--On Tuesday, January 03, 2006 11:49 PM -0500 James Jun
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Perhaps if you looked at www.sixxs.net, there is a tunnel POP right in
Atlanta (which seems to be where your web site is hosted at).
Actually, I'm on the west coast, near Berkeley. The host I'd like it on is
s
Title: RE: ipv6 dns server.
We've had pretty good luck
with bringing a /48 into a *BSD router/firewall
(using pf), with tunnels from various ISPs
over our basic IPv4 service.
We route a /64 into each of our internal
subnets. Performance is OK.
Note Hurricane Electric will only do /64
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Kenneth Porter
> Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 7:28 PM
> To: users@ipv6.org
> Subject: Re: ipv6 dns server.
>
> On Tuesday, January 03, 2006 10:16 PM +0100 JORDI PALET MART
t; Jeroen Massar
> Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 4:30 PM
> To: Kenneth Porter
> Cc: users@ipv6.org
> Subject: Re: ipv6 dns server.
>
> Kenneth Porter wrote:
> > --On Monday, January 02, 2006 4:02 AM +0800 Lawrence Hughes
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> &
On Tuesday, January 03, 2006 10:16 PM +0100 JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Right, if your ISP doesn't offer the service, even if via a tunnel,
better change to another ISP. There are lots of reliable ISPs today
offering the service, and lots of free transition services.
We hav
On Wednesday, January 04, 2006 4:53 AM +0800 Lawrence Hughes
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You can get tunneled service over existing IPv4 connections anywhere in
the world (even in the US). See www.hexago.com or Hurricane Electric,
among others (not affiliated with either, but have used both).
Kenneth Porter wrote:
> --On Monday, January 02, 2006 4:02 AM +0800 Lawrence Hughes
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Most client computers (DNS resolvers) that support IPv6 will (and should)
>> use the IPv6 addresses preferentially over IPv4 when both are returned
>> from the DNS.
>
> With most
Title: Re: ipv6 dns server.
Right, if your ISP doesn’t offer the service, even if via a tunnel, better change to another ISP. There are lots of reliable ISPs today offering the service, and lots of free transition services.
We have our own Tunnel Broker, 6to4 and Teredo. See http
Title: RE: ipv6 dns server.
Wise or not, that is the
standard. If you are using an ISP that does not support
IPv6, and don't have tunneled IPv6 service,
in most cases, you would not need
to have an IPv6 stack installed on your
node. In that case, the "preferred" IPv6
addr
--On Monday, January 02, 2006 4:02 AM +0800 Lawrence Hughes
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Most client computers (DNS resolvers) that support IPv6 will (and should)
use the IPv6 addresses preferentially over IPv4 when both are returned
from the DNS.
With most ISP's not providing an IPv6 gateway,
"resove.conf"
nameserver 2001:4bd0::1I think you are right with WinXP because for IPV4 stack i should enter a dns server address for static ip configuration. And for ipv6 stack i can add an ipv6 dns server address. But it never uses the ipv6 one...But in Vista there is only one stack that combine
behalf of mustafa
sahinSent: Mon 1/2/2006 1:58 AMTo:
users@ipv6.orgSubject: ipv6 dns server.
Hi all,My problem is; I defined an ipv6 dns server to my WinXP dual
stack client. It also has another dns server with ipv4 address. It checks
firstly ipv4 dns-server, not hte ipv6 one. To fix this problem i r
Hi all,My problem is; I defined an ipv6 dns server to my WinXP dual stack client. It also has another dns server with ipv4 address. It checks firstly ipv4 dns-server, not hte ipv6 one. To fix this problem i removed the other ipv4 dns-server address and write the ipv4 address of my ipv6 dns server
13 matches
Mail list logo
