Values are found in some work substantially
higher, but it is generally consistent with a
theory that the actual reaction Q is the
deuterium value, but roughly half if the helium
is being trapped in the cathode or otherwise
escaping detection. Helium *is* apparently
trapped in the cathode,
We do not know what the reaction is.
Storms proposes that d e d (two deuterons with an
electron in between) are trapped in cracks in the
Pd, and that a slow process results in fusion
with release of energy as a series of X-rays
resonant in the crack. I and, I suspect, most
physicists, don't
The news is buzzing with the CERN announcement of the discovery of a new boson.
They are careful not to state that the Higgs has been found at this time.
How would they actually know that this is the Higgs when there are no known
particles that are associated with the force of gravity that I
At 04:29 PM 7/4/2012, Rich Murray wrote:
Well, there's a saying in Zen about swallowing the Niagara Falls in
one gulp -- perhaps a tsunami of verbal arguments by Lomax may float
visions that are plausibly contrary to the visions aired by Murray --
but the possiblities of micro and nano level
Hi,
I may have missed this, but does anyone have more details about or a
pointer to Peter Hagelstein's new theory, that was (according to Jed) so
well received at the symposium in Williamsburg?
Thanks
Andre
It is the newest version, or iteration, of the same theory he had before.
He should be publishing soon. The people at WM said they want manuscripts
in 2 weeks.
- Jed
Wait!
Suddenly you admit that the authors don't believe the field is 3000V/cm within
the electrolyte? Maybe you should read the paper again in order to fully
understand it.
Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2012 01:25:36 -0500
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com; vortex-l@eskimo.com
From: a...@lomaxdesign.com
Higgs are slowing you down. Free Higgs with integer spin:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oLyfBhi3xj4
Now we know we are more than two quarks and an electron.
T
Found or made?
The LHC is the mother and the laws of physics are the father.
Harry
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
Higgs are slowing you down. Free Higgs with integer spin:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oLyfBhi3xj4
Now we know we are more than
David,
I agree that this is could be an elaborate PR stunt, and little more. That
would be true, even if they nailed it. So what ? How can one justify the
enormous expense? It does zero for practical solutions to the energy crisis.
The prima donnas at CERN are extremely well-paid and are highly
Anyway, now that the origin of mass has been found, perhaps the
focus will finally shift to the origin of energy.
Harry
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
Found or made?
The LHC is the mother and the laws of physics are the father.
Harry
On Thu, Jul
At 11:41 AM 7/5/2012, Finlay MacNab wrote:
Wait!
Suddenly you admit that the authors don't believe the field is
3000V/cm within the electrolyte? Maybe you should read the paper
again in order to fully understand it.
No. While I'm not a mind reader, it does appear that the authors
believe
Eric,
It appears that the photon-stopping power of electrons which are dressed
in electromagnetic fields may be much greater than that of bare electrons
- i.e., dressed electrons that are exchanging large numbers of virtual
photons with nearby nuclei and other electrons in magnetic and coulomb
Andre,
This may be a preview of what he presented:
Coupling between a deuteron and a lattice
P. L. Hagelstein, I. U. Chaudhary
http://arxiv.org/abs/1204.2159
-- Lou Pagnucco
Andre Blum wrote:
Hi,
I may have missed this, but does anyone have more details about or a
pointer to Peter
Jones et al,
I think we have to keep in mind what the essence of a theory is:
It is based on a set of assumptions and expands from those with an established
set of tools, ie 'the set of accepted methods'.
Based on that 'belief' of mine, the Higgs Boson is something which only
'exists' within
Rossi’s new reactor core design
http://pesn.com/2012/01/14/9602012_Momentous_Breakthroughs_Announced_During_Anniversary_E-Cat_Interview/
Momentous Breakthroughs Announced During Anniversary E-Cat Interview -
January 15, 2012
It was also clarified that each individual home E-Cat system
At 09:46 AM 7/4/2012, Harry Veeder wrote:
http://ec.europa.eu/research/industrial_technologies/pdf/emerging-materials-report_en.pdf
The effect takes place only with D in
Pd, therefore a search for ashes
(mainly He and Tritium) have to be included into the research
program
as a further task
Axil,
...I believe that many of the design ideas for this reactor core were given to
Rossi by the US government. ...
Now you are in a bit of fairytaling.
Q1: Why should the mythical US-government exactly, which is as incompetent as
corrupt, support Rossi?
and not NASA, Navy , MIT etc?
Spare
Rossi’s new reactor core design, Rewritten to improve readability and
remove typos.
http://pesn.com/2012/01/14/9602012_Momentous_Breakthroughs_Announced_During_Anniversary_E-Cat_Interview/
Momentous Breakthroughs Announced During Anniversary E-Cat Interview -
January 15, 2012
It was also
Rossi’s new reactor core design, Rewritten to improve readability and
remove typos. Another try.
http://pesn.com/2012/01/14/9602012_Momentous_Breakthroughs_Announced_During_Anniversary_E-Cat_Interview/
Momentous Breakthroughs Announced During Anniversary E-Cat Interview -
January 15, 2012
At 01:44 PM 7/5/2012, Axil Axil wrote:
Rossi's new reactor core design
http://pesn.com/2012/01/14/9602012_Momentous_Breakthroughs_Announced_During_Anniversary_E-Cat_Interview/
Momentous Breakthroughs Announced During Anniversary E-Cat Interview
- January 15, 2012
[etc].
There is something
Rossi’s new reactor core design, Rewritten to improve readability and
remove typos.
http://pesn.com/2012/01/14/9602012_Momentous_Breakthroughs_Announced_During_Anniversary_E-Cat_Interview/
*Momentous Breakthroughs Announced During Anniversary E-Cat Interview -
January 15, 2012*
It was
I judge claims made in the field of LENR by technical consistency between
the claim and the research I can do to confirm or reject them. Rossi has
never failed such a check.
On their face, his claims are unbelievable but I project the design that
they imply and also predict what those claims
...but I project the design that they imply and also predict what those claims
mean in terms of
the natural laws that must be true for those claims to also be true.
...
Hmm,
does this mean that You consider any claims to be 'true' which do not
contradict the laws of nature (as they are
It’s a matter of research.
For example, Mileys observation that hydrogen in a crack is superconductive
prompted me to look into and learn about one dimensional superconductivity.
Not many critics at CERN have the time to do this sort of shotgun fact
finding. They reject cold fusion because they
[NOTE: I changed the Subject line, but this msg was sparked by Lou
Pagnucco's posting Thursday, July 05, 2012 11:06 AM]
Well, from a qualitative reading of the paper referred to in Lou's posting,
it would appear that the scattering cross section
It is no secret that Rossi has had many inputs from readers of his journal. I
have suggested a flat design to both Rossi and DGT for over a year that sounds
similar to what he has. To me it was obvious that a flat design would be far
superior to a round one if you were interested in scaling
Here is an uninformative report on the conference:
http://www.opednews.com/articles/2/Cold-Fusion-is-Real-by-Josh-Mitteldorf-120704-254.html
I would say more about the conference but I figure the proceedings will
soon be available so it is better to let the authors speak for themselves.
If the
Here are the list of attendees:
http://www.cvent.com/events/international-low-energy-nuclear-reactions-symposium-ilenrs-12/attendees-2afdc5aee9fe479ca69ff752477cbd25.aspx
- Jed
Wall of Fire - Yves Klein
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tfMlVXPS2aE
Harry
Here is a photo from space showing Pittsburgh, Baltimore, DC and Richmond
with a slider to show before-and-after conditions:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/local/dc-storm-from-space/?hpid=z1
It isn't North Korea but it does show dramatic, widespread outages. My
sister who lives near
Speaking of UFO and LENR, might be worth watching this video.Interesting to see
the burns on the poor man chest as he faced direct exhaust from LENR heated air
;)) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uLtb8ph2WQQ JG MoreauQuebec
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Rossi’s new reactor core
Here is the English report from the Japanese Parliament (Diet)
investigating committee:
http://naiic.go.jp/en/
Here are some interesting comments by Chairman Kurokawa in the Executive
Summary. Incidentally, I cannot find these comments in the Japanese version:
THE EARTHQUAKE AND TSUNAMI of
Hello group,
On the E-Cat News blog I found a transcription in Italian of a portion
(the most relevant section) of NI's Stefano Concezzi's segment from the
latest LENR workshop in Rome, diligently made by user un passante.
Surprisingly, it didn't gather much attention. By now, the information
Here is another wall of fire in San Diego, where they accidentally shot off
20 minutes of July 4th fireworks in 15 seconds:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JuJHfkXEI-o
Sort of like a gigantic lightbulb.
I did not quote the part that blames the disaster on Japanese culture:
What must be admitted – very painfully – is that this was a disaster “Made
in Japan.” Its fundamental causes are to be found in the ingrained
conventions of Japanese culture: our reflexive obedience; our reluctance to
question
I saw another of those flying red fireballs. I ran it down and it landed.
It was a yellow bag about the size of a 5 gallon garbage bag. The bottom
was held open by a metal ring. An X was attached to the ring. In the center
of the X was some kind of incandescent material.
Mystery solved,
Here is what I have been seeing.
http://www.amazon.com/s/?ie=UTF8keywords=flying+lanternstag=mh0b-20index=apshvadid=158778024ref=pd_sl_98x7y5zxij_e
-Original Message-
From: fznidarsic fznidar...@aol.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thu, Jul 5, 2012 8:53 pm
Subject: [Vo]:2d
Mark,
I have been looking at the standard derivations for Compton scattering,
but cannot find any that directly account for the influence of dressed
electrons' large effective mass. They assume a vacuum, bare electron
mass, and an effective momentum corresponding to the bare mass.
Your
39 matches
Mail list logo
