for help. [using memory

JK2 connector proper setup/update procedure?

to delete the workers2.properties and jk2.properties files? thanks in advance, woodchuck __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - now with 250MB free storage. Learn more. http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250

RE: apache2 tomcat5 jk2 questions

Well, for now it is working. But I am thinking in moving to the jk1 again soon. Really ironic, I decided to choose jk2 so that I would not have to upgrade in a while, but well, back luck. -Original Message- From: QM [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 07, 2005 7:04 PM

jk2 connector question

Hi, I have configured the jk connector and it works with apache 2.0.52 and tomcat 5.0.28. Apache host is: 192.168.1.1 The tomcat project can be accessd thro' http://192.168.1.100:8080/myProject After using the jk connector, the tomcat project can also be reached by

Re: jk2 connector question

jeff.fong wrote: Hi, I have configured the jk connector and it works with apache 2.0.52 and tomcat 5.0.28. Apache host is: 192.168.1.1 The tomcat project can be accessd thro' http://192.168.1.100:8080/myProject After using the jk connector, the tomcat project can also be reached by

Re: apache2 tomcat5 jk2 questions

Casas, Claudia wrote: No way! I just got my server completely working on jk2! Does anybody have any links or resources that talk about this. If this is really a big issue, I will definitely move back to jk Sorry. I was as bitten by the news as you are. The thing is, if it is working, not only

Re: apache2 tomcat5 jk2 questions

On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 06:02:14PM +0100, Nikola Milutinovic wrote: : Sorry. I was as bitten by the news as you are. The thing is, if it is : working, not only shouldn't you fix it, but relax. JK2 is OK - if it : works. It is a stable mechanism, it is just not going to be developed : any more

RE: apache2 tomcat5 jk2 questions

No way! I just got my server completely working on jk2! Does anybody have any links or resources that talk about this. If this is really a big issue, I will definitely move back to jk -Original Message- From: j r [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 6:30 PM

RE: apache2 tomcat5 jk2 questions

http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/jk2/news/20041100.html#2 0041115.1 -Original Message- From: Casas, Claudia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2005 12:49 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: apache2 tomcat5 jk2 questions No way! I just got my server

apache2 tomcat5 jk2 questions

Hello everybody, I have configured jk2 successfully finally to work with apache and tomcat. #!Question 1 I have included the following in my server.xml file: Context path=/ccasas docBase=/home/ccasas/wwwdocs debug=0 reloadable=true crossContext=true /Context This allows me to see my jsp

Re: apache2 tomcat5 jk2 questions

Please Read your Documentation at this page http://myserver:8080/tomcat-docs/config/host.html and that should answer your question. Read the section that says: User Web Applications Casas, Claudia wrote: Hello everybody, I have configured jk2 successfully finally to work with apache and tomcat

RE: apache2 tomcat5 jk2 questions

this configuration in the jk2.properties, but do not know how either. If you could point me to the right direction I would really appreciate it. I basically need to be able to view my jsp's through apache as: e.g. http://myserver/~userdir/myfile.jsp -Original Message- From: Dwayne Ghant

Re: apache2 tomcat5 jk2 questions

to make apache forward my jsp request to tomcat. I used to include Jkmount option in my httpd.conf, but now I have not idea. I have read about a JkSet but not sure how to use it. I have also read that you can have this configuration in the jk2.properties, but do not know how either. If you could

Re: apache2 tomcat5 jk2 questions

! : ) But I still do not know how to make apache forward my jsp request to tomcat. I used to include Jkmount option in my httpd.conf, but now I have not idea. I have read about a JkSet but not sure how to use it. I have also read that you can have this configuration in the jk2.properties, but do

Re: JK2 Officially Unsupported - Should I Avoid JK2?

On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 17:03:19 -0700, Sean Dockery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/jk2/news/20041100.html#20041115.1 I had been under the impression that JK2 was superior to JK. In light of the announcement, should we be sticking with JK from here

Re: JK2 Officially Unsupported - Should I Avoid JK2?

