Re: different version of common/annotations/ja.xml

Thanks, I will file that ticket. I'd like to have another version of ja.xml for both TTS and non-TTS. Fujiwara On 03/28/17 15:20, Mark Davis ☕️-san wrote: Ah, yes. Sorry for my confusion. One main purpose for the short names is for TTS, and for that I think people felt that the reading was

Re: different version of common/annotations/ja.xml

Ah, yes. Sorry for my confusion. One main purpose for the short names is for TTS, and for that I think people felt that the reading was more useful. However, it would probably be better for the keywords to have the normal spelling. You might consider filing a ticket at

Re: different version of common/annotations/ja.xml

It would be combinations of Hiragana, Katakana, Kanji. On 03/28/17 02:25, Koji Ishii-san wrote: I think he meant Kanji/Han ideographic by "committed string". 2017-03-27 19:04 GMT+09:00 Takao Fujiwara >: On 03/27/17 18:48, Mark Davis ☕️-san

Re: different version of common/annotations/ja.xml

I think he meant Kanji/Han ideographic by "committed string". 2017-03-27 19:04 GMT+09:00 Takao Fujiwara : > On 03/27/17 18:48, Mark Davis ☕️-san wrote: > >> By "committed strings", you mean the hiragana phonetic reading? >> > > Hiragana is used to the raw text of the

Re: different version of common/annotations/ja.xml

On 03/27/17 18:48, Mark Davis ☕️-san wrote: By "committed strings", you mean the hiragana phonetic reading? Hiragana is used to the raw text of the phonetic reading by the Japanese input method before the conversion. After users select one of the converted strings, the converted strings are

Re: different version of common/annotations/ja.xml

By "committed strings", you mean the hiragana phonetic reading? Mark On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 11:00 AM, Takao Fujiwara wrote: > Hi, > > Do you have any chances to create a different version of ja.xml of the > Japanese emoji annotation? >