Re: Introducing Cassandra 3.7 LTS

We are not publishing the build artefacts for our LTS at the moment as we don't test them on the different distros (debian/ubuntu, centos etc). If anyone wishes to do so feel free to create a PR and submit them! On Wed, 2 Nov 2016 at 11:37 Jesse Hodges wrote: > awesome,

Re: Introducing Cassandra 3.7 LTS

awesome, thanks for the tip! -Jesse On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 12:39 PM, Benjamin Roth wrote: > You can build one on your own very easily. Just check out the desired git > repo and do this: > > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8989192/how-to- >

Re: Introducing Cassandra 3.7 LTS

You can build one on your own very easily. Just check out the desired git repo and do this: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8989192/how-to-package-the-cassandra-source-code-into-debian-package 2016-11-02 17:35 GMT+01:00 Jesse Hodges : > Just curious, has anybody

Re: Introducing Cassandra 3.7 LTS

Just curious, has anybody created a debian package for this? Thanks, Jesse On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 7:45 PM, Kai Wang wrote: > This is awesome! Stability is the king. > > Thank you so much! > > On Oct 19, 2016 2:56 PM, "Ben Bromhead" wrote: > >> Hi All

Re: Introducing Cassandra 3.7 LTS

I will also publish 3.0 back ports once we are running 3.0 On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Ben Bromhead wrote: > Thanks Sankalp, we are also reviewing our internal 2.1 list against what > you published (though we are trying to upgrade everyone to later versions > e.g.

Re: Introducing Cassandra 3.7 LTS

Thanks Sankalp, we are also reviewing our internal 2.1 list against what you published (though we are trying to upgrade everyone to later versions e.g. 2.2). It's great to compare notes. On Thu, 20 Oct 2016 at 16:19 sankalp kohli wrote: > This is awesome. I have send out

Re: Introducing Cassandra 3.7 LTS

This is awesome. I have send out the patches which we back ported into 2.1 on the dev list. On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 4:33 PM, kurt Greaves wrote: > > On 19 October 2016 at 21:07, sfesc...@gmail.com > wrote: > >> Wow, thank you for doing this. This

Re: Introducing Cassandra 3.7 LTS

On 19 October 2016 at 21:07, sfesc...@gmail.com wrote: > Wow, thank you for doing this. This sentiment regarding stability seems to > be widespread. Is the team reconsidering the whole tick-tock cadence? If > not, I would add my voice to those asking that it is revisited.

Re: Introducing Cassandra 3.7 LTS

Awesome! On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 2:57 PM Jason J. W. Williams < jasonjwwilli...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 2:07 PM, sfesc...@gmail.com > wrote: > > Wow, thank you for doing this. This sentiment regarding stability seems to > be widespread. Is the team

Re: Introducing Cassandra 3.7 LTS

+1 On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 2:07 PM, sfesc...@gmail.com wrote: > Wow, thank you for doing this. This sentiment regarding stability seems to > be widespread. Is the team reconsidering the whole tick-tock cadence? If > not, I would add my voice to those asking that it is

Re: Introducing Cassandra 3.7 LTS

Wow, thank you for doing this. This sentiment regarding stability seems to be widespread. Is the team reconsidering the whole tick-tock cadence? If not, I would add my voice to those asking that it is revisited. Steve On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 1:00 PM Matija Gobec wrote: >

Re: Introducing Cassandra 3.7 LTS

Hi Ben, Thanks for this awesome contribution. I'm eager to give it a try and test it out. Best, Matija On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 8:55 PM, Ben Bromhead wrote: > Hi All > > I am proud to announce we are making available our production build of > Cassandra 3.7 that we run at

Introducing Cassandra 3.7 LTS

Hi All I am proud to announce we are making available our production build of Cassandra 3.7 that we run at Instaclustr (both for ourselves and our customers). Our release of Cassandra 3.7 includes a number of backported patches from later versions of Cassandra e.g. 3.8 and 3.9 but doesn't include