Yes, I'll make it part of the key.
I searched but not found, how can I change the default localizer and the
default resourcemodel?
There is no method setLocalizer/setResourceModel in class
WebApplication...
Thank you for your help.
igor.vaynberg wrote:
you can override methods in
Well, the tags are not new, as they do the perfectly same as extend and
child. Basically, the patch only introduces an id attribute to those tags in
order to make linking of markup more flexible. The new names were only
introduced to keep functionality of the patch separated from the existing
Hey Chris, I would need some lobbying here! ;)
-- stefan
Chris Colman wrote:
Wouldn't this essentially be the same as using wicket:panel
id=header/ and using WebMarkupContainers on the java side?
I.e.:
Base
Structural markup goes here (see below for explanation of this)
Hugues Pichereau wrote:
Sebastiaan van Erk wrote:
[...]
If you do override init, make sure to call super.init()
Whao! well done, Sebastiaan, I was overriding init(), and not calling
super.init();
Now it works.
But what bugs me is that it solves my own application (where init() was
Johan Compagner wrote:
I dont think that will work quite that way out of the box.
because our normal statefull redirect page will go to
/?wicket:interface=:0:
And also form post will go to that kind of url (and then redirect)
Actually, we rely on the servlet container to convert relative
skatz wrote:
Is it possible for a javascript function to fail in such a way that
the rest of the script would not be called?
It can throw an exception.
Regards,
Al
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
Swarm is designed to be plain and simple.
In short this is what you need to do:
1 implement Principal (i could see about a reasonable default
implementation , but my guess is you want to store this in a database
anyway and i am not sure i want a dependency on jpa)
2 create policy files
3 implement
Hi,
for my current project I had to serve some PDF files. I am using
Velocity to some of my HTML content as printable, and this is done as
plain Velocity code, and then have a Wicket page serve that content
(by simply having a plain page with span wicket:id=content
[content]/span and
Gwyn Evans wrote:
I've got some text that shows up fine in Firefox but only when
selected in IE (IE7) and I've no idea what the real issue is, so I'm
hoping someone can take a glance.
That bug tends to be triggered by floats, but there are various things
that can cause it. You can almost
ok tell me with 2 examples what is soo different about having 2 panels (or
fragments)
in a page and implement that in a sub page or having 2 wicket childs in a
page
and implement those in a sub page.
A basepage can also have ofcourse an extend area and 2 panels..
johan
On 11/7/07, Chris
Wouldn't this essentially be the same as using wicket:panel
id=header/ and using WebMarkupContainers on the java side?
yes it would be exactly the same thing.
If you think that these are the same then you've missed some vital plot
points of the movie that it child/extend.
Hi Al,
On 07 November 2007, 9:42:36 AM, Gwyn Evans wrote:
AM Gwyn Evans wrote:
I've got some text that shows up fine in Firefox but only when
selected in IE (IE7) and I've no idea what the real issue is, so I'm
hoping someone can take a glance.
AM That bug tends to be triggered by floats, but
Anything similar for spitting something out _after_ the tag that the
component is mapped to? e.g. Sending out some text/html after a checkbox?
Presumably onComponentTagBody doesn't get called because it is not a
Container and the input tag is send after anything I do in onComponentTag :(
Al
On Nov 7, 2007 11:31 AM, Mats Norén [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm...I'm interested in seeing the difference as well. I would love to
get it but right now I don't.
Chris Colman wrote:
This new feature, or extension of the exiting feature, allows more than
one section of markup to be
Doh. Should have thought of Behaviours (sic). Guess my coding style is a bit
old fashioned trying to use extension from than composition. Must re-read
that great article about the pattern behind Spring not intending things to
be extended.
Cheers
Sam
Al Maw wrote:
Sam Hough wrote:
I'm pretty sure I'm using the latest version:
$ svn info
Path: .
URL:
https://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket-stuff/trunk/wicket-contrib-gmap2
Repository Root:
https://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket-stuff
Repository UUID: ef7698a4-5110-0410-9fc6-c7eb3693863f
Sam Hough wrote:
Anything similar for spitting something out _after_ the tag that the
component is mapped to? e.g. Sending out some text/html after a checkbox?
