personally i don't believe nature (or god) balances the books for every process.
we only need CoE to hold for our measuring instruments.
harry
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 11:09 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
This concept is most interesting. I would assume that the energy required
to
Scientific American Blog
http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/2012/05/24/fourth-fqxi-essay-contest/
Which of the basic assumptions of modern physics are wrong? Announcing
the fourth Foundational Questions Institute essay contest
Harry
One of the entries is about anomalous effects ;)
2012/5/25 Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com
Scientific American Blog
http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/2012/05/24/fourth-fqxi-essay-contest/
Which of the basic assumptions of modern physics are wrong? Announcing
the fourth
I mean, entries according to the contest rules.
2012/5/25 Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com
One of the entries is about anomalous effects ;)
2012/5/25 Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com
Scientific American Blog
On the nasa page
http://futureinnovation.larc.nasa.gov/view/articles/futurism/bushnell/low-energy-nuclear-reactions.html
Bushnell said
However, several labs have blown up studying LENR and windows
have melted, indicating when the conditions
are right prodigious amounts of energy can be
I hope that CoE holds in the universe. That is one guideline that is available
for us that I have always relied upon. Does anyone know of any reliable
experiments that have indicated that this conservation law is invalid? Of
course the energy equivalent of mass is an important component of
Lowering of the coulomb barrier is far from an all or nothing situation.
There is a fine grained gradation of the reaction that is reflected in
increasing probability of tunneling as the coulomb barrier is progressively
reduced.
As more screening charge is gradually increased and packed around
Alan J Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
Any other links to labs blowing up and window melting ?
I don't know about windows melting.
I listed 5 incidents in chapter 12 of my book. I have heard there have been
other explosions but I have no specific information on them. I have heard
that cold
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 10:56 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
Kuhn understood that scientists are emotional creatures, given to biases
and fads of various kinds, and that this makes even the hard sciences an
eminently social endeavor.
Its far worse than Kuhn indicates. He
James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
The reason this is far worse than Kuhn indicates is that it is entirely
conceivable that such financial dependence could enslave generation after
generation of scientists.
I don't know about generations. Peter Hagelstein told me the problem has
gotten
At 12:41 PM 5/25/2012, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Alan J Fletcher
a...@well.com wrote:
Any other links to labs blowing up and window
melting ?
I don't know about windows melting.
There's also :
Re: [Vo]:the desktop supernova - The Mail Archive
At 01:49 PM 5/25/2012, Alan J Fletcher wrote:
Hundreds of wave
trains and vortices appeared everywhere and are permanently burned into
walls, objects and trees surrounding the lab.
Came from Le Clair himself, in response to Krivit
Le Clair is quoted:
The experiment gave off powerful crested cnoid de Broglie Matter wave
soliton wave packages that were doubly periodic and followed the Jacobi
Elliptic functions exactly, mostly in the form of large doubly-periodic
vortices. Hundreds of wave trains and vortices appeared
Krivit elaborates on NASA and Larsen :
NASA and Widom-Larsen Theory: Inside
Story
http://blog.newenergytimes.com/2012/05/24/nasa-and-widom-larsen-theory-inside-story/#more-2474
The scenario that they mention is beyond frightening and anyone who remained in
the vicinity of that experiment should be given a metal for bravery.
I can imagine the description of damage being used as part of the plot to a
wild science fiction movie. What a shame that the occurrence was not
I find your attempt to equate Darwin with Newton rather amusing.
If there ever was a field of pseudoscience, that is beholden to and extremely
malleable to political pressure; it is the field that Darwin created with his
swiss-cheese theory.
While Newton created whole fields of legitimate
http://pesn.com/2012/04/28/9602083_NanoSpire_Inc_on_Harnessing_Cavitation_Zero_Point_Energy_to_Produce_Fusion_and_Transmutation_in_Water/
the pictures from LeClair are in the comments section of this blog.
Cheers: Axil
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
Reads like the catalyst may have been
*Lysergic acid diethylamide*
*
*On Friday, May 25, 2012, David Roberson wrote:
The scenario that they mention is beyond frightening and anyone who
remained in the vicinity of that experiment should be given a metal for
bravery.
I can imagine the
Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
http://pesn.com/2012/04/28/9602083_NanoSpire_Inc_on_Harnessing_Cavitation_Zero_Point_Energy_to_Produce_Fusion_and_Transmutation_in_Water/
the pictures from LeClair are in the comments section of this blog.
Thanks. Not many photos there. Only one, it
LeClair has observed the generation of *Protonated Water Clusters* in the
plasma of the collapsing cavitation bubble. This nanomaterial is a
topologic material that concentrates positive charges; most probably
superconductive and quantum mechanically coherent at the tip of the
cluster.
It is
Sorry I opened this can of worms. One response only:
Jojo Jaro jth...@hotmail.com wrote:
Well, centuries after Darwin, other people have indeed found an organ that
could not possibly have been formed by numerous, successive slight
modifications. The bacterial flagellum is one. The organ
This link provides a nice concise summary of evolutionary thought from
the Greeks to the victorian age.
http://library.thinkquest.org/C004367/eh1.shtml
Darwin's account of evolution is over emphasized, but that doesn't
mean it is worthless. Although the link says Lamarckian evolution has
been
I hesitated to post my original critique of Darwinian Evolution; and it is the
reason why I refrained from responding about Darwinian Evolution for so long -
that is; that I value this forum so much, that I do not want to involve other
topics in this forum other than Cold Fusion. I wish people
Inquiring minds want to know:
http://beforeitsnews.com/story/2167/703/Physicist:_HAARP_Manipulates_Time.html
T
Rossi tubules
The tubules that Rossi fabricates on the surface of his nickel micro-powder
could be a way to concentrate electric charge in a very small area.
Assuming a large electrostatic charge is concentrated on the surface of
each nanowire, when that nanowire finds its way to the surface of
It is important to point out the fallicies but I do not think
fallicies render a theory fatally flawed.
A theory can still be useful and valuable even if the logic of the
theory is not completely sound. For example, although it took over 150
years to provide calculus with a thoroughly logical
http://www.enterprisemission.com/Hyperdimensional-Eclipse.htm
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 2:38 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
the pictures from LeClair are in the comments section of this blog.
I know very little about Mark LeClair or NanoSpire. The main thing I
conclude from the photographs in the comments is that the lab is not clean
and that
28 matches
Mail list logo
