Re: [Vo]:Looking for feedback on a BLP POC disagreement

2015-02-01 Thread leaking pen
The issue here is that no matter what the science says, and what the experiment shows, ramping up an effect to a usable product is never certain, and lots of REALLY useful known facts fall apart when you try to make a product out of them. This is why we MAKE proof of concepts. Not to prove the

Re: [Vo]:Looking for feedback on a BLP POC disagreement

2015-02-01 Thread Stefan Israelsson Tampe
Imagination yes, if there was no real quantities calculated. But by calculated many 100 of experimentally measurements one could just say that his theory has 100:s or is it not 1000:s of validation experiments. This would not be strange if there was a bunch of factors that was estimated in the

Re: [Vo]:Looking for feedback on a BLP POC disagreement

2015-02-01 Thread Stefan Israelsson Tampe
I guess that you don't get grants to investigate the hydrino. My take on this whole story is by some reason Mills theory and results are downplayed due to political reasons, not scientific reasons, maybe people are just stupid, and are hindering open minded physists doing coperations with Mills to

Re: [Vo]:Looking for feedback on a BLP POC disagreement

2015-02-01 Thread Peter Gluck
I tell you guys what is the greatest problem and mystery with the hydrino. I was in very good relationship with Randy till the Rossi affair- then he got angry with me because I dared to suppose that yes, Rossi has excess heat ...but after a while we both forgot this incident. Randy has told with

Re: [Vo]:Looking for feedback on a BLP POC disagreement

2015-02-01 Thread Peter Gluck
Forget mathematics, what's with the compounds? For mathematics etc see what Samsonenko has concluded. Even if true, using hydrino is very much as converting lightnings in useful usable electric energy. Peter On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 5:54 PM, Orionworks - Steven Vincent Johnson

[Vo]:the immediate future of the Hot Cat- an idea

2015-02-01 Thread Peter Gluck
The development of LENR+ continues, how could we push and accelerate it a bit... one idea here: http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/02/plans-for-near-future-of-lenr.html I hope this month will be even better than January was. Peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania

[Vo]:Parkhomov Reactro Type 2 or 3 Thermal Feedback System with Insulation

2015-02-01 Thread David Roberson
The latest report from the Alexander Parkhomov reactor testing contains one very important bit of information that should not be overlooked. I had determined that his original device without the insulating blanket was operating as a type 1 positive feedback thermal system. A device operating

RE: [Vo]:Looking for feedback on a BLP POC disagreement

2015-02-01 Thread Orionworks - Steven Vincent Johnson
Thanks, Axil. I browsed the Wikipedia article. I'll need to go through it several more times before I'm even close to a point of saying anything reasonably intelligible. What I can say is that I find some interesting concepts that, once again, remind me of a certain branch of computer

Re: [Vo]:Looking for feedback on a BLP POC disagreement

2015-02-01 Thread Axil Axil
I will go through my primus in detail, one point after the other with references for your convenience. First, stating my primus is simple terms as follows: There is more than one way to confine an electron. First, there is the way that most people know about, that is, an electron can orbit a

RE: [Vo]:Looking for feedback on a BLP POC disagreement

2015-02-01 Thread Orionworks - Steven Vincent Johnson
Peter, I still don't know what to make of Randy's bold hydrino theory and whether BLP will eventually be able to pull the magic rabbit out of the hat. I don't have sufficient mathematical expertise to parse out all the complex mathematical equations Randy has used in order to justify his

[Vo]:Re: [Vo]:RE: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:​New type of chemical bond discovered

2015-02-01 Thread H Veeder
What I don't understand is how the reactants (before they have bonded) can have a zero point vibration energy. Is it simply a sum of each reactants respective quantum wave lengths? Harry On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 7:23 AM, Roarty, Francis X francis.x.roa...@lmco.com wrote: [snip] In this

Re: [Vo]:earlier thread on surface vs volume effect in the gamma decay of radioisotopes

2015-02-01 Thread Eric Walker
On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Bob Cook frobertc...@hotmail.com wrote: With the interaction of particles with linear momentum something has to be produced that conserves this momentum and yet is an allowed energy state in the new system. Hi Bob, I have heard elsewhere that a reaction along

Re: [Vo]:Parkhomov Reactro Type 2 or 3 Thermal Feedback System with Insulation

2015-02-01 Thread David Roberson
A lot depends upon the feedback type, whether 1,2, or 3 which is very design related. A type 1 system is limited in COP to a significant extent according to my simulations. It will be difficult to achieve a net of 6 at best without enough thermal feedback. It is a fine line between a type 2

Re: [Vo]:earlier thread on surface vs volume effect in the gamma decay of radioisotopes

2015-02-01 Thread mixent
In reply to Eric Walker's message of Sun, 1 Feb 2015 11:48:59 -0800: Hi Eric, It must be one of the thousands that I deleted unread, however I wouldn't expect that sort of thing to affect gamma radiation. OTOH it certainly will affect *measured* alpha radiation. The travel distance of an alpha

Re: [Vo]:Gamma-producing fusion branches and solid state matter

2015-02-01 Thread Bob Cook
Eric etal-- My conclusion was that the DD reaction in Pd matrix did not involve any energetic particles, otherwise their slowing down in the matrix would be observed with typical x-rays due to ionization of nearby Pd atoms. This lead to the conclusion that spin energy transfer would not