Presumably onComponentTagBody doesn't get called because it is not a
Container and the input tag is send after anything I do in
Hello!
I have the following problem. I have a parent page, that opens a popup
through a PageLink.
The popup window is a window in which new records can be added, but i need a
combo in the parent page to reflect and contain also the new choice added in
the popup.
1. Reloading the whole parent
Hmmm... more tags? I thought you guys liked Wicket because it's plain
html
support. Now looks like there's a big interest in having more tags. If
this is true, why don't we go back a few years, or move to JSF? Let's
give
Wicket support to Tag Libraries too :)
These aren't just like other
Hey Chris, I would need some lobbying here! ;)
-- stefan
You're doing a great job Stefan - especially now I see that you've implemented
it - excellent job!
Are we both seeing something here that other people can't see? It wouldn't be
the first time in my life I was in that position - only
Hi Mats, let me try to explain what Chris and I see here that others don't -
may it be there or not ;)
You can of course do everything with panels that could be done with multiple
abstract sections (may they be named wicket:child or wicket:abstract).
However, if this is the only argument, you
Hi Martin,
adding the header contributions in the way suggested works fine for me, and
I think this is an acceptable workaround for now.
Many thanks for your quick response!
Regards,
Jan
On 06/11/2007, Martin Funk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Jan,
the good news is that I think we got a
I've finally migrated my time tracking tool, eHour, from Struts to Wicket !
eHour is a webbased time tracking tool for consultancy companies and
other project based businesses.
The primary objective is to keep time tracking as simple and user
friendly as possible while still being
very
You are wrong. I have a component (Panel) that has a method to return a
Fragment. This component returns a default implementation of that Fragment,
but pages can override that Fragment.
CRUDFormPanel extends Panel {
protected Fragment newFormFields(String id, Form form) {
if (property
Given these subtle problems with this approach, I admit I'm warming
to
the multiple extend/child idea.
im oposite - if i have X extends in a page, whose extend should be
preferred (e.g: manipulating the head or a part outside of itself) ?
I'm not sure I understand the issue you raise
Every once in awhile if I am clicking around for awhile in the UI of my
application I get the following error. What causes this?
java.lang.NullPointerException
at
And if somebody really needs 5 child areas, something else might be
even
messier than the page's constructor. I rather think that 2, 3 or in
rare
cases even 4 ids could make sense.
i must disagree - i have a basepage which defines the default layout
on a
project, i.e. header,
Given these subtle problems with this approach, I admit I'm warming to
the multiple extend/child idea.
im oposite - if i have X extends in a page, whose extend should be
preferred (e.g: manipulating the head or a part outside of itself) ?
my override of onBeforeRender is secure from your
Java Rebel worked for me too.
I had no such problem.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/JavaRebel-experience-tf4695671.html#a13632511
Sent from the Wicket - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To
application.init() {
getresourcesettings().setlocalizer(...);
}
you dont have to use the default resource model, just write your own
if you dont like the default one.
-igor
On 11/7/07, Pills [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, I'll make it part of the key.
I searched but not found, how can I
But the number of added panels needn't be the number of abstract section
(though it could).
-- stefan
Jan Kriesten wrote:
hi stefan,
And if somebody really needs 5 child areas, something else might be even
messier than the page's constructor. I rather think that 2, 3 or in rare
Yes, you must be right, another issue against the modal window is that the
datepicker does not work inside it, and I pretty much decided to stick to
normal popups.
Well it seems that i may have something here:
In the parent page:
add(new AbstractDefaultAjaxBehavior() {
On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 07:14:01PM +0100, Korbinian Bachl wrote:
Given these subtle problems with this approach, I admit I'm warming to
the multiple extend/child idea.
im oposite - if i have X extends in a page, whose extend should be
preferred (e.g: manipulating the head or a part
i do see your point, but it is not that much different, its just another way
of doing stuff.
Markup inheritance does come from the border stuff. i think i was the one
that proposes it when
we had a meeting here now a few years ago here in Holland so that that we
could border pages.
