On 1/31/07, Jorge Vargas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
that will be great, could you take care of putting this comment somewhere
http://trac.turbogears.org/ticket/773
Noted I'll take care of that tonight.
Florent.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message
deployment solution.
Regards,
Florent Aide.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
TurboGears Trunk group.
To post to this group, send email to turbogears-trunk@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from
Regarding the trac ticket http://trac.turbogears.org/ticket/773
It is about mod_python 3.2.7 as a minimum requirement. I can not
really comment on the minimum required version since the one I used
was 3.3.0b.
Cheers,
Florent.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received
On 2/3/07, Mark Ramm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you could throw create a ticket for a 2.5 version, you can attach the
eggs there, and Lee or one of the other folks can work out where to host
these on the site.
done it is here :
http://trac.turbogears.org/ticket/1280
Cheers,
Florent.
On 2/1/07, Karl Guertin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
I've gone over the doc and I'm not quite sure where you've located
everything. Can you please write all the file paths starting at the
project root (e.g. the default controller in a quickstart project
would be
On 2/5/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've rewrote the 'Defining your model' and 'Using your model' docs.
Now they should look better XD
http://docs.turbogears.org/1.0/GettingStarted/DefineDatabase
http://docs.turbogears.org/1.0/GettingStarted/UseDatabase
Great work.
One
in. If this is the case let me know
I'll be more than happy to cleanup a bit.
For the record it works on my machine on TG 1.1a0-rev#2549 running on
top of Portable Python 1.0 (2.5 based) on windows. Who said I liked
challenges ?
and now I am going to bed,
Regards,
Florent Aide
On 2/6/07, Florent Aide [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/6/07, Kevin Dangoor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for getting TG running with 2.5! That's most excellent news!
[...]
I should mention that it would be good to have a 2.5 egg for Cheetah with
the compiled _namemapper.pyd. Cheetah
On 2/6/07, Jorge Godoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
I don't believe it will make through... You can send it to me and I'll put on
my machine until someone puts it on TG's website.
done
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are
On 2/6/07, fumanchu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
First, I find overloading expose in this way pretty ugly. Sorry. :/
No offense taken :) Part of the reason why I posted in this list in
addition to adding the trac ticket is because a small voice in the
back of my mind told me this was some
On 2/6/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The last thing is to check why widget bark this error for kid in py
2.5:
I got it !
http://trac.turbogears.org/ticket/1288
I know have a working 1.0.1 on python 2.5 / win32
I only have a sqlalchemy installation though. Could someone
Here is a ticket I just created
http://trac.turbogears.org/ticket/1296
it corrects a BIG performance problem with i18n filter.
The patch concerns kid and not TG. But as I stated in the ticket, I
cannot create tickets in the Kid trac system. Since I have seen that
Dave Stanek has commit rights
On 2/11/07, Jorge Vargas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you need to register an account for that.
http://www.kid-templating.org/trac/register
done:
http://www.kid-templating.org/trac/ticket/203
;)
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are
On 2/11/07, Florent Aide [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
done:
http://www.kid-templating.org/trac/ticket/203
It has been fixed in r482
http://www.kid-templating.org/trac/changeset/482
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed
Hi all,
Some time ago I posted a patch:
http://trac.turbogears.org/ticket/1271
do you think we could see this applied ? Jorge Gogdoy seemed to think
so at least. ;)
Regards,
Florent AIDE.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you
On 3/11/07, Jorge Godoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Florent Aide [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
With RuleDispatch r2115 you don't need PEAK. Maybe it is worth using the
older
version and avoid this dependency.
I can provide this but what will happen when RuleDispatch is released
? Will we
On 3/11/07, Jorge Godoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Florent Aide [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I can provide this but what will happen when RuleDispatch is released
? Will we still use the old svn revision ? Will RuleDispatch be
replaced by something else ?
There's a note at PEAK's webpage
On 3/11/07, Jorge Godoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
With RuleDispatch r2115 you don't need PEAK. Maybe it is worth using the
older
version and avoid this dependency.
I tried RuleDispatch r2115 but I get the same KeyError: 304.
r2135 fixes an issue with py2exe which may also be useful.
