Judy preaches a 'Zirchon' (looks real but isn't)
Jesus and, you are not offended. Others take exception to some of that which you
say/do along with the manner of _expression_ and, we are described as 'not getting
it'. You and yours appear comfortable in giving offence (other than that given
You major on the minors Bill because this is of
paramount importance to your flesh and blood gospel
However, yours is not the Kingdom He came to declare
and fleshwill neverglory in God's presence.
"For ye see your calling brethren, how that not many
wise men after the flesh, not many
You addressed two profoundly important matters. 1.
'Flesh and blood gospel'. 2. The 'Kingdom He came to declare.' Amen to the
former and, we ARE participating in the latter. Even if by mistake Judy,
thanks!
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To:
Title: RE: [TruthTalk] the FWs about free speech thingy
'deceived by the working of iniquity'? 'no
understanding of the issues'?
Please elaborate on 'the working of iniquity',
David. Please help Debbie and myself understand the issues, David.
Lance
PS:Have you ever played the game
'not a sin to...' Says who, David?
- Original Message -
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: January 29, 2006 21:15
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Free Speech
cd wrote:
DavidM what is the difference between
your words to Lance concerning public
Really Lance? Then you don't have a wedding
garment because your old flesh is not going anyplace
but into the ground. Your outer man is perishing
as we speak
On Mon, 30 Jan 2006 06:41:59 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You addressed two profoundly important matters.
1.
'feminine approach'?? 'emasculates society'??
One would, at the very least, have to grant you your gila monster-like tenacity
when you latch onto a way of seeing, David. As to suppression of free
speech..well..it'd appear that that's what takes place within your family
unit..at least for
No Judy!! ATY ought to prefix all of your
speculations.
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: January 30, 2006 06:51
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The spirit of
anti-Christ
Really
Bill writes:
It is rebellion to deny the physical lineage of Christ. He is the second Adam precisely because he is of Adam's
blood: through Eve to Seth, and Noah, and Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, and
Judah, and David to Jesus throughMary. To deny this is
to deny that Christ came in the flesh
Bill you have a Greek gospel because your faith rests
in Gk words .. I wonder, are allGreeks saved??
Jesus Christ is who His Own Word says he is whether or
not orthodoxy agrees and whether you see it or not. Right nowyou are
attempting to validate the pronouncements oforthodoxy which is the
I would underline Root if
I were you and then go and read Romans 11:16-18 ... If the root be holy??
The Lord said to my Lord??
Read on, Judy. As per G's nudging, I did. And
may I ask you why you are so bent on changing the subject?
Bill
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
The seed to whom the promises were made is SPIRITUAL SEED Bill and the second Adam is
spiritual also (see 1 Cor 15:45,46). Please don't try to make it something it is
not. Abraham BELIEVED God and it was counted to him for
righteousness. His sperma who thought they all
had it made in the
Oh, yeah, blame it on the Word.
Bill
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2006 5:03
AM
Subject: Re: Fw: [TruthTalk] Christ, the
Root and the Offspring of David
One smiles, not, I trust in derision, Judy. Look
Judy, DM has a 'Geek gospel' but, it is certainly not the case that all 'Geeks'
are saved. So then, just to put your fertile imagination to rest, Judy,
..NO!
'who His Own Word say He is'...MEANING:As I, Judy
Taylor (and, as I David Miller)
On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 20:32:56 -0700 "Taylor" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
His death was the victory not His
life.
Why then all the fuss about his human nature?
Beats me - You ppl are the ones smaking such a big
deal out of his "humanity"and I believe the rcc teaches the
I don't know what G nudged, since his writings are
mostly incomprehensible
I skip most of them mainly because I don't have the
time to spend trying and figure them out.
Since Dean has recently had a G-epiphany maybe he will
help ...
On Mon, 30 Jan 2006 05:15:10 -0700 "Taylor" [EMAIL
Why was he so negligent about the sperm of David
and the incarnation?
Because he was not addressing heretics.
Bill
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2006 5:17
And may I ask you why you are so bent on changing the
subject?
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2006 5:20
AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The spirit of
Your sweetness once more overflows Bill just like the
orthodox fathers.