Then Juergen
huh why would java code define the layout in this example?
you still have the html of the page that does the layout of those panels
and the content of those panels are layout with the markup of those panels.
Layout in java would be something like:
component.setSize()
component.setLayout()
johan
Well, if naming is your only concern, the attribute's name can easily be
replaced with something else than id ... e.g. name
wicket:abstract name=foo /
wicket:implement name=foo
some text
/wicket:implement
and remember that they can be optional as well:
wicket:abstract /
wicket:implement
some
I can see how wicket:abstract and wicket:implements tags could be
a nice enhancement to the current wicket:extend and wicket:child
tags. Do you have a working, or mostly working, patch?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
Let me paste what I commented in WICKET-1134:
*I think this improvement is just more of a way to override components
declared in markups of a super class. Because this is what really happens.
Let's check your example:
In the BasePage, there are two fragments:
- subNavigation
- content
What
Hi. Well in my case this error apeared when the user clicked on a link that
was directing the user to the next page, and while the user did not wait for
the other page to load, or he thought that he did not press the mouse button
and he clicked again. The server saw that the component(link) was
How can it get messy when it's not yet possible to do in wicket?
i believe it has been shown multiple times already that it CAN be done
with vanilla wicket...
I didn't like the look of any of those 'coded' solutions. They were not
from the coding elegance book I've read. They also mean I'm
Hi salmas,
On 07 November 2007, 7:05:26 PM, salmas wrote:
s Every once in awhile if I am clicking around for awhile in the UI of my
s application I get the following error. What causes this?
s java.lang.NullPointerException
s at
s
a lot of people are saying that this can be implemented with panels,
and that is true. but actually implementing this with fragments will
make it look very similar to this new strategy and does not have the
id collission problem, because components ARE nested in two different
containers:
Thanks for giving the best overview of my thoughts Igor. Are you reading my
mind?
On Nov 7, 2007 3:50 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
let me weigh in with my thoughts on this.
a big problem with markup inheritance is the possibility of id collissions
for example
class
just a question: do i start to convince you? ;)
No... you are not... :D far far away from that
But don't take it personal, my opinion is technical... only!
On Nov 7, 2007 11:29 AM, Stefan Fußenegger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Well, if naming is your only concern, the attribute's name can
Presumably the coded work arounds that don't rely on child/extends mean
that the structural markup of each page is used instead of just that of
the base page - and that would spell maintenance issues. Without using
child/extend then ALL the structural markup in each page is used for
each render -
Korbinian Bachl wrote:
you missed solution3:
the real-wicket-way(tm) for multiple content-places in a tied page-area:
Whaaa, I seriously hope this is not the real-wicket-way! My brain hurts!
A framework is supposed to make things easy and readable! The code below
is just way too complicated
On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 11:31:12AM +0100, Mats Norén wrote:
Is the above statement really true considering that by adding abstract
methods to your page you defer the creation of the markup in just the
same way as the new proposed solution?
BasePage.java
public BasePage() {
So the ultimate result of the onClick() method, in this case, is to move to a
whole new page, i.e the last line is: setResponsePage(...);, so technically,
it probably does not need to be an ajax request, but because of the way we
are reusing some code it is.
I commented out the setResponsePage()
Have you noticed that if you try to close the example window from OK or
CANCEL button it closes even when used through an iframe?
By using firebug, you can place breakpoints to modal.js and see that this
code is executed when the window is closed from OK button:
Good looking app. What kinds of lessons did you learn in the migration? It
would be interesting to collect them into a wiki page.
--
Nick Heudecker
Professional Wicket Training Consulting
http://www.systemmobile.com
Eventful - Intelligent Event Management
http://www.eventfulhq.com
Are you using the ModalWindow? in that case you need to set the
PageCreator to return your page, don't use panels. Second you need to
set a callbackhandler for the windowclose event. There you must update
your combo.
Maurice
On Nov 7, 2007 12:09 PM, serban.balamaci [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
thanks!
I think people become accustomed to how they used wicket up to now.