IMHO avoid JK2 On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 17:03:19 -0700, Sean Dockery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On November 15th, there was an announcement that JK2 is officially unsupported. http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/jk2/news/20041100.html#20041115.1 We're in the process of configuring

Re: apache jk2.conf and tomcat question heeelp

B Wiley wrote: Hello, Is there a way to put an absolute path in the jk2.conf location tag that would look like /var/www/html/*.jsp I'm trying to set things up so If i have a .jsp in my website root it forwards the request to tomcat without having the .jsp physically sitting inside

Re: JK2 Officially Unsupported - Should I Avoid JK2?

It looks like things regarding a connector are still in flux... probably not time to panic yet. JK2 works. mod_jk works. Choose one. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12-22-2004 17:03 On November 15th, there was an announcement that JK2 is officially unsupported. http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1

Re: apache jk2.conf and tomcat question heeelp

location, then put the entry in jk2.conf for that alias. Cheers, -T Hello, Is there a way to put an absolute path in the jk2.conf location tag that would look like /var/www/html/*.jsp I'm trying to set things up so If i have a .jsp in my website root it forwards the request to tomcat

Re: apache jk2.conf and tomcat question heeelp

Create a Java web application in the 'normal' fashion. See http://localhost/tomcat-docs/appdev/index.html for how to set things up. This will create your entire web application in $CATALINA_HOME/webapps. Now, in your Apache httpd.conf file, you need some configuration additions. Let's say your

Re: JK2 Officially Unsupported - Should I Avoid JK2?

Thanks for the reply, Dennis. I did some reading in the list archives on the subject, and we decided to go with mod_jk. Dennis Payne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] It looks like things regarding a connector are still in flux... probably not time to panic yet. JK2

JK2 Officially Unsupported - Should I Avoid JK2?

On November 15th, there was an announcement that JK2 is officially unsupported. http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/jk2/news/20041100.html#20041115.1 We're in the process of configuring new servers and integrating Apache with Tomcat. We are migrating applications from servers

apache jk2.conf and tomcat question heeelp

Hello, Is there a way to put an absolute path in the jk2.conf location tag that would look like /var/www/html/*.jsp I'm trying to set things up so If i have a .jsp in my website root it forwards the request to tomcat without having the .jsp physically sitting inside the tomcat root

Re: apache jk2.conf and tomcat question heeelp

I think the way to do that is set up an alias directory inside apache.conf pointing to that absolute location, then put the entry in jk2.conf for that alias. Cheers, -T Hello, Is there a way to put an absolute path in the jk2.conf location tag that would look like /var/www/html/*.jsp I'm

Tomcat 5, jk2, Apache 2 and mixed name/IP virtual hosts

Hello, I've got a Tomcat 5 / Apache 2 / jk2 server which has been serving several different virtual hosts which share a common IP address. I now need to implement my first SSL-protected website on this machine, and I am working under the assumption that this site must have a dedicated IP

Re: Tomcat 5, jk2, Apache 2 and mixed name/IP virtual hosts

Troy Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 21/12/2004 17.07.40: Hello, I've got a Tomcat 5 / Apache 2 / jk2 server which has been serving several different virtual hosts which share a common IP address. I now need to implement my first SSL-protected website on this machine, and I am working

Tomcat 5, jk2, Apache 2 and mixed name/IP virtual hosts

I just found the problem, my apologies, it turns out to be a firewall port block upstream from me. Thank You, Troy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

JK2 logging with IIS

The documentation for setting up a logger for JK2 is below. I've tried using logger.file and logger.win32 for my IIS configuration, but no luck. Can someone please send the right configuration steps to configure JK2 logging with IIS? I'm trying to locate a bug in JK (not present in JK2

