[vchkpw] vpopmail and drbd

2005-04-19 Thread Alessio Cecchi
Hello i'm testing a configuration of qmail+vpopmail+drbd+heartbeat on two servers, master and slave. My intentions are to share with drbd the home of vpopmail, /var/qmail/users and /var/qmail/control, for setting up the slave server in case of down of the primary server. Nobody has experiences

[vchkpw] how to deny smtp request from an IP

2005-04-19 Thread Manish Jain
I am using qmail+vpopmail. In my LAN some machines are affected with some virus which is generating SPAM. I got the IPs of those machines from /var/log/qmail/smtp/current How can I deny smtp requests from those IPs. thanx in advance, Manish Jain (Network Administrator) C-DAC Anusandhan Bhawan

Re: [vchkpw] how to deny smtp request from an IP

2005-04-19 Thread Adam Ossenford
echo x.x.x.x:deny /etc/tcp.smtp qmailctl cdb qmailctl reload where x.x.x.x is the ip of the affected machine I am using qmail+vpopmail. In my LAN some machines are affected with some virus which is generating SPAM. I got the IPs of those machines from /var/log/qmail/smtp/current How can I

[vchkpw] (Urgent) qmail-smtpd Bug !!!!!!!!!

2005-04-19 Thread Samir Noshy
Hi Everybody, I have a system consists of qmail 1.03 and vpopmail-5.4.9 and courier-imap-4.0.2 and SM and QS. I think that there is a bug in the qmail-smtpd. the bug that I can send mail as/from a local account to any other local account Although I use SMTP auth provided by :

Re: [vchkpw] (Urgent) qmail-smtpd Bug !!!!!!!!!

2005-04-19 Thread Remo Mattei
Dude this is normal behavior. Remo - Original Message - From: Samir Noshy [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Qmail List qmail@list.cr.yp.to; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Com vchkpw@inter7.com Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2005 9:24 AM Subject: [vchkpw] (Urgent) qmail-smtpd Bug ! Hi Everybody, I have a

Re: [vchkpw] (Urgent) qmail-smtpd Bug !!!!!!!!!

2005-04-19 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
You may disable acceptance of message from not authenticated users only if you make one of these changes: - delete any entry from rcpthosts or - modify auth patch so that only auth relaying is allowed. Tonino At 16.24 19/04/2005, you wrote: Hi Everybody, I have a system consists of qmail 1.03

[vchkpw] Re: (Urgent) qmail-smtpd Bug !!!!!!!!!

2005-04-19 Thread Peter Palmreuther
Hello Samir, On Tuesday, April 19, 2005 at 5:35:43 PM Samir wrote: [SMTP-AUTH not preventing forged From-header] Dude this is normal behavior. No I don't think so, It is a big security issue. You name it big security issue, that doesn't necessarily make it one. It *IS* normal behavior for a

Re: [vchkpw] Re: (Urgent) qmail-smtpd Bug !!!!!!!!!

2005-04-19 Thread Remo Mattei
Peter well answered. I tried to tell him that it's a normal behavior but he is not listening.. Oh well he can use postfix or sendmail. Ciao, Remo - Original Message - From: Peter Palmreuther [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Samir Noshy in vpop vchkpw@inter7.com Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2005 9:49

Re: [vchkpw] Re: (Urgent) qmail-smtpd Bug !!!!!!!!!

2005-04-19 Thread Davide Giunchi
Alle 17:49, martedì 19 aprile 2005, Peter Palmreuther ha scritto: 1) Stop crying. The way you find it is the way it *works* 2) Stop bothering this list. This mailing list is about *vpopmail*,    you have a problem with qmail-smtpd. qmail has it's own mailing    list. Absolutely! I'd like to

RE: [vchkpw] (Urgent) qmail-smtpd Bug !!!!!!!!!

2005-04-19 Thread tonix (Antonio Nati)
At 16.42 19/04/2005, you wrote: -Original Message- From: tonix (Antonio Nati) [ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2005 5:24 PM To: vchkpw@inter7.com Subject: Re: [vchkpw] (Urgent) qmail-smtpd Bug ! You may disable acceptance of message from not

Re: [vchkpw] can't relay any more

2005-04-19 Thread Kyle Wheeler
On Tuesday, April 19 at 12:32 PM, quoth Jeremy Kitchen: On Monday 18 April 2005 10:48 pm, Rick van Vliet wrote: You're right -- Thought I had that one. :\ But if we can stretch this topic - why doesn't vpopmail 'pay attention to locals or virtualdomains'? Is it just late and I'm space-y?

Re: [vchkpw] can't relay any more

2005-04-19 Thread Jeremy Kitchen
On Tuesday 19 April 2005 03:04 pm, Kyle Wheeler wrote: On Tuesday, April 19 at 12:32 PM, quoth Jeremy Kitchen: On Monday 18 April 2005 10:48 pm, Rick van Vliet wrote: You're right -- Thought I had that one. :\ But if we can stretch this topic - why doesn't vpopmail 'pay attention to

Re: [vchkpw] can't relay any more

2005-04-19 Thread Kyle Wheeler
On Tuesday, April 19 at 03:24 PM, quoth Jeremy Kitchen: On Tuesday 19 April 2005 03:04 pm, Kyle Wheeler wrote: On Tuesday, April 19 at 12:32 PM, quoth Jeremy Kitchen: On Monday 18 April 2005 10:48 pm, Rick van Vliet wrote: You're right -- Thought I had that one. :\ But if we can

Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail misusing qmail's control files (Was: can't relay any more)

2005-04-19 Thread Jeremy Kitchen
On Tuesday 19 April 2005 03:45 pm, Kyle Wheeler wrote: But if we can stretch this topic - why doesn't vpopmail 'pay attention to locals or virtualdomains'? Is it just late and I'm space-y? It doesn't do it for any real reason, it just does it because it was poorly

Re: [vchkpw] can't get vpopmail to rebuild tcp.smtp.cdb

2005-04-19 Thread Matt MacDougall
I think I may have misled you folks by mentioning how I've fixed this issue in the past. I haven't been able to solve it this time no matter what I've been trying. Anyone have a clue as to why even though permissions are set correctly, vpopmail still won't rebuild my tcp.smtp file? Thanks

Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail misusing qmail's control files (Was: can't relay any more)

2005-04-19 Thread Kyle Wheeler
On Tuesday, April 19 at 04:34 PM, quoth Jeremy Kitchen: I do know, however, that if you remove a domain from virtualdomains, vchkpw will still function without problem. IMHO, this is wrong behavior. What happens if you take a domain and move it into the locals file, and use vchkpw

Re: [vchkpw] vpopmail misusing qmail's control files (Was: can't relay any more)

2005-04-19 Thread Rick van Vliet
Kyle Wheeler wrote: On Tuesday, April 19 at 04:34 PM, quoth Jeremy Kitchen: I do know, however, that if you remove a domain from virtualdomains, vchkpw will still function without problem. IMHO, this is wrong behavior. What happens if you take a domain and move it into the locals file, and