On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 3:33 PM, wrote:
Generally speaking the fission barrier gets lower as the element gets
> heavier,
> which is why 235U can be split with a single neutron.
>
Bob (Cook),
In your days working with/in connection with nuclear reactors, were there
any
Hi Lennart
I haven't been ignoring you. Just lack adequate time. Now that I'm retired it
sometimes feels as if I have less time at my disposal than ever. ...not that
I'm really complaining about it.
I have to ask you. Were you the middle sibling growing up in your family?
Always the
Hello Mark,
First I am glad you have been able to find some funding. Since we talked I
learnt a bit more about diabetes.
Would be interesting to hear more about what is going on.
Back to politics. Just to declare it seems like you and I can agree about
what makes sense in the programs presented
Hi Mark, my old nemesis. ;-)
Regarding the "rant" word accusation see the following link out in the Vortex
archive:
https://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg105057.html
specifically, your statement:
> 3- but then, what comes to mind whenever I see anything (OT) from
Sorry for the delayed response to this thread--I was golfing.
The epo design of the proton is related to the Philippi Hatt model of the
proton and neutron and I think the muon. Hatt presented a paper for this
model at ICCF-19. As I have noted in previous threads, it correctly
predicts the
Good morning Lennart,
Thank you for clarifying a few points… I do agree that most of the political
party platforms are more or less lip service to attract various categories of
voters… the goal is just to get reelected and become the majority party… there
is no compromise anymore. I think the
Steven,
No, I was not the middle sibling - the oldest of two.
This is the first time in my life I have been called a peace maker.
I think that is not all accurate. However, I believe that finding logical,
sensitive and productive solutions is important.
I am fine being controversial but it is not
RE: [Vo]:MMDD Muon Mediated Deuteron DisintegrationJones--
I agree with your comments about muons and Cherenkov radiation. One needs a
sensitive spectrum analyzer to see the distinct bands of radiation in Cherenkov
radiation. A good spectrometer could do this with good accuracy around
One of the major functions that LENR must fulfill is the reception,
concentration, and amplification of energy from the external environment
and the conversion of that power into magnetism. That external energy is
light in one form or another.
In LENR engineering, the structure that first
See this please:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/10/oct-14-2015-about-lenr-domination.html
: almost no news, papers today, sorry! I am asking for your help.
Peter
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
Steven…
Again, appreciate you’re reading/responding… and I apologize for missing my
first use of ‘rant’. I stand corrected…
And please don’t let this exchange dissuade you from venting… you always follow
protocol and label them OT. And I will very likely read them… you are an
intelligent,
For what it's worth, I agree with the Mill explanation of the source of
energy being the angular momentum of electrons, either orbital or intrinsic
or both.
Bob Cook
PS: that’s spin energy.
-Original Message-
From: Jones Beene
Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2015 7:09 PM
To:
I think all such events were associated with spontaneous fission of U-235. I
do not know if physics calculations for non-critical neutrons were consistent
with the spontaneous fission of U-235 measured in a non-energetic environment.
I do believe the neutrino flux from the sun seems to
Some say artificial intelligence is not yet a thing. Maybe so, but we now
have artificial wisdom. Get your random fictional Deepak Chapra quote here:
http://www.wisdomofchopra.com/
Hello Axil,
I admit I do not understand much of the nuclear theories.
However, I think I have somewhat of an understanding of what you say about
the substrate and how it is sensitive to a certain frequency.
I have asked before; why is there not a million replication of the Holmlid
set up?
It seems
Steven,
Thanks for providing a little further explanation.
I looked thru the postings and did not see where I referred to your postings
as being 'rants'. none. I also never said it wasn't informative, only very
one-sided. Agree that the world is full of 1-sided POVs, and I didn't have
a
I really enjoy browsing this site, the discussions are amazing.
I recently on LENR Forum had some similar thoughts but since I am more an
enthusiast than and far from a serious physicist so they are pretty speculative
and I appreciate from the discussions here that there are also all sorts of
Hi Lennart:
Appreciate the comments/thots about campaign financing… and I think Steven and
I are on the same page when it comes to that… too much $ to BOTH parties. I
also agree that the entire campaign process is antiquated. 200 years ago it
took a few weeks for information to ‘gallop’
Public Announcement
On Thursday, October 22nd, 2015 (10:30 AM PDT), Sveinn Ólafsson of the Science
Institute, Physics Department, University of Iceland will present a 40 minute
seminar/colloquium at SRI International (SRI, founded as Stanford Research In-
Peter I liked your last paragraph and feel a little guilty I have not
provided much input although I promised.