Therefore, they don't see this weakness as they worked around it countless
times. However, never change a running system isn't an argument to me ...
and it wasn't to the first guy who said that the wheel should be round
Korbinian Bachl wrote:
you missed solution3:
the real-wicket-way(tm) for multiple content-places in a tied
page-area:
Whaaa, I seriously hope this is not the real-wicket-way! My brain
hurts!
A framework is supposed to make things easy and readable! The code
below
is just way too
hi stefan,
And if somebody really needs 5 child areas, something else might be even
messier than the page's constructor. I rather think that 2, 3 or in rare
cases even 4 ids could make sense.
i must disagree - i have a basepage which defines the default layout on a
project, i.e. header,
From the Java-side, it isn't visible, whether a component will be placed in
whatever html part. So you add all components in the constructor, yes.
However, it's as messy as adding 5 components is right now ... they will
just be added at different places.
And if somebody really needs 5 child
hi johan,
Johan Compagner wrote:
1 thing that does bother me a bit (but maybe i have to do a deeper look
into
the patch) how do you separate
the components in the constructor of the sub page.. i guess you just add
all
the components over all the child fragments
in the page itself.
On Nov 7, 2007 12:37 PM, Christofer Jennings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want to pitch Wicket for a new project at work. Is 1.3 beta 4 stable
enough? Is there a ballpark idea of when 1.3 final will be out? ... I
know that's a dumb question on an open source project but I guy can
dream.
We're
and in extending classes you can easily do this:
protected void initialize() {
addToAnything(new AnyPanel(id));
addToAnything(new AnyPanel2(id2));
}
So now you're proposing the Java code is defining the layout of
components? That's what the markup's job is I
I cannot use the modal windows.
They are plain popups. I do not know if there is a difference beetween modal
windows that have a content a panel or a page, but i need to have tabbed
pannels(which are links) inside the popup and by using a modal page with a
panel content when i press on another
Ok, I had just a look at the Swarm home page, and didn't go further, but
promise I will look at it deeper, now I know it's simple.
Swarm is designed to be plain and simple.
In short this is what you need to do:
1 implement Principal (i could see about a reasonable default
implementation , but
Jan Stette schrieb:
I'm pretty sure I'm using the latest version:
sorry I was just to tired yesterday look into that any deeper.
I just committed a patch. Could you check if it suits your needs?
Also could you check if the codechange in the ManyPanel is asking for
the same as your code?
ok tell me with 2 examples what is soo different about having 2 panels
(or
fragments)
in a page and implement that in a sub page or having 2 wicket childs
in a
page and implement those in a sub page.
Ok, here we go... (well one example at least - it's getting late here ;)
)
I'm not sure
you missed solution3:
the real-wicket-way(tm) for multiple content-places in a tied page-area:
eg: html:
...
div wicket:id=anythingPlace to put anything/div
...
java:
public abstract MyPage extends AnyPageExtendingWicketsWebPage {
private boolean initialized = false;
private
Yes!
see: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1134
-- stefan
Scott Swank wrote:
I can see how wicket:abstract and wicket:implements tags could be
a nice enhancement to the current wicket:extend and wicket:child
tags. Do you have a working, or mostly working, patch?
I am using wicket-1.2.6. Unfortunately it is not possible for me to
upgrade to a newer version.
Hi salmas,
On 07 November 2007, 7:05:26 PM, salmas wrote:
s Every once in awhile if I am clicking around for awhile in the UI of my
s application I get the following error. What causes this?
s
Martijn Dashorst wrote:
As for 1.2 or 1.3.. .I suggest 1.3. It is running on a couple of
production systems already [...]
LOL.
Hands Martijn the Understatement of the Century Award.
;-)
Regards,
Al
-
To unsubscribe,
sounds good and congrats...
Gerolf
On Nov 7, 2007 9:58 PM, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/7/07, Gerolf Seitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 7, 2007 9:40 PM, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
As for 1.2 or 1.3.. .I suggest 1.3. It is running on a couple of
On Nov 7, 2007 11:19 AM, Scott Swank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can see how wicket:abstract and wicket:implements tags could be
a nice enhancement to the current wicket:extend and wicket:child
tags. Do you have a working, or mostly working, patch?