On 3/11/07, Florent Aide [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/11/07, Jorge Godoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
With RuleDispatch r2115 you don't need PEAK. Maybe it is worth using the
older
version and avoid this dependency.
I tried RuleDispatch r2115 but I get the same KeyError: 304
Hi all,
I just applied the following patch to TurboKid:
http://trac.turbogears.org/ticket/1301
I tested TurboBlog (running on 1.0.x svn branch) using it and I
encountered no errors.
Could someone else test a bit (using your own app)?
If everything seems OK I'll close the corresponding ticket
This seems to be a problem with RuleDispatch.
I tried the exact same thing and I had the same problem as you. I then
installed RuleDispatch from SVN rev #2303 which requires PEAK (I used
rev #2305).
Then the problem was no more.
When I encountered the problem RuleDispatch rev #2115 was
Hi,
I'll compile the latest versions for ruledispatch PEAK on windows so
we can release TG.
A few weeks ago RuleDispatch 2115 was sufficient to run TG and now we
need 2305 (which requires PEAK).
I don't know why but I have tested on Ubuntu and I can say that
revision #2873 of TG 1.0 branch
Hi,
I get a proxy error since yesterday night when I try to access the docs server.
Has anyone access to the server to relaunch moinmoin or whatever needs
to be restarted ?
Florent.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to
I cannot reproduce the bug explained in:
http://trac.turbogears.org/ticket/1364
either with sqlite nor with postgresql 8.2 on Ubuntu Linux.
Nevertheless I'd like to see the patch applied before 1.0.2 if it can
help some people out there. Could someone confirm the bug and maybe
confirm the
Excellent : )
I was just starting to work on it ! I'll look at this today.
Cheers,
Florent.
On 4/21/07, Alberto Valverde [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've just committed at bunch of patches. There's also a big change
since FormEncode has been updated to i18n ware 0.7.1 and TurboGears
patched
The problem is that I don't have any orphaned rows left in the
user_group table...
I also feel that this patch seems good but since I cannot reproduce
the problem (neither with sqlite nor Postgress) I don't really want to
take action without at least someone else reporting the bug.
As I stated
I just committed win32 eggs for:
RuleDispatch 2305
PEAK 2287
Cheetah 2.0rc8 with namemapper extension compiled
Regards,
Florent.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
TurboGears Trunk group.
To post to
Yesterday I installed RuleDispatch 2305 and when I started my project
it complained about a missing module: PEAK.util so I provided PEAK.
On 4/21/07, Alberto Valverde [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Apr 21, 2007, at 3:01 PM, Florent Aide wrote:
I just committed win32 eggs
I'll now look at:
http://trac.turbogears.org/ticket/1363
no-one working on this ATM ?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
TurboGears Trunk group.
To post to this group, send email to
Hi all,
Does someone know if there is a mailing list that could permit to
follow ticket modifications/creations from trac ?
Cheers,
Florent.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
TurboGears Trunk group.
I am talking about 1.0 head revision #2873 or later...
On 4/21/07, Jorge Godoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Florent Aide [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
I'm working with 1.0 trunk and it is working perfectly fine with 2115.
Or are you talking about the trunk?
[...]
Count OpenSuSE 10.2
On 4/21/07, Jorge Godoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Christoph Zwerschke [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I can confirm that, RuleDispatch revisions 2100 and 2115 did not run on
OpenSUSE 10.2, but the current head revision works. On Windows XP I used
the eggs you provided here:
Hello all,
following yesterday's discussion about PEAK and RuleDispatch et. al.
here is a new subject to take into account:
I have updated my PyProtocols version to rev 2305 and now TurboGears
spits Deprecation warnings at me:
/home/faide/progs/turbogears-1.0/turbogears/decorator.py:75:
On 4/25/07, Jorge Godoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Roger Demetrescu [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thanks Florent !! :)
I'm accepting payments in reais in the name of Florent (Florent, I'll
pay you the ammount we'd agreed upon after Roger transfers the money)
;-D
Please make sure it goes
you may want to download the file directly from here:
http://trac.turbogears.org/browser/site_resources/eggs/RuleDispatch-0.5a0.dev_r2303-py2.5-win32.egg
or
http://trac.turbogears.org/browser/site_resources/eggs/RuleDispatch-0.5a0.dev_r2303-py2.4-win32.egg
On 4/25/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL
,
Florent Aide.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
TurboGears Trunk group.