It's a valid question - why not be honest and say you
don't have ananswer?
The text says "for God was WITH him".
On Mon, 30 Jan 2006 05:34:14 -0700 "Taylor" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Why was he so negligent about
He does not have a human father Bill; he was fathered
by the Holy Spirit and the family he was born into is that
of Abraham/David. Why are you so adamant about
what you can not possibly know. He was born holy. David was
not
(see Psalm 51:5) "Behold I was shapen in iniquity and
in sin did my
[Original Message]
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Date: 1/29/2006 9:15:28 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Free Speech
cd wrote:
DavidM what is the difference between
your words to Lance concerning public
preaching and your stance concerning
What subject is that?
I don't see anything written here by G so I am not sure
what subject you are on.
On Mon, 30 Jan 2006 05:35:07 -0700 "Taylor" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And may I ask you why you are so bent on changing the
subject?
From: Judy Taylor
I don't know
I believe he was fruit of David's genitals according to the
flesh, Judy. Do you believe the same?
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2006 5:26
AM
Subject: Re:
I did answer the question. Paul was not addressing a challenge
against Jesus' humanity. That heresy sprang up later. John addresses
it.
I certainly do believe that God was with him, Judy; in fact, I
also believe he was God.
Bill
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
Perhaps the subject line could lend some assistance. Do you
deny that Christ came in the genetic material of David's loins, Judy; i.e., the
flesh, which John addresses?
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc:
Not a harsh word among them..."ONE FEW OF YOU SEEM
TO KNOW PERSONALLY, IT APPEARS (TO ME ...AND TO DM OCCASIONALLY)
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: January 30, 2006 07:17
Subject:
cd: I have combined both responses Bill as I believe they are the same and need the same answer. A few days ago you claimed that we could not hear your statement that Christ did not sin-well I heard you now you hear this. We..believe..Christ .. Came..In ..The .. Flesh..But.. WE.. Don't..
No; my belief is that Jesus was fathered in the womb of
Mary by the Holy Spirit
Why is the flesh connection so important to you
Bill?
On Mon, 30 Jan 2006 05:47:02 -0700 "Taylor" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I believe he was fruit of David's genitals according to the
flesh, Judy. Do you
Either Jesus is the Christ of God through the blood line of David or He is nothing at all. You "spiritualize" all references to the genealogy of Christ, making the Old Testament record of no purpose when it comes to the positioning of the Messiah.
It is a shame that you make Him to be something
There are so many aspects to this argument ... offered by Judy. But, for my money, the point driven home by Bill concerning the blood-line of the Messiah is more without debate than the others (me included.) Judy makes fun of Bill's gospel ("your flesh and blood gospel ...") and, at the
While you are busy "spiritualizing" the story of Jesus, you overlook (or worse) what Paul is actually saying. You quote Gal 3:29 which says "And if you belong to Christ, THEN YOU ARE ABRAHAM'S OFFSPRING, heirs according to promise" and ignore the words of 3:16 "Now the promises were spoken to
I hasten to add a word of thanks to Bill for making this a clearly stated fact of scripture.
jd
-- Original message -- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
While you are busy "spiritualizing" the story of Jesus, you overlook (or worse) what Paul is actually saying. You quote Gal
If we can be adopted as sons into the household of God
- why can't God the Word be
adopted into humanity as the "son of man?" You
are locked into a position you can not
prove either way JD. How so, when the flesh
profits nothing and the Spirit is what gives life?
On Mon, 30 Jan 2006
What I deny JD is the sperma connection and this is
because of the curse of death on all mankind.
He came into this world holy - He is the Lord of
Life. Why are you so hot to make him into your image?
My church leadership and BSF would do no such
thing. The days of hunting down and killing
On Mon, 30 Jan 2006 15:12:34 + [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
While you are busy "spiritualizing" the story of Jesus, you overlook (or
worse) what Paul is actually saying. You quote Gal 3:29 which
says "And if you belong to Christ, THEN YOU ARE ABRAHAM'S OFFSPRING,
heirs according
Completely bogus, Judy. For starters, you are now arguing that Jesus is the adopted Son of Man. Months ago, I charged that your doctrine would lead to the notion that Jesus is an adopted Son. I was referring to HisEternal Sonship -- little did I know that my prediction would be true as applied to
You use the "holiness" of Jesus to defeat His genealogy, His Messiahship, His Sonship as God or Man, His coming in the flesh. It is a wonder there is anything left about the Christ for you to believe !!