RE: JK2 logging with IIS

[logger] level=ERROR [logger.file:0] level=ERROR file=d:\\jakarta-tomcat-jk2\\jk2.log [workerEnv:] info=Global server options timing=1 debug=0 logger=logger.file:0 [shm] file=d:\\jakarta-tomcat-jk2\\jk2.shm size=1048576 [channel.socket:localhost:8009] info=Ajp13 worker, connects to tomcat

RE: Tomcat JK2 Connector/IIS Slowdown

OK, I did not try the test under ssl. I'll let you know what happens. Thanks, Rob -Original Message- From: Peter Lauri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, December 12, 2004 10:29 PM To: 'Tomcat Users List' Subject: SV: Tomcat JK2 Connector/IIS Slowdown Try some buffertstream

SV: Tomcat JK2 Connector/IIS Slowdown

] Ämne: FW: Tomcat JK2 Connector/IIS Slowdown For those of you who saw my original posting of this issue, you may remember that my IIS6/Tomcat 5.028 server was very slow at downloading files from an online cart to a Windows 2000, IE6 browser. But the same IIS6/Tomcat server would download files

FW: Tomcat JK2 Connector/IIS Slowdown

For those of you who saw my original posting of this issue, you may remember that my IIS6/Tomcat 5.028 server was very slow at downloading files from an online cart to a Windows 2000, IE6 browser. But the same IIS6/Tomcat server would download files very quickly to all Netscape / Mozilla and

Re: Migrating from Apache2/JK2 to Tomcat standalone

Hi! 3) In Apache I'm using some aliases to serve images stored outside my appbase from inside my webapp (Alias /myapp/alias /path/outside/appbase). I've implemented this by creating context xml files for all my aliases with appBase=/path/outside/appbase path=/myapp/alias. Again, is this the

Re: Migrating from Apache2/JK2 to Tomcat standalone

Hi! What's your hardware? In development I have a Dell PowerEdge something 2.4 Xeon, 512MB RAM, for production I have an IBM something 2.8 Xeon, 1GB RAM Trond - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional

Migrating from Apache2/JK2 to Tomcat standalone

Hi all! I'm migrating from Apache2/JK2/Tomcat 5.0.28 to Tomcat standalone (don't need php anymore), and have some questions regarding the matter. 1) Since Tomcat now will be serving all the static content as well, will it require more threads than when only serving dynamic content? 2

RE: Migrating from Apache2/JK2 to Tomcat standalone

Hi 1) Since Tomcat now will be serving all the static content as well, will it require more threads than when only serving dynamic content? That doesn't *have* to be the case. You could still have Apache serve up your static resources by pointing the document root at your webapp's root

RE: Migrating from Apache2/JK2 to Tomcat standalone

OK, i've just re-read your message and d'oh I see you want to move away from Apache and JK2. Sorry. Will take another look ... -Original Message- From: Allistair Crossley Sent: 03 December 2004 11:23 To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Migrating from Apache2/JK2 to Tomcat standalone

RE: Migrating from Apache2/JK2 to Tomcat standalone

OK :) 1) Since Tomcat now will be serving all the static content as well, will it require more threads than when only serving dynamic content? Same as before. 2) In Apache I'm using mod_rewrite to rewrite requests to mydomain.com/ to mydomain.com/myapp. I've implemented this behaviour by

Re: Migrating from Apache2/JK2 to Tomcat standalone

Thanks for your replies Allistair :) 2) In Apache I'm using mod_rewrite to rewrite requests to mydomain.com/ to mydomain.com/myapp. I've implemented this behaviour by using response.sendRedirect in a scriptlet in the index.jsp of my ROOT app. Is this the preferred way of doing this?

RE: Migrating from Apache2/JK2 to Tomcat standalone

Hi, I'm migrating from Apache2/JK2/Tomcat 5.0.28 to Tomcat standalone (don't need php anymore), and have some questions regarding the matter. Good. 1) Since Tomcat now will be serving all the static content as well, will it require more threads than when only serving dynamic content? Probably

Re: JK/JK2 connector className?