To post to this group, send email to turbogears-trunk@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi list,
I read the tickets assigned for 1.0.2 milestone and found these three
as good candidates to be included before release in two days:
http://trac.turbogears.org/ticket/1353
http://trac.turbogears.org/ticket/1354
http://trac.turbogears.org/ticket/1360
Any thoughs ?
Regards,
Florent.
Applied, Thanks!
On 4/29/07, Christopher Arndt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Florent Aide schrieb:
I read the tickets assigned for 1.0.2 milestone and found these three
as good candidates to be included before release in two days:
No opinion on the listed patches, because I have not tried
Hi guys,
could someone with access to the server please resync trac because I
cannot access the tickets anymore :(
/flo
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
TurboGears Trunk group.
To post to this
I've got problems commiting this last correction... ;( as soon as my
network connection permits I'll commit this one also...
Florent.
On 5/2/07, Jorge Godoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alberto Valverde [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
I've finally installed python 2.5 on my machine to test
On 5/2/07, Florent Aide [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've got problems commiting this last correction... ;( as soon as my
network connection permits I'll commit this one also...
fiew... done at last ;-)
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because
Le mercredi 09 mai 2007 à 21:10 +0300, Ori Avtalion a écrit :
Hi,
This is very trivial to fix. Can someone please pick it up?
done in r3005
FYI the trunk is not advertised as stable... If you want semi-stable
code please use 1.0 branch, where 1.0.3 will take place.
Cheers,
Florent.
and testing the trunk branch! Please continue to do so :p
Regards,
Florent Aide.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
TurboGears Trunk group.
To post to this group, send email to turbogears-trunk
Le jeudi 10 mai 2007 à 01:31 +0300, Ori Avtalion a écrit :
Hi,
[...]
Python interprets tabs as ' '*8, not *4, which means the file is still
indented incorrectly.
Argh!!! :-/ I should have looked more precisely... I though stupidly it
was all tabs everywhere like the other file... :(
Who
Le vendredi 11 mai 2007 à 09:08 -0700, Ian Charnas a écrit :
Brian Beck and myself are in. We're talking about a virtual sprint
right? We're not all going to be in the same city or anything,
right?
Héhé that's for sure! I am in Paris and will certainly not be able to
fly to US at that date
Le jeudi 10 mai 2007 à 20:21 -0700, Ian Charnas a écrit :
[...]
The patch is in 'multiple_databases4.diff' (patched against branches/
1.0 rev 3009), attached to ticket 1380:
http://trac.turbogears.org/ticket/1380
Thanks to Paul and Dennis for reporting the problem and testing my
fixes.
Hum...
+0 on this. I do a _lot_ of plain SA in my work hours and I also do a
lot of plain SA in TG or other for home grown projects and I would
expect TG to come with plain SA by default.
The SA docs are really good and the expressiveness of plain SA is sooo
excellent... We can always have an
On 7/2/07, Jonathan LaCour [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
4. model related support are vague
We're working this out still, because Pylons is also a bit in flux on
how to properly do this. I am in the midst of looking into ripping the
Zope transaction manager out into a separate package that we
Hello all,
Some days ago, Christoph Zwerschke proposed some interesting patches
to the 1.0 branch and Joseph Tate did some corrections to handle
correctly projects
without locale...
http://trac.turbogears.org/ticket/1382
But this applied to 1.0 and not to the then trunk. Since trunk has
Hello,
From our previous discussions I think we all agreed upon having Elixir
explained in the documentation since it is easier and will not scare
people away.
Since Plain SA will be easy to use for people who want it, we should
have default templates and docs speaking of Elixir.
I would
On 7/10/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7月10日, 下午3時58分, Florent Aide [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. if you are already a tg user, it's ok to use '-s' option for
sqlalchemy support. and it works as usual.
Yes that's what I understood
2. if you are a new commer, use
$ tg
On 7/10/07, Mark Ramm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For the -s option I think we should give a plain SA model in that
case, without active mapper. Active Mapper is sort of unmaintained
and the -s option is for folks who want their SA with no ActiveRecord
based thing on top.