To deny the "sperma" connection is to argue that He is not REALLY a descendant of David. THAT
Rev.2:26 And he that overcometh, and keepeth my works unto the end, to him will I give power over the nations
- Original Message -
From: Dean Moore
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/30/2006 12:23:28 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Tolerance Offense
cd: Actually David has a
- Original Message -
From: Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/29/2006 10:23:19 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Was Jesus of God's Nature?
His death was the victory not His life.
Why then all the fuss about his human nature? Would it have mattered if he had sinned
cd: Good point Judy. Reminds me of Christ's first miracle that was mentioned-making of the wine. His mother told the people to do what he tells you to do-she must have good reason to believe Jesus could accomplish miracles-makes one wonder how many she had seen before this.
- Original
- Original Message -
From: Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/30/2006 7:41:34 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Was Jesus of God's Nature?
I did answer the question. Paul was not addressing a challenge against Jesus' humanity. That heresy sprang up later. John addresses
- Original Message -
From:
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org;truthtalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/29/2006 10:56:52 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Was Jesus of God's Nature?
He is like us in every respect. According to you, this means that he is not like us, only similar to us.
When
- Original Message -
From: Judy Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/30/2006 7:21:32 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The spirit of anti-christ
I don't know what G nudged, since his writings are mostly incomprehensible
I skip most of them
- Original Message -
From:
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org;TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/29/2006 11:08:17 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Free Speech
Ours is not a ministry of law. We are not about the preaching of Law. unless, of course, you confuse "law" the rule of the
- Original Message -
From: Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/29/2006 10:07:08 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Was Jesus of God's Nature?
If Jesus was not of the first Adam, he was not his descendant and, therefore, was not qualified to bear his name. You and yours are
-- Original message -- From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 30 Jan 2006 15:12:34 + [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
While you are busy "spiritualizing" the story of Jesus, you overlook (or worse) what Paul is actually saying. You quote Gal 3:29 which says "And
Dean, do you believe that the death of Christ can be separated in reality from the life lived and the resurreection/ascention experienced?
I say "no." I do not believe that you and Bill actually believe differently on this matter. Give it somethought.
jd
- Original Message -
Please unsubscribe me.
Terry
--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you
ought to answer every man. (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org
If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL
PROTECTED] and you will
Dean, do you accept a difference between what one is , ontologically speaking, and what one does? I do. That "he was made to be like us in every respect" is a statement of the essence of His being. It has nothing to do with whether or not He committed sin or whether or not He suffered. More than
How so, Dean?
jd
- Original Message -
From: Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/30/2006 7:41:34 AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Was Jesus of God's Nature?
I did answer the question. Paul was not addressing a challenge against Jesus' humanity. That heresy sprang up
A good question. dean, can you give us an swer , as well. What makes the first man Adam different from the second man, Adam?
jd
From: Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/29/2006 10:07:08 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Was Jesus of God's Nature?
If Jesus was not of the first
- Original Message -
From:
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org;TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/30/2006 2:20:48 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Free Speech
You make it sound so simple, Dean. Which commandments. The 613 ?
Those commandments that continue the practice of Judaism? How
- Original Message -
From:
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org;TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/30/2006 1:56:30 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Was Jesus of God's Nature?
Dean, do you believe that the death of Christ can be separated in reality from the life lived and the
- Original Message -
From:
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org;TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/30/2006 2:23:07 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Was Jesus of God's Nature?
How so, Dean?
jd
cd: Not sure yet John. By the way here is another commandment passage that shows that they
cd: I hope toafter Bill's reply John.
- Original Message -
From:
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org;TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/30/2006 2:25:38 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Was Jesus of God's Nature?
A good question. dean, can you give us an swer , as well. What makes the
cd: JohnI am not even going to address this as I hope you understand better at some point in time.
