Re: rjb-1.1.9 does not build on Windows with JDK in default location

2009-12-19 Thread Will Rogers
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 1:43 PM, Assaf Arkin as...@labnotes.org wrote: I think they're just using a different platform identifier, because their suggestion is: gem install --platform=mswin32 Thanks for clarifying the problem. To follow up, I can confirm that buildr installs and works with:

rjb-1.1.9 does not build on Windows with JDK in default location

2009-12-17 Thread Will Rogers
I just went through an unpleasant two hours trying to get buildr to install on Windows. May I make two suggestions to improve your Installing on Windows section at http://buildr.apache.org/installing.html ? 1. Installing the Ruby one-click installer is not enough, you also need the devkit so you

Re: rjb-1.1.9 does not build on Windows with JDK in default location

2009-12-17 Thread Alex Boisvert
Hi Will, Thanks for sharing your experience. I'm sure it will be useful to others. On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 7:48 AM, Will Rogers wjrog...@gmail.com wrote: I just went through an unpleasant two hours trying to get buildr to install on Windows. May I make two suggestions to improve your

Re: rjb-1.1.9 does not build on Windows with JDK in default location

2009-12-17 Thread Will Rogers
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 1:23 PM, Assaf Arkin as...@labnotes.org wrote: 2. The version rjb-1.1.9 required by buildr-1.3.5 does not build when your JAVA_HOME has spaces in the path I'm not sure why you're getting the all-platforms gem with RJB 1.1.9 dependency, but you shouldn't.   Could be

Re: rjb-1.1.9 does not build on Windows with JDK in default location

2009-12-17 Thread Assaf Arkin
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Will Rogers wjrog...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 1:23 PM, Assaf Arkin as...@labnotes.org wrote: 2. The version rjb-1.1.9 required by buildr-1.3.5 does not build when your JAVA_HOME has spaces in the path I'm not sure why you're getting