Oops I crossed my
On 7/10/07, Christopher Arndt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What do people mean when they say plain SA? With or without assign
mapper? Are there really people that like to manage session contexts on
their own? ;-)
Hehe, really good question :) I should say plain assignmapper-SA.
I always use
Hi all,
As you may have noticed, a lot of patches and improvements went into
1.0.3dev recently. This is reaching to an end and we are now preparing
the release for tomorrow night.
If you find any bug, here is your last chance to voice it aloud before
next release.
A special thought goes out to
On 7/17/07, Neil Blakey-Milner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you look at ticket 1444 (it affects both 1.0 and 1.1). It
prevents using Genshi in strict mode, which is the same way that Kid
works.
Hey Neil,
yes I can. This will be done :)
Cheers,
Florent.
On 7/17/07, Jonathan LaCour [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Florent Aide wrote:
A special thought goes out to Jonathan Lacour, who will be happy to
know ticket 1090 is now closed!
You are my personal hero!
I had some insight from my spies
On 9/3/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: paj
Date: Mon Sep 3 15:11:45 2007
New Revision: 3452
URL: http://trac.turbogears.org/changeset/3452
Log:
Merge [3213] into 1.1 branch
Modified:
branches/1.1/turbogears/visit/savisit.py
Modified:
On 9/3/07, Paul Johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I posted a potential patch for this a while back. It's a little bit
hacky, but no-one's proposed a cleaner patch in a couple of months. If I
don't hear any objections, I'm going to apply this to the 1.1 branch in
a few days.
+1 on this one
Florent Aide a écrit :
Hum I know we did some hard work during the last release (like
compiling RuleDispatch and such for py23 on Windows using Cygwin
because none of us had VS60) but I expect some more hard work to come.
We had failing test cases only under python23... and this means I need
Hi all,
In order to prepare the next TurboGears 1.0.4 release I just released
TGFastData 0.9a7.
At the moment you can find the eggs at the cheeseshop and in our SVN
repository.
Could someone with system access to our servers please push the eggs to
the download page of our site? Thanks.
Hi all,
I have worked on SA 0.4 support for TG and here is the result:
* 1.0 branch still works with SQLAlchemy 0.3.10 and all old
applications developed with 0.3 code should still work. This
includes ActiveMapper based applications. People who want to use
SA 0.4 can use
Hi Diez,
You are right, I forgot to up the requirement in setup.py after my SA patches :)
And I will be possible to not try and import SA if you are using SO,
this is in my todo list of the SA enhancements for 1.1 but as I said
last time in trunk: please comment and enhance.
I admit that for
Elixir does not support SQLAlchemy 0.4 at the moment. If you want to
use Elixir with TG 1.1 you should use the trunk version of Elixir.
On 9/21/07, Ivo Looser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Together
I whould like to try ToscaWidgets.
Because of that i got the revision 3501 from branches 1.1.
On 10/1/07, John M Camara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Trac is being hit by spammers again. Does anyone know if the
TracSpamFilter has been installed and configured. If not someone with
system admin rights should try this plugin to see if it helps. I have
no experience with this plugin but I
Hi all,
As you all know we are trying to move 1.0.4 toward completion. Being
late in the schedule is a tradition that should be respected, but in
order to make sure we indeed are late we need to have some previsions.
Here is what I propose: final release for 1.0.4 on Saturday 20 of
October. I
On 10/11/07, Rick Copeland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Hello,
Apologies for missing the discussion on the decision to remove
implicit transactions and sessions from 1.1 (if there was one... I
can't find it in the archives). One of the things that I think makes
Has you may have noticed in
On 10/11/07, Roger Demetrescu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What about Python's version ? Will 1.1 and 2.0 support python 2.3 ?
Or only 2.4+ ?
Well, If we have enough people actually working on it (ie: compiling
binary modules on Windows and MacOS, testing...) we may keep python
2.3 in 1.1 but
On 10/11/07, Christopher Arndt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have we got rid of all SQLObjet depencies yet? I.e. can you install TG
1.1 and quickstart run a project without SO? If not, we need to add
this as a nother todo.