- Original Message -
From:
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org;TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/29/2006 10:41:04 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] the FWs about free speech thingy
Just
- Original Message -
From:
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org;TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/29/2006 10:22:12 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Was Jesus of God's Nature?
Something else, Dean. It has occurred to me that you and Judy believe in two Adams , neither of which is
On Mon, 30 Jan 2006 17:35:08 + [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Completely bogus, Judy. For starters, you are now
arguing that Jesus is the adopted Son of Man. Months
ago, I charged that your doctrine would lead to the notion that Jesus is
an adopted Son. I was referring to
- Original Message -
From:
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org;TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/30/2006 2:13:30 PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Was Jesus of God's Nature?
Dean, do you accept a difference between what one is , ontologically speaking, and what one does? I do. That
JD writes:
Dean, do you accept a difference between what one is ,
ontologically speaking, and what one does?
I do. That "he was made to be like us in every respect" is
a statement of the essence of His being.
He can not possibly be same as us in the
Lance wrote: As to suppression of free speech..well..it'd appear that that's what takes place within your family unit..at least for the females.Excuse me, but as a female within my father's family unit, I can tell you that there is no suppression of free speech. My father is extremely
I'm not caught up on reading, but I just have to say, Judy, that you are not
hearing Bill properly. He did answer your question. Many heresies sprang
up and those who wrote in the first few centuries after the Biblical writers
addressed these heresies. You personally don't understand this
David Miller wrote:
It is not a sin to attend a Benny Hinn service seeking
for a healing from God. It is a sin for the University
to promote and indoctrinate students to engage in
homosexual fornication.
Lance wrote:
'not a sin to...' Says who, David?
The Bible, Lance. BIBLE, BIBLE,
Yes, Dean, I have been
repeating myself --and thisbecause neither of you have adequately
addressed my concerns; instead, you are always wont to change the
subject.Moreover, I have not seen much yet to suggest that you and Judy
even agree on this topic of Jesus' flesh. While yousometimes
From: "David Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm not caught up on reading, but I just have to say, Judy, that you are
not hearing Bill properly.
I don't agree David. Bill wrote:
It is rebellion to deny the physical lineage of Christ.
He is the second Adam precisely because he is of Adam's
blood:
On Mon, 30 Jan 2006 18:25:06 -0700 "Taylor" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yes, Dean, I have been
repeating myself --and thisbecause neither of you have adequately
addressed my concerns; instead, you are always wont to change the
subject.Moreover, I have not seen much yet to suggest
I have explained this numerous times, Judy. Reread my post of
a few days ago pertaining to the intrinsic vs extrinsic nature of the Atonement
for starters. By the way, thanks for being honest. This should clarify any
confusion Dean may have had about being in agreement with you in regards to
That does not surprise me.
I did answer the question. Paul was not addressing a
challenge against Jesus' humanity. That heresy sprang up later. John
addresses it.
I certainly do believe that God was with him, Judy; in
fact, I also believe he was God.
I don't think Dean is as hung up on David's genitals as
you are Bill.
On Mon, 30 Jan 2006 19:02:41 -0700 "Taylor" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have explained this numerous times, Judy. Reread my post
of a few days ago pertaining to the intrinsic vs extrinsic nature of the
Atonement
-- Original message -- From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
JD writes:
Dean, do you accept a difference between what one is , ontologically speaking, and what one does?
I do. That "he was made to be like us in every respect" is a statement of the essence of His
On Mon, 30 Jan 2006 19:07:06 -0700 "Taylor" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That does not surprise me.
I did answer the question. Paul was not addressing a
challenge against Jesus' humanity.
That heresy sprang up later. John addresses
it.
No
cd:I thinkI can if you would be so kind as to point out that passage for me Bill.
jd wrote this text.not Bill. The scritpure you asked for is in the paragraph.
Secondly, we know that Christ was like us, in every respect. That is the declaration of scripture. You and Judy apparently
cd:I thinkI can if you would be so kind as to point out that passage for me Bill.
jd wrote this text.not Bill. The scritpure you asked for is in the paragraph.
Secondly, we know that Christ was like us, in every respect. That is the declaration of scripture. You and Judy apparently
On Tue, 31 Jan 2006 02:00:07 + [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
--
Original message -- From: Judy Taylor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
JD writes:
Dean, do you accept a difference between what one is ,
humanity - a word that I have yet to find in either OT
or NT.