What I think we should do with this is make
Chris Colman schrieb:
The beauty of the multiple extend/child idea is that it's not a
completely new concept we're talking about here - it's merely an issue
of supporting n1 instead of arbitrarily fixing n=1 like it is now.
1 Question: Who dominates Who and Why?
If you extend 1 class by
Hello everyone,
Been using wicket for the past month on a prototype I am working on. Great
framework !!!
Have a question regarding the tree table, I am using it to display
sub-totals and would like to give sub-total row a different color. How can
I accomplish this?
Thanks
Gene
if your modal dialog contains ajax tabs it should work, but all your
user interaction from withing the dialog must be ajax.
Maurice
On Nov 7, 2007 1:50 PM, serban.balamaci [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I cannot use the modal windows.
They are plain popups. I do not know if there is a difference
I want to pitch Wicket for a new project at work. Is 1.3 beta 4 stable
enough? Is there a ballpark idea of when 1.3 final will be out? ... I
know that's a dumb question on an open source project but I guy can
dream.
Thanks!
,boz
On Nov 7, 2007 9:40 PM, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
See the development list... We're working hard.
As for 1.2 or 1.3.. .I suggest 1.3. It is running on a couple of
production systems already, and it has some great new stuff I couldn't
live without anymore.
is the upgrade of
See the development list... We're working hard.
As for 1.2 or 1.3.. .I suggest 1.3. It is running on a couple of
production systems already, and it has some great new stuff I couldn't
live without anymore.
Martijn
On 11/7/07, Christofer Jennings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want to pitch Wicket
John Krasnay wrote:
You've just illustrated one of the major problems with the
panel-from-a-subclass approach: it's easy to get it wrong. In your
example, addAbstract1 and addAbstract2 will be called in a class whose
constructor has not yet been called. Consider:
public DerivedPage extends
read my previous reply more carefuly, instead of
abstract Component getTemplateOne(String id);
you can simply do: Component getTemplateOne(String id) { return new
EmptyPanel(id); }
now you have a non-required override of any part of markup's template...
-igor
On Nov 7, 2007 10:51 AM, Chris
On Nov 7, 2007 11:22 AM, Chris Colman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How can it get messy when it's not yet possible to do in wicket?
i believe it has been shown multiple times already that it CAN be done
with vanilla wicket...
I didn't like the look of any of those 'coded' solutions.
i dont
this cannot be an option. it always has to be enabled. if i write a
component that uses this and someone drops it into application where
this is disabled what should happen?
-igor
On Nov 7, 2007 1:05 PM, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 7, 2007 11:19 AM, Scott Swank [EMAIL
or you can just use a factory that lets you create transparent borders :)
-igor
On Nov 7, 2007 12:05 PM, Chris Colman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Presumably the coded work arounds that don't rely on child/extends mean
that the structural markup of each page is used instead of just that of
the
I tried disabling the button during the event and while this was easy enough
to implement it did not help. My page contains a table which has panels in
different cells. I swap these panels in and out depending on wether the user
is in 'edit' mode or 'submit' mode and also according to where they
Hi all,
I'm having trouble with localized and styled CSSs.
Everything works alright with HTML. For example, wicket finds
MyPage_mystyle.html instead of MyPage.html if i've called
session.setStyle(mystyle). But for CSS i can't get it working.
i've tried different approaches like:
// inside
I am having a problem with the UrlCodingStrategy. I'm currently extending
BookmarkablePageRequestTargetUrlCodingStrategy. The problem is that the app
is decoding some of the characters in the url before I get the url in the
decodeParameters method.
For example, the url once encoded looks like
what are you doing then in your own
BookmarkablePageRequestTargetUrlCodingStrategy?
who generates that url? and what is that Food%2FDrink? Should that be 1
param? And has the param a /?
which version do you use?