It's definitely on my todo list and I missed to put it on the written
Actually, if you do this at the module level (say in
turbogears.database), you'll get threadlocal sessions automatically
(this is the purpose of scoped_session -- see
http://www.sqlalchemy.org/docs/04/documentation.html#unitofwork_contextual):
session = scoped_session(sessionmaker())
On 10/13/07, Mark Ramm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For 1.1, I'm wondering, since Active Mapper is kind of depricated in
SA, should we think about dropping all references out of it in TG. I
think Florent had mentioned something along those lines at some
point
ActiveMapper is already
On 10/22/07, Christoph Zwerschke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul Johnston wrote:
I've prepared a patch for TG 1.1 to support multiple SA databases, in a
similar way to SQLObject. It introduces a new user-visible function to
database.py - get_metadata. See
On 10/23/07, Diez B. Roggisch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've just released version 1.1.1 of TurboJson. It fixes ticket #1310 and
a long outstanding bug regarding SQLObject.
You can get it as usually at the cheeseshop.
Files are now in place on our download filelist. Thanks again for this fix
On Nov 7, 2007 2:50 PM, Christoph Zwerschke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
in model.py. In this case, importing * makes some sense. This had been
changed recently for sqlalchemy, but with a very arbitrary list, so I
changed this back to import * from sqlalchemy. I am not against
Run! Run!
On Nov 7, 2007 2:17 PM, Christopher Arndt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to go even further and impose a requirement for an
__all__ definition at the start of all TurboGears code files meant to
be imported as modules. This serves as a further security measure
against importing
On Nov 7, 2007 11:57 PM, Paul Johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for the feedback everyone! Are we any closer to a decision? :-)
It may be so. Depends if we can have Elixir based models interact with
our plain SA model definitions. *If* we have this then I think we
reached an
On Nov 7, 2007 8:31 PM, Christopher Arndt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
If we generated an '__all__ = [...]' statement for all generated
database classes in model.py, the user would be either required to keep
it up-to-date by adding his own model classes or delete the whole statement.
On Nov 11, 2007 1:34 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: chrisz
Date: Sun Nov 11 06:34:33 2007
New Revision: 3660
URL: http://trac.turbogears.org/changeset/3660
[...]
+* The tg-admin quickstart command has now an option --svn allowing
+ automatic creation of the project in the
On Nov 11, 2007 2:03 PM, Christopher Arndt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Maybe we should add a wiki page where we put a commented version of a
default model.py and then just add a link to that page in the model.py
of a quickstarted project? The same could be done for controllers.py.
The
On Nov 11, 2007 2:03 PM, Christoph Zwerschke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like that. Shall I try to do the same for SQLObject and Elixir? The
good thing is that since this is only a tempate file, old applications
will not break.
Please do :p I'll move to some other bothering problems in the
On Nov 11, 2007 2:10 PM, Christoph Zwerschke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unfortunately, I can neither edit the page nor add comments.
We could arrange that :), let's ask Chris Arndt.
/flo
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed
Hi all,
a few days ago Graham posted a really interesting mail about the
tgsetup script and its failures:
http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears/browse_thread/thread/5de762aa37455c7/d010b45cabae7cff?lnk=gstq=tgsetup#d010b45cabae7cff
same in tiny format: http://tinyurl.com/27b8ef
I do have
Hi all,
I am looking in the dependency list for TG 1.0.4b3... yes there will
be a b3 :) and I am wondering on TurboCheetah.
I see that Kevin bumped TC version to 1.0 more than a year ago, but
when I look in our requirements I see = 0.9.5 and then when I look on
our D/L page and the cheeseshop I
On Nov 11, 2007 3:48 PM, Christoph Zwerschke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Florent Aide wrote:
I don't have access to the TurboCheetah's project on the cheeseshop.
Does someone have access to it here? If yes could we send the 1.0
release in the wild and up the requirement in TG's setup.py
On Nov 11, 2007 3:18 PM, Christoph Zwerschke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
I noticed that the Elixir syntax currently used in model.py is already
half-deprecated:
http://elixir.ematia.de/trac/wiki/Migrate03to04#Syntax:attribute-basedvshas_fieldandwith_fields
I'd like to change that and
On Nov 11, 2007 4:44 PM, Christoph Zwerschke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Florent Aide wrote:
Good thing. Is there any incompatibilities or upgrade instructions we
should give so people using TG 1.0.3.2 (or newer) with Elixir 0.3 can
upgrade to tg 1.0.4b3 with Elixir 0.4 ?
This document
On Nov 11, 2007 10:38 PM, iain duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
IMHO that's no really Machiavellist, just realistic. The people who will
Nicholas Machiavelli was a hardcore realistic just a little bit
cynical... At the end of the day I perceive him mainly as a democracy
advocate living
On Nov 11, 2007 10:42 PM, iain duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2007-11-11 at 12:22 -0600, Ian Bicking wrote:
Florent Aide wrote:
Hi all,
Just let me know how I could help maintain it.
Noted!
I am on other things right now but I'll come back on this... and if I
don't please
On Nov 11, 2007 10:18 PM, Christoph Zwerschke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Apropos Cheetah, I wonder whether we should replace Cheetah with Tempita
(http://pythonpaste.org/tempita/). It's pure Python, more lightweight
than Cheetah, integrates well with Paste and, as Ian Bicking noted, will
On Nov 12, 2007 7:27 PM, Christoph Zwerschke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
No, I didn't say we should stop supporting Cheetah for HTML views. But
Cheetah shouldn't be required any more when it will not be needed for
the quickstart templates any more. But you should still have the option
of
On Nov 21, 2007 11:03 AM, Diez B. Roggisch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
I just released TurboJson 1.1.2. A small python-2.3-compatibility fix over
1.1.1.
Xllent. Could you require it in TG 1.0.4 head so we get it in the next release ?
Cheers,
Florent.
On Nov 25, 2007 3:48 PM, Christopher Arndt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Florent Aide schrieb:
We will be releasing 1.0.4 real soon now. To make sure all problems are
smoothed down we'll release 1.0.4b3 (tonight or tomorrow).
It's not yet, isn't it?
No. I am beginning the release now
On Nov 25, 2007 3:48 PM, Christopher Arndt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW, there are still about 24 tickets open for TG 1.0.4, one of them
with high prio (#1277 is apparently fixed but not closed yet).
I would definitely accept commits related to #1386 before the final
release since even though
Hi all,
I have fixed: http://trac.turbogears.org/ticket/1598 by monkey
patching CherryPy's DecodingFilter like a savage... It works but I'd
like to know if someone has a more elegant solution to get to the same
result.
Please look at http://trac.turbogears.org/ticket/3771 for the patch.
Thanks
On Nov 26, 2007 4:20 AM, Mark Ramm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I personaly am not using Identity on any of my major projects for
various reasons. But I know there are probably at least some Idenity
users, who are reasonably happy with Identity.
[...]
1) enough people use identity to make
On Nov 27, 2007 2:53 PM, Christopher Arndt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
does anybody know what ticket #1501 is supposed to mean? Can anybody
confirm that there's a real problem?
We are trying to get the ticket count for the 1.0.4 release to zero and
this ticket is in the way.
Yep. At
On Nov 27, 2007 3:06 PM, Florent Aide [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 27, 2007 2:53 PM, Christopher Arndt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yep. At least we think. Diez committed
sorry the email was sent too quick I did not h
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received
On Nov 27, 2007 3:07 PM, Florent Aide [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 27, 2007 3:06 PM, Florent Aide [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 27, 2007 2:53 PM, Christopher Arndt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yep. At least we think. Diez committed
sorry the email was sent too quick I did not h
On Nov 27, 2007 8:14 PM, Christopher Arndt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I have created a patch for ticket #1386 (see ticket attachment) and want
to commit it to the 1.1 branch. Can someone please comment?
just by looking at your description I see the purpose and the
interest of this.
On Nov 27, 2007 10:46 PM, Christopher Arndt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have added another patch to trac, this time for ticket #1457.
This is another somehow radical change, but since this is for an
extension package and the package was broken before anyway, I think this
is the way to go.
On Dec 9, 2007 8:12 AM, percious [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Irrata:
Well folks, I'm going to need a web space for Documentation, and a
Trac instance would be nice. If anyone knows where I can get such a
thing let me know.
First of all thanks for your efforts on this project!
Assembla offers
1 - 100 of 374 matches
Mail list logo