As both you and I learnt over the years - there is nothing new under the
sun.
The article tells in many words what George Washington formulated very
short: (I cannot find the quote so it
I thought that the energic particles the Holmlid saw are fragments of the
hydrogen nanoparticle that he produced via the catalyst.
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 5:55 PM, Bob Higgins
wrote:
> Note that Holmlid is reporting particles with ">10 MeV/u", or 10 MeV per
> atomic
Note that Holmlid is reporting particles with ">10 MeV/u", or 10 MeV per
atomic unit. This is a measure of velocity. Holmlid measured particles
that traversed 0.64 meters in 13 ns. This corresponds to a velocity of
4.9E7 m/c or 0.16c.
This is NOT a measured ENERGY. If he also measured the
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Bob Higgins
wrote:
This is NOT a measured ENERGY. If he also measured the energy, then he
> could have solved for the particle mass and would have had a much easier
> time identifying the particle. IF - you PRESUME that the particle is
He always checks out the competition before he invests. He will invest in
the cigar reactor along with his buddies.
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 7:39 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> See:
>
>
> http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2015/11/we-need-an-energy-miracle/407881/
>
>
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 4:55 PM, Bob Higgins
wrote:
This is NOT a measured ENERGY. If he also measured the energy, then he
> could have solved for the particle mass and would have had a much easier
> time identifying the particle. IF - you PRESUME that the particle is
When nanoparticles that are comprised of a thausand atoms explode due to
coulomb explosion, they produce 1.5 MeV. Look it up...
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 7:15 PM, Eric Walker wrote:
> I wrote:
>
> Needless to say, if the particles end up being resolved to baryons, we're
>>
See:
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2015/11/we-need-an-energy-miracle/407881/
Not a word about his visit with Violante et al.! That is a shame. One word
from him would ignite this field.
- Jed
Holmlid said:
"Previous results from laser-induced processes in ultra-dense deuterium
D(0) give conclusive evidence for ejection of neutral massive particles
with energy >10 MeV u−1. Such particles can only be formed from nuclear
processes like nuclear fusion at the low laser intensity used."
This random one, I liked...,
"Awareness grows through subtle joy."
and here's my koan haiku,
"An ancient mind.
Rich jumps in.
Plop!"
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Orionworks - Steven Vincent Johnson <
orionwo...@charter.net> wrote:
> Jed sez:
>
>
>
> > Some say artificial intelligence is
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 6:32 PM, Axil Axil wrote:
When nanoparticles that are comprised of a thausand atoms explode due to
> coulomb explosion, they produce 1.5 MeV. Look it up...
>
I wasn't aware that "Coulomb explosions" were a thing -- thank you for
pointing this out.
If
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 9:23 PM, Axil Axil wrote:
http://www.google.com/patents/US3977191
>
> The AIROPS engine is a noble gas engine like the Papp engine.
>
I noticed that Robert Gordon Britt, the author of the patent, did not refer
to Papp's patents as prior art. I was
available on research gate
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Axil Axil wrote:
Without the lattice that receives and directs the EMF into the nanopowder,
> a powerful light source such as a laser will be powerful enough to produce
> LENR in just nanopowder alone.
> This particular behavior was observed
From: Stephen Cooke
* Could there be characteristic photon emission from transitions in
muon shell levels similar to those from electrons and at what frequencies
these occur. Could these be observed experimentally? If characteristic
radiation can be seen from muon energy level transitions
I wrote:
Needless to say, if the particles end up being resolved to baryons, we're
> dealing with energies that correspond to nuclear reactions.
>
I take that back -- your point was that they're normalized masses and not
particle energies. Point grasped now. :) (I'm a little slow today.)
Eric
Cool stuff!
https://www.google.ca/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant=1=2=UTF-8#q=KIC+8462852=nws
Jed sez:
> Some say artificial intelligence is not yet a thing. Maybe so,
> but we now have artificial wisdom. Get your random fictional
> Deepak Chapra quote here:
>
> http://www.wisdomofchopra.com/
Hah! Let me do one better. A little haiku ditty straight out of my own
randomized
I looked it up for you.
http://www.tau.ac.il/~jortner/Publications/Pub601-/630.pdf
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 7:32 PM, Axil Axil wrote:
> When nanoparticles that are comprised of a thausand atoms explode due to
> coulomb explosion, they produce 1.5 MeV. Look it up...
>
>
>
38 matches
Mail list logo