Re: Contents of Tuscany SCA 1.0 release, was: SCA 0.92 release?

Hi Radim, It's great to get your feedback on this. Your posts to the user list (including those with tough questions, like Java2WSDL and on the fly WSDL generation :-) have been much appreciated. I am currently working on asynchronous support for callbacks. The @OneWay part of async is already

Re: Services and WSDL files

Ok, was just trying get a feel for what people are using to make sure what we do is what people want :) What would be really good is if you could post an example of one of your service interfaces and associated pojo's so we can use that in a testcase to make sure this does what you need. If you

Re: Services and WSDL files

Comments line. Thanks, Raymond - Original Message - From: Radim Kolarik [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: tuscany-user@ws.apache.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 4:16 AM Subject: Re: Services and WSDL files Hi Ant, That is great news! Thanks! It's just POJOs and

Re: Services and WSDL files

Hi Raymond, But what would happen if the JAXB classes would be handled as POJOs? Wouldn't it work anyway? My understanding is that the actual communication would be exchanging XMLs which do not fully comply with a specific schema, but wouldn't the objects get deserialized to proper JAXB classes

Re: Monitoring, logging and exceptions (again)

On 8/8/07, ant elder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 8/7/07, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We talked about this before ( http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg16784.html) but didn't come to any conclusions. So, 1/ What is the requirement? 2/ What is the technical

Re: Services and WSDL files

And one more question: You mentioned annotations. Will JAXB 1.0.5 be supported as well? Thanks, Radim On 8/8/07, Radim Kolarik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Raymond, But what would happen if the JAXB classes would be handled as POJOs? Wouldn't it work anyway? My understanding is that the

Re: Services and WSDL files

Hi, We only support JAXB 2.x at this moment. Can you elaborate what you meant by JAXB classes would be handled as POJOs? JAXB objects can be marshaled as XML conforming to the XSD that is used to generated the JAXB classes. What do you expect for the POJO/XML roundtrip here? Yes, we can do

Re: Contents of Tuscany SCA 1.0 release, was: SCA 0.92 release?

On 8/6/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip] Bringing this thread up again as time is ticking on if we want to get a release out this month. How would people feel about taking a branch for this release in a bit less than 2 weeks, say aiming for the 14/15th of August?