Re: [Vo]:Parkhomov Reactro Type 2 or 3 Thermal Feedback System with Insulation

2015-02-01 Thread Axil Axil
The Lugano replicators want to run their reactors with constant power input because this is what the Lugano testers had done. The first third party test used periodic input power, the natural mode of Hot-Cat input power drive. The Russian might not get into the burnup condition if he uses

Re: [Vo]:earlier thread on surface vs volume effect in the gamma decay of radioisotopes

2015-02-01 Thread Eric Walker
On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 12:49 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote: It must be one of the thousands that I deleted unread, however I wouldn't expect that sort of thing to affect gamma radiation. Maybe. But consider for a moment the decay of a [dd]* compound nucleus, which normally follows one of the

Re: [Vo]:earlier thread on surface vs volume effect in the gamma decay of radioisotopes

2015-02-01 Thread Bob Cook
Eric etal-- I have always thought that the so called branching ratios were associated with potential states of the system that conserve linear momentum and angular momentum of the earlier system that is subject to decay. With the interaction of particles with linear momentum something has to

[Vo]:earlier thread on surface vs volume effect in the gamma decay of radioisotopes

2015-02-01 Thread Eric Walker
Hi, Sometime back there was a Vortex thread where we were looking at the question of whether electron charge density might be play a role in gamma decays. A point in question was whether gamma branches in the decays of solid radioisotopes might be affected by electron charge density. A

Re: [Vo]:Gamma-producing fusion branches and solid state matter

2015-02-01 Thread Terry Blanton
Eric, This was one of yours. On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote: I'm including a brief synthesis of some of the thoughts that have been discussed on this list concerning a possibly novel interaction between gamma-producing fusion branches and solid state

Fwd: [Vo]:electron screening of fusion precursors within a metal substrate

2015-02-01 Thread Terry Blanton
In this thread, Robin blames it on angry bees. g -- Forwarded message -- From: mix...@bigpond.com Date: Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 6:01 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]:electron screening of fusion precursors within a metal substrate To: vortex-l@eskimo.com In reply to Eric Walker's message

Re: [Vo]:Gamma-producing fusion branches and solid state matter

2015-02-01 Thread Axil Axil
For the first time, I like to put forward for your consideration a speculation which postulates the formation of a unified fundamental force. This is the elemental force that Einstein was after for over 40 years until his death. Produced in the right type of system, this long sought after global

Re: [Vo]:Parkhomov Reactro Type 2 or 3 Thermal Feedback System with Insulation

2015-02-01 Thread Axil Axil
Remember by using far less input power, a periodic input power cycle with a duty cycle of 25 percent will multiply the 2.5 COP that the Russian system is producing by a factor of 4 or COP equal to 10. The Russian system ran for 7 minutes without power. That is great for COP. On Sun, Feb 1, 2015

Re: [Vo]:Gamma-producing fusion branches and solid state matter

2015-02-01 Thread Eric Walker
On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 3:56 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote: In this way, the additive nature of gravity can transform this most feeble force in nature into a process that is so powerful that it can rip space and time apart to produce black holes of gigantic size. Would you like salad

Re: [Vo]:Gamma-producing fusion branches and solid state matter

2015-02-01 Thread Axil Axil
Actually, gravity is the weakest of the four fundamental forces. Ordered from strongest to weakest, the forces are 1) the strong nuclear force, 2) the electromagnetic force, 3) the weak nuclear force, and 4) gravity. If you take two protons and hold them very close together, they will exert

Re: [Vo]:Gamma-producing fusion branches and solid state matter

2015-02-01 Thread Eric Walker
Thank you, Christopher Baird. https://sciencequestionswithchris.wordpress.com/2013/05/22/why-is-gravity-the-strongest-force/ On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 4:44 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote: Actually, gravity is the weakest of the four fundamental forces. Ordered from strongest to weakest,

Re: [Vo]:Gamma-producing fusion branches and solid state matter

2015-02-01 Thread Axil Axil
Most people do not read references. Did you read the post? Do you have an opinion on the monopole, its mechanism for power accumulation, and the additive nature of EMF? On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 7:47 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote: Thank you, Christopher Baird.

[Vo]:info

2015-02-01 Thread aching_002
http://stat.silverking.pl/wxr/qknzuvcwldbmmwx.apiunrchpczamivw -- aching_...@yahoo.com 1/31/2015 9:33:49 AM

Re: [Vo]:earlier thread on surface vs volume effect in the gamma decay of radioisotopes

2015-02-01 Thread Bob Cook
Eric-- I do not profess to understand how the spin is distributed. I doubt that the reaction involving a 24 MEV electron reflects reality. The angular momentum associated with neutrinos is a possibility. Potentially the energy and angular momentum is associated with neutrinos that escape

Re: [Vo]:Gamma-producing fusion branches and solid state matter

2015-02-01 Thread Bob Cook
Axil-- Your idea is interesting--it may be related to the torsion field that Russian astronomers have proposed, that expands to infinity and controls systems with any net angular momentum. This field could be the entity that assures the conservation of angular momentum. (Spin and angular

Re: [Vo]:Gamma-producing fusion branches and solid state matter

2015-02-01 Thread Bob Cook
Yes--sweet mustard please. Bob - Original Message - From: Eric Walker To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Sunday, February 01, 2015 4:15 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]:Gamma-producing fusion branches and solid state matter On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 3:56 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com