On 11/7/07, green804 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am having a problem with the
On Nov 7, 2007 1:39 PM, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You wouldn't write such a component for general purposes obviously.
ok, that right there i really really dont like. define general
purpose? so now we have features in wicket that are guaranteed to
work and others that arent? this
what is the full stack of the exception?
because who does have that field?
Streams should always be transient because those can't be serialized
whats the wicket version?
johan
On 11/6/07, James Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello fellow Wicket users,
I am getting a
Hi,
Since the thread on multiple wicket:child/ support is insanely long
I'm going to try make a clear and concise summary of what has been
proposed and what the arguments for and against were. Bear with me. :-)
1. What is proposed?
Currently Wicket supports *merging* of markup on a base
On Nov 7, 2007 1:32 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
this cannot be an option. it always has to be enabled. if i write a
component that uses this and someone drops it into application where
this is disabled what should happen?
You wouldn't write such a component for general purposes
On Nov 7, 2007 2:02 PM, Igor Vaynberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 7, 2007 1:39 PM, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You wouldn't write such a component for general purposes obviously.
ok, that right there i really really dont like. define general
purpose? so now we have features
Hi Chris,
i rewinded some part of your idea and the thread and now see bit clearer
what you want - perhaps you shouldnt call i multiple extend/child but
more precisely inheritance with multiple areas as you go:
html-basepage:
...
extend id=foo /
extend id=faa /
wicket:child/
what do we need to refactor to make a plugin like this possible?
-igor
On Nov 7, 2007 2:50 PM, Eelco Hillenius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
some here like it and others dont like it, so wouldnt be an different
project like wicket-extension the part for this?
That's what I'm arguing. Though
...
5) Conclusion
In conclusion, the proposed change:
- is useful
- does not have to be used if you don't like it
- is 100% backwards compatible
- it introduces no new tags (if using child/extends)
I also do not see any real issues. This is purely about merging
just a question to you Igor and Eelco:
some here like it and others dont like it, so wouldnt be an different
project like wicket-extension the part for this? couldn't this be
applied similar to the wicket-jmx plugin where you just dump the jar
into the classpath and have it registering and
Guys,
If need be, can we disable altogether the storage of pages (in the form of a
pageMap) in session, similarly on the disk ?
Thanks and Regards,
Farhan.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Disabling-serialization-storage-of-pages-in-session--tf4768006.html#a13638150
some here like it and others dont like it, so wouldnt be an different
project like wicket-extension the part for this?
That's what I'm arguing. Though thinking about it a little bit longer,
it should probably not even be a core project, but rather a
wicket-stuff one.
couldn't this be
applied
Where can I get more info on using ajax with wicket? The examples I've
found so far do not include round trips. Sure, writing a clock label is
cool and all, but I have real time data on a page that I don't want to
have to reload the whole page for all the time.
Also, I'm using a TabbedPanel with
Hello All,
Long story short, we're in the process of load testing an application
built against Wicket 1.3 snapshot. Unfortunately we've seen some
server issues with sessions/page maps in the file store during
testing, and I was wondering how I'd go about programatically changing
the default page
Is it appropriate to have the following...
final WebMarkupContainerWithAssociatedMarkup fieldset = new
WebMarkupContainerWithAssociatedMarkup(
fieldset);
final AttributeModifier levelModifier = new
AttributeModifier(class,
Gwyn Evans wrote:
Hi Curtis,
On 07 November 2007, 11:20:00 PM, Curtis Cooley wrote:
CC Where can I get more info on using ajax with wicket? The examples I've
CC found so far do not include round trips. Sure, writing a clock label is
CC cool and all, but I have real time data on a page that I
never mind... my mistake i needed to use AbstractBehavior (below). Sorry for
the post :)
fieldset.add(new AbstractBehavior() {
@Override
public void onComponentTag(Component component,
ComponentTag tag) {
On Tue, 06 Nov 2007, JohannesK wrote:
13:33:56.143 WARN!! Alias request of 'file:/C:/workspace/ordermanager/:/0'
for 'file:/C:/workspace/ordermanager/:/0'
I'm assuming this has to do with the images the ModalWindow is using.
Any ideas?
- try to reproduce the problem with WicketTester
- try
1 - 100 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