Judy, I use the word "humanity" in the way the
Bible uses anthropos (i.e., "man") to speak of "mankind" as a
collectivewhole.Hence as anthropos was a culturally
acceptable way of speaking about humankind two thousand years ago,
DAVEH: H.I wonder if there are any new TT subscribers
today? And if so, I wonder what they might be thinking after reading
some of our posts! :-[
Judy Taylor wrote:
I don't think Dean is as hung up on
David's genitals as you are Bill.
--
~~~
Dave
I don't think Dean is as hung up on David's genitals as
you are Bill.
It's not my hang up, Judy, but yours. I am simply thrusting
home the meaningLuke's words in regards to Christ's humanity.
osphuos
[UBS] reproductive organs (descendant Ac 2.30).
[Friberg] (2) Hebraistically,
Dean does not say that Jesus was or is the second
Adam, Judy. He says instead that"Jesus was of the second
[Adam]," which is what I was questioning. But in case I have not made myself
clearnumerous timesin the past, I will do so now: Christ Jesus is
the second Adam.
Bill
- Original
I invite you to read again Peter's sermon in Acts
2.
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2006 7:01
PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Was Jesus of
God's Nature?
myth(Joseph's
wife'sparents are alsoJCs human
grandparents)
On Mon, 30 Jan 2006 07:42:54 -0500 Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
..Jesus was fathered in the womb of Mary
..[but] He does not have
a human father
myth (JC was human
before his death)
On Mon, 30 Jan 2006 16:53:37 -0500 "Dean Moore" [EMAIL PROTECTED] quotes Darby
like a dictionary:
"[JC]only called them His
brethren[after] He had finished the work
which enabled Him to present them with Himself before God.
"
who said this(?) :
'I tell you the truth, whatever you did for one
of the least of these brothers of mine, you did for me.'
On Mon, 30 Jan 2006 21:21:47 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
myth (JC was
human before his death)
On Mon, 30 Jan 2006 16:53:37 -0500 "Dean Moore" [EMAIL
CD wrote The scripture
does show a difference between to first man Adam and the second man Adam. Can
you point out those differences to help us clear the air so to speak.Thanks
Hi Dean,
I can begin to do that tonight, Dean, and
if you want more I can go into greater detail later. Romans
ifyou're
thinkin' of askin' JCs Momma,pray shedoesn't ask himto handle
it for her
On Mon, 30 Jan 2006 19:15:54 -0800 Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
..I wonder what[ppl] might be thinking after reading ..
I don't think Dean is as hung up on David's genitals
as you are Bill.
Dean, did you answer this post that Judy has decided to argue? I was hoping for your answer.
Judy -- You are the one who used "adoption" in reference to Christ being the Son of Man. I believe you wrote that yesterday. I dealt with the idea of "likeness" in a previous post, either last evening
Yet without sin says it all JD but you will not accept
the obvious
We are born in sin and the iniquities of our
fathers
He is born without sin
He is holy because his father isthe Holy
Spirit
On Tue, 31 Jan 2006 05:27:38 + [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Dean, did you answer this post that
g, did you get my check?
jd
-- Original message -- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ifyou're thinkin' of askin' JCs Momma,pray shedoesn't ask himto handle it for her
On Mon, 30 Jan 2006 19:15:54 -0800 Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
..I wonder what[ppl] might be
Correction immediately below.
-- Original message -- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dean, I hope that you are NOTcoming to a decision that Jesus in the flesh was not God in the flesh. This is a very serious matter.
jd
-- Original message -- From:
:-)
-- Original message -- From: Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] DAVEH: H.I wonder if there are any new TT subscribers today? And if so, I wonder what they might be thinking after reading some of our posts! :-[ Judy Taylor wrote:
I don't think Dean is
Dean, I hope that you are coming to a decision that Jesus in the flesh was not God in the flesh. This is a very serious matter.
jd
-- Original message -- From: "Taylor" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I invite you to read again Peter's sermon in Acts 2.
- Original Message
90 matches
Mail list logo