Thanks, this really helps! Still not having much luck with my configs though :-( On Tue, 2004-11-30 at 09:20, Nikola Milutinovic wrote: Thomas Charles Robinson wrote: !-- Define a Coyote/JK2 AJP 1.3 Connector on port 8009 -- Connector className=org.apache.coyote.tomcat4

Re: JK/JK2 connector className?

Thomas Charles Robinson wrote: !-- Define a Coyote/JK2 AJP 1.3 Connector on port 8009 -- Connector className=org.apache.coyote.tomcat4.CoyoteConnector port=8009 minProcessors=5 maxProcessors=75 enableLookups=true redirectPort=8443 acceptCount=10 debug=100

JK2 and 404 HTTP Error

the problem is when the webapp is stopped (by manager for ie.) on one worker.The query is send to both tomcat even to the one that have no webapp available and so, the answer to the client is a nice 404 HTTP Error code.IMHO, it's because that jk2 don't parses the http answer.Is

Re: which to use: JK2 or JK?

Ralph Einfeldt wrote: Sorry, but I think you are wrong. There have been several post in the last days from the developers, that clearly say, that there will be no further development for mod_jk2. This saddens me. I was under th impression that JK2 was more advanced. What are the reasons

RE: which to use: JK2 or JK?

That's the official statement: http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/tomcat-4.1-doc/jk2/news/20041100.html#2 0041115.1 -Original Message- From: Nikola Milutinovic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 10:40 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: which to use: JK2 or JK

RE: No more JK2 ?

Subject: RE: No more JK2 ? http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/connectors-doc/jk2/index.html Allistair -Original Message- From: Boulay Arnaud [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 25 November 2004 10:29 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: No more JK2 ? Looking for some more details on this crucial

RE: which to use: JK2 or JK?

Hi, Virtually all of the more advanced features from JK2 will be ported (or already have been) into mod_jk, mod_proxy, or both. Yoav Shapira http://www.yoavshapira.com -Original Message- From: Nikola Milutinovic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 4:40 AM

Re: No more JK2 ?

Where can I find more information on not only the official announcement, but the latest on the connector development. I have also been using JK2 for some time, and was really happy with it. Thank you. --- Mladen Turk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Boulay Arnaud wrote: Looking for some more

Re: No more JK2 ?

http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/connectors-doc/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/29/2004 10:25:49 AM Where can I find more information on not only the official announcement, but the latest on the connector development. I have also been using JK2 for some time, and was really happy with it. Thank you

RE: No more JK2 ?

://www.yoavshapira.com -Original Message- From: Elihu Smails [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 11:26 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: No more JK2 ? Where can I find more information on not only the official announcement, but the latest on the connector development. I have

JK/JK2 connector className?

Hi, I've decided now to try to get tomcat 1.4.30 working with JK. From what I understand (not much at this stage), JK2 is no longer actively supported, hard to configure and all advancements from it will be back-ported to JK thus making JK the best choice today. Right, well my rpm of tomcat4

AW: which to use: JK2 or JK?

http://www.sitepoint.com/article/quick-start-guide-windows/2 above article might give you a solution! vimal -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Erez Efrati [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Saturday, November 27, 2004 9:09 PM An: Tomcat User Mailing List Betreff: which to use: JK2 or JK

Re: which to use: JK2 or JK?

Erez Efrati wrote: Hi, I am installing an apache + JBoss/tomcat and I need to run the JK module. Now I understand that the JK2 is no longer supported so does it mean that it would be better using JK1.2? What do you mean by no longer being supported? The current status is thet JK1 is considered

RE: which to use: JK2 or JK?

webserver project. -Original Message- From: Nikola Milutinovic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 7:43 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: which to use: JK2 or JK? Erez Efrati wrote: What do you mean by no longer being supported? The current status is thet JK1

which to use: JK2 or JK?

Hi, I am installing an apache + JBoss/tomcat and I need to run the JK module. Now I understand that the JK2 is no longer supported so does it mean that it would be better using JK1.2? Thanks, Erez

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >