Electrons moving in certain solids can behave as if they are a thousand
times more massive than free electrons, but at the same time act as
superconductors..
http://phys.org/news/2012-06-mass-scientists-electrons-heavy-speedy.html#jCp
See the included video that displays heavy electrons at
Unfortunately I was tackled by flu and could not visit, but here's some
feedback:
Thanks Chuck,
It's encouraging to know we've had the same ideas! You may not have had
the polarity wrong. I've gone through two wires with it so far. I've
thought maybe I was putting too much power through it, but it also may be
that the hydrogen loading is very rough on the wire. After
Thanks for the suggestions Jones. I will give that a try.
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 9:19 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
A combination of vinegar and hydrogen peroxide works with nickel-copper
and is very safe. This is often used to etch PCBs. Using a few volts with
the wire as
I ordered several additional meters of nitinol and constantan wire (.8mm).
It took some work to find similar diameters.
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 5:52 AM, Jack Cole jcol...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the suggestions Jones. I will give that a try.
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 9:19 PM, Jones
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 10:06 PM, Jack Cole jcol...@gmail.com wrote:
Obviously this is not as sensitive as advanced
calorimetry, but it is also not without utility.
Roger.
Speaking of chemo-nuclear transitions in a general way - and especially in
regards to hydrogen thermal anomalies, it is possible that the very
definition of chemical energy is in jeopardy soon - to the extent that
Mills finally delivers.
This is because of the Rydberg teachings - which is
Jones,
I can see how the 13.6 eV of energy would be very substantially larger than the
normal burning of hydrogen at 1.4 eV as you mention. My problem with this
concept arises when I try to find the original source of the 13.6 eV of energy.
Clearly, free hydrogen is available to burn with
David,
Good question … and yes - nature provides us with a few clues.
Without getting into anything proprietary – you need only look at the oceans of
earth for the source you are asking about.
In effect – “hydronium” is a component of water and represents a free source of
protons –
Hi,
Thanks for the info (extracted the dutch original linked version) en
beterschap gewenst.
Kind regards,
Rob
On 24-1-2013 10:40, Teslaalset wrote:
Unfortunately I was tackled by flu and could not visit, but here's
some feedback:
Thanks Jone,
I have never really thought about that natural source of energy. It sounds
like there are people attempting to tap the stored joules and I wish them
success.
In a manner of speaking, the energy you mention is a form of fossil fuel.
Dave
-Original Message-
From:
The title of your article is Rossi wants to destroy the Piantelli patent.
Rossi has no power to destroy any patent, any more than I can destroy a
football player's contract with the NFL. Rossi has no say in this matter,
and no influence with the patent office in any country. However, Rossi does
It is not about opinion, Rossi says he has tested
the apparatus according to the patent with high fidelity and has
demonstrated it does not work.
I show why this cannot be true, and suppose
that it is true, it would be a loss for him.
The method is the key.
I have not spoken about opinion.
Peter
Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com wrote:
It is not about opinion, Rossi says he has tested
the apparatus according to the patent with high fidelity and has
demonstrated it does not work.
The patent office does not care what he says. He is not a patent examiner.
His tests are going to be
I meant his tests are NOT going to be admitted as evidence.
Believe me, that patent office has never heard of Rossi, and it does not
want to hear from him. He has no influence. Stop worrying about him.
- Jed
And then Piantelli tests Ross's patent and finds it not to work.
Meanwhile, the lawyers get rich and while the elephants are fighting,
the mice eat the corn. Being one of the mice, this is good news.
Ed
On Jan 24, 2013, at 12:07 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
The title of your article is Rossi
Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
And then Piantelli tests Ross's patent and finds it not to work. Meanwhile,
the lawyers get rich . . .
Piantelli has no influence with the patent office either.
This discussion makes no sense. You cannot walk in off the street, declare
yourself a
Rossi's patent description is untestable and has not much in common with
what he is really doing.
I bet thta Rossi does not want a patent for what he does or tries to do,
This action now is just smoke, circus, game playing.
Peter
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 9:27 PM, Edmund Storms
Formally, anybody can object against a granted EU patent within 9 months.
Looking to Piantelli's claims not only pure Nickel but also Nickel alloys
are applicable.
So, it's basically impossible for Rossi to claim Piantelli's setup cannot
work.
Even stronger, Rossi's catalyzer is possibly related
No the action is not at the patent office. The action is in the courts
that oversee patents. Also such challenges can prevent a patent from
being granted in the EU. Remember Patterson and F-P.
Ed
On Jan 24, 2013, at 12:32 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
Also such challenges can prevent a patent from being granted in the EU.
Remember Patterson and F-P.
That is true. I had forgotten about that. Still, Rossi is not an
influential person.
- Jed
I wanted to call Rossi's attention about his moral obligation to tell
better lies. Surely he cannot do anything real against this very well
conceived an written patent.
I start to have very serious doubts if he is progressing on the way from
enhanced excess heat to energy source. A good partner
Jones,
I went back and looked at some of my previous results, and they do raise
the possibility of anomalous cooling. I was a little confused by these
results at the time.
After our discussion, I think this is exactly what you were predicting.
The control trial used HFAC pulses through a
As far as the NiH reaction goes, I doubt anyone could defend a patent
since it was placed in the public domain by Mills years ago.
Processes for increasing the efficiency should be defendable, however.
Randy Mills says hsi process has nothing to do
with Rossi's or Piantelli's. And he is not interested
in ny communiction with these individuals.
The problem is that his CIHT is progressing very
slowly.
peter
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 10:32 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
As far as the
Jack - Well that is interesting. It may be a relic of too little data which
will average out over time, but it may also mean something now.
IOW, it begs for more confirming data with slight changes that would
accentuate the effect by adding increasing levels of H loading with every
run. Since
BTW - can you find out what metal the beverage heater is made of?
Probably stainless and NOT chrome plated (hexavalent chrome is highly
toxic).
If it were to be the 316L grade of SS that could be important. This grade
has been associated with energy anomalies. That could relate to why it
Whoa ! Hold everything. What a find.
This Watta-heater is copper nickel plated...
http://www.amazon.com/Lewis-N-Clark-Watta-Heater/dp/B0045E4DSW
Heck - here is your basic Celani replication experiment for 16 bucks.
Jones
From: Jones Beene
BTW - can you
It would appear that clusters of electrons can form in some materials
at low temperature. The BIG question is whether these have the ability
to initiate a nuclear reaction, especially at a rate of near 10^11
times/sec as is required to explain CF. As for the Miley idea, the
question is
Very recently posted on Lattice Energy site -
LENRs are potentially another mechanism for producing so-called
field failures that can trigger catastrophic thermal runaway fires
in Lithium-based batteries
I went back and double checked the calculations and the beverage heater
control was actually below the predicted level as well. The predicted
value for the control run was incorrect, but the rest of the data was
correct. Anyway, I think the beverage heater is less efficient with pulse
heating
I guess it was Lattice Energy who wrote:
The LENR theory should be easily testable by autopsies on some failed
batteries, looking for evidence of transmutations, i.e., unusual
isotopes or elements.
This would not be an easy test. There would be only microscopic amounts
of anomalous
Why are you surprised? Krivit said that and WL are his masters, so it was
just a matter of time (it was actually days).
2013/1/24 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
Frankly, I am surprised they said that.
- Jed
--
Daniel Rocha - RJ
danieldi...@gmail.com
_
This Watta-heater is copper nickel plated... could be close
to a Romanowski alloy
http://www.amazon.com/Lewis-N-Clark-Watta-Heater/dp/B0045E4DSW
Jed,
No. Lattice did not say that.
That is my statement.
Of course, a definitive test would absolutely require a very, very
clean controlled environment.
Do you believe that the battery environment cannot produce LENRs?
-- Or, that the circumstances under which other (alleged) LENR
pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote:
No. Lattice did not say that.
That is my statement.
Of course, a definitive test would absolutely require a very, very
clean controlled environment.
Do you believe that the battery environment cannot produce LENRs?
Ah, I see what you are saying. A
It is even less suprising that I believe energetic dark matter particles
orbiting @ 43,000 ft in jet streams are triggering the LENR and the
annihilation of Li. Which may also answer the cosmological problem of the
missing Li.
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com wrote:
Randy Mills says hsi process has nothing to do
with Rossi's or Piantelli's. And he is not interested
in ny communiction with these individuals.
The problem is that his CIHT is progressing very
slowly.
I'm talking about
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 4:36 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Whoa ! Hold everything. What a find.
This Watta-heater is copper nickel plated...
http://www.amazon.com/Lewis-N-Clark-Watta-Heater/dp/B0045E4DSW
Heck - here is your basic Celani replication experiment for 16 bucks.
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=south-korea-makes-billion-dollar-bet-fusion-power
South Korea has embarked on the development of a preliminary concept
design for a fusion power demonstration reactor in collaboration with
the US Department of Energy's Princeton Plasma Physics
That might be as good as cold fusion, according to some simulations they
did with some configurations. They surprisingly got a COP of 1000x.
2013/1/24 Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=south-korea-makes-billion-dollar-bet-fusion-power
South
My response:
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=south-korea-makes-billion-dollar-bet-fusion-powerposted=1#comment-18
18. jabowery
http://www.scientificamerican.com/page.cfm?section=my-account06:21
PM 1/24/13
From a founder of the US Tokamak Fusion Program to Congress:
The DoE
Sorry, I thought this was a case of plasma pinch. This is the old Tokamak,
so I mistook this project with another one.
2013/1/24 Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com
That might be as good as cold fusion, according to some simulations they
did with some configurations. They surprisingly got a
BTW: I don't know why rational fusion people don't continually rub the
noses of pseudoskeptics in this letter.
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 5:23 PM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
My response:
This is not 'Fusion' proper; This is Plasma Breach Reactor technology. (which
'can' support
fusion but which would be so monumentally counter productive) and so much so
that simply using the Plas-Breach
Reactor in 'INCIPIENT'-Plas-Breach(restrained-eye)XO-Plasma bleed-through mode
provides
a
This type of hot fusion has three problems that have not been solved
or even widely acknowledged.
1. The fusion is between D+T. The tritium must be created because it
is not a natural isotope. The plan is to convert the neutron flux into
tritium which is fed back into the reactor.
Indeed,
However plasma physics is by itself interesting, so it is nice to have some big
science experiments running. Science is not about profit but having fun!
If plasma physicist would like really do something that could spawn profits on
a long run, then they should study helium-3 fusion.
On Jan 24, 2013, at 6:29 PM, Jouni Valkonen wrote:
Indeed,
However plasma physics is by itself interesting, so it is nice to
have some big science experiments running. Science is not about
profit but having fun!
Well Jouni, when over 25 billion dollars are spent, the question is
who
Did not happen.
http://20121221.tv/nasa-admits-cold-fusion-lenr-energy-revolution-2012-reupload-fast-do-not-let-this-be-covered-up/
Here is where I got the nitinol for those interested:
http://www.amazon.com/dp/B003R5028K/ref=biss_dp_sa1
It would certainly be something if this ended up being replicated with a
beverage heater. ;)
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 24,
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 9:27 PM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
On Jan 24, 2013, at 6:29 PM, Jouni Valkonen wrote:
Indeed,
However plasma physics is by itself interesting, so it is nice to have
some big science experiments running. Science is not about profit but having
fun!
On Jan 24, 2013, at 8:06 PM, Harry Veeder wrote:
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 9:27 PM, Edmund Storms
stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
On Jan 24, 2013, at 6:29 PM, Jouni Valkonen wrote:
Indeed,
However plasma physics is by itself interesting, so it is nice to
have
some big science experiments
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 10:04 PM, Chuck Sites cbsit...@gmail.com wrote:
The proton-proton chain reaction is initiated with a strong interaction
between two protons, that binds to form a diproton, the diproton then
decays via weak interaction (a W boson) into a deuteron + electron +
electron
I wrote:
But the proton-proton chain has its own difficulties.
Here I have in mind only the beginning of the proton-proton chain, where
you have
p+p - 2p
and then
2p - d + e+ + v.
The rest of the proton-proton chain is easier to wrap one's head around in
the context of LENR.
Eric
I don't know what you mean by This study has no relationship to cold
fusion because
the same nuclear products are not formed. See page p.14, section 13. He
tries to explain Rossi's reactor. See p. 18, table II. This context shows
he's trying to explain CF and Rossi's reactor.
2013/1/23 Edmund
I was thinking the same thing while looking at this research.
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 00:29:26 -0500
From: janap...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]:Mainstream scientific research is looking into LENR and doesn’t
know it yet.
56 matches
Mail list logo
