R-Elists wrote:
Ask your customers - block the ads for a while and see if
anyone complains.
/Per Jessen, Zürich
that's right, experts should always ask the uninformed or unqualified.
;-)
Must be why Marc asked the list too :-)
But seriously, in a case like this, who better to
Per,
Must be why Marc asked the list too :-)
so, that is why you responded?
are you the uninformed, or the unqualified? or both?
;-
But seriously, in a case like this, who better to ask than
the people you are serving?
but seriously, *all* necessary things considered to make a
R-Elists wrote:
Per,
Must be why Marc asked the list too :-)
so, that is why you responded?
are you the uninformed, or the unqualified? or both?
;-
Nah, I leave that to others.
But seriously, in a case like this, who better to ask than
the people you are serving?
but
In article 4b5b125e.2050...@perkel.com, Marc Perkel m...@perkel.com
writes
This is a tricky decision. What they Free Credit Report / Experian is
doing is fraudulent. Although they aren't stealing they way phishers
are, just because they aren't just as bad. In fact I suspect they rip
off far
Hello.
Is anyone using the above PERL library?
Is it working fine for you?
I think I'm experiencing some bugs, but I'm used the latest version.
However, that seems to be quite old.
Is it still supported?
Can you suggest any replacement?
bye Thanks
av.
On 1/23/2010 11:56 AM, wolfgang wrote:
I sent an unsubscription request for the address in question to
users-ow...@spamassassin.apache.org.
Won't work, AFAIK. You need to reply to the unsub request to confirm it.
Otherwise, you would be able to unsubscribe anyone :)
The spam/ham decision is always in the eye of the beholder.
One persons spam is another ones ham.
/Per Jessen, Zürich
Per,
you are right!
i am seeing you filling out those free credit report URL's frequently...
:-)
yet...
the thing really is, i havent figured how to block
R-Elists wrote:
The spam/ham decision is always in the eye of the beholder.
One persons spam is another ones ham.
/Per Jessen, Zürich
Per,
you are right!
i am seeing you filling out those free credit report URL's frequently...
:-)
yet...
the thing really is, i havent figured how
On Sun 24 Jan 2010 05:55:21 PM CET, Evan Platt wrote
Won't work, AFAIK. You need to reply to the unsub request to confirm it.
Otherwise, you would be able to unsubscribe anyone :)
why did the bounce not go to apache.org ?, or did it, but apache.org
did not see the problem in maillist ?
not
In an older episode (Sunday, 24. January 2010), Evan Platt wrote:
On 1/23/2010 11:56 AM, wolfgang wrote:
I sent an unsubscription request for the address in question to
users-ow...@spamassassin.apache.org.
Won't work, AFAIK. You need to reply to the unsub request to confirm
it. Otherwise,
In an older episode (Sunday, 24. January 2010), Benny Pedersen wrote:
You are right, concerning mails to users-unsubscr...@spamassassin.org
why did the bounce not go to apache.org ?
As stated before: because the MTA of the recipient sends bounces to the
address in the From: header line, not to
In an older episode (Sunday, 24. January 2010), Benny Pedersen wrote:
You are right, concerning mails to users-unsubscr...@spamassassin.org
why did the bounce not go to apache.org ?
As stated before: because the MTA of the recipient sends bounces to the
address in the From: header line, not to
R-Elists wrote:
The spam/ham decision is always in the eye of the beholder.
One persons spam is another ones ham.
/Per Jessen, Zürich
Per,
you are right!
i am seeing you filling out those free credit report URL's
frequently... :-)
Fortunately, I have yet to see any of
On 23-Jan-10 18:54, Alex wrote:
Have they ever been prosecuted or fined for this fraud?
They are a government protected triumvirate Monopoly, and as such, are
essentially untouchable. You have as much luck as complaining to the
fascists at TSA or ICE.
--
Woof bloody woof.
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010, Benny Pedersen wrote:
why did the bounce not go to apache.org ?, or did it, but apache.org did not
see the problem in maillist ?
Because we have a caching server accepting the mail, and then when it
*finally* decides the client is not going to retrieve the mail, it
15 matches
Mail list logo
